www.411mania.com
|  News |  Columns |  TV Reports |  Video Reviews |  Title History |  Hall of Fame |  News Report |  The Dunn List |
SPOTLIGHTS  SPOTLIGHTS
MOVIES/TV
// Irina Shayk Shows Off Her Killer Curves At Cannes
MUSIC
// Kanye West and Jay-Z's Watch the Throne 2 Confirmed
WRESTLING
// Brooke Hogan Says Hulk Didn't Know She Was in Talks With TNA
POLITICS
// Obama Leads In Florida, Ohio, & VIrginia
MMA
// 411's MMA Roundtable - UFC 146: Dos Santos vs. Mir
GAMES
// Castlevania: Lords of Shadow Sequel Teased


 HOT TOPICS
//  CM Punk
//  John Cena
//  Triple H
//  Hulk Hogan
//  Randy Orton
//  Christian
SYNDICATE  SYNDICATE



411mania RSS Feeds





Follow 411mania on Twitter!




Add 411 On Facebook
 



 
 411mania » Wrestling » Columns



Advertisement
411 Fact or Fiction 02.02.12: Sheamus Wins the Rumble, Undertaker vs. Triple H, Kharma, More
Posted by Steve Cook on 02.02.2012



Hi, hello and welcome to 411 Wrestling's Fact or Fiction! I'm Steve Cook, and it's been quite a week in the world of wrestling! It was dominated by WWE's 25th Royal Rumble event, which your humble correspondent was lucky enough to attend! Most of the questions have to do with that event, which featured CM Punk & Daniel Bryan retaining their titles & Sheamus winning the 30-man Royal Rumble match to earn a title shot at WrestleMania!

Introducing first, the man behind 411 MMA Fact or Fiction, which by the way I'll be appearing in next week to begin defending my Championship of Great Significance and become a two-time two-time two-time champion. Give it up for Todd Bergman!

His opponent is making his 411Mania debut. He sent me an e-mail talking about how big a fan of 411 he was and how he would love to appear in this column someday, so today we're making it happen. Say hello to a fellow 411 reader, Nick Perry!

  • Questions were sent out Monday.

  • Participants were told to expect mostly Royal Rumble-related questions.

    1. Sheamus was the correct choice to win the 2012 Royal Rumble.



    Todd Bergman: FACT. There were only two other options in my book and those guys were Randy Orton and Chris Jericho. I personally thought that the WWE were going to go with a Jericho/Orton double victory ala Luger/Hart but it seems that the Internet message boards changed the possible outcome. I didn't think that Jericho is the type of wrestler who needs to win the Royal Rumble in order to get a title shot at WrestleMania. Orton at this point in his career doesn't need that Rumble win either. Last year, Alberto Del Rio won the Rumble and proceeded to completely flop in his push to the title. I don't think that Sheamus will fail because he has a solid pedigree in his young WWE career. He's a solid wrestler who's a former King of the Ring winner; United States Champion and a former two-time WWE Champion as well.

    Nick Perry: FACT.. Many people would argue that Jericho would have been the correct choice, but Sheamus is and here's why. Jericho was the "predicted" choice by the fans to win it all, but Sheamus was deserving. Also, going against what the fans predicted would happen is a good decision. The element of surprise is often left out of wrestling these days. The crowd is solidly behind this guy as a face and WWE is realizing that. He's a believable contender for whichever championship he decides to pursue. Coupled with the great work he is doing inside and outside the ring for the company, he was definitely the right choice to win.

    Score: 1 for 1

    2. CM Punk & Daniel Bryan will be the WWE & World Champions heading into WrestleMania.



    Todd Bergman: FACT. The champion that could be in trouble here is Daniel Bryan. I could see the WWE taking the title off of him at Elimination Chamber and having Sheamus face someone like Randy Orton at WrestleMania. I don't think that this will happen but ultimately the WWE has to make sure that people will want to see Sheamus beat up the "heel" Daniel Bryan on their biggest PPV of the year. CM Punk is likely headed for a WM title showdown with Chris Jericho, so I can't imagine the WWE taking the title off of him going into the biggest show of the year. One thing to keep in mind is that a couple of weeks after last years WM, John Cena announced that his match against The Rock would be for the WWE title. I'm not sure if the bookers forgot about that announcement or not, so let's keep an eye out for that scenario.

    Nick Perry: FACT. There is too much that can be done with the Jericho/Punk feud coming up to take the title off of Punk before Wrestlemania. These two in a match could be epic at the biggest pay per view of year, and having the title in the mix will just add that much more to it. Plus, keeping the title on Punk and away from Cena makes the Rock/Cena match that much more interesting. Nobody is going to believe that the Rock has any chance of winning that match if Cena is the champ and the belt is on the line. Why would WWE invest in the Rock winning a title he would only defend once a year? (Sarcasm intended) Bryan keeps the belt going into Mania as well by random occurrences in his matches between now and the big event, kind of like the AJ thing. The heat on Bryan for "narrowly escaping" his matches and acting like he WON them on his own makes the crowd hate him even more. He will continue winning and chanting "YES!" up the ramp all the way to the Super Bowl of wrestling. Also it really will show the direction WWE has gone in the past year, giving the "Underdogs" their much-deserved time with the belts.

    Score: 2 for 2

    3. The John Cena vs. Kane feud will contend for the 2012 Worst Feud of the Year Award.



    Todd Bergman: FICTION. The only bad thing about this feud is the Zach Ryder nonsense. The WWE could do themselves a lot of favors by playing some Benny Hill music anytime that Kane meets Zack Ryder backstage. The idea of Cena becoming edger is something that I'm a fan of because the guy's character was stale three years ago. This whole feud is about evolving Cena's character because of the numerous amounts of bitching that is done nearly every day on pro wrestling message boards. It's really too hard to say what the worst feud of 2012 will be but it will likely involve something from NXT or Impact. However, I don't think that John Cena vs. Kane will be included.

    Nick Perry: FICTION. Part of me likes this feud for a couple different reasons. First off it gives them something to do with both men at this point in time and it was a great way to bring Kane back into the scene and make him relevant again. Kane as the indestructible monster who enjoys torturing people is the best character for him. Also, it keeps Cena out of the Main Event picture for a little while and allows guys like Ziggler to be more of a player. Ziggler has such a bright future still to come. Call me crazy, but there is a little bit of Mr. Perfect inside him inside that ring. The year is early and I'm sure there will be a few other feuds that will compete for worst of the year. I just don't see this being one of them if it's ended properly before Cena moves on to The Rock.

