www.411mania.com
|  News |  Columns |  TV Reports |  Video Reviews |  Title History |  Hall of Fame |  News Report |  The Dunn List |
SPOTLIGHTS  SPOTLIGHTS
MOVIES/TV
// Irina Shayk Shows Off Her Killer Curves At Cannes
MUSIC
// Kanye West and Jay-Z's Watch the Throne 2 Confirmed
WRESTLING
// Brooke Hogan Says Hulk Didn't Know She Was in Talks With TNA
POLITICS
// Obama Leads In Florida, Ohio, & VIrginia
MMA
// 411's MMA Roundtable - UFC 146: Dos Santos vs. Mir
GAMES
// Castlevania: Lords of Shadow Sequel Teased


 HOT TOPICS
//  CM Punk
//  John Cena
//  Triple H
//  Hulk Hogan
//  Randy Orton
//  Christian
SYNDICATE  SYNDICATE



411mania RSS Feeds





Follow 411mania on Twitter!




Add 411 On Facebook
 



 
 411mania » Wrestling » Columns



Advertisement
The Importance of...5.25.08: Kayfabe
Posted by Mike Chin on 05.25.2008



Chinnovative Thinking
Quick notes on the past week in wrestling

-Call me crazy. Call me a 1980s WWF mark. Call me an idiot. I want TNA to bring in The Ultimate Warrior for a brief run.

The reason why I'd support this move is quite simple—if they brought in Warrior Warrior, I would watch. As it stands, I'm a casual TNA fan. I watch Impact when I'm free, and there's nothing else I want to see on TV opposite it. I've never been to a live show, never ordered a PPV, and the only DVDs I own are ones I bought during their $5 sale at the turn of the year. Take my current status, and then advertise that you're going to have The Ultimate Warrior on. I'll be honest—I would make a point of not missing Impact, and I'd probably order my first TNA PPV, if for no other reason than to see just how crazy this guy will be.

The key to bringing Warrior to the company is to use him properly. First of all, this means next to no promo time (his first 15 minutes of incoherency on the stick really killed his WCW run). Secondly, it means short term booking that won't leave the company completely screwed when he inevitably fizzles out and returns to parts unknown. You can't put him over anyone important in any meaningful way, which means no one-on-one victories over anyone from the midcard up. Finally, you can't let him have too much ring time, lest you expose the lack of skill and conditioning that, (alongside his insanity) always put a cap on how far he could go in the business.

So the answer in the end? Bring him in for a 2-3 month run, tag teaming with Sting. Have Sting play face in peril at every turn, give Warrior the hot tags where he gets to run roughshod over the heels for 1-2 minutes before getting the win. Put them over a lower level team like Rellik and Silverdust or the Rock N Rave Infection first, then give us a Blade Runners-Steiner Brothers, or Blade Runners-Team 3D showdown before sending Warrior home. Shell out, Dixie. Book it, Vinne Ru.

-Before the news about Regal's wellness situation came out, how odd did this Monday's booking for the Regal-Kennedy program seem? You can say I'm overly optimistic, but the first two weeks of build for this feud had me thinking we might have a legitimate heir to the Austin-McMahon legacy. But then we get these two one-on-one already? And on free TV? And unadvertised? And in a no DQ match? And in f*cking you're fired match? For a minute, I thought I was watching Impact.

It's a real shame that Regal put himself in this position. He had a great push going, and was playing the perfect foil for Kennedy. I'm not sure where either man goes from here. Perhaps McMahon himself steps into the familiar role of heel authority figure, or perhaps Regal returns in two months for crazy, unsanctioned run-ins against Kennedy. Perhaps they drop the whole thing, and Kennedy continues to rot in the mid-card, while Regal returns to do Heat and job duty. I guess we'll see…

-So hey, guess what? I just heard about this great I Quit match between Tully Blanchard and Magn—oh—shoot. Guess I'm a week late.

All kidding aside, yes, as the bulk of last week's comments will attest, I dropped the ball on missing Blanchard-Magnum TA in my discussion of great I Quit matches. At the risk of hurting my credibility even further, the reason I didn't include this match was because I have not personally seen it, and don't like writing about matches I haven't seen. I knew it was a high profile match, but I think I also underestimated just how significant it was, and so, I will gladly have a slice of humble pie a la mode for that blunder. Regarding other significant matches from last week's comments—I actually did include the Chavo-Rey matches in my first draft of the column, but didn't have much of note to say about those ones, and ended up cutting the deadweight paragraph. You can make a case that Vince-Stephanie belonged in the column—it's another oversight, but not necessarily one I'd apologize for. Good match for what it was, but, in the end, it was what it was.

