www.411mania.com
|  News |  Columns |  TV Reports |  Video Reviews |  Title History |  Hall of Fame |  News Report | Search
SPOTLIGHTS  SPOTLIGHTS
MOVIES/TV
// The Dark Knight Review
MUSIC
// [AUDIO] 411 Music Interview: Rich Beddoe of Finger Eleven
WRESTLING
// 411’s Buy or Sell: The Age of the Fall, Vin Gerard, Steve Corino, and More!
POLITICS
// Has Bush Submarined McCain?
MMA
// 411’s MMA Roundtable Preview: Affliction - BANNED
SPORTS
// Roach: Manny Would KO De La Hoya!
GAMES
// Animal Crossing: City Folk (Wii) Preview






 HOT TOPICS
SYNDICATE  SYNDICATE



411mania RSS Feeds
 





 
 411mania » Wrestling » Columns
Advertisement
411’s Countdown to WrestleMania 24: The Turning Points
Posted by Scott Slimmer on 03.06.2008




Graphic by Meehan

WrestleMania is the Granddaddy of ‘Em All. It is the Showcase of the Immortals. It is, quite simply, the most important annual professional wrestling show in the world. Each year, WrestleMania serves as the culmination of a year's worth of WWE storylines and jump starts the action for the year to come. The matches featured at WrestleMania become the stuff of legends. Matches such as Hulk Hogan vs. Andre the Giant, Shawn Michaels vs. Razor Ramon, Bret Hart vs. Steve Austin, and Chris Benoit vs. Triple H vs. Shawn Michaels have become so deeply engrained in the fabric of professional wrestling that it is almost impossible to imagine the history of the industry without them.

Each WrestleMania is special. Each one is memorable. But a few select WrestleManias shine a bit more brightly than the others. They are the beacons that mark true turning points in the history of WWE and therefore in the history of professional wrestling. The WrestleManias discussed here are not meant to be a collection of the greatest WrestleManias, nor are they intended to represent an assemblage of my personal favorite WrestleManias. These are simply the events that, given the perspective of time, can be seen to have marked the dawning of a new day in WWE. Like the signing of the Declaration of Independence, the Battle of Fort Sumter, and the fall of the Berlin Wall, these are the events that serve as touchstones to help us define the end of one era and the start of the next. For those of us who love professional wrestling and all of its rich, fascinating history, these are the turning points.


WrestleMania I
March 31, 1985

Each year WWE promotes WrestleMania as the Granddaddy of ‘Em All, but WrestleMania I truly was the Granddaddy of ‘Em All. While WrestleMania I was one of the most important professional wrestling shows in history, there were also a number of things that it was not. WrestleMania I certainly was not the first supercard in the history of the industry. The Showdown at Shea, The Last Tangle in Tampa, Starrcade, and The First Annual David Von Erich Memorial Parade of Champions had proven that wrestling events could be not just entertaining but also significant to the history of the industry. Events such as these in the early 1980's demonstrated that a wrestling promotion could successfully stage supershows featuring the culmination of a number of high profile feuds, and it was this model that Vince McMahon would adopt for WrestleMania. WrestleMania I was also not the first pay-per-view event in wrestling history. In fact, that distinction would go to WWF Wrestling Classic later in 1985. WrestleMania I thus stands as the only WrestleMania not to be shown on pay-per-view. Finally, WrestleMania I was not the dawn of Hulkamania. Hulk Hogan defeated The Iron Sheik to win the WWF Championship at Madison Square Garden on January 23, 1984. Hulkamania had been running wild for more than a year before WrestleMania I.

So why then is WrestleMania I so seminally important? It wasn't the first supercard in the history of the industry. It was the first pay-per-view in the history of the industry. And it wasn't the dawn of Hulkamania. But it was the first full-scale demonstration of Vince McMahon's vision for the transformation of professional wrestling into sports entertainment. McMahon took the existing supercard model and raised it to the next level by bringing in an unprecedented level of celebrity involvement. From Cyndi Lauper to Mr. T to Muhammad Ali, WrestleMania was the template for professional wrestling as not just a sporting event but also a pop culture extravaganza. Some have decried Vince McMahon's focus on entertainment over sport, but what cannot be denied is that WrestleMania I laid the foundation for the last two and a half decades of success that have been enjoyed by WWE. WrestleMania I also took Hulkamania to a whole new level and made Hulk Hogan into the biggest star the industry had ever seen at the time. But even Hulkamania couldn't last forever, and eventually the WWE would need a new generation of stars to emerge…


WrestleMania X
March 20, 1994

The WWF was at a turning point when WrestleMania X took place on March 20, 1994. One year earlier, WrestleMania IX had proven to be the weakest offering in the ten year history of the event, and the year that followed had not been kind to the WWF. Hulk Hogan, the biggest star in the history of the company, had left the promotion and left a gaping hole in his absence. Hogan had been the preeminent star in the WWF for ten consecutive years, and for many it had become impossible to imagine the WWF thriving without him. WrestleMania X would be the first WrestleMania without Hogan, the man who had headlined eight of the previous nine WrestleManias. And so it would be WrestleMania X that would show the world whether or not the WWF could find a way to move forward after the end of the Hogan Era.

