www.411mania.com
|  News |  Columns |  TV Reports |  Video Reviews |  Title History |  Hall of Fame |  News Report |  The Dunn List | Search
SPOTLIGHTS  SPOTLIGHTS
MOVIES/TV
// [Gossip] Kristin Cavallari's See-Through Lace Top
MUSIC
// Cheryl Cole Grabs Her Some Of Nadine Coyle's Booty
WRESTLING
// Top 10 Survivor Series Matches
POLITICS
// Is It Possible To Change Washington?
MMA
// 411’s Strikeforce: Fedor vs. Rogers Report 11.07.09
BOXING
// Haye Slays The Beast
GAMES
// Top 10 Arcade Games




 HOT TOPICS
//  Chris Jericho
//  Randy Orton
//  Triple H
//  Jeff Hardy
//  Edge
SYNDICATE  SYNDICATE



411mania RSS Feeds





Follow 411mania on Twitter!




Add 411 On Facebook
 



 
 411mania » Wrestling » Columns
Advertisement
411 Fact or Fiction 5.29.08: The AJ Styles Beat Down, the Second Generation Stable, Regal’s Suspension and More!
Posted by Larry Csonka on 05.29.2008





  • Welcome back to another week of 411 Fact or Fiction: Wrestling Edition! This week, two men go to battle as Jarrod Westerfeld enters the 411 Arena to do battle with Goff Eubanks!

  • And remember to go to TigerFlashGames.com and play addictive, free flash games when you're bored at work, school, or whenever! Ashish made this place because he loves you.

    1. The beat down on AJ Styles to close out Impact last week was a great angle.

    Geoff Eubanks : FICTION. Admittedly, I've not been committed to enduring, uhm, watching TNA for the better part of a year, due to the ridiculous, wasteful, superfluous nature of the booking. When AJ Styles, one of his generation's most talented performers, started wearing that fucking crown, I wanted to wallop him with a chair myself. An optimistic mind could consider this gang jump a positive thing with respect to Styles' growing back his balls, likely siding with Samoa Joe, Christian Cage and Rhino, but, aside from personal vindication away from Angle, where does this really leave AJ? As far as I'm concerned, I agreed with TEAM 3D & Booker T when they pointed to Karen and proclaimed to Kurt, "THERE'S the problem!" She's been shaking those hooker tits in AJ's face for so long the poor kid doesn't know if Right is down or left is up. Besides a face AJ has really only one singles title recourse, as Joe has a (well-deserved) hold on the TNA Title. While the company totally needs to re-invigorate the X-Division, and AJ *could* be the man to do it, TNA needs to stop pulling AJ out of the main event to help them out every time they fuck up the XD. Just ask Chris Daniels where that gets you.

    With all that *could* be done here to benefit Styles and the company itself, I've got a fiver that says all of this is going to focus a damn sight more on Kurt & Karen Angle than it will Styles and his future standing in the company. Or maybe they're setting up Styles and Karen once Kurt kills himself in the ring…(see below)

    Jarrod Westerfeld : FICTION. Don't get me wrong, I enjoyed it and thought TNA did a great job of setting it up and getting me to care, again, about AJ Styles in a big way. It was a very good segment that was built up brilliantly these past few months, and earlier on the show with the confrontations between Karen and Kurt, and AJ with Tomko, but it wasn't great. This beating dragged on for so long that I almost felt uncomfortable at points. It also didn't help that AJ was bleeding profusely from, I believe, a single chain shot, while earlier on the show Homicide and Hernandez had tiny cuts from eating unprotected chair shots to the head. So those little things added up to making what could've been a great segment into only a good one that'll be remised in a couple of months.

    Score: 1 for 1


    2. Considering his history of neck issues and that he currently has three cracked vertebrae and two herniated discs; Kurt Angle should not wrestle at Slammiversary.

    Geoff Eubanks : FACT. MOTHERFUCKING FACT!!! For Foley's sake. It increasingly seems to me that perhaps the worst thing Kurt Angle could have done so early in his life was to have managed to buck the odds at the 1996 Olympics and win a gold medal with a broken freakin neck, because, since he did it then, he seems to be eschewing common sense year after year, injury after injury, believing himself to possess a quality of will that supersedes the demands of a fully-functioning body.

    Now, true, we all claim to have a better grasp here in the IWC of that which we do not truly understand (some better and more so than others), and, it's true, Angle must certainly know his body better than any of us, but HOW many serious injuries IS this now? THREE cracked vertebrae AND TWO herniated disks?! This scares me for his sake, because it's reminiscent of the "invincible" attitude employed by Eddie Guerrero after he lived through that horrific car wreck that *should* have killed him but didn't. I'm not going to be all sensationalistic and suggest that Angle's going to die or be paralyzed in the ring or anything, but, unless reports over the last six years have been greatly exaggerated, it seems clear to me that Angle's retirement will be a forced one because his body will not allow him to perform any longer…and sooner than later. (One wonders exactly HOW bad off Angle's physical situation must become before Dixie steps in and says no more, as we were led to believe she would when Angle first signed to TNA…?) A permanently sidelined Angle will be miserable because, in his 40s, he still has a college kid's "fuck it all" desire to compete, which would be admirable if it weren't so suicidal; imagine how unbearable the rest of his life will be if he's forced to live the rest of his life in a wheelchair?

    Jarrod Westerfeld : FACT. I'm only going to buy Slammiversary for Kurt and AJ, but even I can't root to see this happen so soon after yet another injury to his neck. I've been a loud opponent of Kurt's early entry into TNA for so long now that I have to call, once again, foul on his irresponsibility to himself and his family and to this company for not taking better care of him. The man has been working hurt for way too long. He doesn't want to stop and rest and TNA can't afford to not have him around considering he's the biggest star name they have that could, and by all rights should, bring their name into the limelight. It's too soon to stick him onto a pay-per-view card against the likes of a young blood wrestler, and if something is wrong with (Kurt) to the effect that he ends up hurting AJ, then this company is royally fucked for sure. It's one thing to lose a single star, it's another to lose two because of something that could've been prevented by simply sitting one of these guys, namely the limp dog, on the sidelines.

    Score: 2 for 2


    3. Sting deserves a retirement similar to Ric Flair's.

    Geoff Eubanks : FACT. I've followed the progress of TNA Sting (having decidedly been NEITHER a fan of "surfer" NOR "Crow" incarnations) and I have to admit to an almost complete 180 degree turn where my respect for Sting is concerned. Steve Borden signed with the company for all the right reasons (to lend his legendary name to a fledgling franchise and to help both the company and its youngsters grow in a manner that would benefit them all) and has behaved as an absolute class act to be revered and replicated by any and all who respect this business. He's in phenomenal shape, plays ball with management and has been, by all accounts, a hell of a backstage role model, all to be absolutely commended.

    In a business where we've become conditioned to saying goodbye to our heroes far too prematurely due to untimely deaths, it's my opinion that those who are still around at their careers' end should receive an appropriate hero's send off. They, the talent, deserve it, the fans certainly deserve it and more such Flair-type send-offs are just plain good for the business itself, IMO. Plus, considering the fact that Sting's TNA contract expires in December 2008, there's still conceivably time for him to sign a WWE Legends contract and be inducted into the Hall of Fame in Houston (presumably by Flair) on the 25th anniversary of WrestleMania, with a career-spanning DVD to follow.

    Jarrod Westerfeld : FICTION. I already foresee the hate mail coming my way, but let's be honest here, what is Sting's legacy? He played an ultra cool character during the height of the Monday Night Wars. Anything else? Yeah, that's pretty much what I figured too.

