The Piledriver Report 02.02.12: WrestleMania Unification
Posted by Ronny Sarnecky on 02.02.2012
The WWE shocked the world by having Sheamus win the Royal Rumble over favorites Chris Jericho and Randy Orton. Ronny Sarnecky takes a look at who the WWE should have made the surprise winner of the biggest battle royal of the year.
SHEAMUSTAKESONTHEWORLD
Surprise, surprise, surprise! Well, to me anyways. Leading up to the Royal Rumble, I felt it was a two team race as to who would headline WrestleMania, Chris Jericho or Randy Orton. Just as the NFL, or more specifically, the media that covers the NFL, felt it was a two team race for the NFC Championship Game. Most expected the New Orleans Saints vs. the Green Bay Packers for the right to go to the Super Bowl. Instead, we got a thrilling matchup where my New York Giants beat the San Francisco 49ers to headline the NFL's version of WrestleMania. While Chris Jericho did make it to the final two, the man left standing in his way, Sheamus, surprised me. After a thrilling mini-match between the two wrestlers, Sheamus eliminated Jericho, and his now headed to compete in a World title match at WrestleMania.
Looking back, I probably shouldn't have been surprised. After all, a lot of people were predicting Sheamus on wrestling message boards. It's not like these fans had any "inside" knowledge or anything. It's just that when so many people start to make a certain wrestler the dark horse, you need to take notice. Add this to the fact that Vince McMahon likes to throw a curveball when outcomes are too predictable, then it should have been pretty obvious that Chris Jericho and Randy Orton would not win the Rumble. Even so, it wasn't until Jericho and Sheamus were going toe to toe in a pretty even contest that I finally came to the realization that Sheamus was going to walk out of the Royal Rumble as the winner of the 25th Anniversary of the event.
This sets up the angle of "who will Sheamus take on at WrestleMania?" After last Monday night, it became pretty obvious that it will not be CM Punk. Following Chris Jericho's attack on CM Punk during the champion's match against Daniel Bryan, it appears that the WWE is still going to stick with Punk vs. Jericho at WrestleMania. That's a good thing, as I believe the two can have a terrific match on the grandest stage of them all.
Despite the fact that we should be getting a Jericho/Punk match for the WWE World title, I was hoping for something different. For the longest time, I was hoping for Jericho/Punk at WrestleMania. I am going to WrestleMania this year, so I want the best card possible, especially since I had to turn down Super Bowl tickets this year because I have been giving Vince McMahon a ton of money lately. I want this year's WrestleMania to be at or near the level of WrestleMania X-Seven, arguably the greatest WrestleMania of all time.
When I started to hear Rumblings of the WWE switching up their main matches, I was getting nervous. As much as I think Chris Jericho versus the Undertaker would be worthy of being a WrestleMania match, I do not want to see CM Punk vs. Triple H. I'm not saying that they would have a bad match. However, I saw them fight on the Night of Champions pay per view, and I don't think a match between them two at this point in time would be special enough for WrestleMania.
MYSURPRISEWINNERTOHEADLINEWRESTLEMANIA
As the Royal Rumble match was going on, about three quarters of the way through the match, I started getting a thought. I was hoping that the #30 entrant would be the World Heavyweight Champion, Daniel Bryan, and that he would win the battle royal to take on CM Punk in a title unification match. This isn't a Ring of Honor fan boy thing. I haven't watched ROH in years, and when I did follow it, I was more of a casual fan than a diehard. There are three reasons why I wanted to see a CM Punk/Daniel Bryan title unification match at WrestleMania.
CHAMPIONVS.CHAMPION
I am a mark for Champion vs. Champion matches. I remember watching the WWF in the mid/late-eighties, and it seemed that every February the WWF presented World Champion vs. Intercontinental Championship bouts. Even if just the World title was at stake, I couldn't wait to see these contests. The first of these matches that I remembered was Hulk Hogan vs. Randy Savage. I was always a Randy Savage fan, and his first series of matches against the Hulkster were awesome. I few weeks before they were scheduled to fight in a lumberjack match at Madison Square Garden, Savage beat Tito Santana in Boston for the Intercontinental title. This made their lumberjack match even more special for me.
