wrestling / Columns

411’s WWE RPI Rankings 05.06.13

May 6, 2013 | Posted by MP Schroeder

Click here for the entire spreadsheet containing win/loss records and detailed calculations for the past three months.

Overview of this week’s rankings
The Undertaker remains on top of this week’s RPI rankings but all three members of the Shield are close behind with their wins over Daniel Bryan, John Cena, and Kane. Speaking of Team Hell No and the Tag Team Division, it is startling to consider than they have not faced Rhodes Scholars a single time in the last three months. Based upon RPI rankings, it could easily be argued that Rhodes Scholars are the number 1 contenders for the Tag Titles. It will be interesting to see what lies ahead for the four of them heading into Extreme Rules.

The Rock has taken the biggest tumble over the last four weeks. This isn’t altogether surprising with his loss against John Cena at Wrestlemania and the string of losses suffered by his previous opponent, CM Punk.

RPI rankings successfully predicted the winner in 11 out of 15 matches over the last week, slightly less than what would be predicted based solely on win/loss percentages (13 out of 15 matches correctly predicted).

WWE Superstars

1) Undertaker

74.4

2) Roman Reigns

67.8

3) Dean Ambrose

64.8

4) Seth Rollins

64.6

5) John Cena

63.6

6) Mark Henry

62.3

7) Alberto Del Rio

59.6

8) Jack Swagger

58.7

9) Ricardo Rodriguez/El Local

56.9

10) Big Show

56.0

11) Ryback

55.3

12) Sheamus

55.2

13) Yoshi Tatsu

54.9

14) Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson

54.4

15) Zeb Coulter

54.2

16) Randy Orton

54.1

17) Dolph Ziggler

51.1

18) Damien Sandow

50.7

19) Fandango

50.6

20) Chris Jericho

49.5

21) Big E Langston

49.0

22) Rey Mysterio

48.9

23) Kane

48.9

24) Antonio Cesaro

48.8

25) R-Truth

48.8

26) Sin Cara

48.7

27) CM Punk

48.6

28) The Great Khali

48.1

29) Daniel Bryan

47.9

30) Cody Rhodes

47.8

31) Wade Barrett

47.6

32) Kofi Kingston

47.5

33) The Miz

46.4

34) Tensai

45.6

35) Justin Gabriel

45.0

36) William Regal

44.7

37) Jey Uso

43.0

38) Brodus Clay

42.8

39) Jimmy Uso

42.6

40) Billy Gunn

42.4

41) Road Dogg

42.4

42) Drew McIntyre

42.1

43) Hornswoggle

42.1

44) Santino Marella

41.8

45) Jinder Mahal

41.7

46) Darren Young

41.0

47) Zack Ryder

40.4

48) David Otunga

40.3

49) Epico

39.9

50) Primo

39.3

51) Titus O’Neil

39.3

52) Michael McGillicutty

39.1

53) Heath Slater

38.8

54) JTG

34.5

WWE Divas

1) Nikki Bella

63.0

2) Brie Bella

56.9

3) AJ Lee

56.1

4) Naomi

53.6

5) Tamina Snuka

51.0

6) Cameron

50.9

7) Kaitlyn

48.0

8) Layla

44.8

9) Rosa Mendes

42.4

10) Natalya

41.6

11) Aksana

40.5

12) Alicia Fox

39.6

RPI Explained
The ratings percentage index (RPI; out of 100) is a method which ranks teams or individuals based upon their wins, losses and strength of schedule. It is used by the NCAA to aid in the selecting and seeding of teams appearing in tournaments such as basketball’s March Madness.

Why are RPI rankings superior to simple win-loss records? Imagine a superstar that wins matches only against jobbers. Sure, their win/loss record will be stellar but by facing opponents who always lose, their RPI will not be as high as a superstar who wins half their matches but always faces opponents with stellar win/loss records. Using a statistically valid approach to examine WWE superstars will allow fans to determine if their favorite wrestler is being booked appropriately and whether their stock is rising or falling.

The factors involved are:
* 1) the superstar’s winning percentage (25%)
* 2) the average winning percentage of the superstar’s opponents (50%)
* 3) the average winning percentage of the superstar’s opponents’ opponents (25%)

Win-loss records are calculated for every WWE superstar over the past 3 months from Monday Night Raw, Smackdown, Superstars, Main Event, Saturday Morning Slam, and pay-per-views. Superstars must have competed in at least 2 matches in the last 3 months to be included in the overall RPI rankings.

NULL

article topics

MP Schroeder

Comments are closed.