    Score: 3 for 3

    4. Kharma was the most surprising entrant in the Royal Rumble.



    Todd Bergman: FACT. Given that her pregnancy was high risk and the fact that I didn't read spoilers of her being in the rumble, I'm going to say that she was the most surprising entrant. The other options would be: Road Dogg, Michael Cole & Hacksaw. If you read 411mania.com at all in the days leading up to the Rumble then you knew that those three were going to be included. Kharma was a nice surprise and I'm hoping that she brings something to the Divas division and here is to hoping that the Divas get more than 30 seconds in the ring in the future as well.

    Nick Perry: FACT. On the basis of, there weren't many rumors going around about her showing up. She recently gave birth little over a month ago so the chances of seeing her were slim. She was the 2012 "1 diva entrant per year" for the Royal Rumble this year and definitely was a surprise. Guys like Road Dogg were rumored so there was some speculation on that, but I didn't read or hear anything leading up to the rumble about Kharma. It seemed like the crowd was surprised, and even excited to see her coming down the aisle. Michael Cole, on the other hand, is just a joke and nobody really cares about him anyway so he doesn't even count as a surprise. Plus his little "hunch" he had on commentary kind of gave it away.

    Score: 4 for 4


    SWITCH!


    5. Road Dogg Jesse James still has it.



    Nick Perry: FACT. He was in the ring and had his brief moments of glory. He gave the people that remember him a blast from the past and didn't look bad at doing so either. The crowd was into it and even started chanting "You Still Got It" so they know he still has it as well. It's always good to have these guys show up and bring the fans back to 12 or so years ago. It's even better when the guys don't look old doing it. I feel like he might not be able to wrestle on a consistent basis every week, but he still definitely has "It."

    Todd Bergman: FACT. Whatever "it" is, Road Dogg still has it. There are a few wrestlers whose microphone work completely overshadows their in-ring work (Roddy Piper and even The Rock). If I say, "Oh you didn't know" then you know the rest. The guy looked out a little out of shape but I feel like he may have earned himself a spot back on the WWE roster. Think of it like what Mr. Perfect did for himself back in 2002. The WWE really lacks wrestlers who the fans can relate with so bringing back the older guys from the Attitude Era can feed this need.

    Score: 5 for 5

    6. You want to see an Undertaker vs. Triple H WrestleMania rematch.



    Nick Perry: FICTION. Solidly on the fence about this because Triple H has always been my favorite wrestler, but I have to go fiction. Fans have already seen Taker and Trips at Wrestlemania 17 and last year as well. Kane has wrestled Taker twice already and couldn't beat him at Mania. HBK, possibly the greatest of all time, wrestled Taker twice at Mania and couldn't beat him. What would make the fans think that Trips has a chance at beating him in a third match? This is a tough question because Triple H is one of the very few wrestlers who are a believable opponent in having a chance to win this type of match—given Taker's record. 2 matches were enough for me. Part of me feels like the competitor in Triple H and Taker makes them want to go out and put on a better match than their previous one at Wrestlemania 27, but like I said 2 matches were enough for me. It's very hard to follow HBK/Taker's magic in the past two years.

    Todd Bergman: FICTION. I'm not a Triple H fan so anything that involves Trips getting more TV time is going to be a negative in my book. To me Triple H is the Scottie Pippen of pro wrestling. Talented but got most of his success from being associated with the right people. Anyway, I thought that both guys had a solid match at WrestleMania X-Seven and even last years match was quality but this year's match up just feels like the WWE couldn't think of anything better to do with both guys. Triple H just got out of a "blood" feud with Kevin Nash and I feel like it was blown off too quickly. I guess the logical option is for Triple H to put his career on the line but the theory behind a guy who shows up every three months putting his career on the line against a guy who hasn't been on TV in nearly a year is mind numbing to me.

    Score: 6 for 6

    7. Mike Tyson deserves to be in the WWE Hall of Fame.



    Nick Perry: FICTION. I'm a firm believer that the WWE Hall of Fame should be reserved for professional wrestlers and managers only. Mike Tyson was very popular when he attended Wrestlemania and had his interactions with Stone Cold on television, but not Hall of Fame worthy. Next thing we know, Snooki will be inducted into the Hall of Fame for her appearance at Wrestlemania. The guys, who spent years of blood, sweat, and tears for the business, traveling 300 days a year, entertaining every night, deserve to be in the Hall of Fame. Some people argue that Edge's induction is too soon, but I say if Mike Tyson is being inducted, then the man Edge, who gave up his body for the business, and now is retired because of it, certainly is deserving Tyson might deserve to be in the professional boxing Hall of Fame, but not WWE.

    Todd Bergman: FACT. Seems like wrestling fans always get butt-hurt when the WWE decides to induct someone into their celebrity wing. The fact of the matter is that Mike Tyson was apart of one of the most important WrestleMania main events in the history of the event. WrestleMania XIV signaled the beginning of the Attitude Era and Tyson gave the WWF (at the time) a massive amount of mainstream news coverage with his involvement. Whether it was the shoving incident on Raw with Stone Cold or "knocking out" Shawn Michaels in the main event, Mike Tyson was everything that the WWF needed him to be in the storyline and so much more. If anyone deserves to be in the celebrity wing then its Mike Tyson.

    Score: 6 for 7

    8. Sting will retire at the end of his current Impact Wrestling contract.



    Nick Perry: FACT. I'm a little skeptical on this Fact because of the whole "never say never" wrestling thoughts veterans always have in the back of their mind, though. Sting is up there in age, coupled with his recent injury, and the fact that he can be used behind the scenes in a bigger role as well, leads me to believe after this contract he will definitely retire. Sting can still go in the ring for his age, but there is only so much more he can do in TNA on TV. The role he plays right now on TV is something that works for them, but in terms of in-ring, I think his time is coming to an end. He's a fan favorite, but everybody has their time.

