411's Instant Access 1.29.12: WWE Royal Rumble 2012
Posted by Tony Acero on 01.30.2012
Dolph and Punk steal the show! Sheamus wins the Royal Rumble! Daniel Bryan falls to victory! Join myself, Michael Uphoff and Chad Nevett as we look back on this year's Royal Rumble!
411's Instant Access 01.29.12: WWE Royal Rumble 2012
Posted by Tony Acero on 01.29.12
Hey kids, I'm Tony, and this is 411's Instant Access: WWE Royal Rumble 2012. Instant Access is the companion piece to 411 Live Pay-Per-View Coverage and features immediate reaction to wrestling pay-per-views. The focus in Instant Access is on first thoughts and initial reactions instead of play-by-play with the goal of providing you with instant access to onetwo THREE writers' thoughts on the show. Anyway, here's the team for the Royal Rumble:
Okay kids, enough with the explanations. Let's get to the wrestling.
Triple Threat Cage Match for the World Heavyweight Championship Daniel Bryan (Champion) vs. The Big Show vs. Mark Henry Match Result: Daniel Bryan Match Analysis: Acero: This match wasn't bad by any means, but it wasn't as long or as good as I expected. I think the blame goes to Henry's injury more than anything, and it takes one hell of a man to take on this match, considering his injury and how he could have made it worse. I loved Bryan's ability to keep his character intact as a slimy heel trying to get out of the match as many times as he could. For the most part, I wanted more but understood why I didn't get it. Nevett: The obvious choice to open the show and it began well. Mark Henry and the Big Show sort of cancelled one another out, while Daniel Bryan tried for quick escapes. Unfortunately, Mark Henry's injury kept him on the mat for most of the match, making it basically a Big Show/Daniel Bryan match with occasional interruptions from the World's Strongest Man. That threw off the dynamic of the match to a degree and, just when it seemed to be finishing Act 2, it ended. I'll give them credit for ending the match in an unexpected place, but that's it. Bryan drops, match over, and everyone says "That's it?" at the same time. Uphoff: This all began when Bryan cashed in his MITB shot after Show defeated Henry at TLC. Each man would be given a title shot, only to have it end in a no-contest, drawing the ire of SmackDown general manager Theodore Long, thus leading to the triple threat cage match. This was better than I thought it would be, given the limitations that had been rumored for two of the participants. Daniel Bryan has earned the right to be World Heavyweight Champion, and he showed why tonight. He took bumps from both the Big Show and Mark Henry like a true champion, and highlighted his resourcefulness and intelligence at the end of the match. Mark Henry outperformed himself, and I saw no signs of a back injury from the Big Show in this match. Show was pedal-to-the-metal from the get-go, and as a result, we received a good cage match. Was it as good as it could be? Perhaps, and perhaps not. However, the crowd stayed in the match throughout it all, and that is all you can ask for as a wrestler. Good stuff from all three men, and I am looking forward to seeing the American Dragon defend his title in the Elimination Chamber. Match Rating: Acero: (**) Nevett: (**) Uphoff: (**1/2) Average Match Rating: (**)
Divas Tag Team Match Beth Phoenix, Natalya and The Bella Twins vs. Kelly Kelly, Eve, Tamina, and Alicia Fox Match Result: Beth Phoenix, Natalya and The Bella Twins Match Analysis: Acero: This was one hell of a surprise. For a long time now, when you see a Diva, you know the quality of the match will be low. What happened here was that they gave the Divas time. All eight of them had a role that was larger than "eye candy" and because of that, they actually put together something worth watching. Of course, the teaming up made little sense with how often these girls have tangled hair, but I've leared to just let it be. Nevett: I only saw the very beginning and the very end. The rest was spent using the washroom. Uphoff: I really hoped with all the Divas involved that it wouldn't be the normal piss/food break. It turned out to be a decent match, playing off some feuds (Tamina/Natalya), and Kelly Kelly provided a great effort in this match. I was glad to see Beth pick up the win here, because she IS the champion and it is absolutely unforgivable that she has not been on television these past few weeks. Match Rating: Acero: (**) Nevett: (NR) Uphoff: (*3/4) Average Match Rating: (*1/4)
John Cena vs. Kane Match Result: No Contest Match Analysis: Acero: This match was better than it should have been, considering the players involved and how crappily booked it has been. The match itself was strong and kept had tons of fluid moves and sequences. Kane is a little slower than he used to be, but he's still got it. What really drug this thing down to hell was the finish and what followed the finish. This was all kinds of bad. Poor Zack Ryder is playing the role of jobber while Cena gets to make more and more facial expressions that only constitute constipation. The match was good, and could have gone better. Either we're headed to Elimination Chamber with another singles match, or they'll be thrown into the Elimination Chamber itself, but either way, I'm not interested. Nevett: The match itself impressed me. Kane looked good, always one step ahead of Cena. Cena seemed frustrated at times and I loved his top rope Five Knuckle Shuffle. The problems came after the match ended (the double countout makes sense, I guess). A big brawl and Kane killing Zack Ryder in front of Eve before delivering an impressive Chokeslam to Cena. The way Kane left was badass. Considering the build to this match, what happened was what was promised... yet, who wanted some more goofy crap that will continue just long enough to kill time until the Rock shows up? Uphoff: I was surprised throughout this match. Not only did they actually keep me interested for the entire match, but they also kept the crowd into the match as well. I actually like the double count-out finish here, because it protects both men, and honestly either man who took the fall would suffer here. The finish allowed for the beatdown that followed to occur, and I was glad to see that Kane got the upper hand. I was hoping that he would, and it is now clear that Kane's diabolical depravity knows no bounds. Cena tried to be SuperCena and rise above the hate, and in the end, Kane proved to be the stronger and maybe now we will see Cena embrace hate to destroy Kane in the Elimination Chamber. Also, always nice to see someone Tombstoned. Match Rating: Acero: (**1/2) Nevett: (**1/2) Uphoff: (**1/2) Average Match Rating: (**1/2)
Singles Match Brodus Clay vs. Drew McIntyre Match Result:Brodus Clay Match Analysis: Acero: It ain't a PPV without Brodus Clay getting Funky widdit!!! More fun here, but I'm feelin pretty damned bad for Drew McIntyre and what he's going through. I'm supposed to not like this match and what it stands for, but damnit, seeing Brodus do his thing is just too much fun! Nevett: I was a little disappointed that Brodus Clay wouldn't be in the Royal Rumble match, but this was a better spotlight -- and kept one more piece of goofy entertainment out of the Rumble. Nothing new here really. Clay is just damn entertaining. Uphoff: This was something that was not needed, but I guess we needed something to fill time. It wasn't that bad, as Drew got in more offense on Brodus Clay than anyone else ever has (in his new gimmick), but this was nothing more than a glorified squash. I'd like to see Brodus go up against a real opponent at some point in the very near future. Match Rating: Acero: (*) Nevett: (*) Uphoff: (*) Average Match Rating: (*)
