www.411mania.com
|  News |  Columns |  TV Reports |  Video Reviews |  Title History |  Hall of Fame |  News Report |  The Dunn List | Search
SPOTLIGHTS  SPOTLIGHTS
MOVIES/TV
// New Moon Breaks Dark Knight's Single Day Box Office Record!!
MUSIC
// Pics From Miley Cyrus Indianapolis Concert
WRESTLING
// 411 PPV Roundtable Preview: WWE Survivor Series 2009
POLITICS
// 411 Politics RoundTable: Thoughts On The Ft. Hood Massacre
MMA
// 411's Roundtable Preview - UFC 106: Ortiz vs. Griffin 2
BOXING
// 411 Roundtable Preview: Kessler vs. Ward
GAMES
// Top 10 Action Role Playing Games




 HOT TOPICS
//  Chris Jericho
//  Randy Orton
//  Triple H
//  Jeff Hardy
//  Edge
SYNDICATE  SYNDICATE



411mania RSS Feeds





Follow 411mania on Twitter!




Add 411 On Facebook
 



 
 411mania » Wrestling » Columns
Advertisement
The Importance of...9.19.08: Shawn Michaels
Posted by Mike Chin on 09.19.2008



Chinconceivable
Quick notes on the past week of wrestling

-I'm away on vacation for the week, so I'm posting this column for publication way early. That means that, as I type this, I have not seen anything from the current week of wrestling. So, a quick note, not directly tied to this week...

I was among the many who questioned WWE's decision to book John Cena-Batista at SummerSlam, rather than saving it for Wrestlemania. I stand by the argument that this could have been a huge draw at the biggest show of the year, but I think I'm starting to understand why it wasn't such a bad call to book the match when the company did. Take a look at Cena's injury. This could have just as easily occurred in March or April as it did this September. And if it wasn't an injury, there are unexpected wellness suspensions, decisions to leave the company, or releases. What if WWE had held off Cena-Bobby Lashley for 'Mania? Or the King of Kings match between Triple H and Booker T? I'm not saying the wrestling world would have been horribly damaged were these matches to have not occurred, but they would have been wasted opportunities had the bookers waited for a super showdown that would never happen. Sometimes, it pays to just go ahead, and get the match out there.

On to our regular column...

He is the Showstopper, The Main Event, The Icon, The Heartbreak Kid, the one and only Shawn Michaels. I am an unabashed Bret Hart mark to the core, and yet even I cannot deny what Michaels has meant to the business, as one of pro wrestling's most important figures of the last 30 years.

Part of what is interesting about Shawn Michaels is that his career has followed the prototype for a star's career from the get-go, right up until today. Michaels spent the better part of a decade as a part of an exciting young tag team in The (Midnight) Rockers, alongside Marty Jannetty. Together, the two brought a rousing, high-flying, fast-paced brand of performance to mainstream wrestling that made fans across the world take notice. They emerged as one of the most over teams of the late 80s and early 90s WWF, despite existing as a pair of little guys, living in the land of giants. From there, it came time for Michaels to embark on a singles career. In classic fashion, he superkicked his long time partner and tossed him through a window—the perfect pay off to slow-burn angle, which led seamlessly to his re-birth as The Heartbreak Kid.

Michaels' career continued to follow the map as he took hold of the Intercontinental Title, and filled the role of secondary champion perfectly. He was clearly a talent on the rise, an impressive worker, and was booked just right to seem a bit more talented than the rest of the mid-card, but not quite ready for the main event, with which he flirted on occasion (see his Survivor Series 1992 world title shot).

But then, there would come a time for Michaels to rise. His partnership with Diesel, and Diesel's meteoric rise to the top of the card, provided Michaels with a perfect bridge between the mid-card and main event status. Teaming with, then feuding with, then teaming with Diesel again, set Michaels up as a major player, en route to getting his first world title push.

Michaels hung around the main event scene for a number of years. He settled into a period of injury induced retirement, then came back for more, again rising straight to the top of the card. Pushing 40 years of age, HBK proved himself to still be among the best in ring performers, not to mention best promo men, in the business, and went so far as to headline his fourth and fifth Wrestlemanias, placing behind only Hulk Hogan and Triple H for most Wrestlemania main events. But while he still commands his share of the spotlight, Michaels has slowly, subtly slipped into a new role, one tier beneath world championships, with the upper-mid-card status of legend.