On to our regular column...

One of the pieces of professional wrestling that makes it unique to any other form of contemporary entertainment or sport is the institution of kayfabe. Wrestling is a work. The finishes are predetermined, the feuds are scripted, the greatest spots are pre-planned between the wrestlers and many of the promos are written backstage long before delivery. I doubt that any of this is news to anyone reading this column. And as much as we in the IWC like to make like we're up above the general fan population, I don't think there's an overwhelming number of fans out there anywhere who believe wrestling is all real. With that being said it's easy to think that kayfabe doesn't matter anymore, and there's no point in continuing the old ways of trying to protect the business. In reality, nothing could be further from the truth. While the business has changed, kayfabe remains of the utmost importance.

One of the first and most obvious reasons to defend kayfabe is for the benefit of those who do not know the business is work. Stereotypically, this population is made up of kids, super-casual fans, or people who either aren't all there mentally, or for some reason just don't get what wrestling's about. In my own life, I can refer to my grandfather in this light. Born in China, he lived most of his adult life in the USA, without ever developing more than the most basic understanding of the English language. Despite watching wrestling for over three decades, he never saw it as a work, and despite my father, often in unkind terms, telling him that it was, he never believed it. This is a quality that I think I will always admire in my grandfather. I am a fan for very different reasons, as I love to analyze and pick apart the business with the knowledge that it's all a show. But I can only imagine just how entertaining and, indeed, epic wrestling would be if I were conceive of it as all being real. Such is the appeal to thousands of kids out there who haven't been smartened up. It's like believing in Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny and monsters under your bed. None of it makes sense when you really think about it, but when you have the capacity to believe, these are pretty profound things.

Kayfabe isn't just valuable for the marks, though. Turning back the hands of time, let's recall Wrestlemania VII, when Randy Savage reunited with Miss Elizabeth, an emotional moment which led to their on air wedding the following summer. In reality, every piece of this is absurd. In the real world, Savage and Elizabeth had already been married for the better part of a decade. And in the ring, you're telling me dainty Elizabeth was actually able to save The Macho Man from one of the greatest female wrestlers of all time in Sherrie Martel? And after the save, Savage was going to take back two and half years of being a total asshole to fall back in love with Elizabeth? None of this makes any real world sense. Put all of the pieces together, though, in kayfabe, and you have the culmination of one of the longest running, best-executed storylines of the ‘80s and ‘90s. Savage and Elizabeth were lovers, torn apart by jealousy and Savage's meteoric rise to the top of the business. Elizabeth was fiercely loyal, and in seeing her man destroyed, adrenaline carried her to dispose of Sherrie. How could Savage not be grateful for the rescue, and not remember all of his history with Elizabeth, and accept her back into his arms that night? What we have here is one of the greatest mark out moments of all time. Hell, 17 years later, I still mark out every time I watch the match on DVD (mind you, long after the real Savage has gone completely insane, and Elizabeth is no longer with us).

Without kayfabe there could be no marks, and it would be much harder for there to be any mark-out moments. Wrestling doesn't have to be believable in order to give us reason to believe. So long as there is some degree of consistency in the storylines, and no one's coming out and saying it's all fake in the context of the show, the business allows markdom to persevere.

The IWC likes to describe mark-out moments as if they are unique to wrestling. In reality, though, mark-out moments are there in every form of entertainment. Fans of the TV show Friends marked out when Rachel and Ross ended up together in the series finale. Fans of The Matrix marked out when Neo and Trinity blazed there way through the lobby en route to saving Morpheus. You'd have to be legitimately insane to believe that either of these moments were true. But the people behind that show and that film were able to create a product good enough that viewers could lose themselves in the moment, and not consciously think about the fact they were watching TV at the time. The same can be true of wrestling. As much as we know it's a work, during the best matches and the best programs, we can forget that we are watching a show, and let ourselves get wrapped up in the action. All that wrestling really needs to do to promote this sensation is to do like TV shows, movies, books and plays do—not acknowledge the show is a work while it's going on. This is why kayfabe can survive the blooming business of tell-all wrestling documentaries and books. These new media are like articles in Rolling Stone and Entertainment Weekly. Sure, they don't pretend that the shows are real, but they exist in a different universe from the show itself. You'll never see an episode of The Office where Michael Scott slips out of character. Such should generally be the case in wrestling as well (I say generally, because I don't have anything against special exceptions like Flair's retirement or the Eddie Guerrero tribute show).