The real question going into WrestleMania X was whether a new star would emerge to take Hogan's place in the WWF, and that question was answered not once, but twice. Because it was at WrestleMania X that both Bret Hart and Shawn Michaels broke from the pack and staked their claim to being the top stars in the WWF. Ironically, the star-making performances put forth by Bret Hart and Shawn Michaels both came in losing efforts. Hart had lost the opening match of the card to his brother Owen, and later in the evening Michaels would lose the Intercontinental Championship to Razor Ramon in a Ladder Match. And while the rise of Hart and Michaels to replace Hogan could be seen as the start of a new era, it was the manner in which they became stars that truly defined a new era in the history of the WWF. Because Hart and Michaels did not become stars at WrestleMania X by winning big matches. Rather, they became stars by putting forth absolutely legendary performances. Bret Hart vs. Owen Hart and Shawn Michaels vs. Razor Ramon at WrestleMania X are both bona fide classics, and those two matches marked the dawn of a new era of in-ring action for the WWF. Dave Meltzer has only awarded a five-start match rating to four matches in WWE history, and all four of those matches would take place within the next four years. The Hogan Era may have favored style over substance, but that all began to change at WrestleMania X.

Those next four years would also play a key role in developing the stars of the future and preparing the WWF for its next era of greatness. Triple H would debut as The Connecticut Blueblood, Hunter Hearst Helmsley in April 1995, and "Stone Cold" Steve Austin would debut as The Ringmaster later in the year. Mick Foley would make his first appearance in the WWF as Mankind in April 1996, and The Rock would be introduced as Rocky Maivia that November at Survivor Series. These four men, along with the Undertaker, would form the foundation of the next era in WWF history. But who among them would define that era? The answer would come at WrestleMania XIV…


WrestleMania XIV
March 29, 1998

"The Austin Era has begun!" Those were the words uttered by Jim Ross at the close of WrestleMania XIV after "Stone Cold" Steve Austin had defeated Shawn Michaels to win the WWE Championship. It was that victory by Austin and that call by Ross that heralded the dawn of the next era in WWF history. This brave new era in WWF history is most commonly referred to as the "Attitude Era," and I'll admit that you could argue that the Attitude Era started before WrestleMania XIV. It would be exceedingly difficult to make a case for the Attitude Era beginning any early that WrestleMania XIII, and it would be similarly difficult to argue that it began any later than WrestleMania XIV. That leaves a one year window in which this most fondly remembered phase in WWF history may have dawned, and in my mind there were three key matches during that year that ushered in the Attitude Era. Those three matches focused on saying good-bye to the two men that had defined the WWF since WrestleMania X while simultaneously building the next great star in WWF history.

The first of the three matches in my Road to the Attitude Era was Bret Hart vs. Steve Austin in an I Quit Match at WrestleMania XIII. This match was monumentally important in turning Steve Austin into a face and beginning his ascent to super stardom. Bret Hart, along with Shawn Michaels, had carried the WWF for the past three years, but in this match Austin proved that he was the toughest son of a bitch in the company. Sure, Austin technically lost the match, but he beat Hart in the only way that really mattered – he came out of that match looking like the better man. Hell, the image of Austin's blood-drenched face from the end of that match had often been called the single most defining image of the Attitude Era, and that statement implicitly argues that WrestleMania XIII was part of the Attitude Era. I still believe that the single most defining image of the Attitude Era is the Undertaker throwing Mick Foley off of the Hell in a Cell at King of the Ring 1998, but I do understand the visceral impact of Austin's crimson mask. The effect that this match had on Austin's career, and the effect that Austin's career had on the WWF, does make it possible to argue that WrestleMania XIII was the dawn of the Attitude Era. But as I said, in my mind, this was only the first step on the Road to the Attitude Era.

