www.411mania.com
|  News |  Columns |  TV Reports |  Video Reviews |  Title History |  Hall of Fame |  News Report |  The Dunn List |
SPOTLIGHTS  SPOTLIGHTS
MOVIES/TV
// Irina Shayk Shows Off Her Killer Curves At Cannes
MUSIC
// Kanye West and Jay-Z's Watch the Throne 2 Confirmed
WRESTLING
// Brooke Hogan Says Hulk Didn't Know She Was in Talks With TNA
POLITICS
// Obama Leads In Florida, Ohio, & VIrginia
MMA
// 411's MMA Roundtable - UFC 146: Dos Santos vs. Mir
GAMES
// Castlevania: Lords of Shadow Sequel Teased


 HOT TOPICS
//  CM Punk
//  John Cena
//  Triple H
//  Hulk Hogan
//  Randy Orton
//  Christian
SYNDICATE  SYNDICATE



411mania RSS Feeds





Follow 411mania on Twitter!




Add 411 On Facebook
 



 
 411mania » Wrestling » Columns



Advertisement
The Wrestling Sandwich 02.11.12
Posted by Wes Kirk on 02.11.2012





If you expected anything to actually be posted in the responses regarding the supposed "Wes is wrong on global warming" you're going to be sorely disappointed. The science is settled, there is a consensus now among respected scientific figures that there is no global warming...HA! How do you guys like it? Oh, you guys really do give me a good laugh every week I must say that. To actually call God a hoax and made up and then worship charts that show a miniscule little increase in temperature over a twenty year period that has since dropped claiming humans are causing it is just as delusional as you think I am. I don't buy stupidity and alarmism, if you guys want to that is your call but I'm not stupid enough to be swept into this farce. I checked studies by scientists that actually worked in climate (imagine that? Climate scientists discussing climate instead of geologists or geophysics professors!) And the evidence points to a Medieval Warming Period that had the same or greater warming over 500 years ago without any industrial machines to expel CO2 into the atmosphere. Some of you used my graph to try and prove there was warming, which shows how stupid you really are because there was one specific part of the graph that you should have paid attention to more than anything: The CO2.



Specifically look at the section around 1991 to 1995, then compare that to the section from 1999 to 2001. Do you notice anything? You should notice that CO2 is going up and the temperature...is going down. The basis of the AGW theory is that CO2 is CAUSING global warming, but if that were true the temperatures would continue to rise if the CO2 level rose. If you observe the 1991-1995 section you can see CO2 concentration around 355 parts per million and yet the temperature did not rise. At 390 ppm right now, you can see that the temperature is currently around 0.2C above normal and headed downward. The last fifteen years show a DOWNWARD trend, not an upward trend, and if your theory was correct the temperature should be over 1C right now because CO2 has only increased and not decreased. Oh, did I ruin your fantasy world with some facts? Here's more:

No Need To Panic Over Global Warming

Impressive scientific credentials, including the founder of the International Journal of Forecasting. Who do you idiots have, Al Gore and a few twits on the take from East Anglia? What a stupid belief to have!

Speaking of stupidity, your chance to actually be in the next edition of the Wrestling Sandwich is next week. I told you all I'd go over what you need to do in our Great Guest Experiment so here's what is going to happen and I suggest you follow along if capable:

- Your deadline is Thursday night at 11:59 PM EST in the comments section. You will have from the Impact ratings release on Friday until after Impact on Thursday to send in comments on the following:

Top news and reactions to that news from the past week
Your choice for Smartest and Dumbest things of the week
Your pick for Wrestler and Babe to watch (I'll provide the pretty pictures)
Your reviews/analysis of Smackdown, RAW, and Impact

And that's all you need to do. You have 2800 characters per comment box, if you require more then post more. If there is a considerable lack of participation I reserve the right to have my column be anything I want it to be and that means anything! So it is on your head and if you don't step up and show you can offer something, not only will the column be proof you guys suck but it'll also be on your head forever that I was right all along about my naysayers. Whatever you post will be reviewed by a special panel of three 411 writers that will evaluate your work like you do ours every day. Yeah, I'm looking very forward to this!






Top Stories of the Week!

1. Weekly Ratings Roundup

TNA Impact Wrestling - 1.1, 1.6 million viewers (slightly down from last week)
WWE Smackdown - 2.1, 3.1 million viewers (slightly up from last week)
WWE RAW - 3.2, 4.6 million viewers average: Hour 1 4.8 million Hour 2 4.4 million (significantly down from last week)

RAW plunges back to reality would be the headline I'd take away from those numbers. Impact stayed as steady as it usually is although it lost a slight number of viewers, Smackdown lost a slight number of viewers as well but it was RAW that was the major story this week. Over 400,000 people stopped watching the second hour of RAW which has got to be a very big disappointment considering the main event involved the six people in the Elimination Chamber and people didn't even stick around to see if John Cena would be on the show! This is not a very good sign, especially considering how close we are to WrestleMania, that RAW continues to post mediocre numbers with losing viewership in the second hour but we'll keep an eye on things.

PPV UPDATE:

Survivor Series has apparently been lowered from the original forecast of buyrates significantly. As you may already know, the original buyrate reported was 300,000 buys. Afterwards, 280,000 buys were being discussed but now apparently the new number that has been talked about as official is only 260,000 buys! This, if true, makes it only 16,000 buys higher than last year's Survivor Series event.

The reason this is significant is that if The Rock doesn't bounce ratings enough there could be a good chance that WrestleMania does NOT break one million buys this year despite the Cena/Rock main event match. Anything under a million buys MUST be considered a complete disappointment by WWE considering the promotion and preparation they are putting into the show. Oh, and who is being blamed for this? For some reason, The Miz. Yeah, it can't possibly be people getting sick of the same old crap every week can it Vince? We'll find out in late February if this number holds or maybe even gets lower!

WWE YouTube Numbers:

Overall Subscribers to the channel: 378,803 (as of Feb 6th)
Overall Subscribers as of the morning of Feb 10th: 371,036

Shows (as of the morning of Feb 10th):

Are You Serious? 171,577 views
Backstage Fallout 105,819 views for RAW, 39,193 views for Smackdown
Z! True Long Island Story 123,942 viewers
Dolph Ziggler's debut edition of WWE Download - 134,332 views
Edition #2: 34,467
Santino's Foreign Exchange original episode - 157,626 views
Outside The Ring original episode featuring the Usos - 142,125 views
WWE Inbox Original Episode - 136,197 views
Edition #2: 92,605
WWE NXT - No show has broken 10,000 views as of yet
WWE Monday Night RAW - No clip has broken 100,000 views as of yet
WWE Smackdown - No clip has broken 100,000 views as of yet
Superstar Toyz - 28,629 views
NASCAR Carl Edwards and John Cena clip - 5,325 views

If I were WWE, I'd be a bit concerned that the channel has under 500,000 subscribers and that the numbers for their videos seem to top off around 160,000 views, and remember view just means who clicks the video and doesn't identify unique visitors. With most of this going to the WWE Network in the fall, the fact is it doesn't seem to be getting a lot of interest considering YouTube videos generally get hundreds of thousands of hits if anything is reasonably good enough to catch attention. Some of the most famous videos have gotten tens of millions of hits, and WWE is right now looking at what may very well be the WWE Network numbers for these same shows. Also of note is that WWE has LOST several thousand subscribers between Feb 6th and Feb 10th and the second editions of the shows are on average drawing lower than the debut edition.

WWE has around 250 million views from fans, but that is combining every video ever uploaded on that channel and is a misleading number since the actual videos themselves are proving to be fewer than 160,000 views in general. YouTube is free and customers can access it anytime, as well as the fact WWE's channel has no region restrictions, so these are actually WORLD NUMBERS and not American numbers. I compared this to some of TNA's recent postings:

TNA Wrestling Channel - 180,156 subscribers
TNA Wrestling Video Views - 394,285,944 (that is not a typo)

Well, who woulda figured that one out?

Also, TNA has broken the 100,000 and 200,000 views mark already! Most of the TNA Impact clips have reached a healthy five figure amount, and some of the post shows and one and a half minute footage clips from the PPV's are as good or better than the RAW, Smackdown, and NXT viewings!

Frankly I am a little stumped. Why did Bobby Lashley's return to wrestling on TNA get over 1.7 MILLION hits? Why did Awesome Kong's title win get over FIVE MILLION hits? Velvet Sky and Angelina Love reuniting gained 2.3 million hits? To me this indicates that people actually give a damn about what happens on Impact and if they miss it, they watch it on YouTube or even if they watch it they sometimes relive it on YouTube. Honestly, I started this experiment off doubtful TNA's channel would have comparable numbers but it is pretty amazing how well they are doing. TNA should hit 400 million views within next week if the current numbers hold up.