WWE Championship Match – John Laurinaitis as Special Guest Referee CM Punk (Champion) vs. Dolph Ziggler w/ Vickie Guerrero Match Result: CM Punk Match Analysis: Acero: Amazing match from amazing performers. I had high expectations for this match, and they didn't disappoint! It was every bit as awesome as I wanted it to be and the only negative was the overbooking during the match. What could have been a great match was marred through the unnecessary storyline going into it, and it really broke up the match. The positive is that it was only a small hindrance. This match was back and forth bad assery. Nevett: The only match that had guaranteed screwiness. When John Laurinaitis had a real ref come out, I'm sure we all mumbled "Ref bump..." at the same time. Yet, they played with those expectations well. Punk was denied victory a few times and almost lost as a result, making his win all that more earned. In between all of that goofiness, Punk and Ziggler did what we all expected them to: wrestled very, very well. Punk taking it to Ziggler after Ziggler showed off a little, Ziggler's chain of elbow drops, and that counter to the GTS... damn good wrestling. It's a shame that the Laurinaitis stuff distracted from it. Uphoff: I was literally calling for Mick Foley to interfere in this match, and was honestly surprised to see that he did not. I laughed hysterically when Punk called Johnny Laryngitis "Clownshoes." Getting back to the match, this had some really good buildup, and honestly, the result could have gone either way. I do believe that they made the right decision here, as Dolph Ziggler/the Perfect clone has improved considerably in the past year, but I don't think he is quite ready to be the face of the company. I will be interested to see who is in the elimination Chamber next month as CM Punk defends. Was this overbooked at the end? Slightly, but it all made sense. The right man won, Laryngitis gave the illusion that he was calling it fairly, and I'm interested to see what happens on RAW. Match Rating: Acero: (***3/4) Nevett: (***3/4) Uphoff: (***3/4) Average Match Rating: (***3/4)
Royal Rumble Match Match Result: Sheamus Match Analysis: Acero: The Rumble match is always so much fun, and this one was no different. It's tough to keep the match entertaining, as dead spots are almost inevitable. For whatever reason, however, they kept this match as 2/3rd's fun and games and 1/3rd seriousness. What this means for the match is that the laughs got tiring and felt forced. It was funny seeing Santino, it was great seeing Road Dogg, Kharma was cool, but it left the ending to be so….blah. I don't know why I expected something big. Sheamus winning was cool, and I'm interested in seeing where they go with it. Other than that, the match felt like it was lacking a particular…spunk. Nevett: Goofiest Rumble ever? Quite possibly. The one-two entrances of Alex Riley and R-Truth played off the Miz stuff well and things stayed pretty standard until Mick Foley came out. From there, it was Ricardo Rodriguez and Santino. That was a funny few minutes and would have been fine had they left it there. But, then Lawler entered. And Booker T. And Michael fucking Cole. It wasn't until Randy Orton eliminated Kharma that the match seemed to shake that 'just for goofs' feel and settle into a match that actually matters for something. Things were so skewed towards not taking this match seriously that it took something like Chris Jericho and Sheamus putting on a great mini-match to not make the whole thing seem like something of a waste. Okay, that sounds harsher than I mean. One thing that stood out was how minor the entrants seemed this year. We got into the 20s and only a few legitimate contenders had come out. That could be why they skewed so stupid and goofy -- the lack of starpower meant a lot of filler, so why not make people laugh? I was glad to see good showings from Cody Rhodes and the Miz. And I can't speak highly enough of the Jericho/Sheamus finish. Sheamus winning is great -- also puzzling since it's hard to tell where they're going with him now (or Jericho). A memorable Rumble... probably not for the best reasons. Uphoff: Okay, first off: THIS IS MY HUMBLE OPINION. WHAT YOU MAY THINK OF THIS RUMBLE IS NOT NECESSARILY WHAT I THINK OF IT. That being said, this is without a doubt in my mind the best Royal Rumble match I have ever seen. I have seen the WWE Championship won by Ric Flair in the 1992 Royal Rumble, and I have seen the 2004 Royal Rumble. This year topped both. The Royal Rumble is used for so many things, and it was used to its proper and fullest extent tonight. The Rumble should be used to highlight past and current feuds, and it did that with Miz facing Riley and R-Truth early, Orton facing off against Rhodes and Barrett at the end, Jinder Mahal and the Great Khali, and so on and so forth. The Royal Rumble should also be used as a platform to cater to the fans with just a LITTLE BIT of comedy, and we got that as well with Mick Foley and Santino Marella. They provided their little comedy, Foley actually looked decent, and then they were gone. It was kept relatively short, and the epic battle between Mr. Socko and the Cobra was hilarious. The Royal Rumble should also be used to deliver a bit of nostalgia and keep the crowd on the edge of their seats. The entrances of Booker, Lawler, Road Dogg, and Hacksaw Jim Duggan were great for the crowd, and they popped HUGE for the Road Dogg. The Rumble should also be used to have shocking returns, and we had that with Kharma and Randy Orton, and some others. Cody Rhodes and the Miz were excellent tonight. Everyone worked amazingly well, and it all came together. The only thing that wasn't needed was necessary was the entrant Michael Cole. I get that EVERYONE is eligible, but you want to bitch at Foley being in the Rumble? What about Cole? And finally, what the Royal Rumble should be used for is to launch the career of a Superstar into the main event. And this is why I am perfectly all right with Sheamus winning the Royal Rumble. Chris Jericho does not need the Royal Rumble to get a title shot; he is over enough with the fans to ask for one and get it. Sheamus has flirted with the main event before, and he has also had two fluke title reigns as the WWE Champion. This win helps to legitimize Sheamus and truly help him to take that final step into the main event. What will Jericho do next? I can't say for sure, but I will be watching tomorrow night to find out. What will Sheamus do? Will he challenge Punk? Will he challenge Daniel Bryan? It is so exciting right now as a wrestling fan, and I cannot wait to see what develops. This may be sacrilegious to some fans, but this year's ending may have been better than the one to the 2007 Rumble between Taker and Shawn. This truly was the best Rumble I have ever seen. Match Rating: Acero: (***) Nevett: (**3/4) Uphoff: (*****) Average Match Rating: (***1/2)
Final Thoughts
Match of the Night: Acero: CM Punk vs. Dolph Ziggler (***3/4)
The only competition for this match would have been the Rumble, and there was just far too much going on in the beginning of the entire event to bog it down around three stars. Punk and Ziggler put a match together that, although expected, still impressed beyond. We've seen them lock horns before, but this was Dolph's time to impress, and he did just that. Nevett: CM Punk vs. Dolph Ziggler (***3/4)
You have to work hard to outshine the Royal Rumble match and these two did, even with John Laurinaitis. Uphoff: The Royal Rumble Match (*****)
I cannot say any more than I already have. It was perfect.
Trash of the Night: Acero: World Heavyweight Title Match: Daniel Bryan vs. The Big Show vs. Mark Henry
Although, "trash" is kind of mean. It simply didn't do what it set out to do and seemed like a match that was put there by necessity, rather than a want. Nevett: World Heavyweight Title Match: Daniel Bryan vs. The Big Show vs. Mark Henry
The Rumble was disappointing, but not as much as the World Heavyweight Championship match. It never left second gear and, then, ended abruptly.