In 1988, Hogan fought the Honky Tonk Man at the Meadowlands Arena. It was the first of two wrestling events that I attended with my dad. He was a Hogan fan, and I rooted for the heels. This would be the first show that I ever attended where I would not only see Hulk Hogan, but also the World Wrestling Federation title. I was so mad when Hogan dropped the title to Andre about a week before that show. Gone was champion vs. champion. Gone was seeing the WWF World belt. At least I got to see Hogan during his peak. I will always remember this night, and will always argue with people who try to say that Steve Austin or The Rock were more popular than Hogan. I wasn't a Hogan fan until his 2002 WWE run. However, I immediately recognized back on that February night in 1988 that Hulk Hogan was the most popular wrestler in the history of the business. I still stand by that claim today.
In 1989, the WWF gave us the Ultimate Warrior against Randy Savage in the Garden. This match took place shortly after the "Macho Man's" heel turn against Hogan. When the match was first announced, both the Warrior and Savage were faces, plus they were the top two champions in the company. I couldn't wait to see this match, which I did courtesy of the MSG Television Network, who used to air all of the monthly WWF MSG house shows (man, do I miss those days). The match was really good, and you got a glimpse of what the two would later do in the classic feud less than a year later.
Finally, you had the ultimate champion vs. champion match in 1990 when the Intercontinental Champion the Ultimate Warrior took on the WWF World Champion Hulk Hogan in the main event at WrestleMania VI. It was probably the greatest match the Ultimate Warrior had in his career after his Mania VII match against Randy Savage. Unlike the previous matches that I talked about this match was for BOTH belts this was a true champion vs. champion match. The Hogan/Warrior match will go down as one of the most epic moments in WrestleMania history.
Since 1990, there have been other champion vs. champion matches in the WWF. Shawn Michaels vs. Bret Hart, Ric Flair (with the WCW belt) vs. Hulk Hogan, amongst several other quality match-ups. However, for me, nothing will beat that era between 1986-1990 in regards to champion vs. champion encounters.
This past Monday, the WWE gave us Daniel Bryan vs. CM Punk in the latest champion vs. champion contest. WOW!!!! What a great little television match between the two. Can you imagine what kind of match they would be able to have at WrestleMania, where they are given twenty-five to thirty minutes with the added drama that the two belts being unified? The WWE would be getting ready for an instant classic. It would probably be the greatest WrestleMania match in the last fifteen years that did not include Shawn Michaels. Don't get me wrong, I think CM Punk and Chris Jericho have a chance to have one hell of a match and steal the show. While that's a great thing, and I'm glad that I'll be there to witness the match, I just think that Daniel Bryan vs. CM Punk would be amongst the best of all-time.
BYE-BYEBRANDSPLIT
The final reason why I would like to have seen a Daniel Bryan/CM Punk title unification match at WrestleMania is because I hate the brand split. If anything was taught to us during the Royal Rumble is that the WWE current lacks depth in the talent department. In 2001, when the WWE was loaded with former ECW and WCW to go along with their current crop of WWE wrestlers, the brand split made sense. You needed the company split in order to give everyone enough television time. Slowly, the brand split has become a "brand split" in name only. SmackDown! wrestlers frequent RAW and vice versa. The only reason that you know that there still is a brand split is because of the "Bragging Rights" pay per view, and that there are two separate sets of singles champions.
I think it is time to finally end the brand split. If the WWE still wants two brands, then they should at the very least unify the two World titles, and the two secondary titles. I believe the biggest negative to come out of the brand split is that the titles have become watered down. When the World title changes hands, if it is the new champion's first run with the belt, there is still something special about the moment you hear the words, "and new World Champion……………………." However, once a guy like John Cena or Randy Orton wins his third World title in the last year, it will draw a pop from the live crowd, but the momentum of the title switch doesn't last.
The secondary titles are even more meaningless. When a wrestler won the Intercontinental championship, he was looked at as the #2 wrestler in the company. When a performer held the Intercontinental title for the most part, you knew that it was a stepping stone to be used for an eventually main event World title run. In today's WWE, the United States and Intercontinental championships are nothing more than mid-card titles. Sure, occasionally, someone like Daniel Bryan and Dolph Ziggler will hold those titles, and you know that it is only a matter of time before they would break through to the main events. However, for the most part, these are belts used to keep the mid-card talent busy.