2. TNA Impact Quick Recap

1. Christopher Daniels defeated AJ Styles with a pair of brass knuckles ***
2. Alex Shelley defeated Douglas Williams and Austin Aries with the Shiranui/Sliced Bread #2 on Aries ***
3. Velvet Sky defeated Mickie James with an inside cradle **1/2
4. Sting and James Storm defeated Bobby Roode and Bully Ray when Sting forced Roode to submit to the Scorpion Deathlock ***1/4

Best Booking of the Show: The Champ Shows He Can Be Defeated

Worst Booking of the Show: Not putting in a third girl to work with Mickie and Velvet

Another good night of wrestling as we saw four matches with three of them hitting at least three stars and the other one still good enough to outdo pretty much every Divas match of the last five years.

The Star Wars "theme" was simply promoting the movie and the prizes you could win on the bottom of the screen along with a Star Wars movie splicing with the Bischoff family saga, so it was kept limited and effective. Also of note was the production for the U.K tour video, which was absolutely on point. They didn't have any "plastic light saber death matches" or anything of the like and kept the thing focused on wrestling and promoted the 3D version of the movie here and there but not enough to be massively annoying.

Daniels takes a victory but AJ Styles may have the last laugh as he gets Kazarian in the ring Sunday and may finally get to sort everything out or at least beat the shit out of him. Shelley showed once again why he belongs as a top X-Division wrestler with Aries and Williams in a very fun match and Velvet... I must preface this by saying that woman is beyond gorgeous and looked especially delicious tonight, and although she isn't able to wrestle the same style as Mickie or Gail she did a better than WWE Diva job. Also, her ass is out of this world.

The main event surrounded our fatal fourway for the world title with Sting, who will be the guest enforcer referee, tagging with Storm to face Ray and Roode. Sting finished the tag team match despite damaging his heel and getting a victory, which is the mark of a true legend in the business, that kept on going no matter what. Obviously with Bully Ray no longer protecting Roode, things are not looking good at all for the champion come Sunday night. Also, Ray really is upping his game on those "little things" and making a lot of people look stupid for questioning him in the spot he is in now. NEW YORK CITY, BITCHES!

Impact and Against All Odds reviews coming next week!


3. WrestleMania Predictions

1. MAIN EVENT: The Rock vs. John Cena (confirmed)
2. MAIN EVENT #2: WWE Championship: CM Punk vs. Chris Jericho
3. MAIN EVENT #3: World Championship: Daniel Bryan vs. Sheamus
4. MAIN EVENT #4: Streak vs. Career (maybe?): Undertaker vs. HHH part III
5. Diva's Championship: Beth Phoenix vs. Kharma
6. IC Championship: Cody Rhodes vs. Goldust/Dustin Rhodes
7. Money In The Bank match likely featuring Kofi Kingston, Justin Gabriel, Wade Barrett, Dolph Ziggler, and potentially Big Show, Kane, and Ted Dibiase

Nothing really changing from last week, as we now know UT/HHH is pretty much being set in stone but the major question will be what, if anything, will HHH put on the line? Also, how will Shawn Michaels figure in or will he even be a factor in the storyline? Jericho and Punk are already beginning their feud, Bryan still has to get some unfinished business behind him before Sheamus can make his challenge in the Elimination Chamber, Beth Phoenix seems to be laying the groundwork for her fight as well with a likely defeat of Tamina followed by the challenge from Kharma. Nothing new with Cody and Goldust as of yet, and the idea of a Money in the Bank match still exists considering they have the PPV scrapped on their latest listing. I will, however, applaud the WWE for finally realizing that 13 or 14 PPV events a year is too much! Nothing wrong with cutting the price either for their fans, but I doubt they will do that!



4. More Did You Know? Lies!

On Monday Night RAW, the WWE claimed that they beat both NBC's Rock Center with Brian Williams and Fear Factor together. As usual it was a load of bullshit as shown thanks to the awesome TVByTheNumbers.com below:

Rock Center - 3.29 million viewers
Fear Factor - 3.98 million viewers
combined total: 7.27

RAW's last week total viewers: Average 5.2 million viewers from 5.3 first hour and 5.1 second hour/2.1 rating in 18-49 demographic

Top show two weeks ago on Monday Night? Pawn Stars - 7.1 million viewers/2.5 rating in 18-49 demographic

Somehow I doubt that will show up on the next Did You Know? segment.








Smartest Thing of the Week: Wrestling Matters Here

Impact Wrestling continues to be the real wrestling show as the mixture of newer faces and legendary icons put on matches that pretty much leave most WWE offerings in the dust week after week. One of the common complaints is that TNA didn't put on enough wrestling but lately they have put on some longer matches that rated highly although they did have a lot of videos this week, but it was the hard sell for the PPV! Good stuff from TNA and it shows that once again the critics are eating a lot of crow making doomsday predictions that never came true. TNA is dying my ass, if anything it has a second life!





Dumbest Thing of the Week: Wrestling Doesn't Matter Here!

Quite possibly the dumbest show of the week was again Monday Night RAW. I'm sorry, I'm just having a lot of difficulty figuring out the motives of a show in which the following happens:

- HHH said he was about to fire Laurinitas but yet the board of directors says they will postpone the decision and release it the next morning on WWE.COM instead of next week on RAW. By the way, he's staying.
- The Great Khali is given more than five seconds to showcase his "wrestling skills" and helped make Rhodes and Barrett look like idiots while again making Orton look good.
- David Otunga actually gets offense in against Sheamus and for some odd reason does a Tim Tebow mockery pose when Tebow hasn't been on Monday nights for three weeks.
- Eight Divas get around 50 seconds to basically do nothing but allow Tamina to pin a random Bella and even then, nobody even cares including the announcers. The match was so sloppy that Eve suffered a broken nose.
- Bryan and Show have ANOTHER inconclusive ending despite Bryan retaining at the Rumble and supposedly being done with this horrid feud. AJ also is having no favors done to her career with this angle.
- R-Truth nearly ends up paralyzed thanks to Miz forgetting how to catch a guy during a dive in a match so horrible that even the resident WWE mark didn't rate it five stars. The man would give Henry vs. Bastion Booger five stars!
- Where the hell is Brodus Clay? You've pushed him down our throats, are you finally accepting the fans aren't interested in the gimmick since Friday's match was edited out of the broadcast and he was nowhere to be found on RAW?

All I can say is if you enjoy subpar wrestling, horrible entertainment, and utterly trivial matches you'll love the next year of Monday Night RAW. I remember when people actually weren't embarrassed to admit they watched this show back in the 1990's but I feel bad for anybody saying they are a fan of wrestling and citing this show as an example of a wrestling program. Even WWE moved away from "professional wrestling" themselves, that should tell you something!




OLD SCHOOL WRESTLER OF THE WEEK

Wendi Richter

Wendi Richter was one of the most famous and important female personalities in the history of the WWF, and before Montreal she was the victim of the original backstage screwjob as well. What else did you not know about one of the most popular women's champions of all time? Let's find out!

Unsurprisingly, Richter was trained at the Fabulous Moolah's female wrestling school known as the Lillian Ellison School of Professional Wrestling like mostly every female wrestler was at the time and debuted in 1979. Moolah was basically the queen of women's wrestling in the older days and was able to use her influence to get women hired or fired in various parts of the country, and usually used them to get herself over as much as possible. Richter originally teamed with Moolah against the team of Velvet McIntyre and Princess Victoria for a few matches in the World Wide Wrestling Federation before going on to team with Joyce Grable, who helped train her as well and named themselves the Texas Cowgirls. They performed in a series of matches for Stampede Wrestling against McIntyre and Judy Martin as well, and the McIntyre-Richter feud would go on to Mid-South Wrestling where McIntyre would best Richter on two occasions. Richter and Grable feuded once again with Martin and McIntyre into the AWA as of April 1983 and then in May headed to Stampede Wrestling and also managed to pick up the NWA Women's Tag Team Championship on two occasions.

Richter returned to the WWF in late 1983 and soon teamed with Peggy Lee for rematches with McIntyre and Princess Victoria. She was mostly an unremarkable talent at the time but had no idea her world was about to change forever as an angle running in the company was Cyndi Lauper and Lou Albano feuding and at one point Lauper claimed she would be a better manager than Albano could ever be. Therefore, the current WWF Women's Champion Fabulous Moolah was teamed with Albano as her manager against Cyndi Lauper and her new protégé Wendi Richter! With the pop culture icon by her side, Richter took out Moolah to win the gold at The Brawl To End It All on July 23, 1984. The broadcast card in total had earned MTV their top ratings in history up to that year, and began the Rock'N'Wrestling Connection that combined the use of music in professional wrestling.

Richter lost the title to Moolah's new protégé Leilani Kai in early 1985 on the War to Settle The Score, but at WrestleMania she would regain the championship once again. Richter was animated for the Hulk Hogan Rock'N'Wrestling cartoon show, and she'd also be in Lauper's music video for "She Bop" and referred to herself in the ring as "150 pounds of twisted steel and sex appeal" as well. However, there was one massive problem in the form of Vincent Kennedy McMahon awaiting Richter in a situation that would set the stage for the Montreal Screwjob years later.