Uphoff:
Final Analysis: Acero: My immediate response was that this was a one match show. One hour later and this thought has not surpassed. CM Punk and Dolph Ziggler stole the show. I don't share the sentiment that Uphoff does in regards to the Royal Rumble match, but I GET where he is coming from and there was tons of fun to be had. My issue with that is there was a bit too much fun to be had and the final stretch was nowhere near as important as it should have been, considering the winner. Nevett: A disappointing event on the whole. No match exceeded expectations and a few fell short, including the Rumble itself. The entire night seemed to have been touched by a consistent theme of strange goofiness, like they couldn't figure out how to book things in a straight forward manner. Not at all what I expected, and that's not entirely bad. It was definitely entertaining at times, just not enough, nor in the ways you want from the Royal Rumble. Uphoff: This was a great PPV from top to bottom. From the beginning of the PPV to the end, the crowd was in it 100%, as were the over 100 people crowded into the bar where I was watching the PPV. Everything seemed to click in a magical sort of way, and we as WWE fans were finally treated to a Royal Rumble PPV that we deserved for our money. This is a PPV that is a MUST-HAVE. If you are a WWE fan, GET IT NOW. There are so many things on this PPV, story development and OH MY GOD moments that make this PPV a must-see. This may be the best Royal Rumble, top to bottom, that I have seen in a long time.
Verdict: Acero: (***) Nevett: (**3/4) Uphoff: (****) Average Verdict: (***1/4)
well, that was underwhelming.....I got a few good laughs out of the rumble but I've seen better....Kofi had a great spot and the Kharma return was nice, Sheamus was a great choice for winner though,it lacked in star-power however. Decent match from Punk and Zigg but the match centered around Punk and Lauranitis. Also, minor nitpick but wasn't the payoff to Cena and Jericho's storyline supposed to be tonight?
Posted By: wcwfan (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 12:32 AM
LMAO at Uphoff saying this was the best RR ever. Only RR worse than this was 95.
Posted By: Guest#5655 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 12:37 AM
and while I respect your opinion on this being the best RR of all-time, I respectfully disagree. It's just that I don't see this Rumble as being some memorable match that we'll talk about for years to come.
Posted By: wcwfan (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 12:38 AM
I hate Sheamus! He is the most overrated boring piece of crap! Wow, he has two moves: a kick and a stupid bang on the chest! With as many moves as he has they might as well call him Goldberg! I hope he somehow loses his title shot between now and Wrestlemania! And where is Kane? Can't have a Rumble without Kane!
Posted By: Guest#8363 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 12:47 AM
No disrespect Uphoff, but I don't respect you at all.
This was a trash rumble. Basically every entrant from 7-27, sans Sheamus and a double dipping Ziggler, was a jobber, announcer, comedy act, or Kharma.
The Kofi spot was cool, the Sheamus-Y2J stuff was cool, but by and large the first 45 minutes of the Rumble was forgettable.
Posted By: Guest#6264 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 12:52 AM
Is Uphoff trying to out Wes Kirk, Wes Kirk... laughable... Go and watch every single Rumble again and then tell me that this wasn better than 98, 99, 01, 02, 04, 07 to name but just a few off the top of my head...
Posted By: dj_bollocks (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 01:02 AM
I gave the Rumble ***. I have it as the 6th worst rumble of all time, but still had some fun watching it.
Posted By: Grish (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 01:07 AM
They dropped the ball on Drew he was insaneley hot at one point.Now all of his peers have passed him the fuck by.WWE loves that depush of young guys just to test there loyalty..smh..
Posted By: MacDollarz. (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 01:07 AM
"The Rumble should also be used to have shocking returns, and we had that with Kharma and Randy Orton, and some others."
Randy Orton wasn't a shocking return, considering he returned this past week on Smackdown.
Posted By: Guest#3921 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 01:10 AM
LMAO at Uphoff saying this was the best RR ever. Only RR worse than this was 95.
Posted By: Guest#5655 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 12:37 AM
the worst rumble is and forever will be the 1993 royal rumble. that thing was just awful. like really awful.
Posted By: max moon (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 01:15 AM
Sorry Uphoff, 5 stars for that RR match is not an opinion you're entitled to have, it is a lie.
Posted By: Dave (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 01:25 AM
LMAO at Uphoff saying this was the best RR ever. Only RR worse than this was 95.
Posted By: Guest#5655 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 12:37 AM
THIS.
With the amount of jobbers/(sadly)irrelevant "superstars" in this Rumble, there's no way it could be best/all-time anything.
Posted By: SS87 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 01:26 AM
- Triple Threat Cage Match for the World Heavyweight Championship - ***
- WWE Championship: CM Punk vs. Dolph Ziggler - ****
- Kane vs. John Cena - ***
- Diva's match - **1/2.
- Brodus Clay vs. Drew Mcintyre - **. What can I say? I know it was just a squash match, but I'm diggin' Brodus Clay's gimmick and anytime I get to Naomi & Cameron dance & get their groove on, that's always a plus for me. The business needs more gimmicks like Brodus Clay in my opinion. What can I say? I'm diggin' Brodus Clay's gimmick like the devil man. That boy is a fool, but in a good way. Every time I watch him wrestle, I can't help but spread luv, b/c he's making wrestling feel fun again.
- Royal Rumble match: ****
Posted By: TK03000 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 01:36 AM
Really underwhelming show, especially the Rumble match. I'm glad you loved it Mike because it means the WWE is catering to some fans. Maybe it's me. The Rumble did not need Jey Uso, Alex Riley or David Otunga in it. The announcers all having a crack was amusing but not necessarily good. The "surprise" entrants were not as great as previously, although Kharma got a great reaction and probably should have killed a few more bastards dead. WWE have created an expectation now that at least one entrant needs to be a huge surprise; Jim Duggan ain't it (one of the worst wrestlers aof all time). Brock Lesnar would have been good.
Posted By: APinOz (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 01:40 AM
Hope Sheamus loses his title shot at Wrestlemania. He's proven his worth in WWE, and its not very much. Bland, generic, average chairsma.
Anyway the actual rumble itself was average as well, but the card before hand seemed pretty solid to me.
Posted By: Guest#0163 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 01:43 AM
Are you serious, bro?
Seriously, Michael Uphoff always comes off as the biggest mark on this whole site, typically rating matches four or five stars when they should barely be three. But to rate this year's Royal Rumble as a FIVE STAR MATCH? That means it was perfect with no flaws whatsoever. What that hell are you thinking?
This was one of the most uninspiring Rumbles I have ever seen (and I've seen them all). How old are you? Sixteen?
These ratings and comments from Michael Uphoff are probably the worst things I have ever read on 411wrestling. A total and utter joke. It might be your opinion, but if you honestly believe what you wrote above, I feel sorry for you as you are definitely delusional and quite possibly retarded.
Posted By: Matty T (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 01:45 AM
I hate Sheamus! He is the most overrated boring piece of crap! Wow, he has two moves: a kick and a stupid bang on the chest! With as many moves as he has they might as well call him Goldberg! I hope he somehow loses his title shot between now and Wrestlemania! And where is Kane? Can't have a Rumble without Kane!