But what, aside from longevity, makes Michaels a legend? In ring performance, is, of course a huge piece of it. There is a very short list of men with careers as long and as consistently good as Michaels's has been. And while I'm not sure it's fair to call Michaels an innovator in the ring, there's no denying his part in getting new concepts over. For example, it was performances by Michaels that helped get several of the WWE's most celebrated gimmick matches over. Had Michaels not taken every chance he could think of in his Wrestlemania X ladder match, it's quite arguable the concept would have caught on—at least not the extent that it has since this extraordinary performance. And what better man could there have been to pair with Bret Hart in reincarnating the iron man match at Wrestlemania XII. Some may call the hour plus match boring, or unrealistic, but the conditioning, creativity and intelligence the men showed in executing this match was off the charts, and paved the way for the same gimmick to be used for Rock-Triple H, Kurt Angle-Brock Lesnar and others. There was the first Hell in a Cell match. Michaels' sacrifice of falling off the cage, through a table seems relatively tame in comparison to what Mick Foley did with the Cell, but the fact remains that HBK's willingness to throw caution to the wind went a long way toward getting the concept over. Not altogether different was Michaels' gutsy performance in the first Elimination Chamber match, where his title win over Triple H put the match over as truly unpredictable, truly dramatic, and truly a battlefield in which something important could occur. I could go on and on, including Michaels' phenomenal work in Survivor Series elimination tags, his performance in the Wrestlemania XX triple threat match, or his showings in wild brawls against Triple H, Vince McMahon and others. The bottom line remains that he was so wildly successful in all of these domains that he got the matches, the concepts of the matches, and his opponents over every bit as much as he established himself.

Michaels has also been important in his ability to make long term programs work. Rarely before, and never really since has a tag team split program gone over quite so effectively as his long standing partnership, and subsequent war with Marty Jannetty, complete with great wrestling, wild brawls, and thrilling surprises in the form of each of Jannetty's unexpected returns. Then there was Michaels' longstanding feud with Triple H, which brought him out of retirement, and returned him to the main event scene. There have been numerous other entertaining, borderline inspired feuds along the way—from Razor Ramon, to Steve Austin, to Vince McMahon, to the Undertaker. And then, of course, there's the program that perhaps most defined Michaels's career, blurring the lines between what's real and what's a show in his historic rivalry with Bret Hart. As when I wrote about Hart, I'll refrain from digging into the Montreal Screw Job, as it warrants a full column itself, and is a story told often enough. All I will say is that this was one of the most important moments in the history of wrestling, and Michaels's participation in even that one night solidified him as one of the most important names in wrestling, if not for the noblest of reasons.

The Screw Job serves as a good segue into another piece of Michaels's legacy, as backstage politician. I'll refrain from a tirade against Michaels for being self-centered, only wanting to put over his friends, keeping down those who were not in his "Clique." I believe most of it to be true, but the fact remains that I wasn't there, and so, all that I know is hearsay. The fact that remains is that Michaels defined an era of WWF booking in the way no single performer (outside of Hulk Hogan) ever had before, and ever has since. What's more, two of Michaels's partners in crime, Kevin Nash and (to a lesser extent) Scott Hall moved on to use similar politics to rule the roost in WCW.

In considering Michaels's importance, one cannot overlook the formation of Degeneration X—the on screen manifestation of The Clique by which Michaels formed one of the most notable stables in the history of the business, leading the group throughout his last heel title reign, and nearly a decade later, bringing it back together as the most popular face act of the 2000s. The merchandising revenue Michaels realized, alone, is enough to further cement his importance.

This all brings us to the HBK of today. Michaels is perhaps the most over performer in the world. Those who have watched for a long time know his many accomplishments, and his profound influence. Relatively new fans can still spot the glimmer of past greatness as he outworks men who are barely more than half his age. As I mentioned earlier, Michaels has settled into the role of legend, and as he fades progressively further from world title contention, he seems to rightfully passed a torch, and admirably taken on the role of man who will do whatever the business asks of him. Perhaps this is contrition for past sins. Perhaps it's giving back to the business. Perhaps it's just another step in the natural evolution of his career.

Kayfabe and in reality, on-stage and off, Shawn Michaels stands up front as one of the most important figures in wrestling history.

That's all for this column. Next week, we continue our series on DX alumni, with a look at the importance of Chyna.


Post Comment (28)  |  Email Mike Chin  |  View Mike Chin's 411 Profile

  Send To Friend  |    Stumble It!  |    Digg It!  | 



Please add your comment below.
If you are registered, you can login and post under your registered name. If not, you can post as a guest or register.

