www.411mania.com
|  News |  Columns |  TV Reports |  Video Reviews |  Title History |  Hall of Fame |  News Report |  The Dunn List |
SPOTLIGHTS  SPOTLIGHTS
MOVIES/TV
// Star Wars Episode I Brings In $1.1 Million in Midnight Showings
MUSIC
// First Official Pics of Beyonce and Jay-Z With Blue Ivy Posted
WRESTLING
// Impact Wrestling Rating
POLITICS
// Obama Showing Strongest Poll Numbers In Months
MMA
// Dustin Poirier vs. Chan Sung Jung To Main Event UFC on F/X 3
GAMES
// Star Trek Sequel Game in the Works


 HOT TOPICS
//  CM Punk
//  John Cena
//  Triple H
//  Hulk Hogan
//  Randy Orton
//  Christian
SYNDICATE  SYNDICATE



411mania RSS Feeds





Follow 411mania on Twitter!




Add 411 On Facebook
 



 
 411mania » Wrestling » Columns



Advertisement
What Were They Thinking? 1.05.08: Beat The Clock
Posted by William Bumgarner on 01.05.2008



Welcome back to What Were They Thinking?. I am your ever-cynical host, Bill
Bumgarner, and this week I'm going to talk about the "Beat The Clock" #1 Contender's event on
last week's SmackDown!. But before I get into that, let me just say that I speak for everyone
when I say that replacing JBL with Jonathan Coachman on the announce table was a bad, bad
move. Coach just doesn't have the charisma that JBL did and I'll be sorry to see the man go from
the commentator's pool. Quite frankly, I'd have loved to have seen Funaki take Bradshaw's place, as
the sheer comedy value alone woulda been worth listening to. (Plus, can you imagine his
voiceovers on the next SvR game? "I don't think that the manufacturer quite had this in mind
when they made that particular item." "It good for what he used it for!!!!" Gold. Pure gold.)


Anyway, the "Beat The Clock" stuff. Having Finlay come out first and finish off MVP to set the
"Time to Beat" at 9:46 was a decent movie, as it's a conceviable time to beat and would make
Finlay look strong without costing anyone anything. He gets a non-title win over the U.S. Champ,
looks good doing it, and then Chavo beats Funaki in 6:02. Finlay hasn't lost any steam, Chavo has
gained some and potentially positions himself as a #1 Contender; everyone's happy.


Then we get more of the WWE's crap. First, Batista in a handicap match against the Rated
Rmy (Curt Hawkins and Zach Ryder, and I didn't misspel the stable name). This wouldn't have been
so bad if they hadn't made Batista look virtually powerless against these two. The finish, at least,
was clean, which is a rarity in these days of DQ finishes and run-ins that the refs are always
conveniently turned away for. Batista didn't get as much in the way of offense as he usually does,
and that's a no-no if you're trying to book someone as a monster. Batista ran out of time after the
Rated Rmy kept stopping his Batista Bomb, and the time to beats was still 6:02 with Chavo in the
lead after what, to me, was a painful match to watch.


The next BTC match was supposed to be The Undertaker vs. Matt Striker, but instead Striker
was made the special guest referee and the opponent was Mark Henry. This time around, Big Evil
got in plenty of offense and looked very strong in this match. Mark Henry did his job,
as well, and made it look lik The Dead Man had to give it everything he had to keep him down. As
far as that went, this match was fun to watch. But, predictably, Referee Striker screwed 'Taker over.
In the final seconds of the match, Undertaker pinned Henry, Striker counter 1...2....and stopped. He
got up, left the ring, and the bell rang, signalling that the time was up. 'Taker got pissed and did
some damage to Henry afterwards, but once again we lose a viable contender to the World
Heavyweight Title.


The next (and final) match in this series was Rey Mysterio vs. World Heavyweight Champion
Edge, who brought the Rated Rmy (DAMN I hate that pun) to ringside with him. Both men
got some offense in, and then Batista runs down and starts beating up Edge's cronies. Edge is
distracted by this, which allows Rey to get in more offense, then Undertaker appears. the lights go
out, and hen Edge is hanging in the middle rope. Mysterio hits the 619 and West Coast Pop for the
three-count and the win, coming in at 4:35 and becoming the new #1 Contender. The only problem
here is that Rey has a lot of fans, and they're gonna be disappointed by the WWE's booking.
He'll either lose to Edge thanks to some shenanigans, or he'll win the belt, but he'll be made to look
like a wimp by getting squashed in a bunch of non-title matches just like he did the last time
they put the big belt on him. It seems that the WWE just doesn't know how to book little guys (then
again, they don't do such a hot job with the big guys these days, either) and tend to think of
them as jobbers, no matter how over they are (this is a gripe with me about TNA, also, as Shark
Boy is mega-over and yet I can't recall him ever actually winning a match).