Posted By: Guest#8363 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 12:47 AM
It's still real to you, dammit?
Posted By: Guest#4760 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 01:51 AM
But, doesn't this mean that the only words Jericho has uttered so far are bullshit? I don't understand the logic of the vignettes & the silence if this was part of the pay-off. It's really odd that he'd be built up so much in a mysterious fashion only to do absolutely jack shit.
If he wasn't due to win he should've willingly jumped out & given Sheamus the win whilst still 'ending the world as we know it'. I just don't think it was smart booking.
Plus, for those who didn't watch, this report underplays Roadd Dogg's reception & contribution. Put it this way, they should have had Orton follow him as that was the only way you could have kept the crowd at the level they were at when RD entered.
Instead we got an Uso & the crowd died instantly.
Posted By: The Hitcher (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 01:57 AM
guess they have no plans for jericho after all. what the hell was the point of all these weeks of buildup and an 'end of the world' prediction if he's not even going to win?
Posted By: Hercules Strongs (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 01:58 AM
I dug this Eyes were glued to the tv from the start to finish btw nevett kharma was eliminated by ziggler.. Idiot
Posted By: Guest#0127 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 02:22 AM
3 commentators and an uso wrestled in a 30 man rumble
giving it more than 1 star is just insane
this was easily the worst ppv ive ever seen, and easily the worst royal rumble of all time.
Posted By: Guest#3507 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 02:26 AM
They should have added Wes Kirk to this, so we can see more bitching in the comment section. I love how that guy can get these kids to go into raging hissy fits because of something he said
Posted By: Guest#6318 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 02:34 AM
I thought the "world was going to end" tonight? I've been giving Jericho the benefit of the doubt because he's Jericho, but this storyline of his better go somewhere and fast, because his return is starting to look like a massive bust right now.
Posted By: The TradeMark Experience (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 02:35 AM
I'd struggle to give this Rumble 4 stars, nevermind 5.
Posted By: Reg (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 02:38 AM
The reason why 92 was an awesome year for the Rumble was the there were minimal jobbers, most guys were legit contenders by the end, and they had tons of intersecting storylines. Flair wins it from #3 is still the best RR story ever. even better than benoit at #1
Posted By: Guest#8863 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 02:45 AM
best rumble ever? that's amusing.
Posted By: fran (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 03:34 AM
I loved the Rumble match this year. I'm not one for comedy but the Ricardo entry was great, and the Foley/Santino showdown was one of my favorite Rumble moments. Kofi's splits were also a highlight.
Glad to see Cody Rhodes have a great showing lasting 40+ and eliminating 6 or 7 people I believe. Also the Jericho/Sheamus mini match was one of the better endings to a rumble though the Sheamus ending was unexpected and somewhat deflating.
Cena and Kane had their work boots on tonight, and I enjoyed the Cage match. However, I can't help but look at the Punk/Ziggler match as anything but a MAJOR disappointment to me. I liked their Raw match a lot more.
Cage match ***
Kane/Cena **3/4
Ziggler/Punk ***1/4
Royal Rumble ****3/4(greatly entertaining)
Posted By: AmericanWolves (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 03:35 AM
Uphoff is useless, he is the Tony Schiavone of 411 Wrestling. Every single WWE event he sees he thinks it's the best ever and there's a 5 star match on the card.
And opinion is worthless when it is so far out of whack with everyone else that nobody can use it as a gauge for themselves. All opinions and reviews are biased, all semi-intelligent people understand this. This is no "correct" review, despite people trying to claim there is some sort of more legit opinion than others. Instead all anyone can do is find reviewers that prioritize and analyze in a similar way or with some sort of system that the reader can use to figure out if they'd enjoy the product too.
With Uphoff his system is that everything is great no matter what. Most people hate when someone criticizes everything no matter what, but Uphoff is just as bad in the other direction and there are a ton of people like that too.
Usually I try to read negative reviews because they tend to do a better job of explaining what they're reviewing and why they hate it, then if I disagree with what they disliked I still get something out of it. People that are just mindlessly positive can never manage to state why they like it with accuracy.
Posted By: Guest#9338 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 03:40 AM
I actually thought the rumble was the worst announced match of the night.
Posted By: Guest#6279 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 04:44 AM
Did Uphoff say this was the best Royal Rumble match? Better than the legendary 1992 and 2004? And did you say that Y2J and that *charisma of a white wall* had a better ending than Taker/HBK? Seriously you need some help before you murder somebody. Seriously.
Posted By: Guest#2224 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 04:45 AM
Sheamus = boring
Posted By: WTF? (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 04:47 AM
No Kane in RR match = epic fail. How can they break that string? Are they trying to make sure HBK maintains the record for RR eliminations? It made absolutely no sense why Kane and John Cena wouldn't be in the RR match. Ziggler was. Big Show was. So there's no excuse... unless they got hurt... which might explain some of the goofiness and oddball entries like Jey Uso.
Also... Sheamus is not a great choice to win. He doesn't need the RR win to get to the Main Event. He's much better fighting his way to get it, as they've built him up as someone who could win an Elmination Chamber, for example, to either get the belt or a #1 contendership. Not only was Jericho a better choice because it's one of the few accomplishments he has missing from his career (having now finished 2nd twice), but Jeritroll would be absolute gold being able to sit back with his WM Main Event title shot in his back pocket. Sheamus would have been a better choice for next year's Rumble.
Posted By: JDB (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 05:20 AM
I hate Sheamus! He is the most overrated boring piece of crap! Wow, he has two moves: a kick and a stupid bang on the chest! With as many moves as he has they might as well call him Goldberg! I hope he somehow loses his title shot between now and Wrestlemania! And where is Kane? Can't have a Rumble without Kane!
Posted By: Guest#8363 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 12:47 AM
I'm not trying to compare Sheamus to Hogan, but to call Sheamus boring for the same move set, shit the same move set made Hogan a legend!!! If in the story of the match it works then it works.
Posted By: Guest#2828 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 06:21 AM
I hate Sheamus! He is the most overrated boring piece of crap! Wow, he has two moves: a kick and a stupid bang on the chest! With as many moves as he has they might as well call him Goldberg! I hope he somehow loses his title shot between now and Wrestlemania! And where is Kane? Can't have a Rumble without Kane!
Posted By: Guest#8363 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 12:47 AM
Thanks for that Chris, see you on RAW later.
Posted By: Vince McMahon (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 06:26 AM
Agreed, RR was damns entertaining. I just wish it were longer!
Posted By: Guest#5831 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 06:42 AM
Wow someone get me some of the drugs Uphoff is on. That was the worst Rumble I've ever seen. I hate that I wasted my morning watching it for free so I really feel for whoever paid for it.
Too much comedy, the wrong guy won, embarrassing watching people bump for old bastards like Lawler and Duggan. Too many entrants missing that could have made the match so much better. I'm sorry but that was piss-poor. I don't regret stopping watching WWE one little bit now. I had thought I'd watch the Rumble and see if I was wrong but that just completely justified my decision to stop!