The next match on my Road to the Attitude Era was Bret Hart vs. Shawn Michaels for the WWE Championship from Survivor Series 1997. I've already explained that WrestleMania XIII was important because it established Steve Austin as the top face in the company, but this match at Survivor Series 1997 was damn near just as important because it planted the seeds for the establishment of Austin's greatest enemy: Mr. McMahon. I've argued that the period between WrestleMania X and WrestleMania XIV was defined by the feud between Shawn Michaels and Bret Hart, and by the same token I have to argue that the Attitude Era was defined by the feud between Steve Austin and Mr. McMahon. And thus the transformation of Vince McMahon from mild-mannered play-by-play announcer to evil billionaire tyrant was critically important in building the foundation of the Attitude Era. This match also marked the end of Bret Hart's career in the WWF. One of the company's biggest stars was gone, and its next great antagonist had just been created. The pieces were all set to fall into place at WrestleMania XIV.

And thus we return to Steve Austin's victory over Shawn Michaels WrestleMania XIV. Bret Hart had been gone from the WWF for months, and this would be Shawn Michaels' last match with the company… at least for the foreseeable future. And so with the two men who had carried the company since the departure of Hulk Hogan now gone themselves, it would fall to "Stone Cold" Steve Austin to shoulder the burden. Needless to say, he was more that up to the task. As I've explained, there are at least three matches that could be used to mark the beginning of the Attitude Era. But in my mind, the Attitude Era is synonymous with "Stone Cold" Steve Austin, and thus it only makes sense to mark the beginning of the Attitude Era by the beginning of the Austin Era. And as Jim Ross so eloquently stated, that moment took place at WrestleMania XIV. But just as the Attitude Era began with the dawn of the Austin Era, it would end when Austin did the one thing that no one expected…


WrestleMania X-7
April 1, 2001

The Attitude Era was a time of great prosperity for the WWF, but it was also a time when competition flourished in the professional wrestling industry. WCW and ECW had both risen to national prominence during that time, and at one point WWF, WCW, and ECW all had national television deals. But eventually WCW collapsed under the weight of its own booking, and ECW became buried under a mountain of financial debt. Both companies were bought by Vince McMahon, and for a moment the WWF had a virtual monopoly on North American professional wrestling. WCW and ECW were gone. TNA and ROH were a year away from their creation. The WWF was able to stand back, marvel at its glorious victory, and throw one hell of a part. That party was WrestleMania X-7.

There will always be arguments among fans of professional wrestling over the greatest wrestler, greatest match, and greatest show of all time. That's part of what makes being a fan of professional wrestling so much fun. But it's hard for me to image anyone ever convincing me that WrestleMania X-7 isn't the greatest show of all time. It was an absolutely phenomenal card top-to-bottom, and we can only hope to ever see another WrestleMania with so many great matches. But there were two distinct features of WrestleMania X-7 that also lead me to believe it was the end of the Attitude Era. As I've stated, one of the most important aspects of the Attitude Era was the competition between WWF, WCW, and ECW that lead to such unprecedented creativity and innovation. But by WrestleMania X-7, that competition was gone. You hear it in every match; Paul Heyman, the driving force behind ECW, was doing color commentary in place of the momentary displaced Jerry Lawler. We had seen Paul Heyman and ECW on Raw in the past, but it would have been impossible to imaging Paul Heyman calling WrestleMania so long as there was a hint of life left in ECW. And then, as if Heyman's commentary wasn't enough of a reminder of Vince McMahon's victory, McMahon's purchase of WCW was played out, in fictionalized form, in a match between McMahon and his son Shane. ECW's main man was stuck on the sidelines calling the action, and WCW had become nothing more than a plot device. But the true end of the Attitude Era would come during the closing moments of the show.

You'll remember that I've said that, in my mind, the Attitude Era is synonymous with the Austin Era. I believe that they began at the same moment, and I believe that they ended at the same moment. The Austin Era was defined by "Stone Cold" Steve Austin's rebellious defiance of Vince McMahon. The underlying thread that ran throughout the Austin Era was the feud between Austin and McMahon, and it was the metaphorical battle between the people, as represented by Austin, and the authority, as represented by Vince McMahon, that resonated so deeply with the WWF fans. For three years, Steve Austin had fought Vince McMahon. For three years, Steve Austin has represented the people. For three years, Steve Austin had carried his fans' hopes and dreams with him every time he stepped into the ring. But then, at the end of WrestleMania X-7, the unthinkable happened. "Stone Cold" Steve Austin sold his soul to the Devil and aligned himself with Vince McMahon.