Well, I've said my piece. The WWE's thinking (or lack thereof) puzzles me yet again as they've
gotten the hopes of the fans up, only to disappoint (like when they gave Triple H the WWE Title,
only to have him lose it about two hours later). This, frankly, smacks of WCW in the late 90's.
People say that about TNA, and it's true in some respects. But the WWE does it, too, and in grater
volume. They obviously want Edge to retain the title (or get it back quickly after losing it), but they
don't want to job out the big guys like Batista, so they set Rey Mysterio up to take the fall. Sad,
sad booking. It's no wonder that the WWE's games are selling so much; they're a lot
more enjoyable than what's being put on TV these days.


Post Comment (30)  |  Email William Bumgarner  |  View William Bumgarner's 411 Profile


  Send To Friend  |    Stumble It!  |    Digg It!  | 



Please add your comment below.
If you are registered, you can login and post under your registered name. If not, you can post as a guest or register.

* Please note that 411 moderates all comments. Your comment will show up on the site after it has been approved by an editor.
 
Name : 
Comment : 
Remaining Characters : 
2800
 

Comments (30)

 
Smacking has a very good roster, but the way they protect Batista and Taker constantly is rediculous. I also am sick of seeing the beat-the-clock challenge, they have done it at least five times in the last year, Its like its TNA 's version of the gaunlet match, I'm sick of seeing them. I also refuse to listen to Coach any longer. Him and Michael Cole together are nearly unbearable.

Posted By: Matthew B (Guest)  on January 05, 2008 at 01:38 PM

 
 
At least Rey is getting a title shot. He should have gotten one long ago.

Posted By: Flabberschnackle (Guest)  on January 05, 2008 at 01:40 PM

 
 
All you do is bitch.

Posted By: Donco (Guest)  on January 05, 2008 at 01:44 PM

 
 
I think it was a good move to put Rey Mysterio as the No 1 Contender. I DONT wanna see Batista in another title match or against Edge, and we will get Undertaker Vs. Edge at WM so I like it =)

Posted By: Spike (Guest)  on January 05, 2008 at 02:22 PM

 
 
The Beat THe Clock format really exposed just how light the SD roster is. You had Funaki and Chavo looking like legitimate contenders... No disrespect intended for either man, but come on!

Posted By: soulpower (Guest)  on January 05, 2008 at 02:26 PM

 
 
Edge vs Mysterio will be a fun match, saves Edge vs Taker at Mania and avoids another Edge vs Batista title match. What the hell is wrong with this booking?

Posted By: Brendan C (Guest)  on January 05, 2008 at 02:36 PM

 
 
5 times in the last year? Really? The last one I can remember was about this time last year when Mr. Kennedy won to set up his match with Batistia at the rumble. If u could please tell me when the other 4 were, that would be great, thanks

Posted By: Zeke (Guest)  on January 05, 2008 at 03:02 PM

 
 
Under the whole storyline of "getting rid of the competition" from Vickie Guerrero, the whole night made sense from how I saw it.

Also, I've got to disagree with the comment on Batista being made to weak. Firstly, if the "Rated Rmy" is going to somewhat credible, it's not going to be through their promos.

Sure, Dave's a monster. But in a handicap match, there's no harm in actually letting the team show-off what they can do and actually use the "numbers advantage" - not to end up losing to an STFU or a DX "Fatality" combo of SCM and a Pedigree. It's not even like Batista or Taker won't end up facing the Rated Rmy later on the Road to Wrestlemania and end up beating them there. If the bookers are gonna push a team, they need to be in matches where they look credible.

Regardless of who's fanbase is unhappy, for those that are casual viewers, it just means more heat for Edge. For those that aren't, well this isn't the first, nor will it be the last time a decision doesn't go the way they wanted.

To be honest, I don't think Edge vs. Rey Mysterio will turn any heads away from watching the Rumble, it's a good matchup that has promise.

I think it's a bit obvious Taker vs. Edge is going down at Mania 24. And if it weren't for the point that Batista and Edge have already had a load of matches this year in a feud that wasn't that exciting, then maybe I'd agree with you.

The "E'" don't know how to make the most of their little guys. But considering that we haven't seen Mysterio vs. Edge for the title (a match that would've likely happened soon after Rey's return, once Edge defeated Kane at the Bash) - having Mysterio win the challenge is a good move in my opinion.