Unfortunately, it's very obvious that this is not the direction that the WWE is going. Instead, Jericho will take on Punk. That would leave Sheamus to battle Bryan. It's funny to see that sentence. I remember watching WrestleMania last year, and one of the most anticipated matches for me was the Sheamus/Bryan United States Championship match. I couldn't believe that a title match would be relegated to a dark match. A dark match for a championship match is ridiculous to even think about, especially won that had the potential to be one of the better WrestleMania matches. To have them face each other a year later in a World title match is mind boggling. I would have never predicted this after last year's WrestleMania. Of course, there is one monkey wrench that could be thrown into the mix.
COULDTHEVIPERSLIPIN?
That would be Randy Orton. Does the WWE have enough confidence in Daniel Bryan that they would have him participate in one of the top WrestleMania matches? The run that he has been on the last couple of months would tell me that if they did not believe in him, the WWE should believe in him now. He is showing people that he isn't just a great worker in the ring, but a great performer outside of it as well. Is he the main event staple that Randy Orton is? Of course not, but he hasn't been given the opportunity either. There is still the Elimination Chamber pay per view left to take place, and Randy Orton could easily win the World title on that night. This would either create a Randy Orton/Sheamus World title bout at WrestleMania, or a Triple Threat match featuring Bryan/Orton/Sheamus. I hope that's not the route they go, because with the exception of a few, I'm not a big fan of Triple Threat matches. Plus, the Royal Rumble winner should be put in a one on one match at WrestleMania, despite the greatness that was the Shawn/Triple H/Benoit WrestleMania XX classic.
This all comes down to whether the company has faith in Daniel Bryan as a top star. Even if they do not, this pay per view isn't going to live or die on Daniel Bryan's drawing power in a World title match. That honor goes to John Cena vs. The Rock. The WWE can take a chance on Daniel Bryan, like they did with The Miz last year. The WWE isn't going to give me the Punk/Bryan unification match at WrestleMania. Instead, we have CM Punk vs. Chris Jericho and (hopefully) Daniel Bryan vs. Sheamus. Not too shabby, let's hope it stays that way.
I agree with you completely there. A unification match between Punk and Bryan would be epic and it is about time they ended the brand split and gave the titles more credibility by unifying them. By having people from Raw on Smackdown and vice versa they're already proving that a brand split isn't needed anymore anyway.
Personally I'd keep the Heavyweight title because it's prestige is way bigger and the WWE title looks like shit and has needed replacing for years now. I'd also keep the Intercontinental title aswell because again it has prestige, way more than the US title which is an afterthought now they've taken it from Ryder. They've already done it with the tag titles and womens titles so why not the rest?
Also I'd have the Intercontinental champion defending much more and really bring the belt up. Put it on a guy just outside of the main event, make MITB matches for the IC title aswell to show how much it means to people. Cody Rhodes has done a great job but the only way to really elevate it fully is to ditch the US and WWE titles and truly make it the number 2 belt in the company, whilst also playing off the classic champions from the past who have held it.
Posted By: Col (Guest) on February 02, 2012 at 08:37 AM
While I understand the logic behind it, do you think that if the WWE officially eliminated the brand split that both shows would become anything other than the Orton/Cena shows? Or that wrestlers like Punk and Bryan would have even been given a world title run if there was only one title to fight for?
Posted By: Michael L (Guest) on February 02, 2012 at 08:41 AM
I agree with Bryan vs Sheamus last year. I was pissed when that match didn't happen. they were too rushed and last year's mania was hurt by that match not being on there and too little time for all the other matches that were important and not the main events. however instead of ending the brand split they really need to reinforce it. I miss seeing the two shows try and show who was better by putting on the better show. plus raw vs sd matches at mania for dominance, and survivor series teams. those were great little storylines that were no brainers. they do need to do something with it though.