And just like that, the Austin Era was over, and the Attitude Era ended with it. The changes began almost instantly and continued for the next few years. The most obvious change was in Austin's character. The ass-kicking, beer-swilling, bionic redneck soon became a kinder, more loving man, no longer a persona capable of leading a promotion. Austin would walk out on the promotion a year later. The Rock departed for Hollywood soon after WrestleMania X-7. He would return in time for Summerslam, but his sabbaticals would continue to become more frequent and more prolonged as time progressed. WCW and ECW would be used as plot devices for the disastrous Invasion in which many, but certainly not all, of the former WCW and ECW stars would be brought into the company. The roster would eventually be split between Raw and Smackdown, and stars such as Triple H, Kurt Angle, and The Undertaker would lead the company. Shawn Michaels, the Prodigal Son, returned to the company for one night only to finish his career on his terms… but thankfully, "his terms" have spanned the last six years and included too many phenomenal matches to list. But WWE, as the company was now known, faced one major problem. As had occurred after the departure of Hulk Hogan, no new star had truly emerged to fill the void left by Steve Austin. Triple H, Michaels, Angle, and the Undertaker were certainly capable of carrying the company as Michaels and Bret Hart had done a decade earlier, but they were not era-defining stars. WWE would once again have to build the next generation…


WrestleMania 21
April 3, 2005

The next generation of WWE stars would be brought into the company in 2002. Trained in WWE's Ohio Valley Wrestling developmental territory, Brock Lesnar, Randy Orton, Batista, and John Cena would all debut on WWE television between March and June 2002. Those four men were seemingly destined to usher in the next great era in WWE history, but the identity of the era-defining star amongst them would not be determined for more almost three years. Brock Lesnar was the first to receive a major push and won the WWE Championship from The Rock at Summerslam 2002. Lesnar easily could have been the man to define the next era in WWE history; his given nickname, "The Next Big Thing," presumed as much. But Lesnar never seemed to fit in the business. He headlined WrestleMania XIX along with Kurt Angle, but for many that match is remembered mainly for Lesnar's botched Shooting Star Press. Lesnar would leave the company after WrestleMania XX when he and Goldberg were damn near literally booed out of Madison Square Garden. The search for WWE's next big thing would have to continue.

Randy Orton was the next member of the Class of 2002 to receive a big time title push. He defeated Chris Benoit at SummerSlam 2004 to win the World Heavyweight Championship after having spent the better part of the last year establishing himself as the Legend Killer by defeating such all-time greats as Shawn Michaels and Mick Foley. As the Legend Killer, Randy Orton might have found success as World Heavyweight Champion, but he would never be given that chance. Instead, Orton was forced to turn face the night after his title win, and Orton never seemed comfortable in the role of fan favorite. The fans could never truly rally behind a man who naturally exuded such a cocky egotism, and Orton's tenure as World Heavyweight Champion was an unmitigated failure. He lost the title to Triple H less than a month later. The Class of 2002 was now zero for two.

But all of that would change at WrestleMania 21, and it would change in a big way. There were not one, not two, but three matches at WrestleMania 21 that propelled rising stars to the top of the company and thus ushered in the current era in WWE history. One of those matches was the inaugural Money in the Bank Ladder Match in which Edge cemented himself as a singles star and began a quest that would lead him to win the WWE Championship at New Year's Revolution 2006 (and thanks to those of you who cought my initial error in saying that it was Royal Rumble 2006; I remembered it being in January 2006 and have seemingly managed to forget the days when WWE ran two pay-per-views in January). Edge had been a tag team star during the Attitude Era but had struggled to establish himself as a singles competitor in the years since. However, it was Edge's win in the first Money in the Bank Ladder Match, along with his subsequent feud with Matt Hardy, that transformed him into the Rated R Superstar who has been a fixture in the WWE and World Heavyweight title scenes ever since.

Another important match at WrestleMania 21 saw Batista defeat his former mentor Triple H to win the World Heavyweight Championship. After the demise of Brock Lesnar, it seemed as though Randy Orton and John Cena would be destined to inherit the top spots in the promotion. But Orton's career suffered a major set-back after his ill-advised face turn, and in late 2004 and early 2005 Batista became a phenomenon almost overnight. The WWE fans had seen Triple H beat down challenger after challenger after challenger for years both in the ring and behind the scenes, and those same fans seemed more than eager to embrace a man like Batista who flat out refused to take shit from anyone, Triple H included. Batista's win at WrestleMania 21 elevated the World Heavyweight Championship from Triple H's private ego belt to a second legitimate top tier title within the promotion, and Batista's career has revolved around that title as both challenger and champion for the past three years.

And then, of course, there was the big one. The moment that, like Steve Austin's win over Shawn Michaels at WrestleMania XIV, instantly usher in the dawn of a new era in WWE history. At WrestleMania 21, John Cena defeated John Bradshaw Layfield to win the WWE Championship and in so doing took his place alongside Hulk Hogan and Steve Austin as era-defining WWE Champions. As talented as they were, men like Bret Hart, Shawn Michaels, the Undertaker, Triple H, and Kurt Angle could never define the WWE. They could carry the promotion, entertain the fans, and put on great matches, but they could never single-handedly be the face of the promotion. Only Hogan, Austin, and Cena have accomplished that feat during the WrestleMania era. I say "during the WrestleMania era," because otherwise it would be unforgivable to omit Bruno Sammartino from that list. As far as I'm concerned, Sammartino, Hogan, Austin, and Cena are the four biggest stars in the history of the biggest professional wrestling promotion in the world. Each of those four men defined his respective era in the history of the company, the only difference between them being that Sammartino's tenure was during a time when the promotion was still regional in nature. And so, as I said, the WrestleMania era is ultimately the story of Hogan, Austin, and Cena.