    He's a legend, that's for certain, but he's not the caliber of legend that needs some huge send off the likes of which should be remembered for years to come. But I'm not saying he should be shoved out the back door and dragged off to the glue factory, either. His send off should be special and big, but not of the caliber of Flair's – hell, Flair got the kind of send off Harley Race should've had, and a send off that should've been thought about for Bret Hart, but no one else, really off the top of my head, deserves that kind of farewell. A reunion of the Four Horsemen, and the goodbye to a legend that stuck around long after he should've given up the game with so much heartfelt moments and so many people thanking him for allowing them a stage on which to try and live out those boyhood dreams of growing up to be just like him? That's not in the stars for Sting. No one grew up wanting to be him, and what reunion could he have that would be of any significance to him or this industry? Him and "Dingo" Warrior hanging around in the middle of a ring? Yeah, there's some significance in that, alright. Sting should get a proper farewell along the lines of "here's your final match, you go over, get some pretty sparklers, hug a few guys that mean something to you, share the spotlight with your family, and go home with this nice paycheck; thank you, enjoy retirement." Cold, but it's about all his legacy really afforded him.

    Score: 2 for 3


    ---SWITCH~!---




    4. A stable of second-generation stars (Afa Jr, Ted Dibiase Jr, DH Smith, Cody Rhodes) will ultimately fail.

    Jarrod Westerfeld : FACT. Oh man, I want to make that a FACT AND A HALF because it's so damned true. What's the appeal in second-generation superstars? Oh, right…nothing. Cody Rhodes is bland on his own, thus why he has to leech off of Cryme Tyme to look better; DH Smith is a bumbling fool who is either killing his momentum playing with the juice – and no, I don't mean OJ – or fumbling into AFI's closet and coming out with way too much of their mascara; and none of the casual fans will care about Afa Jr. or Ted DiBiase Jr. Why? Because we've seen this all before with past superstars who came in with only the hype and character of, "hey, my daddy was a wrestler, so I'm following in his footsteps." It doesn't work. It's never worked, and I defy someone to tell me a generic character like that has ever worked. Remember Rocky Maivia? Of course not, that guy sucked as a generic third-generation superstar. Remember Randy Orton's first run on SmackDown? Yeah, there was one before he started flipping out because the Undertaker was using horrible B-movie segments to slip inside of his head. Hey, does anyone still care about Chavo? What? No one ever cared about Chavo? But what about when he had Pepe? Oh…people only cared about the stick horse and not Chavo? Geez, poor Chavito. Go ahead, team these guys up. Hell, throw in Natalya Neidhart and Jimmy "Deuce" Snuka Jr. while you're at it. I'm sure that unit will get over just playing characters in the shadows of their father's legacies.

    Geoff Eubanks : FACT. I HATE saying that because I want these young men, all with tremendous upsides and legacies to uphold and extend, to succeed. Personally, I've only seen Rhodes (who seems to me to have been brought up too early, although he has desire in his eyes and his father's gift of gab) and Ted Junior thus far (no, I actually have never seen Smith), and all I've seen of DiBiase was that brief promo on this week's Raw (which felt a LOT like a young Orton, for better or worse).

    So if we go with these four men, apparently to be managed by Ted Senior, the first thing that concerns me is, are these guys ready to come up yet? There's been a lot of talk recently toward the end of "shaking up WWE" (to the end that Vince is giving away money…I just laughed openly at my TV on Monday, asking out loud, "REALLY, Vince? Is it THAT bad?!") and this isn't the first…or second…or 50TH time we've seen Vince try to "shake things up" (remember RUTHLESS AGGRESSION? Yeah, it's been going on THAT LONG), and bringing up kids WAY too soon has been a staple of such a game plan since guys like Cena, Orton, Batista and Brock, basically, the first class of OVW, were so successful upon being brought up (of course, they were kept in developmental for EONS before they saw TV, but Vince doesn't seem to equate that with, say THE SPIRIT SQUAD). If they're a bunch of Drew McIntyre's, Kenny Dykstra's and Mike Knox's whose blood I respect, this whole thing is dead in the chute.

    Next is, do these guys have anything in common aside from all being second generation performers? Is there anything else that unites them? Or can each guy come in with his own story? Like, Smith could feel a heavier burden than the rest of his stablemates because he feels a greater obligation to succeed, to carry on his father's legacy? Ted Junior could feel a greater sense of smugness, as it's HIS dad who manages the stable, etc., etc. dX were all a bunch of counter-culturists with an attitude, THE HORSEMEN were all purists in it to be the best and enjoy the fruits of their labor, and EVOLUTION represented the best of the business yesterday, today and tomorrow. It would behoove these four gentlemen to have a similar such underlying purpose, otherwise it will be a one-dimensional gimmick that will not last.

    Finally, and what swings my confidence in the negative, is that only Rhodes is the sole member named who ALREADY has no black mark next to his name, given that both Smith and Afa have logged a Strike One Wellness infraction and that Ted was pulled over for drunk driving. This is NOT how a "sports entertainer" starts a successful career in these times in which we live. Altogether, I really will be rooting for these kids, and just because this stable MAY fail, it's not a death sentence to their careers, but I just am not brimming with faith in this group just now.

    Of course, they could always bring Nick Hogan as the ultimate face-in-peril.

    Score: 3 for 4


    5. You were surprised by the recent suspension of William Regal.

    Jarrod Westerfeld : FACT. Why is that every time I do Fact or Fiction there's a Wellness Policy violation that involves someone that actually surprised me? First time out it was Hardy who, by all rights, shouldn't have shocked me, and now it's a relapsing Regal. I almost don't ever want to sign up for this column ever again as I'm fearful the next time I do CM Punk will have violated the Wellness Policy – after all this time he now falls off his principles.

    What more can actually be said here? Regal was believed to have been clean for years. Note that, it was years ago that he had issues. The WWE helped him out with rehab and supported him in his trying times, and for years this man had been working for them without any issues, and without any demons or dependencies dragging him down. It still shocked me that he failed this go around, because the last time he was in violation was because his name appeared in the Signature Pharmacy gray market scandal, but he, like others, never tested positive for any substances. In fact, nothing in the report indicated that the substances were recently purchased, only that they had been, at one point or another, customers to the gray market website. So of course this was shocking, because this time he actually failed a test and was shown to be off the wagon – for what? Who really knows? But all I can say is what a major fuck-up. If only he could have conquered these demons once more, so that we could be talking about something else right now – like when will something, even his BAC, put over Santino?

    Geoff Eubanks : FACT. Regal has been quite forthcoming with respect to his former substance abuse issues, but likely so as a result of his ability to have kicked the habit. It was and is a deep hope that he's not reverted back to his addictive ways and I really do believe he's not done so. What he HAS done, I don't know, but I WAS surprised to see him rack up Strike Two, especially during the midst of the most significant on-air role he's enjoyed since coming to the Fed. All I hope is that this is an anomalous mistake from which he learns and never returns. He's too good, he's worked and sat in the shadows too long and really does deserve a solid physical role before his body can no longer perform to spec. There's plenty of time for a cerebral role, such as the Raw GM, as he'll be a well-spoken and intelligent person long after he can no longer perform in the ring.

    Score: 4 for 5


    6. Had Owen Hart not died 9-years ago, he would have eventually had a WWE Title/World Title Run.

    Jarrod Westerfeld : FICTION. I'm a bigger Owen fan than I was a fan of Bret. As a matter of fact, I was the kid cheering for Owen to kick his stupid brother's leg out from under him at the Royal Rumble (1994) and wanted nothing more than to see Owen finally prove, once and for all, that he was not only better than his brother, but that he was right about Bret all these years: he really was a selfish prick. But at no point was there ever a sign that the WWE was going to trust Owen with their biggest title. Hell, they barely trusted Bret with it, and he was clearly the bigger of these two men. That's what kept Owen down, his lack of size. The other thing with Owen was that after a while, his drive for the industry was dying off, and who could blame him? The man only got into it because it was the family tradition, so you really couldn't expect him to keep up the care of this industry for much longer. But hey, if it will make you feel all warm and tickly inside, you could always try and find this one Coliseum Video where Owen pins Bret in a lumber jack match for the WWF Championship, celebrating with all of the heels before President Jack Tunney reverses the decision. There's your title, champ – sorry the company didn't really believe in you enough to actually let you ride out with it.

