www.411mania.com
|  News |  Columns |  TV Reports |  Video Reviews |  Title History |  Hall of Fame |  News Report |  The Dunn List | Search
SPOTLIGHTS  SPOTLIGHTS
MOVIES/TV
// New Moon Breaks Dark Knight's Single Day Box Office Record!!
MUSIC
// Pics From Miley Cyrus Indianapolis Concert
WRESTLING
// 411 PPV Roundtable Preview: WWE Survivor Series 2009
POLITICS
// 411 Politics RoundTable: Thoughts On The Ft. Hood Massacre
MMA
// 411's UFC 106: Ortiz vs. Griffin II Report 11.21.09
BOXING
// Ward Shocks Kessler
GAMES
// Top 10 Action Role Playing Games




 HOT TOPICS
//  Chris Jericho
//  Randy Orton
//  Triple H
//  Jeff Hardy
//  Edge
SYNDICATE  SYNDICATE



411mania RSS Feeds





Follow 411mania on Twitter!




Add 411 On Facebook
 



 
 411mania » Wrestling » Columns
Advertisement
The Piledriver Report 8.06.08: The Birth of the Singles Star Tag Team and the Death of Real Tag Teams
Posted by Ronny Sarnecky on 08.06.2008



Throughout the history of professional wrestling, there have been many great teams that were called World Champions. In the seventies, the World Wide Wrestling Federation placed their version of the tag team titles on such teams like Toru Tanaka/Mr. Fuji, the Valiant Brothers, and the Blackjacks. In the National Wrestling Alliance, at this time, the Andersons, Ric Flair/Greg Valentine, and Dusty Rhodes/Dick Slater all held tag team gold.

The eighties have been looked at as the glory years of tag team wrestling. In the WWF, the Wild Samoans, the Moondogs, Mr. Fuji/Saito, the Strongbows, Barry Windham/Mike Rotundo, the British Bulldogs, the Hart Foundation, and Demolition were the teams that set the gold standard throughout the decade. The NWA was also going through a tag team renaissance. Ricky Steamboat/Jay Youngblood, the Brisco Brothers, the Koloffs, the Rock n' Roll Express, Midnight Express, Tully Blanchard/Arn Anderson, and the Road Warriors were the class of the senior circuit's tag team division.

In the nineties, the WWF's top teams included the Hart Foundation, the Road Warriors, the Nasty Boys, Money Inc., the Steiner Brothers, the Quebecers, the Smoking Gunns, and the New Age Outlaws lead the WWF into the Monday Night Wars and beyond. The NWA, now World Championship Wrestling had the Steiner Brothers, Hollywood Blondes, Harlem Heat, Nasty Boys, and the Outsiders. Extreme Championship Wrestling was a hotbed of tag team wrestling in the nineties. Teams like Axl/Ian Rotten, the Public Enemy, the Pitbulls, Sabu/Rob Van Dam, the Gangstas, the Eliminators, the Dudleys, and the Impact Playaz each found their hardcore roots in the land of the extreme.

This current decade has given us teams like Edge/Christian, the Hardys, the Dudleys, Charlie Haas/Shelton Benjamin, MNM, LAX, America's Most Wanted, and Ring of Honor's Briscoe Brothers.

From the seventies until the mid-nineties, tag team wrestling was made up of actual tag teams. Most teams had a team name. Many wore matching outfits. You had two men whose styles meshed well together. The two teammates were thought of as one. In the eighties and early nineties, when you mentioned Marty Jannety, you immediately thought of Shawn Michaels. If Hawk was on TV, you knew Animal was right by his side.

Over the last ten years, something has changed in wrestling. In today's wrestling landscape, you have just as many singles wrestlers that win tag team titles, as you have actual tag teams. There are very few tag team specialist these days. Today, the top teams on a national landscape are the Dudleys, LAX, Miz/Johnny Morrison, and the Briscoe Brothers. Most other "true" tag teams are considered no better then mid-card wrestlers. Before the de-emphasizing of the tag team divisions, tag team wrestlers were looked at as main event talent.