    Todd Bergman: FICTION. I'm most likely going to be way out in left field with this one but I still think that Sting will wrestle The Undertaker at a future WrestleMania. If you remember back to last year at this time, wrestling sites were set ablaze when people thought that Sting was the subject of what turned out to be Undertaker hype videos. The best idea here would be to induct Sting into the Hall of Fame in the same weekend. It would be a fitting end to one of the best careers in pro wrestling history.

    Final Score: 6 for 8

    Todd & Nick were on the same page for most of the column, but parted ways when we started talking about Mike Tyson & Sting. I thank them both for their participation, and invite you readers to chime in with your opinions on these topics in the comment section. We'll see you back here next week for more 411 Fact or Fiction!

  • Remember to go to TigerFlashGames.com and play addictive, free flash games when you're bored at work, school, or whenever!

  • Don't forget 411 on Facebook & Twitter!


    Post Comment (78)  |  Email Steve Cook  |  View Steve Cook's 411 Profile

      Send To Friend  |    Stumble It!  |    Digg It!  | 



    Please add your comment below.
    If you are registered, you can login and post under your registered name. If not, you can post as a guest or register.

    * Please note that 411 moderates all comments. Your comment will show up on the site after it has been approved by an editor.
     
    Name : 
    Comment : 
    Remaining Characters : 
    2800
     

    Comments (78)

     
    i wanna see The Rock and Mick foley vs Cena and Ryder in WWE.

    and i also wanna see and think we are gonna get hhh vs taker with hbk as ref.


    Posted By: Guest#3617 (Guest)  on February 01, 2012 at 11:05 PM

     
     
    WWE is such a nice company. they help promote foley's projects and hacksaws projects. they are so nice to talent..

    Posted By: Guest#6076 (Guest)  on February 01, 2012 at 11:05 PM

     
     
    sheamus is the right choice to win the rumble match. he is popular, he is a great wrestler and great talker. and he a fresh new face. someone who i wanted to see in the rumble match tho was brodus clay. speaking of brodus, even tho he is having squach matches right now doesnt mean he cant wrestle, brodus can wrestle really good. and soon he will show it.

    Posted By: Guest#7786 (Guest)  on February 01, 2012 at 11:06 PM

     
     
    TNA is terrible. FACT. WWE > Chickara, ROH, ect..

    Posted By: Guest#7159 (Guest)  on February 01, 2012 at 11:07 PM

     
     
    Nevermind worst feud of 2012, Kane-Cena is competing for worst feud ever. It's clear Cena is saving himself for Mania, and they've managed to make Kane's return completely stale and boring within a month. It keeps dragging and dragging on. MAKE IT STOP.

    Posted By: Guest#1387 (Guest)  on February 01, 2012 at 11:12 PM

     
     
    Agree 100% with Todd Bergman's assessment on Mike Tyson's induction, perfectly stated.

    Posted By: Nick M. (Guest)  on February 01, 2012 at 11:39 PM

     
     
    NEWSFLASH!!!!

    If Mike Tyson isn't involved in 1998, the Attitude Era explosion never happens.

    I was in college at the time and everybody in my frat watched WCW...but when Tyson, suspended from boxing and fresh off the ear bites, was scheduled we watched Raw that night and every night thereafter it was constant flipping. Within a 6 months we were watching Raw flipping to Nitro during commercials rather than the reverse.

    Austin should induct him, since Iron Mike made it possible for him to make a fortune.


    Posted By: Guest#5885 (Guest)  on February 01, 2012 at 11:44 PM

     
     
    I didn't read or see anything about Kharma being in the Rumble so therefore nobody else on the planet did either so of course it was the most surprising...

    Posted By: We Know and See All (Guest)  on February 01, 2012 at 11:47 PM

     
     
    Isn't it amazing.

    Jessie James in TNA was COMPLETE DOGSHIT...but now that he'd Road Dogg in WWE again, he awesome once more.

    The website should change it's name to HypocriticalMania.com


    Posted By: Guest#4182 (Guest)  on February 01, 2012 at 11:47 PM

     
     
    I'm most likely going to be way out in left field with this one but I still think that Sting will wrestle The Undertaker at a future WrestleMania.

    You really think Sting is going to work for Vince (even though he doesnt want or need to) just so he can be just another streak victim? Forget 'left field', it's virtually impossible.


    Posted By: Guest#2835 (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 12:02 AM

     
     
    The guys, who spent years of blood, sweat, and tears for the business, traveling 300 days a year, entertaining every night, deserve to be in the Hall of Fame.

    Once again, he is being inducted into the CELEBRITY wing of the HOF. He's not meant to be considered on par with legit wrestlers.


    Posted By: Guest#7294 (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 12:04 AM

     
     
    The guys, who spent years of blood, sweat, and tears for the business, traveling 300 days a year, entertaining every night, deserve to be in the Hall of Fame.

    Once again, he is being inducted into the CELEBRITY wing of the HOF. He's not meant to be considered on par with legit wrestlers.

    Posted By: Guest#7294 (Guest) on February 02, 2012 at 12:04 AM

    Tyson at the time was on top of the world, he would have wiped the floor with any of the WWF guys in an actual fight and everyone knew that. Having him there, when he was so big at the time, legitimized the WWF and launched the Attitude era.

    Plus the guy is a huge fan of wrestling. I don't understand the animosity at all. This isn't David Arquette we are talking about, it's the one time baddest man on the planet.


    Posted By: Guest#4413 (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 12:09 AM

     
     
    Isn't it amazing.

    Jessie James in TNA was COMPLETE DOGSHIT...but now that he'd Road Dogg in WWE again, he awesome once more.

    The website should change it's name to HypocriticalMania.com

    Posted By: Guest#4182 (Guest) on February 01, 2012 at 11:47 PM

    Looks like someone is mad and butt hurt. nobody ever said he was terrible in TNA. is that his gimmick in WWE is better than his gimmick in TNA. Road dogg > BG james..


    Posted By: Guest#1305 (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 12:23 AM

     
     
    Sheamus was the correct choice to win the 2012 Royal Rumble. I must be a complete moron because when Sheamus comes on TV I see a guy who kicks and punches and screams and thus instantly change the channel. What on earth makes people think Sheamus has "it". he's the most boring wrestler I have seen in the last 25 years.