    Geoff Eubanks: FICTION. This one hurts to have to admit, as I have ALWAYS been a BIG Owen mark and have likewise always considered him to be a better wrestler than his older brother (not the in-ring general or the promo man, mind you, but the better wrestler). My first inclination was to place this squarely in the "Fact" category until I considered two things:

    1) The wrestling landscape following SURVIVOR SERIES 1997 (when Owen elected to remain in the WWF as his HART FOUNDATION teammates defected to WCW following the so-called Montreal screw job, leading directly to the company's greatest business boom EVER). As performers such as Steve Austin, The Rock, Mick Foley, Triple H and Kurt Angle rose to main event level (as well as Kane, The Undertaker, The Big Show and even Vince himself having the proverbial cup of coffee with the belt), the main event was becoming its own exclusive VIP Lounge, indeed. It was felt as if Owen could stand to gain from Vince's propensity to reward company loyalty, and it appeared as if that initially just might occur for a month or so when Owen had "reportedly" gone off the deep end, following what dX and Vince had done to his brother, morphing into "The BlackHart" as a result, out for blood against those who had wronged The Harts and left him suddenly alone and without family, the lone and cornered animal.

    However, this push, for whatever reason, was quite short-lived, Owen eventually joining the ranks of THE NATION, the faction supposedly providing the core sense of family Owen missed and required. Unfortunately for Owen, though, he was lost in what was essentially an African-American faction and saw "his" program with HHH ostensibly handed off to NATION leader, The Rock, instead being booked in a much sloppier, less-coherent story involving the rivalry among Ken Shamrock, Dan Severn and Steve Blackman. Basically, in the hotbed of talent that was the post-Bret WWF, one had to be one of the very absolute BEST in the business EVER to vie for the HWT, and, good as he was, in Vince's eyes, at least, Owen simply wasn't in the same light as the likes of The Rock, Taker and HHH. Owen was clearly a mid-card mechanic to Vince without the ability to "turn up the burner" and match the Attitude required of a top tier WWF main eventer of the time.

    2) If Owen, apart from his in-ring prowess, was known for anything, it was his playful nature, always ribbing his compatriots on the road, and for being an utter and complete tightass on the road. The reason for the latter was because of the third thing for which he was best known, being a loving family man. He enjoyed sharing about his family and was tight with his money because he was scrimping and saving so he could retire early and be there to watch his kids grow up, to be a proper father and husband to the people he loved the most.

    The fact that he was such a jokester leads me to understand why he had such a difficult time manufacturing a believably angry tough guy character, which was why he floundered (in terms of securing a main event spot) during the Attitude Era. Altogether, as Owen saw his chances in the main event slipping farther and farther from his reach combined with his desire to be home with his family (despite all of the other Hart family tragedies he'd have had to have experienced had he not passed), I'm inclined to suggest that he'd have looked at his career, said, "Well enough," and retired from active duty without a world title ever associated to his name, the greatest performer never to wear a World Title.

    Score: 5 for 6


  • These two finish 5 for 6! Come on back next week for more of 411 Fact or Fiction: Wrestling Edition!

    Post Comment (72)  |  Email Larry Csonka  |  View Larry Csonka's 411 Profile

      Send To Friend  |    Stumble It!  |    Digg It!  | 



    Please add your comment below.
    If you are registered, you can login and post under your registered name. If not, you can post as a guest or register.

    * Please note that 411 moderates all comments. Your comment will show up on the site after it has been approved by an editor.
     
    Name : 
    Comment : 
    Remaining Characters : 
    2800
     

    Comments (72)

     
    "This beating [on Styles] dragged on for so long that I almost felt uncomfortable at points." - What do you usually feel, Jarrod, when you watch someone assaulted by a large group of people? Aroused? Granted, it is sports entertainment, but a **vicious beating** (including a staged one) SHOULD last longer than one or two chair shots. Being "almost uncomfortable" means, however, that you're not completely desensitized to something like that in an age when you can find videos of twenty actual decapitations on the internet within one minute; you're still enough of a human being to acknowledge that a man is bleeding - BLEEDING - for your entertainment. So congratulations on that.

    "It also didn't help that AJ was bleeding profusely from, I believe, a *single* chain shot, while earlier on the show Homicide and Hernandez had tiny cuts from eating unprotected chair shots to the head." - Okay, never mind what I said...


    Posted By: KanyonKreist (Registered)  on May 28, 2008 at 11:27 PM

     
     
    Jarrod you are so so so so so wrong about Sting. He was THE most popular figure in Wrestling at the height of WCW's run. And carried WCW for its entire history.

    The problem is Sting is the the only true vestige that WCW has. WWE adopted Flair and the Horsemen into their cannon, Goldberg has left wrestling behind. Therefore he stands as a man without a country, without the WWE machine to market him he seems irrelevant.

    But the truth is while Flair was the NWA, Sting was WCW. Its just that WCW doesn't mean anything anymore.


    Posted By: ThePhenom (Guest)  on May 28, 2008 at 11:33 PM

     
     
    I think what kept Owen down was the lack of desire oft he other main event folk from working with him especially Stone Cold and DX. I really think has he not broken Stone Cold's neck he would have been the logical person to fued with Stone Cold after Wrestlemania XIV.

    Posted By: nanoman (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 12:04 AM

     
     
    Even though a did not watch a lot of WCW before nitro. I have to agree with ThePhenom. Sting was WCW. He was the only major WCW superstar not to spend time in the WWE/F. I think Geoff's idea is pretty good.

    Posted By: nanoman (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 12:08 AM

     
     
    What's wrong with all writers.. Why you guys piss on Bret all the time? he is better than Westerfald and Eubanks

    Posted By: Jeremey (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 12:09 AM

     
     
    Why ask WWE marks questions about TNA when they obviously hate the promotion? Enough of the propaganda already. It's getting out of hand.

    Posted By: Seriously. (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 12:11 AM

     
     
    I commented on this in the last Fact or Fiction, so I want to comment on it in here and thank you Jarrod (and to a degree Geoff) as well for dealing with the true surprising/sad part about Regal falling off the wagon, and not concentrating on the "oh no, he was getting pushed' aspect of it.

    Posted By: Devin (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 12:27 AM

     
     
    Honestly, if you didn't think the AJ ending of Impact was a great angle, than I question your sanity. Maybe you have become too cynical or jaded. Maybe it's to the point where you can't enjoy anything unless it's pure rassling.

    Goff, Geoff, or whatever your name is, I have a suggestion for you. Watch the performance. Judge the moment. Stop trying to play smarky internet geek who whines about booking. The AJ beatdown was griping television and better than anything WWE or TNA has done in a looong time.


    Posted By: Steve (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 12:33 AM

     
     
    I've always been disappointed that they didn't run with the Black Hart gimmick . . I had followed Owen's entire WWF career, and that was the first time I saw Owen with main eventer potential. I do think he would've won the belt eventually if he stayed healthy, maybe around 03-04 when they were pushing technical wrestlers more. I envision him being part of the Smackdown Seven. ;) And all those wrestlers ended up winning gold so . .

    Posted By: y2kev (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 12:36 AM

     
     
    Angle is going be wheel chair bound if he keeps it up, that a no brainer. Totally off on the Owen Hart question. He would have gotten it but not for long.Sting deserves a retirement like flair in every way. But because hes not HHH's personal icon, or a former WWE wrestler, he probably wont get it.As far as Regal, one should never be surprised at a former addicts relapse. Nice in hoping its not what it looks like,but smart money says it probably is.