Posted By: Sam (Guest)  on January 05, 2008 at 03:03 PM

 
 
rey is a cruiserweight and should not be allowed to hold the heavyweight title. that was the entire point of the weight classes. i know they did away with the CW title but still how bout a US title run, booked good?

Posted By: trucks88 (Guest)  on January 05, 2008 at 04:24 PM

 
 
It could have been worse. They could of had Batista squash the Rated Rmy and ruin the push they are getting. at least this makes their team look a little stronger. for so long, WWE has had their top faces completely KILL tag teams in handicap matches (Triple H mainly) and its nice to see a tag team do well this time. i'd like to see Zack and Curt start a feud with another tag team soon. wouldn't it be awesome to have London and Kendrick come back to Smackdown and feud with them? but thats not gonna happen. they are needed too much on HEAT.

Posted By: Jordan (Guest)  on January 05, 2008 at 04:27 PM

 
 
To be honest it was a good show. The beat the clock stipulations only been used twice in the last year, once on raw and once on smackdown, and both times was used to define clearly a top contender for a throwaway main event. The fact that there were low card guys up against upper midcard/main event guys is neither here nor there because thats the way the concept works, its supposed to be broken. The plot of last nights show was simple and I liked it. The deck was stacked in edges favour, all the fan faves were screwed over by matters outside of their control. For once a handicap match didn't end with one man beating two, and most importantly in the end the good guys got their revenge and the villans plan was undone. If thats poorly booked I don't know what a well booked show is supposed to look like. I also don't get how putting a popular guy in a title match could ever be defined as a bad move. People want to see Rey win, Rey loses/is cheated...fans go oh noes and then get cheered up by the result of the rumble. The rumble is the draw, not the title matches, so why not try something different. Let the story get told before you shit on it.

Posted By: Skintymcedger (Guest)  on January 05, 2008 at 04:27 PM

 
 
Having Rey Mysterio win by beating Edge in the final match thanks to a creative UT interference was a really surprising and smart way to set up the Rumble AND Wrestlemania at the same time. I thought it was an OK show with a great ending.

Posted By: Kevin (Guest)  on January 05, 2008 at 04:58 PM

 
 
Once again, someone on the IWC looks at things purely from a wrestling standpoint and ignoring the story. Just stop watching the WWE since it's obvious you don't have a clue how storylines work.

Posted By: MC42 (Guest)  on January 05, 2008 at 05:11 PM

 
 
I thought the Beat the Clock matches and concept on Smackdown was excellenty booked and executed. I guess you don't like the logical booking of Vickie screwing her "lover's" main rivals.

Posted By: Jamie (Guest)  on January 05, 2008 at 05:18 PM

 
 
You're missing the point of the Edgehead alliance's strategy simply backfiring on them. And you're only assuming what WWE might do. Why not look at the positives. It's a fresh matchup of two great workers. And I hate how people are complaining Rey is only gonna be jobbed out, in what other promotion do you see a guy under six feet and 200 pounds being the number one contender to the title. That's an accomplishment in itself. And Rey has won matches against Chavo and Finlay, and he technically beat MVP on PPV as well. And your whole comparison to WCW is a joke.

Posted By: Henry (Guest)  on January 05, 2008 at 05:27 PM

 
 
Bad column. Purely made just to bitch about something.

Posted By: Dudemeister (Guest)  on January 05, 2008 at 05:49 PM

 
 
Kevin: Try RoH. Bryan Danielson is 5'10 and 185 lbs.

Anyway, I mostly disagree with the article's whining. You claim that WWE is going to "disappoint the fans", but by doing what? Having a face lose a championship match? So what, is every face supposed to win every match at all times? Gee, that'd make for exciting, suspense-filled shows.


Posted By: Ange (Guest)  on January 05, 2008 at 10:05 PM

 
 
How do you still have a job? This was an awful column. You just wrote it to complain and bitch about the E

Posted By: Punkhead (Guest)  on January 05, 2008 at 11:10 PM

 
 
Okay, I missed the show due to work and women... so why was Edge in one of the matches to decide the number one contender to face Edge? Or was it if he won (beating the clock) he'd get the night of the Rumble off?

Posted By: G-Walla (Guest)  on January 05, 2008 at 11:10 PM

 
 
G-Walla: IIRC, if Edge had beaten Rey then Chavo would have gone on because he had the highest time before that. In previous years, only one of the people in each match was beating the clock and if the other person won then they wouldn't get anything. I remember last year's had Super Crazy winning a match but didn't advance because he wasn't the one beating the clock.

Convoluted I know but it still played in perfectly with a) Edge wanting the least threatening challenger (Chavo) and b) Vickie trying to bring Chavo into the fold by giving him opportunities at title matches.