Today, it seems like the only time tag teams are featured as main event players is when main event singles wrestlers team up to create a short term tag team. This trend started during the Monday Night Wars. During this time period in wrestling, Bret Hart/Goldberg, Shawn Michaels/Steve Austin, The Rock/Mankind, Steve Austin/Dude Love, Scott Hall/The Giant, Sting/Kevin Nash, and Steve Austin/Undertaker all held World tag team gold.

Lately, the WWE has been using the tag titles as a prop to put two wrestlers who have a beef with one another, but must work together as a team since they have won the belts. Last year, the WWE put the belts on WWE World Champion John Cena and his upcoming WrestleMania opponent, Shawn Michaels. The WWE thought this worked out so well that when MVP and Matt Hardy started to feud last August, the WWE threw the SmackDown! tag straps on them. Just when you thought that the main event singles wrestlers were being kept away from the tag team belts, the WWE did it again. This past Monday night, the WWE had John Cena and Batista win the tag team titles from the newly created team of Cody Rhodes and Ted DiBiase, Junior.

I don't understand the WWE's fascination with taking top singles wrestlers, and giving them the tag straps for no reason, but to push a singles feud. Why would you put the belt on a World singles championship caliber wrestler, like John Cena? Are the tag team titles going to get stronger because Cena holds one half of those belts? The answer is no. How could the titles get the rub when the main point of his teaming with Batista is to see how the two partners get along? It has nothing to do with Cena and Batista teaming for months and months, and now all of their hard work has been paid off with a tag team title victory. Their title win on Monday night didn't leave the fans thinking that Batista and Cena are the greatest team in the world.

Quite the contrary. When The Midnight Express and the Rock n' Roll Express fought for the NWA World Tag Team championships, you knew the winner of that match was arguably the greatest tag team in the land. Today, when random singles wrestler A and random singles wrestler B wins the belts, you do not get that same feeling.

Another ploy the WWE likes to use every so often is when they put the tag team titles around the waist of one of their singles champions. Why would they do this? It makes no sense, except that it buries the tag team championship as being an after thought. How tough can tag team wrestling be if a singles title holder, who is mainly concerned with defending his singles title, is able to step right in to the tag team division, and win it's top prize?

You never saw Stan Lane or Bobby Eaton win a singles title while they held the NWA World tag team championships. Most tag team wrestlers, who win singles gold, do so after a long period of time after being removed from the tag team ranks. Shawn Michaels won his first WWF Intercontinental Championship ten months AFTER he put Marty Jannety through the Barber Shop's plate glass window.

This isn't to say that singles champions never won tag team gold before the "Attitude Era." On August 9th, 1980, the WWF World Champion Bob Backlund teamed up with Pedro Morales to beat the Wild Samoans to win the WWF World Tag Team titles. Over fifteen years later, on September 24,1995, WWF World Champion Diesel and the WWF Intercontinental Champion Shawn Michaels captured the WWF World Tag Team titles from Owen Hart and Yokozuna. At least in these two instances, the new champions vacated the tag straps since they already held singles gold. The two divisions were kept separate, the way it should be.

I'm not against all "singles stars win the tag team gold" angle, as long as it elevates the tag team championships. When Edge and Randy Orton started to team up with each other, it was mainly to further their singles feuds against Shawn Michaels and Triple H. Eventually, the two gelled as a team. They even had an old school team name when they called themselves "Rated RKO." When they won the tag team titles, you had the feeling that they really wanted to win the belts. When they lost the titles, you believed that they were not happy to have the belts taken from them.