    Posted By: Huhu (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 12:41 AM

     
     
    Nine years ago, no one would ever have guessed there would be three world championships in one company. No one would have guessed that Guerrerro, Benoit, Jericho, RVD, Edge or Bradshaw would hold world titles but they did. Times have changed a lot in nine years and I have to think that Owen would have gotten a short shot at the top.

    At the very least, he would have gotten the ECW Title, even though I know that wasn't part of the question.


    Posted By: Ron Martin (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 01:36 AM

     
     
    I already foresee the hate mail coming my way, but let's be honest here, what is Sting's legacy? He played an ultra cool character during the height of the Monday Night Wars. Anything else? Yeah, that's pretty much what I figured too.

    He's a legend, that's for certain, but he's not the caliber of legend that needs some huge send off the likes of which should be remembered for years to come. But I'm not saying he should be shoved out the back door and dragged off to the glue factory, either. His send off should be special and big, but not of the caliber of Flair's – hell, Flair got the kind of send off Harley Race should've had, and a send off that should've been thought about for Bret Hart, but no one else, really off the top of my head, deserves that kind of farewell. A reunion of the Four Horsemen, and the goodbye to a legend that stuck around long after he should've given up the game with so much heartfelt moments and so many people thanking him for allowing them a stage on which to try and live out those boyhood dreams of growing up to be just like him? That's not in the stars for Sting. No one grew up wanting to be him, and what reunion could he have that would be of any significance to him or this industry? Him and "Dingo" Warrior hanging around in the middle of a ring? Yeah, there's some significance in that, alright. Sting should get a proper farewell along the lines of "here's your final match, you go over, get some pretty sparklers, hug a few guys that mean something to you, share the spotlight with your family, and go home with this nice paycheck; thank you, enjoy retirement." Cold, but it's about all his legacy really afforded him.

    i gotta agree, Sting does NOT deserve the type of sendoff the Flair got. He was MADE by Flair, straight up, and has always been overrated. I hated the "surfer" Sting and the "Crow" Sting was even worse! there is no performer out there right now who deserves the Flair type of send off, period.


    Posted By: dirtyfrank (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 01:38 AM

     
     
    There is not enough room on any roster besides ECW to bring in a few more young guys and book them strong enough for the stable to succeed in my opinion.

    Posted By: Most Valuable Poster (Registered)  on May 29, 2008 at 01:42 AM

     
     
    I didn't even see the Styles beatdown, but complaining that he bled too much compared to LAX? Do you even like wrestling Jarrod, or is it just a hobby of yours to obsess over every miserable detail so you have something to bitch about?

    Posted By: Chopper (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 01:48 AM

     
     
    Me being the eternal Sting mark, I just can't see how both of you guys feel that Sting doesn't deserve a good send-off.

    The guy was the franchise of WCW ever since Flair made him in the early 90's. He was THE MAN in WCW.

    When the NWO was running roughshod over WCW, Sting was the fan's saving grace.

    Even at the height of Goldberg's run, Sting could stand toe-to-toe with him and command the same pop.

    This is Sting, we're talking about


    Posted By: scipio2009 (Registered)  on May 29, 2008 at 02:46 AM

     
     
    I disagree I think Owen would have been World or WWE champ if he were still alive. I mean I never would of guessed JBL of all people would win the WWE title

    Posted By: Colin (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 02:46 AM

     
     
    Oh come on. Every single question asked about TNA in this column every time it is posted, is always, ALWAYS responded to negatively. TNA could run the greatest angle in the history of the business, and internet writers and cynical smarks alike, would all crap on it just because its TNA.

    TNA does a lot of shit wrong, but its incredible the lengths that some people reach just to come up with reasons as to why the things they do RIGHT, somehow sucks in the end.


    Posted By: damix (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 02:53 AM

     
     
    "No one grew up wanting to be him"

    I did...


    Posted By: JD (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 03:52 AM

     
     
    Sting is a legend.True.

    But he certainly DOES NOT deserve a send-off as big as Flair's.


    Posted By: nomdeplume (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 04:56 AM

     
     
    Does "moralvirus" ever give anything credit apart from Puro. Sting is a legend and deserves av flair type send off.

    Posted By: Jarrod is a fool (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 05:08 AM

     
     
    Definite FICTION on William Regal. Everyone EXPECTS someone like Jeff Hardy to violate again, so how could this be suprising?

    Oh wait, the internet loves drug-addict Regal.


    Posted By: Fury (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 05:19 AM

     
     
    Jarrod, you say that Sting didn;t accomplish enough to get a Flair farewell, and I agree. But then you imply that Bret Hart deserved one? On what grounds? Hart hero worship aside, the man didn't accomplish anything that a bunch of other performers did. He left the WWF just before it resurfaced properly and went to WCW in time to sink with it. His performances were good with the bad opponents and great with the good ones but the same could be argued for Sting and many others. He was loyal to a fault but, again, so was Sting. Bret Hart's biggest contribution was being a casualty in the evolution of the industry. He is undoubtedly a legend and will always be remembered as such but, on the level of Flair? Nowhere close.

    Posted By: Dr Domino (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 05:43 AM

     
     
    I think the 2nd generation stable will work if booked right. I think you need Randy Orton and Carlito to be the leaders though. The others could back them up. This would be a nice place to divert Randy away from the title scene until it is reset after Hunter drops it. If developed slowly, the others will gain experience and look better (think Batista)as they eventually get the rub from the vets.

    I would have Randy Orton, Carlito, Cody Rhodes, Ted Jr, DH Smith and Nattie. I would place them all on smackdown after the lottery. This would help polish their promos because they would have post show editing to make them look better.

    Also they can be a stable without being together all the time. The NWO came out to open the show but then were apart the rest of the night until the smoz endings. Each could develop their charachter seperately while being together. I think Cody has tons of talent and will get the ultimate rub in a year when they break him off. They just have to let it develop for over a year before they all get pushed to the moon.


    Posted By: tom (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 06:45 AM

     
     
    stables always get under utilized talent and green talent over while led by and established main eventer.

    Nash and Hall became household names after Hogan joined the Nwo.

    Would Tully and Arn ever been so big with out Flair?

    HHH saved a way past his prime Flair and made two main eventers in Orton and Batista.

    HBK made HHH and Chyna.

    HHH helped Xpac, Billy Gunn and BG James/Road Dogg to get over at the time.

    The Spirit Squad did not work because they were all green and had no viable mouth piece to speak for them while they developed their charachters. They were also rushed in the main event scene to feud with HHH and HBK before they were ready. Had they been given a veteran mouth piece, say Angle before he left, they may have gotten over.


    Posted By: bobby (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 06:56 AM

     
     
    Why ask WWE marks questions about TNA when they obviously hate the promotion?
    Enough of the propaganda already. It's getting out of hand.

    Posted By: Seriously. (Guest) on May 29, 2008 at 12:11 AM



    Quoted for truth.


    Posted By: Huzzah! (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 07:33 AM

     
     
    1. If the AJ beatdown made you feel uncomfortable, then it was a damn good angle. That was the purpose of it. Didn't you feel uncomfortable when Foley took that all those chair shots vs. the Rock. If it brings out the desired emotion, it's good shit.

    2. Angle's a grown man, let him make his own choices. That being said, he's being selfish and should be thinking about his children needing a daddy.

    3. Sting was the best thing (one of my favorites, surfer or crow) in WCW for 10+ years, but he is no Flair. Flair was the last true bridge from OLD school wrestling to new school sports entertainment. He deserved something extraordinary.