Richter was legitimately one of the most popular talents in the company, some considering her as the #2 face behind Hulk Hogan himself. Richter wanted a salary increase, and McMahon wasn't very keen on it and therefore Richter refused to sign a new contract on the current salary. McMahon brought in Moolah once again and had her backstage at an event when Wendi saw her and wondered why she was there, as she'd never shown up at events where she did not compete. This set the stage for what appeared to be a routine title defense at Madison Square Garden in the month of November of all things!

November 25, 1985 was the date of the Original Screwjob when Richter faced off with the masked Spider Lady in what was supposed to be a simple defense of the belt with an unknown female wrestler under a mask and bodysuit. During the encounter, the Spider Lady broke from the script and pinned Richter to the canvas while the referee counted three quickly even as Richter kicked out at one, as he was in on the plan as well. Richter continued to struggle and fight with the Spider Lady anyway, throwing shots and unmasking her to show it was Moolah! After the match was over, Richter stormed out of the arena still in her gear and booked a flight out of New York. She never spoke to Moolah again and she'd only speak to McMahon over twenty years later for her Hall of Fame appearance.

Richter found a career in the indy circuit, starting out in Puerto Rico and then Japan and finally the US in a stretch for the late 1980's that saw her become the WWC Women's Champion over Monster Ripper, perhaps better known as Rhonda Singh or Bertha Faye. Richter also popped in the AWA to face Madusa for the Women's Championship, and won it in December 1988 before losing it shortly thereafter. Richter wouldn't be seen much until 2005 when she rejoined the wrestling world as the tag team partner with Bambi, Malia Hosaka, and Jenny Taylor to face Sherri Martel, Peggy Lee Leather, Krissy Vaine, and Amber O'Neal. She'd also appear in a six-person tag match the same year in August.

Wendi was understandably pissed off about the situation with the WWF and retired from the in-ring competition in 1988. She did a shoot interview in 2005 during her reappearances to express hatred at the portrayal of females in the current WWE product and said she was still hurt over the screwjob that McMahon had foisted upon her. She was contacted in February 2009 to take part in the Divas battle royal but declined, and Santino Marella would later win that match in drag proving she was one smart cookie. The 2010 Hall of Fame would see Richter finally inducted by none other than former foe "Rowdy" Roddy Piper and discussed how the Divas thanked her for her work in the company that would lead to their division years later. She appeared at WWE Axxess as well and signed autographs in the WWE Legends section for her fans. For a long time, Wendi was married to famous ex-wrestler and Spanish announcer Hugo Savinovich!

My Memories

I would see Wendi's matches mostly on replays and older events as they surfaced and of course I'd watch her in the Hulk Hogan cartoon but due to the timeline of her exit I never got to see her perform in the ring during her WWF career. I remember that she was talked about as one of the biggest names in wrestling at the time, and frankly when I first heard about her being screwed because she wanted more money I was pretty appalled. McMahon really should have emptied a little more money in her account considering how much she actually meant not only for women's wrestling but the entire wrestling industry and the crossover with MTV. It was this change that helped add music for all the wrestlers as they came to the ring, such as "Girls Just Wanna Have Fun" for Richter herself and "Born In The U.S.A" for the US Express. Later on more songs would come such as "Demolition" by Rick Derringer as well as "Real American" and Robbie Dupree's famous "Girls in Cars" song for Strike Force that for some reason a few Internet sites claim was Andre The Giant's theme music... how stupid is that?

Richter definitely has a legitimate dispute and deserved an increase in salary, but back then most females weren't even good looking that got in the ring. Today we see hot half-naked models competing in the ring for a few minutes but in the 1970's and 1980's it was mostly very rugged women who had anything but a perfect physique getting in to compete. Wendi was one of the first attractive female wrestlers, and after she got over as well as she did we'd eventually see more beautiful women in the company like Miss Elizabeth as Randy Savage's manager and eventually we'd have a division in the 1990's based around girls like Sable. Although Wendi didn't have a very long stay in wrestling, her impact on the sport is felt to this day and perhaps she herself would agree it was better to end with a bang rather than a whimper. She may not win any records for longest time spent in the company but what little time she did spend was worth every penny and helped create the modern women's wrestler mold that we use today. Thank you Wendi!

And for all of you I have a nice treat. Here's the big title win as it happened in 1984! We'll be joining the match in progress so take it away Gorilla and Mean Gene Okerlund!





Take 5 is being renovated with some new designs so it will be back soon. Didn't help they purged all the pictures off the server last week right before I was about to post, but I came prepared! Always keep backups, kids. In lieu of putting up new pictures every week for match and promo I'm going to add some permanent fixtures instead so stay tuned!




The Good, The Bad, and The… WTF?

The Good

"How ironic, A real injury from a fake punch.

Posted By: Guest#2977 (Guest) on February 04, 2012 at 12:21 PM"

Isn't it? When you think about it, you really stop to think by that point this person should not be in a wrestling ring for a while.

"According to a report, the WWE has been culling potential Superstars in the making for the project, making a list of those they want involved and even already reaching out to a few. The series would focus solely on cruiserweights around the 200 pound range, a division that set World Championship Wrestling (WCW) apart from the then-WWF and helped establish its dominance during the beginning of the Monday Night Wars.

Wrestlers like Rey Mysterio, Eddie Guerrero, Dean Malenko and others welcomed fans and tore the roofs off of arenas, whetting the appetite of those in attendance while the main eventers like Hulk Hogan, Goldberg and Sting closed out the show. It's a tried and true formula the WWE, for some reason, hasn't stuck to, since they've banished almost every high-flyer minus Kofi Kingston and Evan Bourne -- although the latter is not too long for the WWE, methinks -- from Stamford.

Mr kirk what do you think about this?

Posted By: Guest#1087 (Guest) on February 03, 2012 at 11:32 PM"

I think all you need to do is look at the cruiserweight wrestling division in 2006. They had all their cruiserweights jobbing to a midget leprechaun who ended up becoming the Cruiserweight Champion and ended the division because he was, at the time, supposedly Vince's son and nobody wanted him getting hurt. That's how their entire division just up and died. The fact is nobody in the management section believes these cruiserweights are worth the majority of television time so expect it to fizzle out just like the last time. Should they put the cruiserweights on TV, well, you can see what they did to the Divas lately so expect the same treatment - short matches, dumb angles, and a lot of stupidity in general regarding how they are booked. In short, the outlook is very bad for any cruiserweight division beyond the first couple months, as Hornswoggle with the Cruiserweight title belt tells me this isn't going to be pretty.

"Could do without all the political and religious diatribe. Doesn't add anything

I agree about Jericho. They had one storyline heading into the Rumble which was Jericho predicting the end of the world and threw it away for the sake of a swerve. Sometimes surprises aren't the best alternative. They've done it for the last few years and it hurts the quality of the product and the superstars (i.e HHH not putting RVD, booker, Kane, Orton over, Del Rio winning the RR and then losing at WM 27)

I actually really like him, but Sheamus could have easily gone the EC route of becoming the number 1 contender, hell he's even on the all the marketing materials for the event.

Jericho and Punk are good enough to turn it around though, so I'm staying cautiously optimistic.

Posted By: Guest#1671 (Guest) on February 03, 2012 at 11:42 PM"

I'm trying not to inject too much religion and politics, just here and there when important news comes out like it did the night of the Rumble.

Some here say that Jericho is so established as a star he doesn't require the Rumble victory, which to an extent I agree with. However, Jericho has been with the WWE since 1999 and never won a Royal Rumble! He really did deserve it if this is his last year or last full year of competition.

Sheamus is a good enough competitor but let us not forget he's only in the WWE because of whom he worked out with and got a massive push thanks to that individual. Punk and Jericho also are not especially loved by the Son-In-Law-From-Hell so I wouldn't expect very much good to come out of 2012 for those two, especially since Punk is the current champion. Why be optimistic? This is the same company that screwed up the Nexus angle in 2010, screwed up the Summer of Punk in 2011, and screwed Jericho's return in 2012. In my view, they need to earn our optimism now.


"Yoyoyoyoyoyoy wurd up tuganomics I'm a white boy rappuh.
I guess you could consider me a Cena-hater. Then again, who could like a guy who acts like a white-boy rapper, actually does rap (badly, I should say) and has little to no wrestling ability, and has been pushed to glorious "exalted" status, as I call it, meaning he's the WWE champion for over a year nonstop, without losing it once, and ALWAYS in the main event of every PPV and TV show. If WCW were still around, Cena would not be big business for the WWE.

If you like untalented "wrestlers" who have really dirtpoor gimmicks and really bad mic skills, you'd probably like Cena. If you're not a Cena fan, you really won't care about his car collection or his house. And with only seven matches featured, you won't really feel satisfied with this, even if you are a Cena fan.