Heading into SummerSlam 2008, Batista and John Cena became the latest singles stars to win the tag straps. While the belts may serve as a prop to help build the tension between the two stars, I think that putting the tag titles on Cena and Batista is a big mistake. The WWE is in the early stages of pushing new young stars to the forefront. In recent weeks, Ted DiBiase, Jr. and Cody Rhodes were wrestling in the main event match on Monday Night RAW. DiBiase has looked like a future star. Rhodes is starting to show a charisma as a heel that he was lacking as a face in his months since being called up from development. The WWE just put the tag straps on the duo a little over a month ago. They team was just starting to get their wheels in motion. The tag team belts made Cody Rhodes and Ted DiBiase, Jr. a legitimate piece of talent that should be taken seriously. Instead, their development is stunted just so the WWE can play their "I don't like you but am forced to defend the tag titles with you" game between Batista and John Cena.

The days of tag team glory that the fans enjoyed in the eighties, and again during the Edge/Christian, Dudleys, and Hardys wars of 2000-2001 will probably never be experienced again. Instead, the fans will continue to see mid-card level teams or single stars holding the gold. Tag teams will never be given a chance to flourish. If a team is hot, the promotion will eventually break them up to put the wrestlers in the singles scene. A perfect example of this was the tag team MNM. They broke up Joey Mercury and Johnny Nitro too soon. Its too bad as they were probably the last great true tag team in the WWF/E. My advice to tag team enthusiasts is to watch WWE 24/7 and buy the WrestleMania and SummerSlam Anthologies. It's here that you will be able to see tag team wrestling the way it was and ought to be, featuring legendary teams, and not two-month pretenders.


Post Comment (16)  |  Email Ronny Sarnecky  |  View Ronny Sarnecky's 411 Profile

  Send To Friend  |    Stumble It!  |    Digg It!  | 



Please add your comment below.
If you are registered, you can login and post under your registered name. If not, you can post as a guest or register.

* Please note that 411 moderates all comments. Your comment will show up on the site after it has been approved by an editor.
 
Name : 
Comment : 
Remaining Characters : 
2800
 

Comments (16)

 
"A perfect example of this was the tag team MNM. They broke up Joey Mercury and Johnny Nitro too soon."

Actually, it' a good example as that was out of WWE's hands because Mercury was so messed up on drugs. When he returned, WWE immediately put the team back together, then Mercury got fired.


Posted By: Guest#0684 (Guest)  on August 06, 2008 at 12:51 AM

 
 
There's still a chance that Tag team belts can get prestige again. but i think that the Smackdown/ECW belts are more likey to be be prestigious. Miz/Morrison, Wang/Moore, Jesse/Festus (Freddie could really get himself over as a writer if he made up tag team names!) and the Edgeheads are all established teams that can compete.

on the other hand Raws tag teams are just Cryme Tyme and Rhodes/DiBasie, and the highlanders (who haven't been seen in months). Post Draft it's time for Raw to start throwing midcarders together, have them consistantly team up together, and share themes and videos.


Posted By: Davis (Guest)  on August 06, 2008 at 12:52 AM

 
 
I hate SO MUCH when they take the belts off an actual team and give them to the soon-to-feud faces. It's so goddamn hackneyed! It's an angle that i never ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever EVER want to see again.

Posted By: Spaz Monkey (Guest)  on August 06, 2008 at 01:59 AM

 
 
I would have thought London and Kendrick were a better example. Alongside MnM, Dave Taylor and Regal, the Hardys, they almost killed themselvs in that sick ladder match at Armageddon. And their reward? Job to Douche and Domino, and then draft to Raw to get berried by HHH. *sigh*

Posted By: Taiso (Guest)  on August 06, 2008 at 05:15 AM

 
 
I personally think the only time the only 'let's put tag titles on singles wrestlers' worked was the Smackdown Six Days of 2002. You had Angle & Benoit (two guys who really hated each other but worked amazingly well together), Rey and Edge (two clean cut faces) and Eddie & Chavo (two cheating heels) and it worked! And when Team Angle beat Los Guerreros it was a big moment because those other teams made the WWE Tag Team Titles mean something. Personally I would put Cena and Orton in a tag team - do like an Angle/Benoit-like pairing where because they always want to beat each other up all the time, then the only solution is to put them together. They showed some decent chemistry on that Raw before Wrestlemania when they went up against the Raw Roster (cough jobbers cough).