    Posted By: Guest#1111 (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 12:26 AM

     
     
    Sheamus was the correct choice to win the 2012 Royal Rumble. I must be a complete moron because when Sheamus comes on TV I see a guy who kicks and punches and screams and thus instantly change the channel. What on earth makes people think Sheamus has "it". he's the most boring wrestler I have seen in the last 25 years.

    Posted By: Guest#1111 (Guest) on February 02, 2012 at 12:26 AM

    troll alert. everyone knows sheamus rules.


    Posted By: Guest#8701 (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 12:33 AM

     
     
    People really do need to get over the mentality that only wrestlers should be in the Hall of Fame. They specifically call it the celebrity wing because it comes with the caveat that their inductions are fun novelties and not to be taken as seriously as active competitors.

    This is yet another case of wrestling fans taking all of the fun out of being a wrestling fan. The wrestlers themselves don't seem to be up in arms so why the hell are the fans like that?

    Wrestling is great because compared to other "sports" it's all about providing variety. You have main eventers, cruiserweights, women, comedy acts, technicians, etc. The Hall of Fame for said athletic competition should be no different.

    When the WWE starts to pretend like Drew Carey is some awesome athlete who helped raise the company to massive new heights, call me. Until then? Take the stick out of your collective rear ends and learn how to have fun.


    Posted By: Ron Mexico (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 12:35 AM

     
     
    Sheamus was the correct choice to win the 2012 Royal Rumble. I must be a complete moron because when Sheamus comes on TV I see a guy who kicks and punches and screams and thus instantly change the channel. What on earth makes people think Sheamus has "it". he's the most boring wrestler I have seen in the last 25 years.

    Posted By: Guest#1111 (Guest) on February 02, 2012 at 12:26 AM

    yes, you are a complete moron.


    Posted By: Guest#9579 (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 12:37 AM

     
     
    You'd think Todd could get Ryder's name right. It's Zack not Zach

    Posted By: Guest#9514 (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 12:41 AM

     
     
    If Tripe H vs Taker III has to happen it should be a 3 Stages of Hell Match like Hunter had with Stone Cold oh so long ago. HHH could get the first fall but still lose the next 2 falls, but have the honor of being the only one or at least the 1st to get a pinfall on UT at Wrestlemania.

    Posted By: John D. (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 12:43 AM

     
     
    Sheamus was the correct choice to win the 2012 Royal Rumble. I must be a complete moron because when Sheamus comes on TV I see a guy who kicks and punches and screams and thus instantly change the channel. What on earth makes people think Sheamus has "it". he's the most boring wrestler I have seen in the last 25 years.

    Posted By: Guest#1111 (Guest) on February 02, 2012 at 12:26 AM

    So you're that one guy who has a hard on for shitting on Sheamus and multiple-posts all the time? If he's really the most boring wrestler you've seen in the last 25 years then you clearly havent watched much wrestling. He's not even the most boring wrestler NOW. Otunga, Slater, Rob Terry, Mason Ryan etc say hi.


    Posted By: Guest#5255 (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 12:44 AM

     
     
    Plus the guy is a huge fan of wrestling. I don't understand the animosity at all. This isn't David Arquette we are talking about, it's the one time baddest man on the planet.

    Posted By: Guest#4413 (Guest) on February 02, 2012 at 12:09 AM

    He called Austin 'Cold Stone' and HBK 'a young up and comer'. Wrestling has given him some nice pay days, but he's never seemed like a fan to me.


    Posted By: Guest#3848 (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 12:51 AM

     
     
    Sheamus is only, "it" because he and Triple H are buddies/friend of the boss, it is not because he an put on entertaining matches and promos because the guy is worse on a mic than John Cena with scripted promos. Sheamus is a big worthless idiot much like The Great Khali, because when was the last time someone bought a PPV because of Sheamus main eventing or putting on a great or even decent promo for that matter. The only time people bought PPVs when Sheamus was main eventing was to see him lose because he is as big a worthless as The Great Khali. Funny how the SD crowd was upset when Khali was introduced into Elimination Chamber, obviously whoever is booking at the moment has no clue or is doing things just to swerve what was expected, so why not change Cena vs Rock because everyone knows Cena is going to win, much like Rock/Hogan WM X-8. You all know it, so why deny it.

    Posted By: Horrible Truth (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 12:56 AM

     
     
    No one wants to see Triple H vs Undertaker yet again at Wrestlemania 28. I just hope the WWE doesn't cram it down our throats. So many better opponents for both of them that would increase the buyrate. At the end of the Day Undertaker and Triple H can't top their previous 2 matches so why try.

    Posted By: Giles (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 01:17 AM

     
     
    please WWE don't make us watch another Triple H vs Undertaker match at Wrestlemania 28.

    Posted By: Andrew (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 01:17 AM

     
     
    1.FACT
    2.FACT
    3.FICTION (but... it is top 5)
    4.FICTION (the announce table was, and it shouldnt have happened!)
    5.FACT
    6.FICTION (with 1 exception: HELL IN A CELL!)
    7.FICTION
    8.FACT


    Posted By: Guest#8706 (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 01:22 AM

     
     
    Undertaker vs Brock Lesnar @ WM 28

    Posted By: omegamewtwo (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 01:22 AM

     
     
    Kharma's pregnancy wasn't at risk. She gave birth December 31st.

    Posted By: SS87 (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 01:28 AM

     
     
    I feel like the new guy did very well. Nice answers that seemed to be well thought out. Good job Mr. Perry.

    Posted By: Every Week Reader (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 01:35 AM

     
     
    Sheamus was the correct choice to win the 2012 Royal Rumble. I must be a complete moron because when Sheamus comes on TV I see a guy who kicks and punches and screams and thus instantly change the channel. What on earth makes people think Sheamus has "it". he's the most boring wrestler I have seen in the last 25 years.