    4. Orton needs to be the mouthpiece (eventually, not right away) or it won't work.

    5. Fuck Regal. He's no better than Hardy. Hypocrites.

    6. Owen would have been champ at sometime. There's 3 world belts for god sake. Even Chavo's been champ. Owen was a true professional, worthy of the Hart name. I've said it before and I'll say it again, the wrong Hart brother died in KC.

    Good F or F, guys. Keep up the good work.


    Posted By: Bull o' da Woods ! (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 08:02 AM

     
     
    Hey Kurt- get out of wrestling while you still can walk. Don't be a stubborn mule and get your head out of your ass!!!

    Posted By: C-Girl (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 08:28 AM

     
     
    This is crazy, sting is one of the greatest and that was before the crow sting. Sting early in his career was sooooo athletic, he may not be as young now but he can still wrestle better than MANY wrestlers today. dirtyfrank---"Sting does NOT deserve the sendoff Flair got. He was
    MADE by Flair"
    So in your case, Nature Boy Buddy Rogers deserved a bigger sendoff then flair because the "nature boy" was made by buddy rogers. Flair deserved that sendoff because he was great, and sting deserves one because he is great.


    Posted By: cj (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 09:37 AM

     
     
    "Nash and Hall became household names after Hogan joined the Nwo" Nash and hall were household names before hogan came along. Razor ramon and Diesel were Huge in the wwf, plus they started the whole invasion before hogan got there

    Posted By: cj (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 09:49 AM

     
     
    Had he lived, Owen would have gotten Eddie or Benoit's title run. They would have looked at him as a solid hand who was a WWF guy, and pushed him above those two. Hell, he might have even been the guy to beat the Rock and Austin and win the Undisputed Championship. Where would he be now? Probably US champ on Smackdown.

    Posted By: Tim Haught (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 10:10 AM

     
     
    ask 100 wrestling fans to name the 15 best wrestlers ever. no matter how you break it down, in-ring ability, entertainment value, drawing power, sting's name won't appear on more than 10 ballots.

    his greatest legacy is his history with flair. that doesn't make you a legend.

    my strongest memory of sting is him appearing at the end of the show, springing from the darkness holding a baseball bat. he never even wrestled.

    only a handful of greats deserve a flair-size sendoff. sting isn't one of them.


    Posted By: b-rad (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 10:22 AM

     
     
    You two are retarded...moreso Jarrod. Sting absolutely deserves a send off in the style that Flari got. Maybe he is not as great as Flair, but Sting was one of the top 5 performers in the late-80's-late-90's. Those comments smack of ignorance. Also, Owen definitely would have gotten a title run. If Jericho, Benoit, Mysterio, Eddie, and RVD got one why not Owen? He had as much (if not more) charisma than all of these guys and work work as well (if not better) than them as well. Vince would not have blackballed him due to the Bret situation. Owen already showed his loyalty to WWE just by sticking around.

    Posted By: Guest#4263 (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 10:34 AM

     
     
    I think Owen could have won the title. I remember watching a Triple H DVD and HHH saying that "The Game" gimmick was planned for Owen had the accident not happened. Anyway, look what the gimmick did for 12 time champ.

    Posted By: Mad Hatter (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 10:47 AM

     
     
    "No one grew up wanting to be him"

    I did...

    Posted By: JD (Guest) on May 29, 2008 at 03:52 AM

    Jarrod, are you freakin serious? I know you're a WWE mark, but EVERYBODY back in the late 80's wanted to be Sting! He was counter culture cool before DX ever existed.

    For you to even suggest he shouldn't get the same level of retirement as Bret Hart you should get smacked upside the head for such a stupid comment! Hart didn't draw, and he only got the title because Vince had no one else to give it to.

    Name me one other person who could be the most over wrestler in the promotion for a year, AND NOT EVEN WRESTLE?! 1997, remember?

    He deserves respect in that he always showed integrity and worked hard to entertain the fans, not to mention put on great matches when needed.

    As for Geoff, for you to call out TNA for its booking is hilarious. Aren't you the recapper for Smackdown, one of the most poorly booked shows around? Oh yeah, because's SD is soooo much better with the same 3 guys (Batista, UT, Edge) fighting over the title for over a year and watching MVP do the job.


    Posted By: Orlando (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 10:49 AM

     
     
    Good job - Geoff Eubanks admit what he don't watch TNA for the better part of a year, and still answer ALL questions about it.

    Posted By: L'Mago (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 10:51 AM

     
     
    Jarrod...how old are you?

    I think I'm done with 411mania. Maybe I'll come back when you hire some writers who
    1.) have a little bit of historical perspective on wrestling, regardless of their age
    2.) have some sense of reality and understand that nobody is ever going present a mainstream wrestling show with a bunch of indy / smarky favorites.
    3.) are not so interested in making themselves look too cool for everything that is mainstream


    Posted By: cpbasil (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 11:23 AM

     
     
    ok so most people are tire of the same people and wan to create new stars. So a stable of these young wrestlers could potentially be formed and already i see two fail. Look we don't know that it will or not but can we please give it a chance if it happens.

    Posted By: matt (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 11:30 AM

     
     
    Clearly there needs to be a Sting DVD because some people are either too young to remember his prime, or personal taste is clouding their judgment.

    "what is Sting's legacy? He played an ultra cool character during the height of the Monday Night Wars. Anything else?"

    Well Jarrod, he had long classic battles with Ric Flair, and don't let Flair fans tell you Ric "made" Sting's career. That FEUD made Sting, and Sting kept up with Flair on the mic and in the ring. Then there was a feud with Cactus Jack that produced numerous classic matches. Plus the on/off feud with Rick Rude that lasted for years and was packed with great promos and matches. Then there was Sting's feud with Vader, where every match had an epic feel comparable to Rock vs Austin because they were THE guys at the time. All of these were main event programs and were the primary reason fans tuned in and came to shows. To ignore all this is simply laughable. It's as ridiculous as me saying "Sure Flair had a few good matches with Steamboat, but what else did he do?" Personal taste is one thing, willful ignorance is another.


    Posted By: Shockmaster (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 12:03 PM

     
     
    There is no one in the IWC that has an objective look at any wrestling nowadays, including the E.
    The original IWC of Al Issacs, Chris Hyatte, even the 1wrestling guys, while biased to an extent, shared a love of all wrestling.

    When it became "in vogue" to rail on the wrestling world and make Paul E the messiah, that's when it got this way.

    TNA is doing a lot of good and is growing. Sure they are booking some things that are suspect.

    Anyone remember TL Hopper? Isaac Yakem? Bob "Sparky Plug" Holly? HHH the rich kid from Connecticut? PM News? Johnny B Badd? I could go on and on.
    The boom period happened and all the "smarks" started logging on to their computers and now this is what we have.
    Some of it is entertaining and some of it is down right boring.

    Oh, and saying that Flair made Sting so Sting doesn't deserve the same send off? Flair was made by Harley Race and Dusty Rhodes to name a few. It's the older guys JOB to make the newer guys, otherwise it never continues on for anything.
    The wrestling world is full of egotistical maniacs that don't want to lose their spots, while HHH takes heat for being the prime example, look at how he made so many guys that are main eventing now. I mean some of them are crap, but they were too young at the time he made them.
    Anyway, that's my say.


    Posted By: JT (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 12:06 PM

     
     
    I never thought of Flair as a WWE wrestler I thought of him as a WCW and NWA guy that just ended up in WWE. I also think of STING as the same but he ended up in TNA. I think it would be a waist if they did't give him a big send off.

    Posted By: Sully (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 12:30 PM

     
     
    I have to disagree with you two on the issue of the AJ beatdown angle. I feel you two are going against the grain for the sake of argument or just to take some cheap shots at TNA's booking.