And so I've essentially broken down the last twenty-four years of WWE history into five distinct periods using five of the twenty-three WrestleManias as divisors. WrestleMania I through WrestleMania X was the Hogan Era. WrestleMania XIV through WrestleMania X-7 was the Austin Era. WrestleMania 21 through the present is the Cena Era. The two transition eras, WrestleMania X through WrestleMania XIV and WrestleMania X-7 through WrestleMania 21, were eras in which stars such as Bret Hart, Shawn Michaels, Triple H, and Kurt Angle carried the promotion while the next generation of stars developed. What emerges is a clear pattern in which a single Superstar defines an era, and the end of that SuperStar's reign at the top is followed not by the immediate ascension of a new era-defining Superstar but rather by a multi-year period of transition.

But what remains constant is that it is WrestleMania that defines the beginning and end of the great eras in WWE history. And maybe that is the ultimate testament to the vision proposed by Vince McMahon at WrestleMania I. It would be easy to say that McMahon is simply a carnival barker more concerned with selling tickets and creating hoopla than in truly promoting events that change the face of the professional wrestling industry. But when you look at the history of WrestleMania, you see that Vince McMahon created an annual tradition that has not merely reflected the times but rather dictated the course of the company's history. So yes, WrestleMania has played host to many great matches. And yes, WrestleMania has seen the culmination of many heated feuds. And yes, WrestleMania has made professional wrestling into a pop culture phenomenon. But it is WrestleMania's impact upon the history of WWE, and by extension the entire professional wrestling industry, that has consistently made it the most important show of the year. Because WrestleMania is the Granddaddy of ‘Em All. It's the Showcase of the Immortals. And for more than two decades, it has been the turning point.


Post Comment (37)  |  Email Scott Slimmer  |  View Scott Slimmer's 411 Profile

  Send To Friend  |    Stumble It!  |    Digg It!  | 



Please add your comment below.
If you are registered, you can login and post under your registered name. If not, you can post as a guest or register.

* Please note that 411 moderates all comments. Your comment will show up on the site after it has been approved by an editor.
 
Name : 
Comment : 
Remaining Characters : 
2800
 

Comments (37)

 
And what's the era that nobody will give a fuck about and hopefully drain from their memories? This era.

Posted By: JJ (Guest)  on March 05, 2008 at 10:18 PM

 
 
I blame it on Triple H.

Posted By: Blanky (Guest)  on March 06, 2008 at 12:17 AM

 
 
Good article but you missed out on Wrestlemania VI, the start to the ill-fated Ultimate Warrior Era. Not only was there a new face champ, but from this moment I truly believe was the end of the first inital boom period for the WWF.

And sorry to burst your bubble JJ but I do give a fuck about this era. Screw the critics, screw it if it isn't the highest drawing era (though WM 23 does hold the record for most buys), it's an era that ushered in a more pro wrestling style, arguably absent from the two boom periods of the WWE. It's an era that respects the past and an era trying to head to the future. Like it or not but people do give a fuck about this era. If people didn't, than there wouldn't be some stupid ass smark named JJ commenting on a WRESTLING site. If it's realy that bad change the channel, no one's holding a gun to your head to watch wrestling.


Posted By: Henry (Guest)  on March 06, 2008 at 12:19 AM

 
 
When comparing this Wrestlemania to the ones you just mentioned I just noticed that I'm not that excited about this one. There's just nothing I absolutely HAVE to see this year... but the two people you can always count on to put up one hell of a show are the Undertaker and the AWESOMENESS that is HBK! Those two are the main reason I want to watch that show, because you know they will give you the best they got. I can't help but to wonder who's gonna be prepared to step it up and fill the huge void these two will leave once they finnaly retire.

Posted By: Kristi (Guest)  on March 06, 2008 at 12:51 AM

 
 
Great column, Scott!

Posted By: Andy Clark (Registered)  on March 06, 2008 at 12:59 AM

 
 
Shelton Benjamin is always a guarantee to step up. I only wish the guy would have a manager so he could get to the main event. He is awesomeness that is underutilized and yet to be really used in a manner that would make him a true top tier wrestler.