    Posted By: Guest#1111 (Guest) on February 02, 2012 at 12:26 AM

    Nevermind the fact that he hasnt eaten a pinfall since last years mania except his title match with Orton where RANDY ORTON needed Christians help to beat Sheamus. Think about that for a few minutes Randy Orton needed Christians help to beat Sheamus. Sheamus' only pinfall loss on TV since last years mania. He had to be counted out at Summerslam against Mark Henry. Mark Henry beat Randy Orton, Christian, John Cena, Kane, Big Show, Daniel Bryan and Great Khali clean yet was never able to pin Sheamus. Why does Sheamus get a pass because he wasnt WWE Champion or World Champion last year. Guaranteed if Cena or Orton did this one pinfall since Mania and didnt put over your monster heel clean the IWC would call for their head. I hope it doesnt take CM PUNK losing his title to Sheamus for people to realize the true cancer of pro wrestling. Cena and Orton have jobbed since July and September respectively. Putting Punk and Henry over clean without ever getting their wins back. Not Sheamus


    Posted By: Radtke (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 01:48 AM

     
     
    Fiction 1,000,000 times. HHH V 'Taker 3?? Neither man is capable of putting on a match like they did at XVII and although last years match was brilliant from a ring psychology standpoint it sucked the big hairy from a "wrestling" standpoint (and ONLY because of the streak!). I don't particularly want more of the same even if they do throw HBK into the mix. And does 'Taker have another full year left in him? I doubt it (though I'd be happy to be proved wrong). I have always said the streak should be used a launch pad for someone to be pushed to the sky by ending it. Will 'Taker even be around at WM XXIX to do that?

    Posted By: RockerDropper (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 01:53 AM

     
     
    They could've gone with Ziggler winning the Rumble. He's super over at the moment, and turning him face would be easy...if they wanted to go that way. I like Sheamus better as a heel, I hear his music and I just cringe, fella.

    Posted By: OpTimistic (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 02:05 AM

     
     
    1.Fact(Him or Jericho were the 2 good picks, and even though I wanted Jericho to win it, Sheamus got a bigger boost from it.)

    2.Fact

    3.Fiction(It's not a great feud, but not terrible. It puts Ryder in a major feud and hopefully in a big WM match with Kane. It gives Cena something to do and makes it look like he might turn heel, even if it's not likely. Also, there is going to be a feud that will run away with worst feud of the year, there always is.)

    4.Fact(Easy fact, nobody saw that coming.)

    5.Fact(Don't want to see him on RAW or SD each week, put he looked good in the Rumble and could have some matches left in him.)

    6.Fiction

    7.Fact(In the celeb wing of the HOF, completely deserving. He was part of one of the biggest WM main events ever. Macho Man should be in the wrestling part of the HOF.)

    8.Fiction


    Posted By: Still Guest#8287 (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 02:25 AM

     
     
    Whoa...scottie pippen is one of the greatest pgs of all time. He was a bad call away from winning the championship WITHOUT Jordan. To me, trips is more of the Patrick Ewing of pro wrestling. Never really as good as anyone else in his era but just because he was a part of that era people put him on that pedestal.

    Posted By: db (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 02:28 AM

     
     
    "Sheamus was the correct choice to win the 2012 Royal Rumble. I must be a complete moron..."

    I stopped reading your comment there and disagree with both Bergman and Perry. From a pure storytelling point of view, Jericho should have won that Rumble. I like Sheamus but he could have just won #1 contendership for Wrestlemania vs Bryan in the elimination chamber. Hell, Sheamus would have probably ended up winning the Rumble next year anyway but Jericho's angle is going on in the here and now.


    Posted By: Guest#0851 (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 04:45 AM

     
     
    What on earth makes people think Sheamus has "it". he's the most boring wrestler I have seen in the last 25 years.

    Posted By: Guest#1111 (Guest) on February 02, 2012 at 12:26 AM

    Guess you didn't see too many Al Snow matches then!


    Posted By: Mick Foley (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 05:16 AM

     
     
    I would have won the Rumble but I wasn't booked.

    Posted By: Dennis Farina (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 05:17 AM

     
     
    Cena vs anybody is the worst feud of the year.

    Kharma should have killed that bitch Cole dead.


    Posted By: Sku-Tar (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 05:24 AM

     
     
    HHH vs Taker
    Careers on the line
    HBK as ref

    That would be interesting.


    Posted By: Guest#7373 (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 06:14 AM

     
     
    Sting v.s. Taker at WrestleMania they wouldn't even need a huge build-up Sting shows up on Raw or Smackdown and challenges Taker for a shot at the streak.

    Posted By: TheOne (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 07:29 AM

     
     
    I can't stand Sheamus, so he'll never be the right choice for me. A ginger punk who is a weird half-breed of Orton and Cena with an extra splash of personality. And by "personality" I mean stupid grin on his face.

    And what's with the brogue kick? Even Randy "I'll punt my own grandma in the head" Orton knows you can't end every match with a kick. It's fine to like the guy, but don't think because he's cousins with Beaker he's the company's new best workhorse.


    Posted By: Carlos (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 07:30 AM

     
     
    Sorry but the attitude era would of happened with out Tyson as, u had Austin and Michaels/Triple H before Tyson. They could of had Butterbean instead and it would of still worked lol.It was the wrestlers that made the era, nothing to do with Tyson. Plus technically it was the original ECW that made it and vince stole it but we wont go down that lane again.

    That Hall of Fame spot should go to someone that deserves it and has put blood sweat and tears into his or her wrestling career. Like the late Randy Savage, Dynamite Kid, Vader, or even legends of WCW as WWE own the rights like Diamond Dallas Page.

    Just a Thought.


    Posted By: Reaper-NG (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 08:22 AM

     
     
    I'm going to Wrestlemania and I really don't want to see HHH vs. Undertaker III. Unfortunately it looks like that's what we're going to get unless a miracle happens. Bergman is right - careers being put on the line between 2 guys who hardly wrestle any more anyway is stupid.

    Posted By: Mr. America (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 09:01 AM

     
     
    Roaddog still has it? I guess if you mean by "it" that a wrestler gets blown up within two minutes, than I suppose it's fact.

    But then again, I remember a Rumble in which Roaddog pretty much laid down and clung to the ropes for fifteen minutes or so, so that's nothing new.

    Roaddog is worth a cheap pop for those that remember the Attitude era. However, they forget that he was pretty much shit until the Outlaws got over, and he was shit when they broke up. A solid mic guy yes, but that's about all.


    Posted By: Michael L (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 09:07 AM

     
     
    Isn't it amazing.

    Jessie James in TNA was COMPLETE DOGSHIT...but now that he'd Road Dogg in WWE again, he awesome once more.