Posted By: Guest#5347 (Guest) on February 04, 2012 at 01:09 AM"

Yo yo yo Cena!

Cena is business right now for the kids, and that's wonderful for the WWE but the fact is he isn't drawing any new numbers and ratings are down for nine years and counting. If a billionaire backed a company like TNA to be the new WCW and put it on a channel people actually watch I'd agree that he'd probably be annihilated in competition, but at this point wrestling is no longer a very good investment.


"The Royal Rumble was garbage. For me it was more like a 1.0

Impact on the other hand now has two diehard new fans (just started airing down here)

Posted By: Fazz (Guest) on February 04, 2012 at 01:27 AM"

Wrestling matters here, Fazz! Glad to have you and your friend aboard.

"I know I asked you about this a few weeks ago, but I just don't see *As much as it pains me to say it* HHH losing to Taker for a 3rd time at the biggest show for WWE.

I just have a terrible sick feeling in my stomach that they'll do something stupid and have HBK help screw Taker over or something..and not only will I be pissed at that as a life long Taker fan, but I think Miami would shit on it.

My best case scenario would be to have HBK as the ref, so fans might possibly think that a screw job will happen. Shawn can get things over on emotion and every time Taker makes a pin, he can be hesitant to count his friend out.

At the end of a long battle, Taker hits maybe the..3rd? Tombstone and folds H's hands symbolicly over his chest and Shawn gives Taker a "Damn you" look before reluctantly counting the 3.

I hope I'm right on that one, but it's scaring me..

Posted By: Baboon (Guest) on February 04, 2012 at 01:50 AM"

Honestly, the one thing they have gotten right every year is Undertaker not losing the most famous PPV streak in history. If they do happen to go that route and have HHH take a victory, watch Miami lose it and boo the hell out of the show until the end. And if Rock loses after that I wouldn't want to be working customer services that night!

The Bad

"I would really like to meet you in real life Kirk. #SQWAINTHENUTS

Posted By: Seriously? (Guest) on February 04, 2012 at 05:31 AM"



VINTAGE.

"You've called Dolph Ziggler 'overrated' and 'not as goof as he thinks he is' a number of times now. What is it about him that ticks you off? Is it something to do with him or just how much everyone else goes on about how great he is?

Posted By: mr_wishart (Guest) on February 04, 2012 at 08:28 AM"

Honestly, it is just that he seems like he's trying way, way too hard to get over as a heel with athletic ability and frankly if the guy ties his shoes people are all over it saying how awesome he is. I get it, trends come and go and when they are around people think they are the greatest things ever but frankly watching Ziggler I see somebody who has tried very hard to emulate Curt "Mr. Perfect" Hennig and doesn't quite have that ability he thinks he does. I think he's good, but he bores the hell out of me and how anybody can think somebody with a chinlock AND a sleeper is going to be the top guy in the company someday is just beyond me. Perhaps WWE thinks the same, explaining why Kharma got to plant him in the mat at the Rumble!

"Interesting that Wes no longer comments on the UK TV ratings. This is presumably following comments that he was unaware of RAW being shown live in the uk (instead claiming that WWE "chose a lare night slot), was unaware that RAW is also repeated several times on tape delay during the week, and was unaware that the figures he'd quote for RAW were not the FINAL figures for the show (and only the live show, at that), as final figures aren't available for at least 12 days following broadcast.

Oddly I haven't seen Wes apologizing (as he claims he does when wrong)or posting correct figures.

Presumably this is an oversight and I'd like to invite Wes to admit he was wrong and apologize to those he annoyed - on a weekly basis- with his half-baked, ill-informed, and just plain wrong comments.

Or aren't you the man you claim you are?

Over to you, Mr Kirk.

Posted By: Titus (Guest) on February 04, 2012 at 08:36 AM"

First people complain when I post the UK numbers, then they complain when I don't post the numbers!

Okay here is the latest data I found on the subject:

Jan 22nd Impact - 204,000 viewers
Jan 16 RAW - 173,000 viewers
Jan 20 Smackdown - 163,000 viewers

Jan 8 Impact - 241,000 viewers
Jan 2 RAW - 74,000 viewers
Jan 6 Smackdown - 142,000 viewers

So what's the problem, the numbers are wrong? Odd, seems they are published all over the Internet exactly as I just described them to be. Get over it.


""The last time somebody not heavily involved with the company from day one won the Rumble was Rey Mysterio in 2006, prior to that it was Chris Benoit in 2004 and Lex Luger co-winning in 1994"

Bret Hart-stampede for 8 years
Shawn Michaels AWA 2+years
Stone Cold-WCW 4 years

not including Undertaker,HHH or Alberto

And people say you're not a real wrestling fan....

Posted By: Guest#6497 (Guest) on February 04, 2012 at 09:00 AM"

You have got to be kidding me.

Stampede and the WWF had a working relationship when both were still territories and Vince ended up buying them out. Before Bret Hart was on WWF TV nobody knew who the hell he was so no, that wouldn't count. Also, the fact his family OWNED Stampede wrestling and he still chose to go to the WWF shows his willingness to succeed somewhere else.

HBK was in the AWA for two years... so? By the end of the 1980's the AWA was on its last dying breath as WWF had killed it and raided all their stars. Again, HBK wasn't known nationally until the WWF pulled him and Marty in in 1987 and again in 1988.

Stone Cold was a mid-carder for WCW who didn't really do anything of significant note outside of his tag work with Brian Pillman and was fired because they said he'd never get over big time.

I'm talking about people who stepped into the wrestling world nationally for the first time with WWF/WWE. To try and argue with me about UT's short-lived WCW run or HHH's failed run or Alberto's work in a company half the world doesn't even know exists doesn't cut it. National exposure, not territorial.


"Massive LOL at Wes Kirk likening himself to Vince McMahon simply because he owns some low rent PC repair shop. Trust me numbnuts, your experience has ZERO relation to the kind of decisions required at corporate level, where millions of dollars are at stake. And you have the audacity to justify criticism of the as-yet-untested WWE Network - based on what? Because one time you made the risky business decision of opening a couple of hours longer on a Friday?

Internet pussy boy, you'd be in the mail room at Stamford.

Posted By: The GOAT (Guest) on February 04, 2012 at 09:46 AM"

ooo, we've got the crux of the problem right here kids.

It isn't that I own my very own store and land thanks to a good decision by well-off parents and the fact unlike Goat I can hold a job in a recession economy and actually get real money and not food stamps...

It isn't that I supposedly have no ability to judge the corporate level when I already run a corporation; small as it may be, and have to deal with the same types of documents and legal reports that WWE does...

It is the fact I have the "audacity" to deal with the WWE for their stupid ass decisions!

Yeah, I do Goat. I do. If it takes 5 years of Hollywood experience and a Harvard degree to pitch the idea of a midget being the boss' illegitimate son, think that losing gimmicks get wrestlers over, forget a storyline half way through it making a new one in the process, and approved Katie Vick and the WCW Invasion angle the way it went down then yes, I'm not the right guy for the job.

I'd never have made such stupid decisions. And the WWE Network is a stupid decision! As shown, YouTube's airing of those shows meant for WWE network is bombing big time. They don't even have one million subscribers to the new shows... and WWE Network will reach only 40 million homes according to their own press release. They were about to launch the network and then realized they had no programming director or enough new material to make it happen, and had to postpone it until November after paying millions for that horrible dubstep promo that looked like it was designed by an eighth-grade autistic child. You want to know the definition of stupid? Putting on a network with no idea what to put on it and no director of programming!

The mail room at Stamford? Dude, I wouldn't last one hour because good ideas, creativity, and being honest do not get you anywhere in WWE. You live your life making minimum wage and criticizing me for my supposed lack of knowledge about corporations but boy are you out of your league. Female farting gimmicks are "risky business decisions" involving millions of dollars at stake... Stuff your head back up your ass, it's getting lonely.


"The 2012 post-Rumble RAW was the second lowest in the last six years, with the lowest rating being the year before. Numbers don't lie, people do!

well i will start with this, as wes never seems to address what i say,or, more to the point cant answer it.

So the clutching of straws really has hit a new low here, because tis was the highest rated RAW in however long he no goes back years to try and knock the E :0)

Posted By: mozza1974 (Guest) on February 04, 2012 at 01:39 AM"

Yeah, it is really clutching at straws! The fact that another website bothered to compare six years of data and found WWE to have had the 2nd worst post-Rumble RAW number is not relevant at all. The fact that ratings have been in decline for over nine years is just desperation tactics. The fact that buyrates have plummeted is just a last gasp... yeah, you wouldn't be one of those people who crowed about how Bischoff was burying the X-Division last year would you? I'd hate to have your track record!


The WTF

"If you compare the ratings for the four last RAWs of 2011 to the four first of 2012, would you then be able to say that ratings are up? Honest question, because I don't have those numbers. But if said ratings are up, then Ace and Lawler are correct, no?