Posted By: AH (Guest)  on August 06, 2008 at 08:07 AM

 
 
it never made sense from a kayfabe perspective for two randomly thrown together guys to beat an actually team, who wrestle together for months if not years. i think it is total BS.

Posted By: rey (Guest)  on August 06, 2008 at 08:32 AM

 
 
I think fans getting upset about the Cena/Batista win over Simply Priceless should just hold on a second and see where this goes.

Think about it for a minute. Cena/Batista at Summerslam is going to get a lot of buys, but who do you job in the match? You can't job Cena, he already lost to HHH and JBL recently. You really can't job Dave (although they should) because where does he go from there if he loses?

So here's how I see it playing out. Dave puts the Batista Bomb on Cena, Cena kicks out. Cena hits the FU on Batista, Dave kicks out.

Then, out comes Simply Priceless to attack both of them, no contest, setting up a return match on Raw. Kane or JBL or Jericho or someone else then cost Cena/Batista the titles, and bam, you're back to Simply Priceless dominating the tag division.

I also have no problem with JBL winning the triple threat Monday, if WWE does the right thing and has Punk BEAT HIM CLEAN at Summerslam. JBL has won wayyyy too much lately. Set up Kane/Punk at the next PPV with another clean win for Punk, then have someone take his belt at Survivor Series (Jericho, please).

Solid booking 101.


Posted By: Brian (Guest)  on August 06, 2008 at 08:55 AM

 
 
Agreed 100%, Rhodes/DiBiase were really starting to build some momentum as champions and drawing some great heat as soon as they started cutting promos. By taking the belts off them, it made them look like also-rans to John Cena and Batista.

Posted By: Nick (Guest)  on August 06, 2008 at 09:41 AM

 
 
"They broke up Joey Mercury and Johnny Nitro too soon. Its too bad as they were probably the last great true tag team in the WWF/E."

A few corrections. They broke them up because Mercury got caught in a wellness violation and was sent away to rehab. So Morrison was forced to go it alone in a singles situation... which he capably did as an IC title holder on RAW and as the ECW champion.

What further prevented them getting back together was that Morrison proved to be charismatic and a capable wrestler on his own. When he wrestled in a tag situation with MNM, Mercury usually did the wrestling while Nitro came in to just add some flash and mop up after Mercury.

On other correction, I'd add that Morrison and the Miz have gelled together even better than Morrison and Mercury and represent an actual tag team. Jesse and Festus and Cryme Time also represent actual tag teams who have gelled together.

Overall, this is a good article that I wish the E, TNA, and others would read and take to heart.


Posted By: Guest (Guest)  on August 06, 2008 at 10:10 AM

 
 
Hey Ronny, ever hear of a tag team called the Motor City Machine Guns? If you're going to mention how the tag team scene is "dead" in the WWE, you might want to mention the fact that in TNA it is alive and well. They are the perfect example of a throwback tag team that you mentioned. Go back to the 2006 hot feud of Styles/Daniels vs. LAX, which was almost on the level of the old Rock N Roll/Midnight Express feud.

The WWE does not and will not make tag team wrestling a priority, they way they treated the Miz/Morrison during their title reign proved as much. That team should've had some real challengers in the time they held the straps.

So to all of those who enjoy REAL tag team wrestling, watch TNA or ROH sometime, federations where championships are more important than a federation that only cares about which kids are buying merchandise.