    The website should change it's name to HypocriticalMania.com

    Posted By: Guest#4182 (Guest)  on February 01, 2012 at 11:47 PM

    Cool story bro.


    Posted By: Guest#5807 (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 09:15 AM

     
     
    "To me Triple H is the Scottie Pippen of pro wrestling. Talented but got most of his success from being associated with the right people."

    Excellent analogy.


    Posted By: Guest#3847 (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 09:39 AM

     
     
    While many of the celebrity inductees have been dubious, at best there are some that I believe are deserving due to real contributions:

    Mr. T - Main Evented the first Wrestlemania

    Cyndi Lauper - The catalyst for Rock n Wrestling.

    Mike Tyson - Major storyline involvement in Austin's first title win.


    Posted By: Carl (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 10:09 AM

     
     
    Sheamus was the correct choice to win the 2012 Royal Rumble. I must be a complete moron because when Sheamus comes on TV I see a guy who kicks and punches and screams and thus instantly change the channel. What on earth makes people think Sheamus has "it". he's the most boring wrestler I have seen in the last 25 years.

    Posted By: Guest#1111 (Guest) on February 02, 2012 at 12:26 AM

    Agreed. I don't get it at all. People complain about Cena's moveset yet this guy has clubs, a kick and very little else. He is clearly over, so I get the move, but I don't think he offers anything special in the ring or on the mic.


    Posted By: Guest#3209 (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 10:16 AM

     
     
    Sheamus was the correct choice to win the 2012 Royal Rumble. I must be a complete moron because when Sheamus comes on TV I see a guy who kicks and punches and screams and thus instantly change the channel. What on earth makes people think Sheamus has "it". he's the most boring wrestler I have seen in the last 25 years.

    Posted By: Guest#1111 (Guest) on February 02, 2012 at 12:26 AM

    Hulk Hogan says hello


    Posted By: dalpe (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 10:21 AM

     
     
    Isn't it amazing.

    Jessie James in TNA was COMPLETE DOGSHIT...but now that he'd Road Dogg in WWE again, he awesome once more.

    The website should change it's name to HypocriticalMania.com

    Posted By: Guest#4182 (Guest) on February 01, 2012 at 11:47 PM

    Waaaaaahhh, I watch shitty wrestling and I'm angry about it!


    Posted By: Guest#8766 (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 10:25 AM

     
     
    Personally, I hope they keep HBK out of Taker/HHH III. Not in terms of storyline, I dont think they went quite far enough last year with his involvement. But as far the match itself, the streak is at a point where the victory shouldn't be clouded by anything shady (like HBK possibly helping HHH or, in a swerve, helping Taker) HBK and HHH screwing Taker out of a 20-0 WM record would be the ultimate flop for what is essentially a 20+ year storyline. The same if HBK helped Taker win. Would 20-0 be as impressive if the last memory we had was Taker needing help to pull it off? So either way, if HBK influences the outcome at all, it would be wrong. The only way, in my eyes, it wont be a disaster is if Taker goes over clean with no funny business from HBK. But then, what would be the point in having HBK there at all? At first glance HHH/Taker III isn't that appealing....but at the same time, they put on an entertaining show last year, so there's no reason why they won't again. I know a lot of people are clamoring for Taker to put over a younger talent to give them the rub of ending his streak. But in all honesty, at his age and condition, I dont know if I want to see Taker out there with a guy he's not familiar with. We could end up with a lackluster finale for the greatest WWF/E career of all time. It may be the safe choice, but Taker/HHH III is the right choice.

    I see people are up in arms defending Tyson's induction into the HOF. Do we really need to defend it? Who is actually upset about this? And don't we have this same debate every year when they induct a non-wrestler? Get over it, the air will smell just as sweet tomorrow, whether Tyson is in the Hall of Fame or not. And honestly, if Duggan and Koko B Ware are in, and Savage and Jake Roberts are not, can we really cry "undeserving" about anyone else?


    Posted By: El Wrob (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 10:31 AM

     
     
    Sheamus was the correct choice to win the 2012 Royal Rumble. I must be a complete moron because when Sheamus comes on TV I see a guy who kicks and punches and screams and thus instantly change the channel. What on earth makes people think Sheamus has "it". he's the most boring wrestler I have seen in the last 25 years.

    Posted By: Guest#1111 (Guest) on February 02, 2012 at 12:26 AM

    Nevermind the fact that he hasnt eaten a pinfall since last years mania except his title match with Orton where RANDY ORTON needed Christians help to beat Sheamus. Think about that for a few minutes Randy Orton needed Christians help to beat Sheamus. Sheamus' only pinfall loss on TV since last years mania. He had to be counted out at Summerslam against Mark Henry. Mark Henry beat Randy Orton, Christian, John Cena, Kane, Big Show, Daniel Bryan and Great Khali clean yet was never able to pin Sheamus. Why does Sheamus get a pass because he wasnt WWE Champion or World Champion last year. Guaranteed if Cena or Orton did this one pinfall since Mania and didnt put over your monster heel clean the IWC would call for their head. I hope it doesnt take CM PUNK losing his title to Sheamus for people to realize the true cancer of pro wrestling. Cena and Orton have jobbed since July and September respectively. Putting Punk and Henry over clean without ever getting their wins back. Not Sheamus

    Posted By: Radtke (Guest) on February 02, 2012 at 01:48 AM

    That is very interesting. HHH has passed the torch to his buddy Seamus in terms of not putting people over.


    Posted By: Impressed (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 10:33 AM

     
     
    Roaddog is worth a cheap pop for those that remember the Attitude era. However, they forget that he was pretty much shit until the Outlaws got over, and he was shit when they broke up. A solid mic guy yes, but that's about all.

    Posted By: Michael L



    ^ This.


    Posted By: El Wrob (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 10:33 AM

     
     
    "Whoa...scottie pippen is one of the greatest pgs of all time. He was a bad call away from winning the championship WITHOUT Jordan. To me, trips is more of the Patrick Ewing of pro wrestling. Never really as good as anyone else in his era but just because he was a part of that era people put him on that pedestal.

    Posted By: db (Guest) on February 02, 2012 at 02:28 AM"

    Scottie Pippen wasn't a PG. Fail.