    Everything felt surreal about this beatdown and that's what made it special. Rather than your typical "chairshot and stand over the fallen carcas" schbeil, we got a beautiful 3 o'clock fight like build, a five on one beatdown, Don West calling for Keith to cut to a commercial, guys opening up the laceration which made AJ bleed even more than LAX, Karen Angle pulling a Beulah and allowing AJ to bleed all over her, Brother Ray calling Karen all types of profanities and a wicked looking chairshot complete with Kurt manhandling Karen. This beating is proof positive that AJ will return to being the kickass hero that we all came to respect long ago. No way in hell can someone take a beating of that magnitude and not retaliate. And in essence, no way can a character suffer that much brutality and not be built as something stronger coming out of it. This was a major step in the right direction for the AJ character.


    Posted By: bighustle (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 12:43 PM

     
     
    Got to disagree with Jarrod about Sting. Nobody grew up wanting to be like Sting...
    I would like to direct you to a person by the name of Shelton Benjamin. He is an admitted fan of Sting, and if you watch the way Shelton throws his punches and kicks you can see the Stingers influence. Hell Benjamin even uses the Stinger Splash.

    Aside from that, there is something to be said about the man Ric Flair, proclaiming you as his greatest opponent of all time.
    If the question would have been Sting deserves the Ric Flair sendoff, I would say fiction, but the question was if Sting deserved a retirement SIMILAR to Flairs. In which case I have to give a Fact.


    Posted By: Toddo (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 12:45 PM

     
     
    I like Sting and all, but Flair is on another level. The only other person who would deserve a sendoff like Flair is Hogan. Put aside the Hogan hatred (cause I don't like him either) but his importance in the history of wrestling cannot be overlooked. The argument has always been Flair or Hogan. Sting has never entered that conversation, neither has Brett, Dusty, Harley, Piper or any other number of legends.

    As for the stable, you would need a world title leader, and that is where Orton would come in. Flair was the world champ in the Horsemen, HHH was the champ in Evolution, Orton would be the champ while the others collect the IC and tag titles and protect Orton's belt.


    Posted By: DC (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 12:47 PM

     
     
    I think too many people have been jaded by the awesome Flair send off a few months back. You need to realize that this was a rarity - a one time event that may never be repeated.

    Ask yourself this: who else received a goodbye like this when they retired from wrestling? Hogan? Austin? Rock? Road Warriors? Bruno? Piper (after WM3)? The answer is nobody. That's what made it so special and why we look at it as the ultimate testament to a wrestler's career. It doesn't mean that we should look for "who's next" and in fact, having another similar to it may take away some of the luster from the Flair sendoff. Flair was beloved by almost everyone he worked with in the ring and behind the scenes. After a lot of the crap he endured during his final years in WCW, it was only fair that WWE and “the boys” made sure he left the industry the right way.

    I compare the Flair celebration on RAW with Saturday Night Live. Think of all the superstars that came from that revolving cast over the past 33 years. When one left the show, you didn't see an elaborate goodbye. Not for Chevy Chase, John Belushi, Eddie Murphy, Dana Carvey, Mike Myers, Adam Sandler – or any other big name that went on to future TV or movie fame. A few may have had a small goodbye (Phil Hartman and Jimmy Fallon come to mind). But only one star received a special goodbye - Will Ferrell. His last appearance as a featured player on SNL was a 5 minute segment with interviews from his castmates about why it was great to work with him. It was never done before and hasn't been repeated since which just shows how beloved and special Ferrell was to the re-emergence of SNL in pop culture.
    In life after wrestling, there are two ways to be immortalized for the masses: Hall of Fame (WWE version) and a WWE-produced DVD retrospective. Sting will get both of those accolades before long. Fans just need to exercise a little patience and not be so willing to dilute a once-in-a-lifetime celebration.


    Posted By: Jason S (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 12:53 PM

     
     
    I have to admit, I'm fairly new to wrestling. But what I've done since getting hooked is watch and read everything I can in order to learn the history. From everything I've managed to get my hands on thus far, I think Sting is a legend in his own right and certainly deserves a send off befitting his contributions to the business.

    The 'E grabbed me right away and gave me many a reason to care about the wrestlers. I tried TNA that same week, and it did not manage the same. However, I do try it again every once in awhile. Eventually, I found I cared about Roxxi and Gail Kim, ODB amused me, and I like watching AJ in the ring. I generally couldn't care less about the bipolar portrayal of Kurt Angle, and am not really a fan of Booker T. That being said, watching the beatdown of AJ actually got me to care about him. I think it was a good thing for TNA to do. It's not like the 'E hasn't engaged in a few prolonged, brutal beatings. As long as we get a payoff for AJ, I won't decry the function of a vicious beatdown. It seems like a great start to an angle. Now we'll see how the arc plays out. I, for one, am willing to give TNA a chance to make something good out of this story.


    Posted By: Mina (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 12:55 PM

     
     
    Okay, now I'm angry. You guys either don't do your homework or are so biased you can't think straight. For all that STING has been for professional wrestling, he deserves a big send off. His matches with Flair are legendary, but they weren't legendary because of Ric alone. Sting's charisma, athleticism, and character as a human being is what made him carry his own weight in those matches and beyond. Sting's drawing power was through the roof and he was THE most popular wrestler in the late eighties and nineties. I don't know about you Jarrod, but I wanted to be like Sting when I was young as well as some of these other fellas that have posted here. Neither NWO nor the Horsemen would have been as legendary as they were if it had not been for STING'S role as the vindicator to it all. Go back and look at his matches against not only flair but Koloff, Vader, Rude, DDP, Savage, the Roadwarriors, there was a classic with him and Luger against the Steiners, Cactus Jack, Jeff Jarrett, Kurt Angle, Goldberg, do I need to keep going because I can. He's been a World Champ about 11 times(Including 2 in TNA). Not to mention, he has the respect of all his peers in the business. He didn't have to kiss crack to get his time to shine. He didn't hold others back. I'm willing to bet any wrestler in the WWE or TNA would tell you that STING is a model by which young wrestlers can learn a great deal from. Dare i say he has more respect on a personal level to a man than Flair does. How many times have we heard wrestlers jab at Flair for his antics(Austin, Rude, Steiner, Shane Douglas and others). All i'm saying is Ric did deserve his send off, but do you really think a great performer and great human being like STING doesn't deserve a great send off as well? You guys are delusional! In a time where roids and drug abuse runs rampant in a genre of sports I grew to love as a kid, STING and his legacy reminds me of why I fell in love with wrestling in the first place. Now, you want to know what Sting's legacy is? i'll tell you.
    STING'S LEGACY
    A gentleman who had and still has tremendous ability. A man who didn't hog the spotlight and a man who had to step aside countless times without complaining, for lesser talented guys(Hogan,Savage). A guy who had double digit World title reigns, but never shyed away from putting guys over(Abyss, Joe, Big Bubba, Vampiro, Sid, Booker, Goldberg, Angle, Rude, Vader,). And a man who became a household name WITHOUT the help of one Vince Mcmahon. And lastly, A man with great character and integrity that wrestlers and announcers(like J.R.) respect and model themselves after. Not to mention, what other 48 year old do you know can put on a match like Sting? I didn't think so!


    Posted By: Brady (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 01:06 PM

     
     
    The AJ beatdown angle was a great way to transition his complete face turn, something that was long overdue. Now the fans have something to rally behind if TNA continues to build it slowly. Let AJ get revenge on Tomko first as he's trying to get to Angle.

    Naturally Jarrod and Eubanks were going to dislike it because this didn't happen in a WWE ring.

    Personally I think the payoff will be worth the beatdown.


    Posted By: Orlando (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 01:19 PM

     
     
    Geoff, if all you think Sting's legacy is being an cool guy during the monday night wars, then I just feel sad for you.