As you are very well aware of, it's all about perspective and promoting what one has. Because numbers do in fact, from time to time, lie.

Finally, and I've said this before: Why do you have to antagonize so much? I mean, it's great that you call out WWE, or other people/organizations/things, on their bullshit, but your condescending tone of writing is doing nothing but hurting your column.

Personally, I'm a WWE fan. I don't watch TNA - yet, but I still like this column (mostly), because it gives me more perspective on things, which I appreciate. But sometimes I want to click that close tab X when you go into your fullest bitch-and-moan-about-WWE-whilst-masturbate-to-all-that-is-TNA-mode.

Seriously, you're doing a hell of a job, but sometimes..............

Posted By: Candy Bottocks (Guest) on February 04, 2012 at 06:02 AM"

This goes in this particular category because of one thing: I posted the 2011 and 2012 first four weeks of RAW ratings IN THAT COLUMN showing 2011 ratings were higher than the first four 2012 RAW ratings, proving Ace and Lawler liars.

Why do I have to antagonize? Because when people outright lie and everybody is too stupid to even read the numbers proving it a lie right in front of their face what else am I supposed to do? I don't jack it to everything TNA does, but right now they are focusing a lot on wrestling while WWE is focusing on what comedy segment to throw Natalya in so she can make a few more farting sounds. Lovely product.













Why don't you Ask 411 Wrestling for your wrestling related matters?

Most of you agreed with me on not wanting to see All The Kings Men: HHH vs. UT III at WrestleMania, so maybe there is hope after all.

Our resident redneck Steve Cook provides you the inebriated wrestling lowdown in News From Cook's Corner and I finally figured out why he drinks as much as he does: He has to review WWE shows!

Check out our Canadian brethren with the always Buddyrific edition of The Wrestling News Experience and remember to look at the Injury Bug Bites section. Ouch, WWE!

Think you can do a better job than me? Your chance is in your hands with the Great Guest Experiment. Remember, little or no participation means I'll put whatever the hell I want in next week's edition so if you really think you have what it takes to write even a segment for an article, I'm giving you the chance. Three quick tips for you all:

1. Remember your deadline and always get your work in BY that number if not before it.
2. Spell and grammar check your work yourself or it'll be published AS-IS next week.
3. Be bold - Don't post the same old shit everybody else says! Be original and don't be afraid to be the only guy posting one side of an opinion. Just because it is popular doesn't make it true!

Carpe Diem!


Post Comment (52)  |  Email Wes Kirk  |  View Wes Kirk's 411 Profile

  Send To Friend  |    Stumble It!  |    Digg It!  | 



Please add your comment below.
If you are registered, you can login and post under your registered name. If not, you can post as a guest or register.

* Please note that 411 moderates all comments. Your comment will show up on the site after it has been approved by an editor.
 
Name : 
Comment : 
Remaining Characters : 
2800
 

Comments (52)

 
i am tired of wes kirk. and WM will do big numbers cause its WM.

Posted By: Guest#2489 (Guest)  on February 11, 2012 at 12:06 AM

 
 
WM28 will do fine.

Posted By: Guest#7388 (Guest)  on February 11, 2012 at 12:07 AM

 
 
no, a little of kirk goes a long way. i cant stand that guy..

Posted By: Guest#2495 (Guest)  on February 11, 2012 at 12:08 AM

 
 
Wes kirk is a stupid loser. and i bet this wont get posted cause its anti wes kirk..

Posted By: Guest#1443 (Guest)  on February 11, 2012 at 12:11 AM

 
 
The Rock owned on sportscenter tho. and i saw a tweet of his on sports center talking about lin..

Posted By: Guest#6834 (Guest)  on February 11, 2012 at 12:13 AM

 
 
Miz is so awful he is the reason two non WWE shows got canceled. miz = bad ratings and PPV buy rates..

Posted By: Guest#5974 (Guest)  on February 11, 2012 at 12:14 AM

 
 
I for one am sick and tired of the Obama administration blissfully driving this country into an abyss of debt!

And that is why I guarantee that by the end of my second administration, we will have a permanent base on the moon -- so rich white men like me can get as far away from.. those people.. as possible!


Posted By: Newtonian Grinchrich (Guest)  on February 11, 2012 at 12:21 AM

 
 
Column was better this week-less poliics. I agree with you on WWE-I think their ratings are going to start dropping noticeably soon. Especially when Rock leaves again.

Posted By: Guest#7045 (Guest)  on February 11, 2012 at 12:21 AM

 
 
The WWE channel does have some region restrictions. I can't watch neither RAW nor Smackdown, because i'm not in the USA. The newer webshows are available though.

Posted By: Cami (Guest)  on February 11, 2012 at 12:24 AM

 
 
I didn't say.. I didn't.. I did not say that I don't care about black people. I said.. I said I don't care about "blah" people.

And THEN I said something about gay marriage being like a piece of paper and buttsex with dogs, which is what liberals choose to do.

Each morning when I wake-up, I reaffirm my choice to not gargle another man's marbles.


Posted By: Richard "Dick" Frothman (Guest)  on February 11, 2012 at 12:24 AM

 
 
Kirk thinks he is so original and telling the truth when protecting TNA. TNA sucks and deep down inside kirk knows it..

Posted By: Guest#2316 (Guest)  on February 11, 2012 at 12:29 AM

 
 
WrestleMania XXVIII (9 Matches):

-Rock vs. Cena
-Taker vs. HHH
-WC: Jericho vs. Punk
-WHC: Orton vs. Sheamus vs. Barrett
-Show vs. Shaq
-Cody vs. Foley
-Kane vs. Ryder
-MITB: Bryan/Henry/Del Rio/Kofi/
Ziggler/Miz/R-Truth/christian
-Beth vs. Kharma
vs.


Posted By: VIPER (Guest)  on February 11, 2012 at 12:41 AM

 
 
It is strange. As TNA gets better your column gets worse.

Posted By: gpjunk (Guest)  on February 11, 2012 at 12:48 AM

 
 
WWE will do better ratings than TNA thats for sure.

Posted By: Guest#6237 (Guest)  on February 11, 2012 at 01:04 AM

 
 
First of all Wes I'd like to give you props for posting about Wendi Richter and the original screwjob. It is definitely one of the bigger screwjobs in wrestling history that doesn't get as much discussion as the more infamous one in Montreal.

Now in regards to RAW this past Monday night, the show just seemed a little disjointed to me. I mean if they were gonna keep Johnny Ace anyway why make people go on wwe.com the next day to find that out. That didn't make any sense to me.

I think the Bryan-Show feud is a lot better than you are willing to give it credit for. It's the big man-little man feud but with a different twist on that in which the little man is the heel. I love what WWE is doing with Bryan's heel turn right now. It sort of reminds me when Punk was doing the whole straight edge heel angle except for now it's obviously Bryan doing the vegan heel angle I guess you'd call it.

In regards to Brodus Clay, it's only a week they've had him off TV (3 shows; 2 smackdown, 1 raw; although the first smackdown match was cut due to time which is totally understandable considering all the matches they had to fit in to TV that night). I'm sure Brodus will be back on TV sooner rather than later. I think that most fans are buying it. I mean, come on it's a goofy funny gimmick. It's not supposed to be taken seriously. I'll admit that I don't really like the gimmick. But even I'm smart enough to realize that if you want to improve his charisma and help him connect with the fans, then this is a great way to do it. Greg Demarco (or was it his co-host this week? I can't remember which one said it but I know one of them did) brought up a great point on his show on Tuesday about why Brodus may not be on TV right now. I think you oughta take a listen to it.


Posted By: The Hodge (Guest)  on February 11, 2012 at 01:41 AM

 
 
Well hopefully Vince realizes that 20-0, sounds a lot better then 19-1 in an advertising campaign, I mean who'd buy a show if you say "Well yeah he's got a big match, but he's 19-1, so he has lost..once"

Compared to "Hell yeah man, this guy is 20-0, nobody can beat this dude, seriously"

As for the TNA stuff, I like the current product, just wish Hogan wouldn't say "This man is the future of the business" when talking about Garrett..that thought scares me.

I was watching Slammiversary 2005 on DVD the other day and it was such an awesome show..just bought it off of Amazon around Christmas time. I wish Monty Brown had won the World Title at some point..


Posted By: Baboon (Guest)  on February 11, 2012 at 02:31 AM

 
 
Wes, what's Orton doing at WM28?

Seth Mates (former WWE writer on twitter and someone worth following) fears Daniel Bryan drops at Elimination chamber to Orton... Then a crappy build between Orton and Sheamus to WM.

I think he may be right with that fear.

Finally Seth Mates has had a better build for a WM match with Jericho than Punk has. Check it out if you can tweeters.

Btw: Good write up this week Wes.