    Posted By: Dirk Dickler (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 10:41 AM

     
     
    #6 is the most surprising FACT of the year. here's why:

    1. for once, taker is the chaser. for years, everyone has gone after him. now he's the one to choose his wm opponent. that's a nice twist.

    2. there's still suspense. is hhh really going to lose 3 times to the same guy at wm? maybe i'm naive, but i still think there's the slight chance that hhh ends the streak.

    3. their past 2 wm matches have been epic. i still say their wm 17 match was highly underrated. i was there & loved watching those guys toss each other around the astrodome.

    this match will surprise people. & this is coming from a guy who has never liked undertaker.


    Posted By: memphis b-rad (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 10:47 AM

     
     
    i actually like the cena/kane feud as both man really dont have anything else to do and its nice to see them collide..

    i do not want to see taker/triple h 3..

    great white vs Daniels
    Jericho vs CMPuNK!


    Posted By: wylun (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 10:56 AM

     
     
    Tyson helped bring WWE back into the number one spot in the US, and its THE FREAKING CELEBRITY WING of a fictional HOF for a fictional sport. Get over it, its all in good fun.

    Posted By: APrince66 (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 11:01 AM

     
     
    Kane and Cena has its cheesy moments but I actually like what they're doing with it, which is to slowly turn Cena heel. Either that or give him an agressive side before he faces the Rock.

    Posted By: Guest#1118 (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 11:04 AM

     
     
    I def agree with Nick Perry, I def see a lot of Mr. Perfect in Ziggler

    Posted By: Mikey G (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 11:14 AM

     
     
    Mike Tyson completely deserves to be in the Celebrity "Wing" of the WWE HOF. For God's sake, he brought more mainstream coverage to the WWE than 99% of the wrestlers ever did.

    Posted By: The Big Fat F*g (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 11:17 AM

     
     
    Hey Nick, my beloved Snooki is worthy of the Hall of Fame. Any Hall of Fame.

    Posted By: Spencer Mallard (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 11:22 AM

     
     
    "I'm most likely going to be way out in left field with this one but I still think that Sting will wrestle The Undertaker at a future WrestleMania." I agree!! Sting is one of the all time greats and sting should go out on top by facing the Undertaker at wrestlemaina

    Posted By: Maddogjb (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 12:25 PM

     
     
    Taker vs Trips is about as exciting as Taker vs Kane. It's been done twice, let someone else move in for the Taker moment. I was praying that Jericho would get the nod because he can take Taker (lol) to a solid match. Trips is not the worker he used to be, and it will be a worse match than last year, which by no means was bad, but had nothing on the HBK matches, and I feel Jericho could flirt with that level (but not surpass either).

    But, Jericho vs Punk is also a great alternative so I'm okay with it.

    Taker's 20th should come against Cena in all seriousness though. He has been the face of WWE for some time, past Trips, and if he is to turn heel, why not on Taker?
    Cena's not on the HBK level where he NEEDS Taker to be a legit heel (crowd loved michaels regardless, Taker was the one figure to give him that little extra) but it would have been awesome.


    Posted By: MPMoore (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 12:28 PM

     
     
    " but it seems that the Internet message boards changed the possible outcome. "

    God, the IWC's arrogance knows no bounds


    Posted By: Guest#3731 (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 12:40 PM

     
     
    Sorry, but Sting's never going to work in the WWE. Get over it.

    Posted By: Guest#5067 (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 12:50 PM

     
     
    1.Fact = Jericho and Orton were to predictable. Sheamus deserved it.

    2.Fact = (I Hope Bryan still has it for Mania though, small chance he won't)

    3.Fact = but it won't win worst fued, just be nominated.

    4.Fact = If you read 411 then you knew Road Dogg and Hacksaw Duggan would be in it. I heard nothing about Kharma in it.

    5.Unsure = How can anyone say "he's still got it" when he only wrestled like 3 minutes. I would need to see more to judge.

    6.Fiction = Twice was more then enough. I wanna see a Fresh opponent for Takers Mania Streak.

    7.Fiction = No celebrities should be in a Wrestling HOF, however if you're gonna do it anyway, Tyson is one of the better celebrities to put in due to his Wrestlemania 14 stuff.

    8.Fact = I'm surprised he hung around this long.


    Posted By: Somebody call his Mama (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 01:58 PM

     
     
    "He called Austin 'Cold Stone' and HBK 'a young up and comer'. Wrestling has given him some nice pay days, but he's never seemed like a fan to me."

    Posted By: Guest#3848 (Guest) on February 02, 2012 at 12:51 AM
    _________

    I think that has more to do with the fact that multiple blows to the guy's head over the years (as is the case with most boxers) have probably wreaked havoc with his brain/speech coordination - and Tyson, fresh out of jail and with the taste of Holyfield's ear probably still in his mouth, wasn't exactly at a "mentally balanced" point in his life then, anyway. Ever hear a guy who's had the shit beaten out of them for a living try to string sentences together? It's not pretty. I'm still surprised Mick Foley still manages to sound as coherent as he does (though I've heard stories).

    That said, if you don't think that his involvement in Mania XIV was a huge factor in the phenomenon that professional wrestling became over the next four years, you're dreaming. He deserves to be in the Hall of Fame (it's the CELEBRITY wing, for God's sake. Lighten up, folks.), and I'm frankly surprised they didn't induct him sooner. Austin should do the honors, without a doubt.


    Posted By: BJC (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 02:33 PM

     
     
    I don't know if Nick Perry was watching wrestling some 15 years ago, or so, but Tyson was a major catalyst. As good as Austin and Michaels were, WWF didn't have any big name folks drawing people in to see their shows. With the spectacle caused by the addition of Tyson, who was actually relevant at the time, the media came out in droves. WWF go so much out of having Tyson there for 2 shows, that is why he deserves in the Hall of Fame.

    Posted By: G-Walla (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 02:49 PM

     
     
    >One thing to keep in mind is that a couple of weeks after last years WM, John Cena announced that his match against The Rock would be for the WWE title. I'm not sure if the bookers forgot about that announcement or not, so let's keep an eye out for that scenario. <

    Yeah, cause forgetting that would be as ridiculous and insulting to the WWE fans as if the WWE would "forget" about announcing who the anonymous general manager was, and we KNOW they'd never do THAT.
    As for the WWE Hall of Fame, to think they do this every year and yet it doesn't actually exist as a building is just as stupid.