All in all, kayfabe is what makes pro wrestling pro wrestling. It's simultaneously the business's dirty little secret, and it's greatest element—the piece of it that allows the mark in each and every one of us to believe that for every villain there is a hero, and in the end, the heroes will triumph, winning world championships, redeeming themselves with face turns, and competing on the most dramatic stage in the modern world.

That's all for this column. Next week, we take a look at the importance of Referees. See you in seven.


Post Comment (12)  |  Email Mike Chin  |  View Mike Chin's 411 Profile

  Send To Friend  |    Stumble It!  |    Digg It!  | 



Please add your comment below.
If you are registered, you can login and post under your registered name. If not, you can post as a guest or register.

* Please note that 411 moderates all comments. Your comment will show up on the site after it has been approved by an editor.
 
Name : 
Comment : 
Remaining Characters : 
2800
 

Comments (12)

 
You make a great point. no Kayfabe means no storylines, and no storylines means a lot of the emotion would be gone, the titles would be meaningless (can you imagine the promo "well the boss thought I was a bigger draw, so they let me beat the old champ and now here we are")and there would be absolutly no surprises. a well excecuted swerve is as much a surprise as anything in the real world. awknolaging wrestling as fake on screen would be like actors breaking character. I pay to watch CM Punk, Samoa Joe and Ric Flair, not Richard Flair, Phil Brookes, and Joel Seanoa.

you take away kayfabe and you've got an acrobatics proformance, or a stunt show, not a scripted sport.


Posted By: Davy (Guest)  on May 25, 2008 at 11:34 AM

 
 
warrior just no no0 non no no!

Posted By: Guest#9287 (Guest)  on May 25, 2008 at 12:07 PM

 
 
you kind of kill your own warrior argument. no mike (no shit) no wrestling no beating big opponents. They want to be DIFFERENT (well so they say) not the friggin wwe's fat ugly sister nobady wants to be with. While they are at it how about goldberg or abdullah the butcher. more guys with old reputations that can't wrestle.

Posted By: ted g (Guest)  on May 25, 2008 at 01:43 PM

 
 
I think Warrior could work if used in a very, very limited capacity and booked extremely smart, i.e.:

Hype his return extensively, then immediately re-unite him with Sting to take on a (talented!) heel tag team. Sting and the opponents could do most of the work, allowing the Warrior to showcase his 3 moves without exposing his age and lack of in-ring skills.

After that match, the Warrior should go crazy and turn on Sting (which, really, could be logically explained in a million ways). ´That sets the two icons up for a 10 -12 minute match at the next PPV, placed high up the card between two high-speed, action-filled matches.

I'd like to see the Warrior defeat Sting (because, let's face it, it's not like Sting needs the victory). This could conceivably set him up for a title shot against Samoa Joe. Actually, I'd really like to see that. It certainly wouldn't be pretty, but I'm sure Joe could carry the Warrior to a passable 10-12 bout. I mean, HBK/Hogan main evented the 2006 Summer Slam, and that ruled in its own way. I can't imagine Joe/Warrior being from an in-ring standpoint. Of course, Joe MUST win decisively, driving the beaten Warrior away from TNA in the process. Call me crazy, but I'd pay money to see that.


Posted By: Vinz (Guest)  on May 25, 2008 at 02:44 PM

 
 
A really interesting column!

Never was really a Warrior mark, NWA/WCW for me, but if TNA were to use Warrior in any way, that'd be a solid way to do it.

Sting/Warrior over the Monsters, who unlike RRInfection, are working without contracts, and then a short feud with the Steiners? Brilliant.

Hopefully a lot of people end up reading this.

nice read


Posted By: scipio2009 (Registered)  on May 25, 2008 at 05:51 PM

 
 
First of all, about Warrior. NO!!!!! There is absolutely no way to book that insane, talentless, neo-Facist that could work today. He doesn't even have his old look, which as far as I could tell was the only thing he ever had going for him. TNA needs to build on its mix of veterans and young talented wrestlers, and bringing in that waste of space could only hurt that effort. If you didn't know, now you know.