Posted By: B (Guest)  on March 06, 2008 at 01:04 AM

 
 
Great stuff man, I agree with most everything you put in here. Never thought of those four as the Class of 2002, but it works well. Was Shelton Benjamin a lost member of that class?
Who's in the next class?


Posted By: JM (Guest)  on March 06, 2008 at 02:01 AM

 
 
Whoever wins the mitb match this will be their year to step up and make a name for themselves. Kennedy will win cos last year he won but got injured so Edge got a title out of it. Speaking of Edge this is a main event that could either make or break him.

Posted By: Tony Dorian (Guest)  on March 06, 2008 at 02:39 AM

 
 
I see a lot of the "IWC" are hard for Shelton. Is he good? Yes. Athletic? No doubt about it. But sorry, he just bores the shit out of me. I agree with sticking him with a manager because the guy sounds like Kermit and is just terrible on the mic. And that song is so bland. I'm not a fan of his, but he CAN put on a good match and he's always good in MiTB matches. I think he's overrated though. He's good, but he's not great. I loved him and Haas together and wished they would have won the tag belts on RAW and had a feud with London and Kendrick, but apparently WWE thinks Holly and Rhodes and Santino and Carlito are better. R.I.P. tag team wrestling. I'm not bashing Shelton, but he needs a fire lit under his ass or some direction. Being on ECW may or may not be the best thing for him. It did wonders for Morrison and Punk, but I hate Chavo with the title.

Posted By: Joey Gladstone (Guest)  on March 06, 2008 at 02:55 AM

 
 
That was a good read Scott

Posted By: Mark (Guest)  on March 06, 2008 at 04:06 AM

 
 
Edge won at a Royal Rumble? I thought it was right after an Elimination Chamber.

I think it was a New Years Revolution. He got a huge pop for finally dethroning Cena


Posted By: Registered (Guest)  on March 06, 2008 at 05:28 AM

 
 
can i just say that after all the other columns, all the other bitchy remarks, all the other smart arsed arm chair fans making their noise, its nice to have an uplifting article about wrestling.yes the E isnt as good as it was, yes tna will go 2 the dogs unlees they wake up......BUT we watch it because it creates an atmosphere and historic events to look back on, also.....its fun!i love wrestling and this article has got to make all the smart arsed, no life, shit for brains so-called fans, take notice and appreciate a business that get knocked by every type of media on the planet.just because you are a fan it doesnt mean you have to analyse and criticise.. Enjoy it!
thank you for the article


Posted By: iwasgame (Guest)  on March 06, 2008 at 06:26 AM

 
 
as a guy who didn't get satelitte until 2003, wrestlemania XX was the best wrestlemania i've seen. it had everything that a mark like i could ask for. of course that was before i "lost my innocence" and found the internet dirt sheets. god help me, i can't quit them. there isn't shit to do without them.

Posted By: steveo (Guest)  on March 06, 2008 at 08:32 AM

 
 
Great article. But you made it seem as if Cena's win was THE event at WM 21. Sure, in retrospect, it is, because he's the top face of the company. But at the time, Cena's win wasn't anything like Austin's win against HBK. It was Batista's win over HHH that was meant to recreate that moment. Keep in mind that Batista was SUPER OVER at the time, and even more popular than Cena. And he and HHH ended the show...
Still great column.


Posted By: Samer (Guest)  on March 06, 2008 at 08:42 AM

 
 
Couldnt have said it better myself Henry!!!!

Posted By: steven719 (Registered)  on March 06, 2008 at 08:48 AM

 
 
Should have mentioned WM4... a big deal if only because Hogan wasn't in the main event for the first time at WM

Posted By: Me guy (Guest)  on March 06, 2008 at 08:52 AM

 
 
The way it is looking, the next era will be defined by the Hardy's, MVP, probably CM Punk, and a higher authority of your choosing willing, Shelton Benjamin. Lets face it, these are the only guys that are on the roster that have yet to reach the top tier yet that are marketable, and haven't fucked themselves over (Kennedy, through poorly timed injuries and suspensions and just being all around full of shit) or been fucked over by the system (Elijah Burke and Carlito, though I still have a great deal of hope for Burke... I've said it before, he is Christian Cage 2.0, given the chance).

The rest of the semi big name midcarders that are on the rise are Santino Marella, who all but sucks when he has to wrestle, and still fundamentally sketchy John Morrison is only a half notch better than the god awful Randy Orton on the mic.

The only guy that could be a major player in and get in on ground floor of the next generation looming on a not too distant horizon is Chris Harris. He could be next and deserves plenty of opportunities. Quite honestly they'd be fools to not make their absolute best efforts to make him a huge star.