Posted By: Col (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 06:50 AM
By the end of this column, I felt I'd been massively trolled by Uphoff.
Posted By: Guest#9231 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 06:59 AM
Decent rumble but best ever? Seems questionable, I was gutted Jericho lost but I had a feeling Sheamus was going to win, I'm
Hoping D Bryan holds onto the title as I really don't want to see another Orton, Sheamus match.
Posted By: Jbardo (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 07:03 AM
I think RR was interesting But why do we need Mick Foley,Hacksaw and ROad Dogg?I have no problem with Book and Lawler but that Foley stuff was dumb and btw u say cm punk vs ziggler was great?well i say it was boring as fuck At least Divas are sexy while those two are just plain boring,and i wanted to see Christian show up and Y2J win...
Posted By: Guest#3750 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 07:18 AM
I hate Sheamus! He is the most overrated boring piece of crap! Wow, he has two moves: a kick and a stupid bang on the chest! With as many moves as he has they might as well call him Goldberg! I hope he somehow loses his title shot between now and Wrestlemania! And where is Kane? Can't have a Rumble without Kane!
Posted By: Guest#8363 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 12:47 AM
Aww, someone's here is butthurt Jericho didn't win. Someone call the WAAAAAAMMbulance.
Posted By: Fella (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 07:28 AM
Hey Nevett, Ziggler eliminated Kharma. Rumble was entertaining enough, but was anyone else disappointed by the lack of Jericho's promise to show us "the end of the world as we know it"?
Oh and Acero, "it aint no PPV w/o Brodus Clay getting funky widdit". I like Clay too, but considering he has never appeared on PPV yet (as Funkasaurus), your comment make you sound like an idiot.
Posted By: Guy (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 07:28 AM
Uphoff must be purposely trying to get a cheap reaction to the article...which is not necessary at all. "Underwhelming" is a great word used by WCWFAN. Love Sheamus win, but Michael Cole, Jim Duggan, Jerry Lawler instead of the likes of Cena, Kane, Undertaker, or Triple H. Then, ultimately no pay off with Jericho's promise that it will be the end of the world as we know it...WTF???? very lame.Im very disappointed and discouraged as a wrestling fan. Very "underwhelmed."
Posted By: Underwhelmed (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 07:31 AM
Uphoff said he watched at a bar...he probably had too much to drink ...that explains his unbelievable skewed perception of the Rumble...now that makes sense.
Posted By: guest221 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 07:36 AM
Anyone who thinks Ziggler/Punk was good is an idiot
Posted By: Guest#4491 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 07:44 AM
Why is it okay for Danielson to completely no sell everything? Also, Punk vs. Ziggler was nothing more than an over booked cluster****. And if anyone cannot see that Ryder is the one turning heel then I pity them for being so stupid
The show was poor
Posted By: Guest#1970 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 07:58 AM
Things I liked about the Rumble match itself:
Kofi's handstand spot. I've been waiting for someone to pull something like that, and that was cool to see.
Sheamus winning, because why not?
Cody Rhodes basically establishing himself as the NEW LEGEND KILLER!
The Miz, because he's awesome.
Not the best Rumble I've ever seen, but not the worst.
Posted By: Guest#7933 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 08:00 AM
Seriously, every rumble has jobbers and comedy acts that we know have ZERO chance of winning. With Christian, Rey & Del Rio out injured it was obvious that there would be a lack of star power. It was a good rumble. Not as good as 1992/2004 but they're perfect rumbles. No where near as bad as 1995/1999.
Posted By: Ryan Haseldine (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 08:11 AM
I like Sheamus, but his Rumble win doesn't sit well with me at the moment. There are no good match ups for him as it stands.
If Undertaker is a surprise entrant in the Smackdown chamber match and wins the title, then you've got something interesting.
Triple H would fit well into that scenario, given the known friendship between Sheamus and he. But HHH's involvement in the match would have be minimal. It should be a clean finish given the streak is involved.
Posted By: Sheamus v Undertaker (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 08:17 AM
I don't think this PPV was as bad as some of the writers are making it out to be.. and, with the exception of Uphoff, they're all just echoing each other (although that really doesn't bode all that well for Uphoff who obviously is on some kind of "I love everything" serum). Wasn't the best ever, wasn't the worst the ever. I'd give it a C
Posted By: Pimpsauce McJackson (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 08:19 AM
I hate Sheamus! He is the most overrated boring piece of crap! Wow, he has two moves: a kick and a stupid bang on the chest! With as many moves as he has they might as well call him Goldberg! I hope he somehow loses his title shot between now and Wrestlemania! And where is Kane? Can't have a Rumble without Kane!
Posted By: Guest#8363 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 12:47 AM
I'm not trying to compare Sheamus to Hogan, but to call Sheamus boring for the same move set, shit the same move set made Hogan a legend!!! If in the story of the match it works then it works.
Posted By: Guest#2828 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 06:21 AM
Hmm yeah. but Hogan was actually charismatic in his hey days while Sheamus' charisma is 0/10.
Posted By: Guest#5783 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 09:00 AM
* Cage Match: Underwhelming
* Diva's Match: DoDs are hypocrites for working with. * Bellas and Beth's attitude ticked me off.
* Cena v. Kane: Good match but double count-out blows, and Eve needs to stop guilt tripping Cena.
* Punk v. Ziggler: Decent match, hilarious ending.
* Royal Rumble: Duggan alone made it worth $23 (I only paid half), but the match as a whole was freaking awesome. Congrats Shamus.
Pre-Rumble Grade: C +
Royal Rumble Grade: A
Total PPV Grade: B+
Posted By: TBL (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 09:02 AM
uphoff stop trying to get a cheap reaction. the 2012 rumble was nowhere near the 5* like 1992 and 2004. it was terrible but wasn't the worst. the worst rumble can be '93, '95 or '99.
Posted By: The Dogg says (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 09:12 AM
Just another piece of evidence of HHH's growing power in WWE. His workout buddy wins the Rumble and challenges a heel Daniel Bryan and wins at WM, while Jericho wins a #1 contenders match at EC to face Punk at WM and will lose probably.
Just my 2 cents
Posted By: Jadedone (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 09:12 AM
How could Uphoff give this by-the-books and unexciting Rumble 5 stars?
Posted By: Guest#5371 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 09:16 AM
Sheamus? Are you kidding me? Hmmm i wonder who's call that was...
Posted By: Wonderboy (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 09:30 AM
Worst Royal Rumble in a really long time the whole card was god aweful, and the rumble itself so disappointing, and the wrong guy won. WHo wants to see SHeamusface Daniel Bryan AGAIN at Mania they wrestled last year!
Posted By: JIVE (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 09:45 AM
Has Uphoff lost his mind? Even Sheamus probably doesn't think that was the best Rumble ever.