As to kayfabe, I agree that it's necessary for pro wrestling to work properly; I disagree that it's still in place to the extent needed. Ever since Vince Macasshole decided he was in the "entertainment busines, not the wrestling business" kayfabe has been steadily and continually diminishing. Too many interviews and promos are done with a knowing wink to the "smarks;" too many matches involve obvious cooperation between the "opponents" to make spots work. When I was a kid, watching wrestling back in the 50s and 60s, I knew wrestling was "fake," but kayfabe was strictly maintained, and this made it so much easier to buy into - and enjoy - the illusion. Back then, pro wrestling was covered in the sports sections of newspapers, and respected sports broadcast journalists worked as announcers on wrestling shows. Matches involved fewer "high spots" and more actual wrestling holds, which helped maintain the illusion that we were watching a real contest, worthy of our attention and respect. Today's approach may be more successful at attracting the attention of teenage boys, but just maybe, if some promotion would take a step back, forsaking "sports entertainment" for a strict kayfabe approach, with more realistic matches and straight forward interviews and feuds, it might attract back an audience which has been lost. It might find young kids, and adults who remember what wrestling once was, becoming fans again. I doubt it will ever happen, but it sure as hell would be interesting to see. And that's the truth, because truthie says so.


Posted By: truthsayer (Guest)  on May 25, 2008 at 06:53 PM

 
 
Kayfabe is what made wrestling. GREAT points for sure.

As an aside, and as corny as this sounds, as a Junior High student in the 80's I was forced to "journal" in english class daily. I still have my most cherished journal and it dealt with wrestling and the escape it provided my 11 year old mind.
I think the E needs to get back to basics, bring back kayfabe in a non-insulting way and make the matches resemble more of a UFC style seriousness.

Taker's new finisher is powerful in communicating how "real" it can be.
More of that please, with less of him (Taker) setting mysterious fires to belts etc.
Great column!


Posted By: JT (Guest)  on May 26, 2008 at 10:33 AM

 
 
Truthsayer, your name is the biggest lie of all.

Posted By: Veritas (Guest)  on May 26, 2008 at 11:41 AM

 
 
"[V]iewers could lose themselves in the moment..."

That is it exactly.

I agree with the comments earlier: too many high spots make it obvious that the competitors are partners. Thus, the illusion of actual competition is dispelled. The fan is immediately taken out of the moment. Instead of two wrestlers vying for a title that means oh so much too them, using all of the skills of their profession, we have two acrobats jumping around.

Sausage and legislation -- you do not what to see how either are made; you just want to enjoy the taste and/or benefits of both.

Too often nowadays fans are more interested in the process and not the product. We look at how it was made and how it could be better. We do not suspend our disbelief; we put on our critic's hat from the moment we hear the chimes of the opening bell.

Randy Savage and Elizabeth were special (and both should be in the Hall of Fame). Randy was a great performer; he could convince us that he believed what he was saying. Elizabeth was not a great performer; she was genuine. It was Elizabeth Hulette that shined through oh so often. We liked her, and so she could convince us to always side with her. Their story worked because it was given time to work and because Randy made us care and we already cared for Elizabeth.

May she rest in peace.


Posted By: Guest#2550 (Guest)  on May 26, 2008 at 12:35 PM

 
 
Veritas -- first of all, don't Cap my handle; it's spelled the way it is for a reason, and if you lack the sense of humor to understand that, at least respect my preferences. Secondly, it might be helpful if you specified exactly what about my post belies my handle; just posting a general insult without explaining what provoked it is hardly conducive to any sort of enlightening dialogue. Just throwing that insult up there, without any explication, tends to give off the odor of trolldom ... if you can smell ... what truthie ...is cooking.

Posted By: truthsayer (Guest)  on May 26, 2008 at 06:43 PM

 
 
I did what I generally do with and Warrior news, ignored it. As for kayfabe, Hear Hear and very well said.

Posted By: CM Wolf (Guest)  on May 27, 2008 at 07:59 AM

 
 
just say NO to Warrior!

Posted By: ECWFan (Guest)  on May 27, 2008 at 08:13 AM

 


www.41mania.com
Copyright (c) 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.