Posted By: Dave (Guest)  on February 11, 2012 at 02:55 AM

 
 
"Because when people outright lie and everybody is too stupid to even read the numbers proving it a lie right in front of their face what else am I supposed to do?"

You ignore them and and continue with your otherwise excellent column. Surely, as a long time writer for a wrestling webpage, you are more than aware that haters are gonna hate, and that people are stupid. Just think this would put yourself in a better light amongst those actually worth spending time writing for. Higher road, etc..

And as for the ratings thing, I still don't get it. Yes, you posted the ratings for the first four RAWs of 2011, and then compared them to the first four RAWs of 2012. What were the ratings for the LAST four RAWs of 2011? And anyways, All they have to do is just compare any rating from 2011 that are lower than the current of 2012 and say that ratings are up. In the true spirit of Joseph Goebbels.


Posted By: Candy Bottocks (Guest)  on February 11, 2012 at 02:57 AM

 
 
Wes you are a shameless troll - the climate change stuff is hilarious - but I enjoy skimming through your column each week, just to see the butt-hurt created by your first class trollery. Keep up the good work.

Posted By: Guest#0601 (Guest)  on February 11, 2012 at 04:37 AM

 
 
Global Warming, it's still real to me dammit!

Good column Wes, my thoughts:

Don't see how Miz can be blamed for the Survivor Series buyrate, He and R-Truth were made to look inferior throughout the entire build up, Even The Rock wasn't promoted right. It should have been the Story of The Rock returning for his first match back in the building, at the very event he first debuted and Vince should have been part of the build up forcing them to team up instead we got poorly planned horse shit. You know the WWE special.

I haven't bothered watching the WWE youtube stuff because in all honesty I DON'T CARE. If they can't make me give a fuck about a 2 hour show, what are the odds I will give a fuck about 5-8 minute internet specials. BTW I'm calling it now, all the fun will be sucked right out of Ryder's youtube show.

Those TNA youtube numbers are amazing.

I'm caring less and less about WrestleMania as the weeks go by. Cena and Rock has no buzz, Taker-HHH I don't care, and Punk-Jericho while it will be good, Eh.

Surprised WWE would try and boast about their numbers over NBC since they are a NBC television partner.

Impact really has become the wrestling show, people used to push Smackdown but their wrestling has fallen off and unlike TNA they never really advanced angles or had many memorable sports entertainment moments (at least since 2007)

It's amazing how far Raw has fallen, since the glory days and to think that's the A Show. If the A Show and B Show both suck is there truly a difference?

My only real memory of Wendi Richter was WrestleMania 1 with her title win. It was an incredible moment though.

Wes I was just curious, a few weeks ago you posted the ways you'd Improve TNA if you were in the power seat. So how would you fix WWE, or at least Raw to improve ratings and possible buyrates. What would your road to WrestleMania look like to get those 1 million buys. Guest Booker with Wes Kirk (Royal Rumble to WrestleMania) I'd watch that. Are you reading, Kayfabe Commentaries?

Anyway, Wes take care. Kirk Nation Stand Up!


Posted By: Mister Mike (Guest)  on February 11, 2012 at 05:26 AM

 
 
ah, a conservative gimmick from 2004 and a lame smiley from 2008. all in 2012

Posted By: Guest#0902 (Guest)  on February 11, 2012 at 05:49 AM

 
 
I notice you talk about ratings being down with the WWE. Did you know that in 2001 according to the WWE corporate website they drew a high for the year of 4.58 million viewers the day after WrestleMania XVII. That got them a 5.7 rating back then. Looking at your statistics they had 4.6 million viewers this week which got them a 3.2 rating. Looking at just this week and the day after WrestleMania XVII the only thing that has changed is the rating not the amount of people watching Raw.

Posted By: Guest#0853 (Guest)  on February 11, 2012 at 05:49 AM

 
 
I didn't the whole article, but let me guess wha he wrote:

"TNA is God's gift to wrestling and WWE is in danger of going out of business."

In other words, the same old delusional Wes Kirk bullshit.

The only part I did read is that this dickhead is now comparing YOUTUBE VIEWS?


Posted By: Guest#7137 (Guest)  on February 11, 2012 at 05:50 AM

 
 
People talk about lower ratings, truth is ratings in general are lower in the internet age.

Posted By: Guest#0587 (Guest)  on February 11, 2012 at 07:19 AM

 
 
Not unlike the Liddell vs. Ortiz rivalry, the first two matches were accepted by the fans and things were hunky dory. However, with the build up to the third match slowly starting, I cannot help but draw so many parallels to the aforementioned MMA rivalry.

Both men cannot accept the fading of the spotlight on their generation of wrestlers from the 90s and their lack of relevance to today's storylines. Just like both fighters, fans will pop loudly because of the legacy both men have in the ring. In reality, the men risk ruining their legacies this way, just as the fighters did by taking fights past their primes. Triple H is slowly ascending to Hulk Hogan levels of booking abuse, while still trying to wrestle and maintain a front office position like Liddell did recently in trying to campaign for a final fight for Ortiz's retirement match. Undertaker returns once or twice a year as both of these fighters did to take a match and still manages to look broken down.

Even in terms of injuries, the similarities are striking. Triple H's quadriceps mimics the back problems that would plague Ortiz. While Triple H's quads would blow out during high spots, Ortiz's back severely affected his bread and butter in the double-leg takedown. Liddell and Undertaker have both greatly slowed with age and their quality of performance has diminished with each outing.

And not unlike season 11 of The Ultimate Fighter, we could have a lackluster build up into something tragic. While the UFC's show was predictable and sad to watch, the WWE is using the the same script with minimal tweaks for this year's rematch. Undertaker comes out, points to the sign, and poses. Triple H rejects this time around, but will be goaded into a rematch. That said, the tragedy that could infest WrestleMania lies in HHH's booking power. With Undertaker being exposed at last year's WrestleMania, this could be the opportune time for Hunter to book himself to end the historic streak, thus ending one of the most sacred WrestleMania traditions.

In all, this storyline has all the makings to be as melancholy as the Liddell vs. Ortiz rivalry. The bittersweet thing that could come from this is a classic match that puts the bookend on legendary careers for both. Whether this feud that will seemingly close both mens in-ring careers will leave us high and dry like its MMA counterpart remains to be seen, but all signs are pointing to a pretty sour ending that will validate one man's front office career and end another WWE tradition.


Posted By: Guest#7901 (Guest)  on February 11, 2012 at 08:06 AM

 
 
I want to vote for Buchanan, Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck. I think they are the greatest and can turn america around..

Posted By: The Hodge (Guest)  on February 11, 2012 at 08:08 AM

 
 
Oh Wes, I stopped reading the sandwich because of you putting lots of politics in, i disagree with you on lots of points and this ruined my enjoyment of your take on the wrestling business. When it became apparent you were reigning in your political views in your column i started reading again on and off, truely enjoying what was becoming a well written column. Therefore i was so dissapointed when i clicked on this link, looking forward to seeing the light you would shed on survivor series and WWE's Youtube channel, and saw you opened the column with a rant based on your political and religious views, attacking people who disagree with your opinions with real venom and hate. Please focus on the wrestling in the wrestling sandwich, you will never get left wing atheists to turn around and say "actually your right wes" on certain subjects in the same way they will never get that response from you, and i know the internet is full of trolls but please stop tainting your writings with this cheap heat you keep chasing. Please stop cementing your place at 411 by having lots of comments that perpetuate arguments and concentrate on writing a truely readable column. You have the talent and insight to be a great contributor to this site for many years, but you really need to think about writing an interesting informed suppliment rather than picking fights and pushing the buttons of the readers of this site. Maybe your happy that the majority of people who click on your column do so to top up on hate, but to me it seems like such a waste.

Posted By: Guest#5090 (Guest)  on February 11, 2012 at 09:18 AM

 
 
We don't have food stamps in the UK boy, but since I'm half way through a PhD I won't ever be needing them. Remind me to stop by here and sneer at you once I'm forging ahead in life with my Doctorate - a position which allows me to choose my own salary rather than have it dictated by the amount of socially-inadequate geeks who shuffle through my shop doorway each week.

PS. Your 'new talent' (Aries etc.) scored the lowest rated segment on Impact this week. Wrestling matters alright, but only in the WWE. Bush league indeed.


Posted By: The GOAT (Guest)  on February 11, 2012 at 09:22 AM

 
 
Just to make a correction. I live in Canada and about 90% of the content on youtube is blocked. the only videos which aren't are the WWE classics, and the new original content. you do make a valid point though on how low some of the views are.

Posted By: Guest#7547 (Guest)  on February 11, 2012 at 09:42 AM

 
 
Just to make a correction. I live in Canada and about 90% of the content on youtube is blocked. the only videos which aren't are the WWE classics, and the new original content. you do make a valid point though on how low some of the views are.