What else does that leave? Chuck Palumbo finally finding the missing ingredient that makes the fans care about him? Jimmy Wang Yang is certainly capable, but it would take a perfect storm of events for him to not end a match staring up at the lights against any main eventers. Trevor Murdoch is clearly the superior talent of his team. Jamie Noble has the charisma and talent, but is small and more of the goofball type like Santino. These are the best of the rest, but nothing less than serious longshots by any stretch of the imagination. They are good enough to be front line guys, but can probably only get there as the result of a minor miracle.

The next leaders by committee era is probably officially starting at WrestleMania 25 and will be in full swing at 26. Will you be ready?

Well, will ya?


Posted By: twf's sdc (Guest)  on March 06, 2008 at 09:05 AM

 
 
Yes, Edge won the WWE Championship at New Year's Revolution and LOST it at the Royal Rumble.

Also, Wrestlemania I was, in fact, a pay-per-view in some markets.


Posted By: T.G. Corke (Registered)  on March 06, 2008 at 09:21 AM

 
 
i'll go with kristi...alas how far from grace our heroes have fallen

Posted By: john (Guest)  on March 06, 2008 at 10:23 AM

 
 
ass the article say, Hulkster is teh biggst star in wwe history. hulkster will be at tis wrestlemaia and win. you wil al see.

Posted By: JJ (Guest)  on March 06, 2008 at 11:13 AM

 
 
HHH could use a lesson from 'Taker. Step aside for awhile and let some yonger talent get pushed. Then in a few months,come back and fued with them.

Posted By: WWEMAN88 (Registered)  on March 06, 2008 at 11:29 AM

 
 
AMEN, jj! If they had thrown in Jeff Hardy into the main event instead of the predicatble tripe, I might actually order WM. As of now there's no reason to watch, I don't care if it is WM.

Henry, if this era was such a tribute to the past, then explain what the hell happened to the IC/Tag Team titles? At least those titles meant something. Nowadays we'd be lucky if the 'e' actually remembers they have those belts. Don't come in here with the "respect for the past" crap if the WWE doesn't even respect the legacy of those championships.

Great column Scott as always.


Posted By: Orlando (Guest)  on March 06, 2008 at 11:39 AM

 
 
Great look at these Wrestlemania's. True, Wrestlemania 17 and 21 both kciked ass and I think they are the greatest Wrestlemanias overall. These were the two that had some of the best matches of all,not including special moments outside of these two.

Posted By: WWEMAN88 (Registered)  on March 06, 2008 at 02:52 PM

 
 
This is to Kristi, john and Orlando. You don't see a reason to see this year's WrestleMania? I'll give you a few.

Possibly Ric Flair's final match. If you don't want to see that, I question your sanity.

The Money in the Bank Ladder Match. You have Jeff Hardy, Chris Jericho and Shelton Benjamin. Those three are sure to pull out some crazy stuff.

An appearance by Snoop Dogg.

Edge vs. Undertaker. So if you're not watching WrestleMania this year, then too bad.


Posted By: William (Guest)  on March 06, 2008 at 04:49 PM

 
 
Wrestlemania X can hardly be considered a "turning point", rather it was a continuation of a serious downturn in business and represented one of the lowest points in the company's history. Bret, as great as he may have been in the ring, was simply not a draw and interest floundered almost immediately after he became a main eventer.

Posted By: Bob (Guest)  on March 06, 2008 at 06:37 PM

 
 
HHH ruined wrestling.

Posted By: Joe Mastronardo (Registered)  on March 06, 2008 at 06:58 PM

 
 
How is Murdoch clearly the star of his team? WTF?

Cade has the look, the skills, the moveset, and YES, the mic skills, to be a huge main event heel.

I have no idea why he hasn't been pushed to the moon already, it's mind bottling.


Posted By: Phi (Guest)  on March 06, 2008 at 07:26 PM

 
 
Cena is NOT one of the 4 biggest stars in the history of the company. He just happens to be the top guy during a period where WWE isn't even half as popular as it used to be. He's as big of a star as say, Randy Orton. inb4thatrandomguestsays thatJohnCena'sdrawnmoremoneythantheattituderawhileignoringDVDsalesandm
arketshare. God, people like you, Slimmer, just piss me off because you make Cena seem bigger than he truly is.


Posted By: JJ (Guest)  on March 06, 2008 at 08:24 PM

 
 
Please tell me you didnt leave out Wrestle Mania 20 just because of Benoit

Posted By: Guest#0111 (Guest)  on March 06, 2008 at 08:38 PM

 
 
Great article really make me reflect on how the WWE has progressed, and I can't help but wonder on who will be next after Cena, It could be anyone.
I also agree with Henry JJ is just a douche bag.