    Posted By: REALITY (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 02:49 PM

     
     
    Nevermind the fact that he hasnt eaten a pinfall since last years mania except his title match with Orton where RANDY ORTON needed Christians help to beat Sheamus. Think about that for a few minutes Randy Orton needed Christians help to beat Sheamus. Sheamus' only pinfall loss on TV since last years mania. He had to be counted out at Summerslam against Mark Henry. Mark Henry beat Randy Orton, Christian, John Cena, Kane, Big Show, Daniel Bryan and Great Khali clean yet was never able to pin Sheamus. Why does Sheamus get a pass because he wasnt WWE Champion or World Champion last year. Guaranteed if Cena or Orton did this one pinfall since Mania and didnt put over your monster heel clean the IWC would call for their head. I hope it doesnt take CM PUNK losing his title to Sheamus for people to realize the true cancer of pro wrestling. Cena and Orton have jobbed since July and September respectively. Putting Punk and Henry over clean without ever getting their wins back. Not Sheamus

    Posted By: Radtke (Guest) on February 02, 2012 at 01:48 AM

    Since May Sheamus has been pinned by Orton twice, Christian twice, Sin Cara, Alberto Del Rio & Wade Barrett.


    Posted By: Guest#5881 (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 02:53 PM

     
     
    N o NO NO on the Taker vs HHH. Its done. Give taker some new blood, Christian, or Mark Henry. Some one good and new to fight him at Mania

    Posted By: deez nuts (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 03:00 PM

     
     
    I will be so glad when this Kane vs Cena fued is over. Glad to see Sheamus win the Rumble. Forget Jericho, Punk vs. Bryan feud is one worth looking into.

    Posted By: Eddie (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 03:35 PM

     
     
    Sorry but the attitude era would of happened with out Tyson as, u had Austin and Michaels/Triple H before Tyson. They could of had Butterbean instead and it would of still worked lol.It was the wrestlers that made the era, nothing to do with Tyson. Plus technically it was the original ECW that made it and vince stole it but we wont go down that lane again.

    That Hall of Fame spot should go to someone that deserves it and has put blood sweat and tears into his or her wrestling career. Like the late Randy Savage, Dynamite Kid, Vader, or even legends of WCW as WWE own the rights like Diamond Dallas Page.

    Just a Thought.

    Posted By: Reaper-NG (Guest) on February 02, 2012 at 08:22 AM

    ITS THE CELEBRITY WING. Why don't people understand this? He's not being inducted alongside Hulk Hogan and Shawn Michaels. He's being inducted alongside Pete Rose and The Fridge. It's the celebrity wing, not the Wrestlers hall of fame. Think before you post.


    Posted By: Guest#0274 (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 04:00 PM

     
     
    1. Sheamus: YES! 2. Punk and Bryan: YES! 3. Kane-Cena: YES! 4. Kharma: YES! 5. "Load Dogg" : OH HELL NO!. 6. Game-DeadMan III: OH HELL NO! 7. Mike Tyson: OH HELL NO! 8. Sting: OH HELL NO!

    Posted By: KnyghtRyder (Registered)  on February 02, 2012 at 04:42 PM

     
     
    Considering Sheamus is neck and neck with Mark Henry for the title of worst wrestler ever everyone who's even remotely ok with this should be ashamed of themselves. Michael Cole would have been a better Rumble winner.

    Posted By: Guest#8072 (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 05:10 PM

     
     
    Ummmm.....anyone that knows basketball knows that if anything, Scottie Pippen was actually underrated as he was overshadowed by playing with the greatest of all-time. He was one of the greatest defensive players ever and excelled at playing a secondary role where he made the players around him better when he could have easily been a 25 PPG scorer had he not been playing alongside MJ. Speak to any basketball expert and they will quickly tell you that Scottie Pippen was one of the 25-30 greatest players of all-time.

    Posted By: Anonymous (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 08:48 PM

     
     
    Q1: FACT! Look, Sheamus is pretty OVER now. He's also not nearly as green as he was during his first title push. But the ONLY way he makes sense in a WWE Title match at WrestleMania. The same can't be said for Jericho (the wheels are already in motion for the long rumored CM Punk WrestleMania program). The same can't be said for Orton (if McMahonagement decides to take the belt off Daniel Bryan at Elimination Chamber, it's going to Orton). But as an upper carder, Sheamus NEEDED the Rumble win to logically insert himself in a WrestleMania Main Event.

    Q2: FICTION. Mark my words, AT LEAST one of the belts is changing hands at Elimination Chamber. Does McMahonagement hotshot Daniel Bryan's belt to Orton to set up a Triple Threat match at WrestleMania? Or does Johnny Ace SCREW CM Punk in a way that allows Jericho to win the belt, setting up the obvious WrestleMania rematch? Unless McMahonagement is building towards a gimmick match between Randy Orton and Wade Barrett to blow off a feud that has already run its course, Orton still needs a high profile WrestleMania match... so I'll go with Orton winning at Elimination Chamber and Daniel Bryan using his rematch clause to make it a Triple Threat.

    Q6: FACTION. Don't get me wrong, I fully expect Taker/Trip Part 3 to be a GREAT match, possibly even better than last year's. But it's been done already... TWICE. And much like Taker's back to back Mania series with HBK, I DO NOT BUY Trip as a REAL threat to The Streak. It's going to be a GREAT match, there are going to be some close false finishes, but at the end of the day Trip (like HBK before him) KNOWS there's more longterm value in preserving The Streak for a younger up-and-coming Main Eventer who's still got SEVERAL good years left (read: Cena, Orton again or CM Punk). Therefore, the final outcome is NOT IN DOUBT, even if it's going to be a good ride getting there.


    Posted By: Guest#3902 (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 10:42 PM

     
     
    Taker vs Foley at wrestlemania pending the match could be really good also Foley never got a shot at wrestlemania

    Posted By: Guest#0172 (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 11:09 PM

     
     
    I'd love to have Taker/HHH on Mania again.

    Every card needs a badly booked match with nothing but plunder to make the rest of the matches look better.


    Posted By: objective (Guest)  on February 02, 2012 at 11:30 PM

     


  • www.41mania.com
    Copyright (c) 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
    Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
    Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.