Posted By: Guest#5913 (Guest)  on February 11, 2012 at 09:43 AM

 
 
kirk trolls... then WM 28 will sell about 1.3 million PPVs (150k more than last year's) and he will troll again,(even though an average WWE PPV sells 20 times more than a TNA one - 200k vs 10k) 'cause that's what he does. he knows the facts but manipulates them in order to make people comment about him so he can continue with his column.

THEREFORE, this is the last time i'll post/read the sandwich and i suggest all good wrestling fans do the same.

PS: i like both WWE and TNA but this is ridiculous, really


Posted By: Guest#6231 (Guest)  on February 11, 2012 at 10:48 AM

 
 
Keep your government hands off my Medicare you socialist bastards!

Posted By: Mississippi (Guest)  on February 11, 2012 at 11:06 AM

 
 
god is this guy annoying. What a great way to get readership!

step 1 - treat your readership like crap

step 2 - post political nonsense in a wrestling column

step 3 - don't actually respond to any legit criticism that is backed up with facts and links, and ignore anything that doesn't agree with the author's narrow view of the world.

This is the last view you get from me bud, this place would be a much better place without you.


Posted By: Guest#9912 (Guest)  on February 11, 2012 at 11:38 AM

 
 
good read!

some thoughts...

...what miz did is unexceptable and just show how green he still is!

his wrestling is average at best & I think the reason wwe hasnt done to well in the last 2 year is because they have jokes like miz in the main event scene!

...these last 2 impact episodes have been amazing from top to bottom, theirs been no stupid booking or terrible segments, and the shows have been loaded with good wrestling...

on top of all that the crowd has been phenominal!

so why is tna getting lower ratings?

do people prefer bad shows? because these last 2 shows are easily top 5 best impact episodes since BFG, yet the bad show get better ratings!

...please keep the uk ratings, i want to see how well tnas doing overseas, especially because tnas live there...

fuck the haters, if they dont like them they can scroll past the section!

...any luck getting the impact analysis running?

...this years wrestlemania card actually looks good! i skipped the last 2 terrible manias, but... i think im gonna watch this one!

i just dont like the thought of UT/HHH 3!

HELL IN A CELL is the only way this would intrest me, and even then id prefer it to be a 3 way HIAC with michales!


Posted By: Guest#1961 (Guest)  on February 11, 2012 at 01:01 PM

 
 
As mentioned above, the WWE channel does have region restrictions. Also, TNA has more than a year's headstart on YouTube, joining 23 Feb 2006 while WWE has been on since 10 May 2007. Both of which facts would contribute to a lower total view count.

In the spirit of unbiased fairness, I've compiled the top ten YouTube videos from both TNA & WWE (forgive the c&p):

1. TNA: Awesome Kong Wins The Women'... - 5,093,881 views

2. WWE Survivor Series: Casket Match - 4,115,957 views

3. WWE RAW 15 -- OMG Moments - 4,009,083 views

4. WWE NIGHT OF CHAMPIONS - Cena vs.... - 3,320,459 views

5. TNA: "Global Impact!" (May 3, 2006) - 3,173,535 views

6. WWE WrestleMania XXIV Promo - 2,705,467 views

7. WrestleMania XXIV -- Mayweather V... - 2,686,367 views

8. Friday Night SmackDown Fri, Nov. ... - 2,519,150 views

9. TNA: Velvet Sky & Angelina Love - 2,363,204 views

10. WWE Shop: DX - 2,282,889 views

WWE gets 7 out of the top ten. Not bad for a company that tops out at 160,000 views.

"Why did Awesome Kong's title win get over FIVE MILLION hits?" - Because watching Kong kill bitches is fucking awesome. The clue is in her name.


Posted By: Guest#0518 (Guest)  on February 11, 2012 at 02:15 PM

 
 
percentage wise TNA lost more viewers. your analysis is so weak I assume you don't have a post high school education.

And congrats on having rich parents to buy you a job in this recession. And before you start yapping about food stamps, we don't get those in the UK and I work 60hour weeks.


Posted By: JJ87UK (Guest)  on February 11, 2012 at 03:51 PM

 
 
There is no such thing as god, and you're a douche...how are those TNA ratings from this past week?? Oh they are down!!!

Posted By: WWELives (Guest)  on February 11, 2012 at 04:47 PM

 
 
I sure would find it funny if the bacon sandwich at the top of the column was replaced by a vegie sandwich, and Kirk would give Daniel Bryan current character some love. I'm really digging the smug vegan and his feud with the Big Show, I think he is comedy gold. As a fan who enjoys the WWE more then TNA I find it hilarious all the hateful comments Kirk gets for his column. The dude is a writer with an opinion on wrestling and politics that is different from your own, this is no reason to demonizing him, or have so much hate for someone. I know some of the commenters would rather live in the old USSR, North Korea, or almost any country in the middle east. But unlike those places we are able to express our opinions even the unopopular ones like TNA is better then the WWE.

Posted By: Siva (Guest)  on February 11, 2012 at 05:19 PM

 
 
I guess you could consider me a Cena-hater. Then again, who could like a guy >who acts like a white-boy rapper, actually does rap (badly, I should say) and has little to no wrestling ability, and has been pushed to glorious "exalted" status, <
Yeah, WWE pushing a guy with little or no wrestling ability to the stars and shoving them down our throats cause the kids love him is ridiculous. OH,you ever hear of a guy by the name of Hulk Hogan?


Posted By: REALITY (Guest)  on February 11, 2012 at 06:53 PM

 
 
Regarding global warming, there are some FACTS that at most shut up people who insist it exists, or at least get them flustered because they can't come up with a reasonable explanation OTHER than there's no such thing as this horror story known as global warming.
it would be good if a climate investigation over centuries would be known. Well, Science magazine gave the results of such a study that covered the last 3000 years. It showed that we now are under the mean temperature of the last 3000 years. It also showed that the widely fluctuating mean temperature (based on isotope ratios in the skeletons of marine organisms deposited in the Sargasso Sea) hit peaks five degrees higher than now around 900 B.C. and 400 B.C. and 3 degrees higher than around 100 A.D. There were also lows 2 degrees cooler than now around 100 A.D. and 1700 A.D. Since this last one, the temperature has been steadily rising (a scorching :) 2 degrees in the last 300 years). An outcome of these calculations is that: (2) human activity could not have been the cause of it (as global warming alarmists claim). (3) ‘Slightly rising temperatures’ can actually be a good thing when you consider that they cause greater food and animal growth for the starving people of third world countries. (You’d think that liberals would be happy about that?) (4) Global warming and cooling fluctuations are tied to solar activity. (Another proof that human activity is not the cause). (5) More than 17,000 American scientists have signed a petition opposing the Kyoto treaty. (6) Proponents of global warming predicted 20 years ago that in the following 20 years from then there would be a warming increase of between 1 and 2 degrees. There’s been none. (7) The fear that global warming would cause floods is not justified because at a warming spike in 1000 A.D. there was no major flooding. Much of the above was reported in The Wall Street Journal, Global Warming Is 300-Year-Old News, January 18, 2000, by Arthur Robinson and Noah Robinson, chemists at the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine, with updates from them in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons (2007) 12. 79-90.
But I think that some even newer data puts this issue to rest. NOAA has reported that almost all the allegedly “lost” ice has come back. An NOAA report shows that ice levels which had shrunk from 5 million square miles in January 2007 to just 1.5 million square miles in October, are almost back to their original levels. And a Feb.18 report in the London Daily Express showed that there is nearly a third more ice in Antarctica than usual.The winter of 2007-2008 was one of the worst on record in many parts of the Earth. And the polar bear population has soared in recent years. But don't let facts get in the way, people.


Posted By: REALITY (Guest)  on February 11, 2012 at 07:00 PM

 
 
Seth Mates (former WWE writer on twitter and someone worth following) fears Daniel Bryan drops at Elimination chamber to Orton... Then a crappy build between Orton and Sheamus to WM.

I think he may be right with that fear.

Posted By: Dave (Guest) on February 11, 2012 at 02:55 AM

So what? I've been calling exactly the same thing since Christmas, so Mates' opinion is irrelevant. It's not rocket science.


Posted By: Analysis Stupido (Guest)  on February 11, 2012 at 07:01 PM

 
 
As the old saying goes when it rains it pours. The Miz just can't catch a break in the worst week of his career, arguably rightfully so. It all started on Monday's Raw when Miz failed to protect R-Truth on a risky dive, who was lucky to escape without a serious injury, but the unnecessary bump to the back of his head would have done Truth no favours. The end result was tons of heat from his fellow performers for his unfortunate error and a tongue lashing from future WWE boss Triple H. Now Alberto Del Rio steps in to rub salt into the wound.