Bryan vs Show vs Henry: ** I feel like giving it an even lower rating. They basically buried Smackdown (their big angle and 3 big stars at the minute) by putting them on first and more importantly giving them little time. Atleast Miz last year and Jericho a decade ago got time in singles matches at the Rumble during their title runs; sports entertainment angles and 3 way cage matches with big slugs (regardless of whether Show and Henry have improved) is not the best use of heel World Champion Bryan. Bryan can elevate that title past it's current IC level feel with great matches. Rollins and Ambrose are right there in developmental waiting to be made stars of by Bryan aswell.
Divas: * pointless filler to get these girls out there for the sake of it. Just have Beth defend against someone. Why would the D.O.D team up with the Bellas anyway?
Cena vs Kane: ** match was a lot better than I thought it would be as it progressed to it's cheap finish, but this Kane/Cena/Ryder/Eve angle is just so awful in concept and somehow worse in execution with cringeworthy acting.
Clay vs McIntyre: 1/2* more filler with a Smackdown squash on PPV. No one buys a PPV to see the exact same squash matches as what's been on TV for weeks.
Punk vs Ziggler: *** 1/2 being generous solely for the hard work involved by the wrestlers even though they had a better match on free TV last year and Ziggler had a better match with Edge at last years event. The overbooking buried Ziggler because he was beaten four times in as many minutes. The finish was weird. No one cares enough about Laurinaitis to justify marginalising Ziggler so much. Ace should future endeavour himself because he indeed sucks.
Royal Rumble: *** 1/4 some fun stuff in there, maybe too much goofy fun. Having every announcer come in was unneccessary, but Kharma was great I thought. Having two heels with no conflict in Miz and Rhodes carry the Rumble was a mistake. R-Truth and Miz in there from beginning to the last entrant would have given the body of the match more purpose. Lacked star power also; exemplified by #30 just being the Big Show. Sheamus/Jericho at the end was good but a bad sequel to HBK/Undertaker five years ago.
All in all a pretty underwhelming show for me and a step down (both the actual match and PPV as a whole) from the last couple of years. Wrestlemania will sell regardless with all the effort that's gone into Cena vs Rock but they've got a lot of work to do to make interesting matches for the undercard.
Posted By: Guest#4740 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 10:04 AM
I've been reading this site since the 411wrestling days and I have to say I've never seen a writer on here as mental as Uphoff. I'm convinced he's just a gimmick.
Posted By: Bob (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 10:05 AM
This was the greatest night in the history of this great sport.
Posted By: Mike Uphoff (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 10:10 AM
sooooooo ive read the reports and wanna know how exactly jericho ended my world????
Posted By: Guest#8841 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 10:19 AM
I had some fun watching that ppv... nice job wwe!!! But don't stop impressing me please...
Posted By: dalpe (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 10:49 AM
This RR is a great example of the difference between the normal wrestling fan and the IWC. The internet fans complain that the Rumble was won by the wrong guy, had too much goofiness, and just wasn't memorable. The normal wrestling fan loved Socko vs. Cobra, Road Dogg, Karma, Hacksaw, the announcers, and Kofi's handstand and they think Sheamus is a badass. Also, they thought the ending was awesome and that Jericho/Sheamus were the best final two ever besides HBK/Taker. There was no drag in a Rumble match and that doesn't happen often.
Also the WWE Championship match was helped, not hurt, by the overbooking. Until the ending sequences it wasn't much more than the average Raw match.
I love when I come online and see that I had a completely different reaction to a show than most of the IWC. That means I'm still watching as a fan instead of a smark.
Posted By: gpjunk (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 10:59 AM
I hate Sheamus! He is the most overrated boring piece of crap! Wow, he has two moves: a kick and a stupid bang on the chest! With as many moves as he has they might as well call him Goldberg! I hope he somehow loses his title shot between now and Wrestlemania! And where is Kane? Can't have a Rumble without Kane!
Posted By: Guest#8363 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 12:47 AM
Ok, putting aside the fact that number of moves someone has means nothing in terms of connecting with an audience and getting over, just to argue the point -
brogue kick
irish hand grenade
slingshot shoulderblock
top rope shoulderblock
backbreaker
double axehandle
razor's edge
Rumble was fun, but a bit underwhelming. Too many jobbers. Too much comedy. Only Rumble I can really remember where the undercard was significantly more entertaining than the rumble itself (Cena/Kane excluded, we took a smoke break for that one).
Posted By: Distracto (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 11:15 AM
The most disappointing part of the night was Jericho being...Well, just plain old Jericho.
Normally that would be all well and fine, but with his month a trollonic pandering and "End of the World" declaration on RAW, I expected something different. Instead he enters, and is the same Jericho from his last run. CodeBreaker, Walls, nothing different, nothing memorable. Shame...
Posted By: Hashtag Daley (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 11:19 AM
This RR is a great example of the difference between the normal wrestling fan and the IWC. The internet fans complain that the Rumble was won by the wrong guy, had too much goofiness, and just wasn't memorable. The normal wrestling fan loved Socko vs. Cobra, Road Dogg, Karma, Hacksaw, the announcers, and Kofi's handstand and they think Sheamus is a badass. Also, they thought the ending was awesome and that Jericho/Sheamus were the best final two ever besides HBK/Taker. There was no drag in a Rumble match and that doesn't happen often.
Also the WWE Championship match was helped, not hurt, by the overbooking. Until the ending sequences it wasn't much more than the average Raw match.
I love when I come online and see that I had a completely different reaction to a show than most of the IWC. That means I'm still watching as a fan instead of a smark.
Posted By: gpjunk (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 10:59 AM
I completely agree. I loved this Rumble. Surprised to see so much negativity but it's the Internet. The Socko Cobra bit had me rolling. Plus being a fan of Cody I loved his performance. People complain about this rumble being boring but I think it was anything but. Plus a somewhat surprise winner. Overall FUN rumble.
Posted By: Guest#9454 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 11:25 AM
After 17 years, it's still disappointing when the last entrance is the Big Show.
Far too goofy. I understand the lack of starpower, but when the entire announce team is in the Rumble, you may want to reconsider your situation. Christian? Mysterio? DiBiase? Maybe throw some of the agents out there? Unfortunately they have made the Royal as a platform for big returns, so anyone else is a huge disappointment.
Posted By: will (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 11:40 AM
Let me guess: a bunch of internet wrestling fans are going to shit all over a perfectly acceptable pay-per-view because they didn't mark out enough during the actual Rumble match?
*reads comments*
Yeah, sounds about right.
Posted By: Guest#5139 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 12:20 PM
The cage match was over before it started. Bryan pretty much no sold w/ the way he hoped up that cage like he was running to the toilet. After getting his ass kicked all over the place by the big men.
Kane was awesome. I dont totally 100% love the story surrounding this feud, but the match was great. And the total domination by Kane is something we havent seen for a long time. Loved it.
WWE Title match was solid, but overbooked. My biggest problem w/ the way theyve handled Johnny Ace is hes still not a full on heel. Hes still just a dorky guy that kinda bungles things once in a while. So Punk comes off as a paranoid whiney bitch.