Posted By: yodasoda10690 (Guest)  on March 07, 2008 at 12:00 AM

 
 
Great article, but I take exception to this: "Dave Meltzer has only awarded a five-start match rating to four matches in WWE history, and all four of those matches would take place within the next four years."

Meltzer also has his head up his ass. Who cares what he thinks?


Posted By: DG (Guest)  on March 07, 2008 at 12:30 AM

 
 
Some of you marks just will never get what the difference between being a big star and a guy just being on top when the company makes more money which was due more to having more shows and WM 23 wasn't big buys because of Cena I hate to break that to some of you that had more to do with the Trump storyline then Cena.
You don't have half the ratings and half the PPV buys then the attitude era and claim to be a huge draw. WWE suffered big time when Rock left and Austin got injured to the point of retirement. Cena got injured the company took in the same amount and even more money without him and the ratings haven't changed at all. People won't care about Cena 10 years down the road he isn't a real legend while guys like HHH will always be acknowledged.


Posted By: JJ is right (Guest)  on March 07, 2008 at 02:35 AM

 
 
Sorry, but no. I don't see Randy Orton making regular appearences on mainstream shows such as Larry King or MadTV, or starring in films, or making records. The WWE has a good number of names at the top, but Cena is quite clearly the biggest wrestling star of his era when taking into account media OUTSIDE of wrestling. Whether or not that has anything to do with what wrestling has become (by that I mean, The Rock was already a humongous star in wrestling but was still overshadowed by Austin, whereas Cena admittedly doesn't have much mainstream competition), that's neither here nor there.

One thing I want to pick a few bones with, I really find it unfair that the World Heavyweight Championship was deemed 'Triple H's private ego belt' and had to be 'elevated' by Batista having headlined numerous pay-per-views since its inception before then including the previous year's Wrestlemania.


Posted By: T.G. Corke (Registered)  on March 07, 2008 at 08:18 AM

 
 
Great column. But I have to disagree with the notion that Wrestlemania 21 was the start of the John Cena Era. Although he won the WWE Championship, it was a result of an underwhelming match with JBL. The year of 2005 was not the best year for Cena - he never main evented any cross-branded PPV's (often Batista would actually do so)and was not consider a 'real' champion. In all fairness in the year of 2004 he went from wrestling the likes of Angle, Big Show, Lesnar, Benoit to Rene Dupree, Carlito,Jesús and Kenzo Suzuki. And the fact that he defeated JBL wasn't the best build up to a Wrestlemania title win (unilke Batista in matches involving Orton, Edge, HBK, Jericho). And in his reign he often went against 'fan favourites' like Jericho, Christian and Angle. In my opinion, the Cena era officially got underway when we beat Triple H Wrestlemania 22 in the Main Event. He beat the man who was on top of the WWE (rightly or wrongly) since the likes of Austin and Rock left and dominated everything. Unlike Wrestlemania 21, there were actually fans who believed that Triple would get 'back on his throne'. Cena became the real deal and would go to be a consistent Main Eventer and draw. Anyway that's my opinion. Honestly I think the next big star could be MVP. He's the full package and can only get better! Plus his gimmick could easily transfer to the mainstream.

Posted By: AH (Guest)  on March 07, 2008 at 10:15 AM

 
 
no I'm sorry Orton is a heel they wouldn't use him as they would use Cena more since hes a face and Orton has been on Larry King a couple of times as well. You keep talking about mainstream no one knows Cena unless you're a wrestling fan I hate to break that to you. Rock was in austins shadow yeah except Rock along with HHH carried the company when Austin went down with his neck injury. People actually really like Austin and Rock while Cena is just filler. Austin and Rock would probably be bringing in more today. Nothing changed in ratings with Cena out and certainly hasn't improved with him back most of the high ratings lately have been because of mayweather. No one cares about wrestling anymore and Cena is the face of what has been a real slow period for the business. The supposed high money made came from more shows, ppvs, higher prices and the such. Hogan, Austin, and Rock brought in the mainstream publicity. Lets see Cena do half the things Austin and Rock brought in. Heres a reality check for you if Rock and Austin were still around Cena would be the curtain jerker and no one would care about him. HHH has been the real flag bearer for the company.

Posted By: no TG (Guest)  on March 22, 2008 at 07:55 PM

 
 
HHH is more known by the mainstream then Cena. I know you Cena supporters seem to think otherwise but ask any average joe who HHH is they would tell you not many would know who Cena is.

Posted By: oh and (Guest)  on March 22, 2008 at 07:56 PM

 
 
I fail to find any mention of The Rock in this column. surely he had some kind of impact on wrestling comparable to that of a Hulk Hogan or Stone Cold

Posted By: dmoore37 (Guest)  on May 16, 2008 at 03:38 PM

 


www.41mania.com
Copyright © 2005 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.