In an interview with 95.7 FM The Game, a sports station in the Bay Area, Del Rio when asked whether he socialises with his fellow WWE wrestlers rather bluntly admitted that he doesn't like many of his colleagues. Probed about the guy he least likes in the ring, the Mexican superstar pulled no punches in detailing how much he hates The Miz:
This is not part of the show I really dislike that guy. I've tried to punch him in the face several times, not in the ring I mean outside the ring, but he's just like a little girl, he's always running away from me.... There's a big difference between The Miz and I, I'm a real athlete, he's just a loud stupid little kid. He's probably one of those guys that was bullied when he was in school, that's the reason he's now oh so loud and he wants to get attention from everybody, but in my case he's the real deal.... I don't think [he has many female fans] because he's fat and ugly.
It's probably not wise for Del Rio to make light of bullying when WWE runs a high profile Be a STAR anti-bullying campaign, but otherwise I don't expect management to be upset with his comments in light of Miz's current standing with the company.

What this proves is that it's open season within WWE for The Miz, who made few friends within the company when he debuted in 2006, due to his abrasive and obnoxious attitude, already carrying himself like a star thanks to his prior exposure on numerous reality shows, most notably The Real World in 2001. He managed to turn things around somewhat by working hard to transform himself from one of the greenest guys on the roster into one of their hottest rising stars, but as he never became more humble, lingering resentment obviously persisted. However, his enemies had to keep their thoughts to themselves when he became a management favourite in the summer of 2010 due to being such a media darling and so willing to do all the PR work they required. Now the tide has turned, there doesn't seem to be any holding back, which may not be a pretty sight for The Miz to behold.


Posted By: Guest#5485 (Guest)  on February 11, 2012 at 09:34 PM

 
 
I notice you talk about ratings being down with the WWE. Did you know that in 2001 according to the WWE corporate website they drew a high for the year of 4.58 million viewers the day after WrestleMania XVII. That got them a 5.7 rating back then. Looking at your statistics they had 4.6 million viewers this week which got them a 3.2 rating. Looking at just this week and the day after WrestleMania XVII the only thing that has changed is the rating not the amount of people watching Raw.

Posted By: Guest#0853 (Guest) on February 11, 2012 at 05:49 AM


Bump.


Posted By: Guest#7498 (Guest)  on February 12, 2012 at 01:21 AM

 
 
Its about fucking time someone on this site stopped sucking Vince's dick and say what this site neglects.

WWE is not prepared for a Network. I guess they assumed people would watch 24 hours of old footage and tape their shitty reality shows in the process. They also STILL don't have the necessary management for the damn network.

I think WWE should abandon it while they still can because I doubt the 5 million people that watch raw are willing to shell out extra money for the network. I really and truly can only see a few thousand viewers for anything other than PPVs brought to thenetwork.

Now if WWE still host PPVs then run them as reruns then I don't see WWE Network having any show worm over a million viewers.

I have little faith in WWE network success. Vince's non-wrestling related track record should be proof enough


Posted By: Guest#2440 (Guest)  on February 12, 2012 at 02:24 AM

 
 
Made some good poins here Wes. Though can the Global Warming talk, there is so much opinoin on boths sides that an arguement over the internet is nothing but a tedious ordeal. Also, I gotta disagree on your dumbest thing of the week, although Ray didtching Rood and Rood tapping was great he should have tapped to Storm because Sting winning was only for his ego

Posted By: Chaos Theoy (Guest)  on February 12, 2012 at 07:06 AM

 
 
Global warming and cooling fluctuations are tied to solar activity.

Posted By: REALITY (Guest) on February 11, 2012 at 07:00 PM

End of the argument right there. Listen, I've had my beef with Wes Kirk in the past but on this Global Warming issue he's right and all you mindless sheep are wrong. Ever heard that saying 'the only thing that's free is the air you breathe'? Not any more. The Global Warming scam was created to legitimise the Carbon Tax and the only 'inconvenient truth' is that the sun calls the shots, not CO2 emissions. I always found the whole Gore vs Bush farce very interesting, them being cousins and Skull & Bones frat buddies an' all. Anyway, how about all the dickheads poking Kirk with their disinfo sticks back off and let him get back to doing what he does best: hyping that dead duck TNA.


Posted By: Analysis Stupido (Guest)  on February 12, 2012 at 04:41 PM

 
 
I imagine part of the reason TNA has high youtube numbers could be that it is the only accessible medium for a shedload of people around the world to actually watch TNA.
Whereas people that already watch the wide-reaching WWE on whatever TV channel it is in their country, would be less inclined to search something they've already seen?

Maybe. That's without knowing anything about where TNA is viewable, and what the location spread of youtube views relates to.

I'm in NZ (needle in the haystack of viewing population of course), but we have only just started getting TNA's weekly show on our pay TV channel "The Box" (home of Raw/Smackdown/NXT/Superstars as well). Also now getting the PPV's again, after a brief period in the mid-00's where we got PPV's but not weekly shows.


Posted By: Burnsy (Guest)  on February 12, 2012 at 05:24 PM

 
 
Glad I finally got a damn weekend off...man big ups on toning down the politics, great read and enjoy Against All Odds. Ill send you a toast while im getting smashed trolling TNA tonite bro, Shot out to...you, Kirk FN Nation, Proud, Representing Still! Thanks for the sandwich...

Posted By: sTiNgfAn1985 (Guest)  on February 12, 2012 at 08:03 PM

 
 
according to the rumor mill vince russo has been fired(thanks TNA!!), do you think they should go further and completely clean house

Posted By: Guest#9999 (Guest)  on February 12, 2012 at 11:03 PM

 
 
Nothing is going to make these morons happy so why would TNA target them?

They asked for longer matches, the got it they bitched.

They asked for fresh faces in the main event they got it, they still bitch

They got better story lines and TNA feels fresh, its still not good enough

Yet every fucking week they sit and listen to CM Punk smary ass insider bullshit. They listen to an announcer that takes away from matches and a color commentator that just doesn't care.

They say nothing when Smack down went through 2 months of short matches, crappy feuds and the only person that developed any character was a World champion who laid on the Big Show for 3 seconds.

They accept anything WWE half ass booking team throws at them and eats it all up but TNA makes some big changes and they still bitch?

I won't be happy until the writers other than Wes, DeMarco and maybe Colin Reinhart just admit they are WWE fan boys that will NEVER give TNA a fair shot. That's all I want instead of them making excuses pretending they're unbiased writers.


Posted By: Guest#8059 (Guest)  on February 13, 2012 at 02:24 AM

 
 
Wes, the fans do care about Brodus Clay, but the WWE is too stupid to give the fans what they want.

Posted By: Guest#9650 (Guest)  on February 13, 2012 at 11:11 AM

 
 
This year's Valentine's Day must be a bittersweet one for TNA owner Dixie Carter, as she's had to bid a sorrowful goodbye to her closest ally within TNA management, senior script writer Vince Russo. Yes, Russo has indeed been ousted from TNA's creative team, which Dixie confirmed a few hours ago on her Twitter feed:

TNA and Vince Russo have mutually parted ways as of this week. The separation is amicable and professional. We are glad for the opportunity to have worked together and wish each other nothing but good luck and success in the future.

One presumes that Russo finally got fed up of working alongside Hulk Hogan and Eric Bischoff, whose power has grown over the last six months ever since Hogan re-signed with TNA for another year.

That's a safe bet, as it is well known that both Hogan and Bischoff have never rated Russo's abilities as a writer, ever since they briefly worked together uneasily in the dying days of WCW, which ended in a worked shoot (WCW champion Jeff Jarrett laying down for Hulk Hogan at Bash At The Beach 2000) that turned into a shoot when Hogan got the huff at Russo's subsequent unexpected verbal burial of the Hulkster. Hogan even sued Russo and Universal Wrestling Corporation (the remnants of WCW that Time-Warner was still responsible for once they sold its assets to WWE) for defamation and false light invasion of privacy over the shoot promo that blindsided him, a case that he eventually lost. So the only reason Russo wasn't forced out much earlier by Hogan and Bischoff is that Dixie did her utmost to protect him, but that wasn't enough to stop the proud man from quitting after seeing his creative power and influence reduced over time to almost nil to placate his former WCW enemies.

So from a creative standpoint don't expect major changes whomever replaces Russo as their lead writer, since Hogan, Bischoff and Bruce Prichard will still be responsible for the big picture creative decisions and will want someone to meekly turn their ideas into a cohesive script. The favourite for the job is Dave Lagana, the former lead writer of Smackdown and ECW, who TNA hired last October to work on their Indian Ring Ka King project. Unfortunately Lagana comes with worse baggage than Russo. In the book Ring Of Hell, his former WWE writing colleagues Dan Madigan and Dominick Pagliaro painted an unflattering portrait of Lagana as a cowardly sycophant and a sexual pervert that tried to solicit sexual favours from both male and female undercard talent. He was supposedly fired by WWE in January 2008 when Kevin Thorn complained to his friend The Undertaker about Lagana's sexual advances, who made a very public stink about it. Yes, this is the man to save TNA!


Posted By: Guest#5921 (Guest)  on February 14, 2012 at 09:31 PM

 


www.41mania.com
Copyright (c) 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.