Posted By: Ryder (Guest)  on August 06, 2008 at 11:12 AM

 
 
Giving feuding guys like batista and cena the belts is a good thing. Everyone talks about how the tag division is horrible, but i assure you that one day cena and batista will lose those belts. Giving whoever beats them instant credibility and bragging rights. Perhaps dibiase and rhodes win them back, then they get to come out on raw the next week and they can say that they just beat the TWO most dominant wrestlers in the business.

Posted By: tom (Guest)  on August 06, 2008 at 01:05 PM

 
 
"While the belts may serve as a prop to help build the tension between the two stars"

Herein lies the problem not just of the titles, but of tag team wrestling overall. I'd add that it's probably been inevitable with the way the business has evolved in the last 25 years or so.

Think about it...At one time, wrestling on TV was exclusively a weekend thing, mostly mismatches and interviews intended to promote the upcoming show at the local arena. You could get away with that approach on Saturday morning.

But as the TV shows moved to weeknights, more attractive matchups were needed. At the same time, you had to hold back enough to make people pay for the upcoming event, by then a pay-per-view. Therefore, the programming was chock full of tag matches with funky, hastily put together combinations. More importantly, the outcome of the match itself became unimportant, its purpose being, as you say, "to help build the tension between the two stars" who'll battle it out when it really counts at the PPV.

Now factor in, during pretty much this same time frame, the emergence of the "trappings" of Sports Entertainment as opposed to good old fashioned 'rasslin' and, as the old tune goes, something's gotta give.

Is that something not just the titles, but the whole concept?

One additional idle question, if I may: Do the Sheepherders still work for Vince? (Hell, are they even still alive?)


Posted By: Boomerang (Guest)  on August 06, 2008 at 02:33 PM

 
 
Angle & Benoit teamed up to win the tag titles in 2002 when they were feuding, and that got still ended up with one of the best tag team matches ever against Edge & Rey Mystireo at No Mercy 2002

Posted By: da bomb! (Guest)  on August 06, 2008 at 07:20 PM

 
 
I think that during the golden age of wrestling there where just as many thrown togehter tag teams as there are today its just the fact that the booking was much better back then. Many team in the 80's where thrown together but where given the chance to gel. Teams like The Dream team, Shiek and Volkof, Bundy and Studd, Strike Force where all teams that had established Singles stars that where put into teams just to name a few. It would be easy to revive the tag team ranks if they wanted to but they choose not to.

Posted By: The JAP (Guest)  on August 07, 2008 at 01:21 PM

 
 
Look at the lis tof tag teams that the WWE has either broken up released over the past few years

The Bashams
The Dicks
The Gymini
The Heart Throbs

All Talentent performers down in OVW but the WWE choose to not give them a chance with the exception of the Bashams

As talented as The Brian Kendrick is he should still be teamed up with Paul London. Dont get me started about The wordls greatest Tag Team. Neith one has proven they can be singles stars. Take those teams along with putting together a few new teams from some of the midcards that have no direction and you could have a tag team division worth watching


Posted By: Guest#7579 (Guest)  on August 07, 2008 at 01:34 PM

 
 
I know it ain't gonna happen. But a nice curve ball to throw in there is to turn both cena and Batista heel.

Have any of the two just lie down for the other, no matter who wins/loses. It might hurt the ctc thing a bit... unless you also turn them heel but that's asking for too much.

Let them actually defend the titles for a while and actually make it appear as if it means something to them.Let's say until the rumble where one of them wins it. Which then creates friction between the two of them over the fact that one of them has a chance at the wwe championship.

Then you get the wrestler who doesn't have a shot a the title keyfabe hurt whoever holds it at the time in order to cost his partner's shot at the title.
Thus, the title gets vacated (bring back the 30 days without title defense clause in the mix to explain this one)

meanwhile tensions raises explosive level and THE ADAMLE actually makes the two wrestle for the title at Mania.



anyhow... food for thought


Posted By: Kévin (Guest)  on August 08, 2008 at 03:07 PM

 


www.41mania.com
Copyright © 2005 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.