    Posted By: Money Macc (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 01:23 PM

     
     
    1. AJ Beatdown - FACT - This was just awesome. I felt uncomfortable watching it too. Know why? I was supposed to!! I was just going "Will someone save this kid?!" But noone did, because AJ has burned some many bridges (storyline wise) and noone wants to help him. He is now a man on his own who has to fight a war against a group of badass's. Hopefully, AJ will have to become a serious competitor in order to survive and that is...GASP... Character Development.

    2. Angle at Slammiversary - FACT!!! - Please, please, please - someone set up a meeting btw. Dynamite and Angle! So angle can see the pin sticking out Dynamites friggin foot and realize that sometimes you need to take a break.

    3. Sting Retirement- Fiction - Sting deserves a retirement honoring him and his career but nothing like Flairs. I take nothing away from Sting but there is only one Ric Flair.

    4. 2nd Gen Stable - Fiction - Just like the IWC to shit on something BEFORE it even starts!! So many bitter people on here. Give the thing a chance.

    5. Regal Suspension - fact - if only cuz you would think nearly dying would curb someone from taking drugs, but we don't know the whole story so we should prolly just keep our opinions to ourselves.

    6. Owen World Champ - FICTION!! - HAHAHAHAHA - I'm sick and tired of the Owen Fan boys. Seriously. I'm sorry for him and his family that he passed the way he did. That being said, if his last name wasn't "hart" he would be lucky to be a mid carder. Even with the last name Hart - he was just a mid carder. He didnt draw, needed to be carried - yes i said carried - someone point out ONE match that rocked that didn't involve, Bret, HBK, Austin, Henning or HHH. And I seriously believe that him and Bulldog - European belt was more two blind squirrels finding a big nut.


    Posted By: Eddie Chicago (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 01:23 PM

     
     
    Eubanks finally has found reality!!!

    Now if he can just shift on Dusty...


    Posted By: thegunisgood (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 02:05 PM

     
     
    I feel that the only people that deserve the kind of send off that Flair got is an extremely short list. By having a Flair sendoff for anybody that is considered a legend like Sting is, it diminshes the specialness of the moment. Besides Flair, the only other people that I feel deserve that kind of send off would be HBK, HHH and the Undertaker. HBK for all that he has given to the business and all the great moments and matches that he has been a part of. HHH because of his ability to have great matches with almost anybody. The Undertaker for the simple fact of his longivity and his popularity and respect that it seems everyone has for him. When so many other performers jumpedship to WCW for the money this three men did not. All them could have made a lot more money in WCW but chose to stay in the WWF.

    Posted By: spidey2285 (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 02:08 PM

     
     
    Stables that debut as stables don't work that well because the Identity of the stable becomes bigger than the wrestlers. The reason Evolution worked is because each wrestler had their own gimmick and role, Flair was the manager and teacher, Triple H was the champ who's flunkies helped him out, Randy was "the future of the buisness" and Batista was going to be the next big brute! all had debuted alone and Evolution just provided storylines and teaching to Randy and Batista.

    The Spirit sqaud failed, and only the guy with the most potential was kept, Kenny, who now jobs constantly.

    Half the NWO at one point was carried by being an NWO member, and afterwards was revealed to just be a tool.

    If Vince want's this he needs to give all the second gen guys a few decent fueds and storylines, and get them semi-established before putting them into a stable, If he's hell bent on the idea. that way theres some chance that they'll survive. and he has to make sure they all have characters and roles that they can fall back on if the stable crumbles

    Cody can be the face, who girls love (already is, just ham it up dude, flirt with the front row)

    DH can get really mean and conceited and show all the technical stuff he learned as a Hart and Benoit student, turn him into a wrestling machine, and make it clear he beleives he's the best pure wrestler going today.

    Ted can have a wealthy gimmick like Dad, and play politics, be a dick backstage, and then put on good matches.

    Afa, needs to come in as a face and demand that Umaga respect the Family Legacy, and fued with him.

    Reid Flair can WOOOO! and come in as a face, claim that his first goal is Gold, antagonize the secondary champ (US or IC) while building up a winning streak and evenutally becoming a contender.

    They have to have their own thing or else the group will fail. Could anyone tell the spirit squad guys apart? thought not.


    Posted By: Davis (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 02:25 PM

     
     
    KanyonKriest, I don't know about you, but when I see a beat down I'm feeling sympathetic and hopeful that the odds will be evened and a chance to flee the fight for another day, or possibly exact some revenge. I’m not thinking that I should feel uncomfortable about a situation for another person, whether it is staged or not. I expected to see more than just a beating on the guy last so long while nothing was being done to help him out – that makes me uncomfortable to think that a situation like that can occur and nothing, not even a miracle, can help out.

    And as for the chain shot busting Styles open – I’ve commented on that in my blog; the drawn blood [of AJ] would’ve been more significant had LAX not been cut open by chair shots. The unprotected chair shot was enough damage to leave in my mind, allowing me to feel that much more sympathetic to AJ when he was left bleeding. Sorry, but if three guys are bleeding, and the two have minor cuts from something that looks to just do more damage, I can’t really get behind the gusher who took a smaller shot from something that couldn’t be visibly jagged to produce such a cut that draws so much blood. The earlier beat down stole some of the thunder of AJ’s segment.


    Posted By: Jarrod Westerfeld (Registered)  on May 29, 2008 at 02:58 PM

     
     
    Chopper, it wasn't so much that AJ bled too much, it was the fact that it wasn't as significant considering LAX bled earlier in the night from shots that just looked more devastating. It took away from AJ's moment to have that much blood featured on one show. It didn't do anything for me as a viewer. I'm not interested in blood for the sake of blood, I'm interested in the story, and the story of that night should have left me thinking, "I have to watch next week for certain." It didn't do that, unfortunately. It left me flat, and thinking, "okay, that was kind of painful to sit through; I don't know if I'd want to do that again next week."

    Posted By: Jarrod Westerfeld (Registered)  on May 29, 2008 at 03:09 PM

     
     
    damix, by all means, point to where I said that segment sucked. Did I not say it was good? Or did I come out, swinging a hammer, screaming, "TNA! GAR! TNA BAD! SMASH ITTY-BITTY TNA! ARGH!"?

    Please...at least READ and COMPREHEND what's being said.


    Posted By: Jarrod Westerfeld (Registered)  on May 29, 2008 at 03:15 PM

     
     
    First off, sorry for being a prick with my post. I always get too angry and then end up looking like an asshole when someone responds reasonably.

    It still does seem nitpicky though. I mean, who's to say what causes someone to bleed or not? I'm all for criticism, but there are times where the writers (and readers) of this site seem to be looking for things to be disappointed in.


    Posted By: Chopper (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 03:24 PM

     
     
    Dr. Domino, I didn't mean Bret should have gotten the treatment, only that it at least be thought about for him. At least in comparison to the send off he actually got, which didn't add to his legacy or the memory of him in the light many of us grew up watching him under. I agree, he, too, wouldn't be deserving of the Flair send-off treatment, but there would be those that could argue it considering the impact the Hart family had in wrestling, and his impact in the WWF when they were suffering through some tragic times of their own. That's about as far as I'd go - he should be thought of as more deserving for that type of send off than Sting.

    Also, I put over Puro more so than anything else? I thought I was a ROHbot? Someone better get their lies about me straight before they blow their cover and end up looking more a fool than they try to depict me as being. Only saying.


    Posted By: Jarrod Westerfeld (Registered)  on May 29, 2008 at 04:02 PM

     
     
    IMHO, blood don't have such turn away effect from this beatdown. People tune on next show not because AJ's blood shed, but because his character's evolution.