Posted By: the mecca (Guest) on February 02, 2012 at 09:55 AM
My only problem with this idea is that a champ vs. champ, title unification match deserves to headline Wrestlemania. We all know the real main event is Cena vs. Rock. A title unification match should feel epic and should not play second fiddle to anything else on the card.
Although Punk/Bryan was a good match on Raw, I was pissed off that they gave it away with no build and in the middle of the card--not even the main event slot! I know that the match had a DQ ending and they can set a rematch up later if they want. But still...a match between the two world champions should be a bigger deal than it was.
Posted By: JDW (Guest) on February 02, 2012 at 10:11 AM
I don't see why they can't have a title that is like something along the lines of "champion of champions".
The World and E titles remain the same but it would be like the super bowl, once a year (or every 6 months whatever you like) the two champions face of for that particular title and "bragging rights".
Posted By: fuzzy (Guest) on February 02, 2012 at 10:12 AM
Ending the brand split is incredibly short-sighted. The WWE doesn't lack depth. It lacks proper pushes for talent.
Not to mention the fact that with no one forced to spend the majority of their time on one brand or another, that opens the door for the bulk of the roster to not get any air time. You end the split and you effectively need to hand at least a dozen guys their walking papers.
How does the split have anything to do with the number of title reigns guys have? The reigns are watered down because of too many month long title reigns. Miz's first reign was still great. Del Rio's would have been pretty good if he didn't drop it to Cena for a month. Neither of those situations have anything to do with the fact that the World title still exists. It's because of hot shot which are always a problem. That's why the WCW title became a joke. And guess what? They only had one title.
What about all of the people who have benefited from the split. JBL? Miz? Punk? Henry? Your boy Bryan NOW? Batista and Cena being allowed to rise simultaneously? A lot of guys wouldn't have gotten the chances they didn't without the split.
The midcard titles? Rhodes and Ziggler dominated them this last year. Rey and Jericho had a great IC title feud. Miz and Bryan did the same with the U.S. title. That's not "occasionally." That's a selective memory. Those titles aren't meaningless.
Unfortunately, this column is a shining example of today's fan who wants immediate gratification and can't think in the long term scope.
Posted By: Ron Mexico (Guest) on February 02, 2012 at 10:25 AM
Any potential unification wouldn't include Daniel Bryan in the match. Orton/Cena would be the most likely scenario. Punk would be an outside shot. In a year you might be able to add Sheamus to that list.
They're not going to do something that big and not attach the biggest names to it.
Posted By: Carl (Guest) on February 02, 2012 at 10:37 AM
I agree with Ron Mexico.
Create stars*, each brand can stand on its own, and each set of titles becomes relevant. That's the ideal situation.
*This may mean increasing the size of each roster significantly or revival of no-name squash matches. And if not no-name jobbers, just use whoever is floating around NXT these days.
Posted By: Guest#7645 (Guest) on February 02, 2012 at 11:06 AM
With all due respect, how is ending the brand split (it pretty much has been ended for the better part of 4 years now anyway) when the brands split a decade ago? We have 10 years to look back and evaluate. Overall, I would say it is an epic failure. The problem with it is guys like Sheamus or Bryan or Swagger, win the world titles, but they aren't any more over now than they otherwise would have without the titles. You want to make Sheamus a star, you put him on the biggest show of the year and you unify the titles. They should have a Vengeance 2001 style 4 man mini tournament. MAYBE the added attraction of people watching SPECIFICALLY because of Rock, will come back to the product. They left because the product started to suck. There have been some nice moments over the past 5-6 years but nothing that makes you stand up and take notice like we all did when Austin 3:16 happened, or the nWo, or Shawn and Undertaker tearing the house down in creative matches like hell in a cell. Titles don't make the man. The man makes the titles. You don't have to take my word for it, Shawn Michaels said it in his book. Ric Flair isn't considered one of the greatest of all time because he won a title. He was a great character that got himself over by being creative. He made the world title that much more important because of it. The world titles are far less important now. Think about it, the last few years, more people clamor for WrestleMania to see who will face the Undertaker than care about who is in the title matches. You need ONE world championship, and put the right guy in place to put some prestige and importance into that title, because sooner or later, Undertaker isn't going to be around to be the main attraction for your biggest show of the year for much longer. Rock isn't going to ever be a full time wrestler anymore and come back to main event your biggest show of the year every year.