Posted By: MC42 (Guest)  on January 06, 2008 at 12:10 AM

 
 
What a crappy column.

The Beat the Clock show was booked very well. Neither Finlay beats MVP by cheating after a long match. No heat lost there. Chavo makes a weird speech about family, but Vicky feels that he'd make a good opponent for Edge, so he gets the creampuff opponent (Funaki). Undertaker & Batista are get unfair stips and fail to beat the clock. They don't really lose any heat doing so because they would have probably won their matches with a little extra time and they are able to get some revenge at the end of the show.

At the end of the night, Rey Mysterio vs Edge on PPV should be a great match. Yeah Edge will win, but it'll still be a good match. Quit bitching so much.


Posted By: Unright (Guest)  on January 06, 2008 at 02:45 AM

 
 
Damn, some of you guys are think. The column is called "What Were They Thinking?" Of course it is going to be negative! Some of you are acting like SmackDown! was the recipient of genius booking, too. It wasn't.

Posted By: Matt Eli (Guest)  on January 06, 2008 at 10:21 AM

 
 
The Undertaker and Edge interacting killed their feud, in my eyes. My interest in it is now gone. *Gasp* The Undertaker's zombie powers killed Edge! It just completely sours everything in my opinion. The one-sidedness of Beat the Clock is awful, and the idea has been toggled for worse instead of better. There are much better, and much more episodic ways to crown a #1 Contender heading into a major PPV, and the way the matches went from favouring Taker/Tista to favouring the heels? Why? Why not just have Vickie Guerrero sign them with the heels having the advantage? This was average booking, at best.

Posted By: Matt Eli (Guest)  on January 06, 2008 at 10:25 AM

 
 
Matt Eli, many of us don't believe that SD was full of genius booking. It's just that we think it deserved such a HUGE level of critizism.

Posted By: Flabberschnackle (Guest)  on January 06, 2008 at 01:23 PM

 
 
WWE made a sensible and logical booking decision and put on a decent show, and I think everybody else has put the reasons why more than adequately, so I will go in a different direction with my complaints. If you are going to give your opinion on something, then at least make a compelling case for it. You basically just stated the facts and said you didn't like how it went down, then went completely off the board about speculative future booking decisions, lack of ability in booking small guys in WWE and TNA, and a poor comparison to WCW, whom I recall in their dying days featured Rey and Billy Kidman very prominently (with Mike Awesome's help, Kidman even scored a pinfall victory against Hulk Hogan off a splash through a table, if memory serves), as well as giving Chavo, Elix Skipper, the awesome 3 Count stable and that cajun dude a good bit of face time. Even if they were less than respectful in de-masking Latin stars and eventually depushing the lower tiers of them, which is admittedly the case, your argument is still rather badly flawed and has nothing to do with the task at hand anyway. That isn't good enough for someone in your position as a writer for a prominent and respected website. Compelling arguments to the question at hand and better fact checking is needed in the future on your behalf, or perhaps a more readily defendable topic, if nothing else.

Posted By: twf's sdc (Guest)  on January 06, 2008 at 01:29 PM

 
 
The most amusing name and the worst 411 column by a country mile. I thought this guy had been given the boot.

Posted By: Col (Guest)  on January 06, 2008 at 07:41 PM

 
 
so that means Batista & Undertaker are in the ROYAL RUMBLE?...AWESOME!!! The more Former world champions the better, now let Triple h back in it, along with people better than moore/wang/snitsky/holly and we're good

Posted By: jake (Guest)  on January 06, 2008 at 07:52 PM

 
 
I think Sam said it all. The BTC tournament did what it was supposed to do, push storylines, protect stars, and set up a potential classic in Edge vs Rey Rey at the Royal Rumble. You couldn't ask better from the WWE these days. No stupid Hornswoggle skits or gimmick matches involving Khali, and someone still finds something to bitch about. I'm surprised Bumgarner hasn't come out to defend his column or to provide reasons for his thinking yet.

Posted By: Finn (Guest)  on January 06, 2008 at 11:42 PM

 
 
Apparently some of you humanoid readers don't get the concept of the column---"What Were They Thinking". That should tell you he is going to slam on what, in his opinion, were stupid decisions or ideas. Of course it's going to be more negative because that is the concept. If you're too stupid to get the concept, then you need to read something else.

Posted By: songremainsinsane (Guest)  on January 07, 2008 at 05:58 PM

 
 
Last year's sprint was way better. Everybody was trying to screw each other over, and the heels were cheating to get quick times.

Posted By: JJ (Guest)  on January 20, 2008 at 07:37 PM

 


www.41mania.com
Copyright � 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.