    Posted By: L'Mago (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 04:09 PM

     
     
    Guest#4263, it’s okay Xcellence, you can come out of that closet. I know it’s you.

    What justification is there for Sting to get such a huge send-off? Besides your clear bias that Sting is the greatest wrestler to wear a pair of tights.

    Sorry, but Sting’s send-off shouldn’t be as big as Flair’s, and by all rights it couldn’t be. Again, what meaningful reunion would there be? Who would remember Sting as fondly as they did Flair? What wrestlers would come out and say they wanted to be him when they had so many other people to idolize when they were growing up?

    It’s okay to be a Sting fanboy, but don’t press that junk on me like I’m the ignorant one here. Sting gets a good farewell and only a good farewell.

    Also, Orlando – LOL! You’re a funny little one, aren’t you?


    Posted By: Jarrod Westerfeld (Registered)  on May 29, 2008 at 04:19 PM

     
     
    Cpbasil, see you next week then? Good to know.

    Shockmaster, 1992 called, they want to know if people will go back and put money into all of the Sting programs back then so he can look like a better draw than what he actually turned out to be.

    JT, Undertaker wants his credit for helping to make and sustain a damaged Randy Orton as a viable contender to a title again. Also, JBL wants his credit for helping keep Batista hot during a period where Cena started losing his fanfare after being such a big deal on the “B” show.

    Toddo, a retirement similar to Flair’s would require an entire roster to admit to idolizing him as a kid – naming one person out of an entire industry doesn’t exactly stack up to the amount of people who’ve said they grew up idolizing guys like Hogan and Flair. Sting just wasn’t of that caliber. Then you have the reunion of the Horsemen that added to the moment of Flair’s farewell speech – what could equate to that with Sting? A reunion with Luger? A reunion with Warrior? I doubt they could swing Flair down for that as there might be an issue with the WWE for future projects. That’s why I went Fiction, and stand by it.

    Jason S, it’s not so much that it would take away from Flair’s send off as it just wouldn’t match up. Sting’s farewell wouldn’t be close to the type of moment that Flair got simply because there isn’t that much history behind Sting to pull from his past and try and build around it. Like I said, the reunion was the big part of that farewell, and that’s something Sting can’t have for various reasons. Then you have an entire roster praising him and stating how much they idolized and respected him growing up, that isn’t an easy thing to say about Sting when you consider these guys had various others to choose from, mostly from the camps of either Flair or Hogan.


    Posted By: Jarrod Westerfeld (Registered)  on May 29, 2008 at 04:42 PM

     
     
    Chopper, but that's the thing, I wasn't nitpicking that segment to say it was bad, just why it wasn't great. I felt it did a good enough job in getting me to care for all involved in one way or another. It just didn't do a strong enough job to get me, or anyone else for that matter, to look back and remember that segment with some fondness of the significance it held. It wasn't like Shawn's betrayal of Marty, or Austin's alignment with McMahon - it just fell short of that goal.

    The thing with me and that segment was, it was enjoyable for what it was worth, but it wasn't something that stands out as being the very thing that should get me, or anyone else, to watch TNA religiously just because it did a few things wrong that underwhelmed it a bit. Again, I said it was good, but apparently some people can't read beyond the words "Fact" or "Fiction" which provides great LULZ.

    It's like me and Geoff were in synch to shit on TNA, when all I did was say the segment was good and nothing more. Very funny, indeed.


    Posted By: Jarrod Westerfeld (Registered)  on May 29, 2008 at 04:57 PM

     
     
    sting will never be to wrestling what flair was, but flair will never be to class what sting is. i think everyone from fans to promoters to fellow wrestlers all like sting. that in itself makes him worthy of a pretty good send off.

    Posted By: fred (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 05:53 PM

     
     
    Jarrod, the question was does he deserve a SIMILAR send-off and i think he does. If you go back and look at what makes STING special and different from guys like Hogan, Flair, and others in his time, you'll see that his willingness to not only help make stars(unlike Hogan) and have unparalleled respect from his peers for his success and INTEGRITY (unlike Flair whose respect is mostly based on his abilities in the ring and on the mic and rightfully so), you'll see that he does deserve a SIMILAR farewell. Did I mention already that he achieved all he did without Mcmahon's help. THAT MAKES HIM STAND OUT ALL BY ITSELF!!!

    Posted By: Brady (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 06:00 PM

     
     
    "Why ask WWE marks questions about TNA when they obviously hate the promotion?
    Enough of the propaganda already. It's getting out of hand."

    Agreed, who cares what they have to say?

    What right do they have to even put anything in print?

    Its like they don't realise that TNA's raitings went UP last week and RAWs wend down.

    Geoff Eubanks isn't even a good writer because he won't admit that Smackdown is always Ridiculous, ffs!


    Posted By: JJ (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 06:16 PM

     
     
    The second generation guys just need to debut as an arrogant stable that feels they are owed something because of what their fathers did. That would be a lot of fun! Ted Jr. is already on his way to that.

    Posted By: Ryan (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 06:24 PM

     
     
    I've think Owen might have gotten a short reign out of respect or if someone gotten injured, like Jericho, Booker T, Eddie Guerraro, Khali,Rey Mysterio, and a few others have gotten. They were all mid-carders at best, but got a short reign because fans demanded it or the story/situation called for it.

    I like Sting and he is a legend, but his career was nowhere near Flair league.


    Posted By: JLAJRC (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 06:27 PM

     
     
    Kurt Angle cracks me up man. First he cries about Vinne Mac making him work through injuries, then he does it on his own accord. Great wrestler, but man is he a hypocrite.

    Posted By: sefdog (Guest)  on May 29, 2008 at 10:46 PM

     
     
    Sting is a legend, and deserves to go out in style. Sting is the ONLY! and I repeat ONLY wrestler in modern history to become one of the most iconic figures in the history of the business to not have at least made part of that name in WWF/E. There is no one else. Goldberg doesn't even rate on close to the same level as Sting.

    Posted By: Sim Joe (Guest)  on May 30, 2008 at 12:25 AM

     
     
    I respect your decision for your answer Jarrod, but to say nobody grew up wanting ot be Sting is not true. The question said similar send off. Not THE Ric Flair sendoff... You keep talking as if he is getting the exact same sendoff that Ric Flair got?
    What would be wrong with Sting getting a little 5 minute celebration, hell it doesn't even have to be at the end of the show. They can get a few legends that worked with Sting and appreciate him. He doesn't have to reunite with anybody for it to be a good sendoff. A similar sendoff would not have to be a carbon copy.


    Posted By: Toddo (Guest)  on May 30, 2008 at 09:25 AM

     
     
    I agree with Jarrod about Sting, Not even close to Flairs level. I can see some of you really loved him but yeah... not even close

    Posted By: Guest#3129 (Guest)  on May 30, 2008 at 03:14 PM

     
     
    You're right Guest#3129...Sting wasn't on Flair's level. HE WAS ABOVE IT. When Flair played game backstages because he didn't want to lose his spot, Sting was a team player and put on great matches all of the time. The boys respect Sting. The fans respect Sting. Moreso than Flair. Don't buy into the WWE hype. When I was younger, everyone I knew wanted to be Sting. Even when WWF was winning the ratings war, most people said their favorite wrestler was Sting.

    Posted By: Here's the truth. (Guest)  on May 30, 2008 at 06:07 PM

     
     
    I think the problem is that a lot of wrestling fans think of wwe as the big leagues.there fore since sting never wrestled for wwe he should not be considered a legend.if you look at history then maybe alot of these guys should be wccw legends because that is where a lot of them first cut there teeth in the wrestling biz.I also think it depends on the age of the wrestling fan in general.

    Posted By: bigj (Guest)  on May 31, 2008 at 06:25 AM

     




  • www.41mania.com
    Copyright © 2005 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
    Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
    Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.