Posted By: gwpbrian (Guest) on February 02, 2012 at 11:13 AM
>>Any potential unification wouldn't include Daniel Bryan in the match. Orton/Cena would be the most likely scenario. Punk would be an outside shot. In a year you might be able to add Sheamus to that list.
They're not going to do something that big and not attach the biggest names to it.
Posted By: Guest#9664 (Guest) on February 02, 2012 at 11:24 AM
Obviously no title match will headline Wrestlemania. Rock v. Cena is the real main event. I love Daniel Bryans character but I honestly dont think Daniel Bryan deserves to headline Wrestlemania in a unification match. WM should be about firsts... I'd rather see Orton vs. Bryan and Sheamus vs. Punk, because those matched havent happened a hundred times. I understand Punk vs. Jericho may have happened only a hand full of times but I've watched Jericho for over 15 years now and I'm still not buying it,they should have struck while the iron was hot in 2000 with his fluke world title win. In his last WM main event with Edge was a joke, dead crowd. Lets give the crowd something different, I want to watch Wrestlemania to see something NEW and fresh, not the same fueds they had a year ago.
Posted By: Derek (Guest) on February 02, 2012 at 12:48 PM
I would have went with Ricardo Rodriguez. Have him pull a Santino from last year but actually win it. He could then be forced to give up his Mania match to Alberto Del Rio.
Posted By: Crowley (Guest) on February 02, 2012 at 03:31 PM
Well, shit. Now the thought of a Daniel Bryan vs. CM Punk Title Unification Match at Wrestlemania will leave me hopelessly disappointed in whatever actually does happen; regardless how how good Jericho/Punk may be.
That said, a Sheamus/Bryan World Title match could have a good build around the fact that they were snubbed from the main card last year.
Posted By: dime138 (Registered) on February 02, 2012 at 07:28 PM
i want see Punk/Dragon in an Iron Man Match
Posted By: Guest#5487 (Guest) on February 02, 2012 at 08:02 PM
I completely agree on what you had to say about the US Title match at WM last year. There was no reason for that match to be a dark match. WWE's time management of WM 27 was inexcusable.
They had probably close to 40 minutes worth of video packages. If they would have trimmed just 10 minutes off that they could have crammed in the US Title match.
If they would have cut 5 minutes of Triple H and the Undertaker lying around in the ring doing nothing they could have given the US Title match a little more time.
If they would have cut 5 more minutes off of the Undertaker lying dead in the ring after the match they could have given some of that time to the six person tag or the eight man tag (both of which were under five minutes in length).
If they would have cut 5 minutes off of the Rock’s 20 minute opening promo and cut at least 5 minutes off of the awful Cole vs. Lawler match (the match itself went nearly 15 minutes and was given more time than Edge vs. Del Rio, Rhodes vs. Mysterio, the six person tag or the eight man tag) and the endless beer drinking celebration after it, they could have given the time to flesh out any of the aforementioned matches, or they could have, you know, added another match to the card.
I hope they manage their time a bit better this year, but after the at least half an hour’s worth of Cena and Rock videos and other commercials aired during the Royal Rumble I won’t hold my breath.
Posted By: John (Guest) on February 02, 2012 at 10:59 PM
Why would you root for the heels as a kid? your own father rooted for the faces!
Posted By: Guest#6513 (Guest) on February 02, 2012 at 11:44 PM
The main reason that they won't end the brand split is because of the ability to run 2 sets of house shows.
Posted By: Guest#9070 (Guest) on February 03, 2012 at 10:52 AM
I really hope Orton doesnt slip in. The fact that Bryan/Sheamus were completely left off last years show is more than enough to build off of. They dont need to throw Orton into the mix at all
Posted By: Guest#3166 (Guest) on February 03, 2012 at 11:32 AM
The WWE shocked the world by having Sheamus win the Royal Rumble over favorites Chris Jericho and Randy Orton.
Correction...Disappointed the world
Posted By: Guest#5178 (Guest) on February 03, 2012 at 06:50 PM
Copyright (c) 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.