The Rumble match sucked. Boring. No spots where someone comes in a nails their finisher on six guys in a row. No real awesome spots at all. Way too many goofy entrants. They could have used some of those spots for Golddust, Brodus Clay, Drew McIntyre, Undertaker, Kane, HHH, etc... Kharma was cool. I like that Sheamus won. He was my pick. But there wasnt a lot of chemistry w/ Jericho. And now that I think about it, he hasnt had a meaningful PPV win in a few months. So despite the fact that hes been kicking everyones ass, it felt a little out of left field.
Posted By: Mark of Excellence (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 12:44 PM
Why is it okay for Danielson to completely no sell everything?
The show was poor
Posted By: Guest#1970 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 07:58 AM
It's okay because Show and Henry are both legit hurt. If Bryan had oversold, it just woulda been three guys lying on the mat for the whole match. Someone had to actually get back up and move around a little bit.
Posted By: Guest#3639 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 12:47 PM
I know it was cheesy but when Foley & Santino grabbed hands with Mr. Socko & the Cobra and Booker T goes, "They're locking up!!!" it made me laugh out loud. His delivery of that line was awesome.
Posted By: Guest#5848 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 12:52 PM
Worst Rumble ever. It was awful. It's like they just put it together last minute. No problem with Sheamus winning but the entire match as a whole was awful. 2012 is the worst Royal Rumble ever
Posted By: Jon (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 01:00 PM
poor
Posted By: tully (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 01:24 PM
We had a Rumble where seven out of thirty participants weren't full-time wrestlers and probably won't wrestle a non-comedy match in WWE ever again. How seriously should we take an event where the winner gets a shot at the championship of his choice when nearly a quarter of the participants aren't even legitimate contenders to appear on Superstars in the next month?
Posted By: Guest#3108 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 01:25 PM
Sheamus is going to challenge UT and the streak.
Posted By: Dark Grin (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 01:39 PM
The 30th entrant should've been Kane, have him eliminate Jack Swagger, The Miz, Cody Rhodes, Zig Zag instead of Big Show (Kane's a monster again who actually gets offence on Cena, Big Show is nothing right now). Then have Cena either eliminate him illegally or distract Kane to allow Sheamus or RKO to eliminate him. Kane and Cena than brawl out of arena (off camera).
This way Kane gets his 13th rumble, breaks (or at least comes closer) to breaking HBK's record and adds something to his feud with Cena. But instead Big Show disappoints (again, look at how many times he comes in at 30) and buries 4 up&coming talent with no real payoff.
Posted By: Guest#9839 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 01:47 PM
If I'd paid for this I'd have been pissed. Jericho promised the world would change and NOTHING FUCKING HAPPENED. I imagine they got quite a few extra buys with people tuning in to see what would happen with Jericho, and then they did nothing with it. It felt like false advertising to me.
Posted By: Jay Smith (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 02:13 PM
Mediocre-to-solid PPV. My two top picks ended up as the final two competitors, which made it very predictable, though fun. Strangely enough, and I don't know if this is bad or good for the event, my "Top Moment" came in seeing the return of Kharma, despite that she only eliminated Hunico (and Cole, if you believe the story) before being taken out by Ziggler. I hope we see much more of her before long....
Posted By: Rob A (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 02:41 PM
Waste of money! punk/ziggler could have had a good match without johnny ace..he seemed lost and the match just didnt flow well. Weird ending too. Bryan/show/henry was horrid. no effort from any of them. i am not buying sheamus as a WM main eventer..this company has hit rock bottom as far as entertaining me
Posted By: STUBBS (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 03:31 PM
Ofcourse people will be calling this show bad and calling the Royal Rumble match, one of the worst ever because the IWC's lord Chris Jeritroll did not win the Royal Rumble match. If Jericho had won the match, than the IWC's not so smart marks would be creaming their pants and calling it one of the best Royal Rumble matches of all time and calling the whole show an early contender for PPV of the year. And ofcourse if another 40 year old won the Royal Rumble match the smarks would be ranting on how the WWE does not push young stars, but if Jericho won the smarks would be loving the hell out of it like Jericho is still in his 20s and like another young man could not have benefited more from the win. Gotta love the smarks.
Posted By: Cory (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 04:10 PM
I wish I didn't know wrestling was predetermined. =(
Posted By: Guest#2250 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 04:16 PM
Royal Rumble 2012 in one word
JESUS!!!!
Posted By: Guest#8639 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 04:28 PM
I am sorry but this Rumble should of been 40 again they had the time the show ending with 20 minutes left. Cut the Diva&Brodus match and it would of been plenty of time. The other 10 could of added more star power with Cena,Kane,Henry then to fill out the 10 Brodus,Drew,Reks,Hawkins,The other Uso,Yoshi and a NXT guy or have a shocking debut like Tyler Black or Claudio Castenogli would of made the rumble much better IMO.
Posted By: Spike (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 04:32 PM
this show was such a disappointment!
the cage match was ok, but the rest was terrible, sure their were some really nice moments in the punk/ziggler match, but it was overbooked, and it left ziggler looking pathetic...
on top of that the recent punk/ziggler raw match was way better...
so everything up to the rumble felt like it should have been on raw, not on a $50 ppv!
now on to the rumble, it was just so boring...
it was full of a bunch of midcarders & nobodys, their were almost no credible contenders...
and most of the match was more of a bad comedy act than a fun rumble match...
you know its bad when king, jim duggan, & road dogg get the biggest reactions in 2012...
and why have the whole announce table in the match? there were just so many fillers and not enough main event talent that it makes the winner not look anywhere as good as previous winners...
now i will say i really enjoyed the final 4 and the jericho/shemus ending, and i think its good a young talent won...
but the rest was bad, well aside from kofi's epic handstand...
then to top all this off, jericho does a promo about the world ending at the rumble, and nothing happens...
that was a big letdown, well jerichos whole return has been a letdown, and it sucks because hes definitely one of my favorites!
this show was easily a 4/10...
..................................
serious question...
how in the hell is uphoff allowed to rate wwe shows?
he is so far up VKMs ass he wouldnt know what a good match/show is...
he is a huge example of the extreme bias on this pro wwe site!!!
seriously, ive seen my fair share of rumbles, and this is no where near the top, its easily in the worst 5 ever section...
and uphoff calls it ***** LMAO...
its hard to give it ***1/2
.................................
and to the people hating on shemus, i know in your pg wwe minds the same guys (orton & cena) must always win the big matches...
but...
news flash!
its boring & old...
its time for new talent to shine!!!!!!
Posted By: Guest#8235 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 04:53 PM
I really enjoyed the rumble, sure it wasn't the greatest rumble of all time but it had comedy mixed with story lines a great ending and alot of younger talent on display. Sheamus was a great pick to take the rumble.
Posted By: Guest#4511 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 05:52 PM
But, doesn't this mean that the only words Jericho has uttered so far are bullshit? I don't understand the logic of the vignettes & the silence if this was part of the pay-off. It's really odd that he'd be built up so much in a mysterious fashion only to do absolutely jack shit.
If he wasn't due to win he should've willingly jumped out & given Sheamus the win whilst still 'ending the world as we know it'. I just don't think it was smart booking.
Plus, for those who didn't watch, this report underplays Roadd Dogg's reception & contribution. Put it this way, they should have had Orton follow him as that was the only way you could have kept the crowd at the level they were at when RD entered.
Instead we got an Uso & the crowd died instantly.
Posted By: The Hitcher (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 01:57 AM
Jerhico v Sheamus on the road to Wrestlemania, with a possible match for the title shot.
It may be last minute booking, they may not do it, but it would be a decent program.
Posted By: Darth Mortis (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 06:05 PM
I have a growing feeling Jericho isn't in for a Punk-feud... think about it, Bryan finished his mini-feud with the Big show and Henry, no Smackdown-Superstar needs a Rumble-win to book a match at Mania, least of all sheamus, who has a lot of history with bryan to build on. So, imo, he goes on to face the WWE champion at Mania. That, to keep up the logical chain, can't be punk as both are to over as faces, so he has to drop the belt to a heel at Elimination chamber, my guess being
a) Triple H himself (you know he would dig a rematch with his workout-partner...)
or b) Kane
Jericho has other things ahead, though, since he is... what? "the modern day shawn michaels"? he doesn't really like to be called that, i know, but i think he's actually in row to add one last Win to the deadmans streak, knowing how good Taker and michaels worked, on paper, it's a "match made in heaven"(or maybe hell)... if (and i know i'm fantasy-booking hard here) they do that, jericho needs one assload of credibility and momentum, but yeah, if that would happen, you could see why he says the world as we know it would end, because we "know" taker wins at mania... the "at the rumble" bullshit? come on, i guess it got some people to buy the PPV (11 or so), so it's legit and forgotten once the story unfolds
Now, as for Punk, in the above case, he's obviously screwed for high-profile single-feuds and will, i'm positive, find a way in to make it a triple-threat
So, in conclusion of my fantasy booking:
Bryan - Orton (AJ banned from ringside, i would dig her turning with Bryan, Bryan winning to set up a longer feud)
Barrett - Kofi - Christian - Rhodes - Miz - Truth - Ziggler - Clay (MitB, Ziggler winning)
Swagger - Ryder (Us Title rematch, ryder winning)
Kharma - Phoenix (No holds barred, Kharma winning)
Punk - Sheamus - HHH/Kane (Austin or Foley special ref, Sheamus winning)
Jericho - Taker in some form (You know who wins this)
Rock - Cena (see Jericho - Taker)
The rest is filler, and yes, i could very well do without del rio promoting something as his destiny or show vs. shaq (except it is a short contest to try to bend your knees in a triple threat with mark henry, first to manage to kneel down wins... than again, that would take all of them forever, forget it)
Posted By: Matt86 (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 06:27 PM
Slightly above average Rumble. The Rumble had plenty of fun spots (Kofi's handstand, Cobra/Socko, returns from Kharma and Road Dogg) and even though there were a few boring and odd picks, it was still a fun rumble. Definitely needed a bit more star power. I was hoping Del Rio would be in it. Ricardo was hilarious though. It played off good stories at the beginning with Miz's former buddies and the Khali/Mahal feud. Everybody marked HARD for Duggan. THAT is how you utilise legends properly.
Overall, fun match, but could've been better.
Posted By: Skreb Masters (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 06:51 PM
well, that was underwhelming.....I got a few good laughs out of the rumble but I've seen better
the Kharma return was nice
Sheamus was a great choice for winner though,it lacked in star-power however.
Decent match from Punk and Zigg but the match centered around Punk and Lauranitis.
Posted By: wcwfan (Guest) on January 30, 2012 at 12:32 AM
Wow, wcwfan could almost be me with their comments about the 25th anniversary of the Royal Rumble. Apart from a few spots this could have been the worst WWE PPV I've seen since Wrestlemaina 25. It almost feels like the WWE can't help but fumble 25th anniversaries.
Best match of the night was the World Heavyweight Championship, best match I've seen from the Big Show and Mark Henry whilst the right man went over and will hopefully face Sheamus in a decent match at Wrestlemania if Jericho doesn't somehow get the WWE championship off of CM Punk. This was a gimmick match done exceptionally well and booked so as not to break the WWE code about big wrestlers vs small wrestlers.
Punk vs Ziggler was a huge letdown, destroyed by the stupidity of the storyline. Whilst Daniel Bryan battled adversity and won Punk was dumped with the opposite, he was effectively saved by the storyline of Laurinitus (sp?) being re-evaluated on Raw. I also felt that neither wrestler put enough effort into the match. Considering the potential this match had it was a dud, about as good as Roode vs Angle at BFG, ruined by the booking.
Cena vs Kane was dull whilst the aftermath just felt like lots of filler. No surprises about the unnanounced filler matches either, all of which failed to do anything exciting.
As for the Royal Rumble, oh dear. What a colourless match this was. The madcap antics bewteen Mick Foley and Santino, the silliness of the ring announcers entering and Ricardo's run stick out the most. The WWE's 25th Royal Rumble will be remembered by me for being a comedy match. Worse still the main roster entrants were overshadowed by such stars as Roaddog, Hacksaw Jim Duggan and Mick Foley. Despite their long runs Codey Rhodes and the Miz looiked like bland middcarders who'd just been promoted from NXT. It was only when Jericho and Sheamus squared off asd the final two that the Rumble was worth watching, finally some quality wrestling that wasn't kick, punch, try and lift over the ropes.
Any 411 journalist that rates this Royal Rumble higher than ** is just as unrealistic about the WWE as Wes Kirk is about TNA. This PPV wasn't good enough to be on PPV in the UK, it should have been alongside TNA PPV's.
Posted By: JAK (Guest) on January 31, 2012 at 03:50 AM
Man, Uphoff said it was just his opinion. I disagree but I'm not going have a freakout about it like the rest of you guys.
Posted By: Ben (Guest) on January 31, 2012 at 11:09 AM
Should have been Taker, not Show at no. 30. That last entry killed the Rumble-match.
Also they should have had HHH enter fairly late and start the Taker-HHH storyline there, thus making the Rumble more star-studded and simply bigger.
And LOL at Uphoff's 5-star rating, opinion or not.
Posted By: Candy Bottocks (Guest) on January 31, 2012 at 06:09 PM
Trash of the Night:
The Royal Rumble Match
Sheamus is pure shit
Posted By: Guest#6445 (Guest) on February 01, 2012 at 03:19 PM
Uphoff's comments were just embarrassing until the end when he revealed he was in the bar which makes everything he said make perfect sense. Obviously he was drunk out of his mind.
Posted By: Guest#0418 (Guest) on February 01, 2012 at 03:23 PM
Should have been Taker, not Show at no. 30. That last entry killed the Rumble-match.
Also they should have had HHH enter fairly late and start the Taker-HHH storyline there, thus making the Rumble more star-studded and simply bigger.
And LOL at Uphoff's 5-star rating, opinion or not.
Posted By: Candy Bottocks (Guest) on January 31, 2012 at 06:09 PM
And LOL at you for not understanding that stars are an arbitrary thing. HE enjoyed this rumble enough to give it 5 stars. Because IT WAS ENTERTAINING.
Posted By: Guest#9178 (Guest) on February 02, 2012 at 02:25 PM
Copyright (c) 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.