* Please note that 411 moderates all comments. Your comment will show up on the site after it has been approved by an editor.
 
Name : 
Comment : 
Remaining Characters : 
2800
 

Comments (28)

 
Get a haircut asshole. It ain't 1988 anymore.

Posted By: FUZEY (Guest)  on September 19, 2008 at 03:39 PM

 
 
Thank you, Mr. Obvious.

Posted By: Guest#8567 (Guest)  on September 19, 2008 at 03:44 PM

 
 
Huh... I just finished watching Heartbreak and Triumph about 20 minutes before reading this... coincidence?

Probably.

But uh... Chyna? That's kind of an underwhelming follow-up. I would've done Shawn last.


Posted By: m8 (Guest)  on September 19, 2008 at 04:01 PM

 
 
Quite possibly the best ever. Ric Flair and he both have about equal claim to the title both for their consistency and ability to bring out the best in the other opponents. The first professional wrestling match I ever saw was Sean (yes it was Sean) and Marty vs Buddy Rose and Doug Summers in the infamous blood bath match back in the old AWA. At first they were imitators to the midnight express and the rock and roll express but within three months they were the INNOVATORS of the tag team scene regardless of federation.

Posted By: mirer03 (Guest)  on September 19, 2008 at 04:19 PM

 
 
"You may not like him, but you can't deny his importance."

Well i like him, i don't care if hes a politiker, so was ric flair, and looking at all the classic matches its brought us (including against flair) you gotta say it was worth it.

Plus, i wouldnt say hes totally out of the title scene yet. Granted, all his out of wrestling work with the church means hell never actually be champion cos hed miss too many house shows, but the E can still put him in there as a legitimate contender when needed.

The fact theyve put him in a title match at no mercy dispels your arguement (however temporarily) on that for now


Posted By: DaJ (Guest)  on September 19, 2008 at 04:39 PM

 
 
I'm going to make a bold prediction and say that the people who practically demanded that Mike do a column on the importance on HBK are going to stay silent now that they are happy, and we will instead get people bashing the column for praising HBK or telling us what we already know.

Nice recap Mike. Clear, concise, and to the point. Kudos.


Posted By: Aaron Hubbard (Registered)  on September 19, 2008 at 05:00 PM

 
 
HBK is the worst champion ever! Worse than SANTINO!!!

Posted By: Guest#9855 (Guest)  on September 19, 2008 at 05:32 PM

 
 
Good article but...

"Michaels has settled into the role of legend, and as he fades progressively further from world title contention, he seems to rightfully passed a torch, and admirably taken on the role of man who will do whatever the business asks of him."

...that's a load of crap.

Shawn hasn't faded into the background at all. Hell, he's got a title shot at the next PPV while CM Punk isn't even in the #1 contender's match. Shawn gets thrown into the title picture at least a couple of times a year. That hasn't changed since his comback 6 years ago.

Passing the torch? He's just like 'Taker in the respect that they both have the mindset that they have to get their wins back to save face even though they're legends to the point where no numbers of losses will hurt their legacy. When's the last time Shawn had a long term feud with someone who wasn't Hunter in which the other person got the last definitive win that didn't involve any shennanigans?

Do anything for the business? What about moving to the so-called B-show? I don't want to hear the religious excuse either. Many churches hold mass 4 days a week. If Shawn was doing what was asked of him for the business he'd be losing more high profile matches decisively to up and coming young stars that could use the rub.

Shawn is a great, innovative wrestler with a rich and deserving legacy. But he's still the same old selfish Shawn when it comes to doing business.


Posted By: The Mayor of Awesometown (Guest)  on September 19, 2008 at 06:13 PM

 
 
411 writers must cringe when Hubbard posts under their articles... it takes the level of the article down when another writer (Hubbard) is calling out the readers of the article before the first stone is even thrown...
I liked the article, HBK has always been a favorite of mine (even the Kliq days) because he always put on great matches and the writers always had a good story for him plus his PPV matches always seem like a main event quality match when no title is on the line... not many performers can bring that to PPV buys the way Michaels consistantly does!
And plus the guy was awesome in my book the second he super-kicked jannety's head off and threw him through the barber-shop window, that was great!


Posted By: Guest#6969 (Guest)  on September 19, 2008 at 07:09 PM

 
 
Great column. HBK is, IMO the 2nd greatest all-round performer of the last 30 years (with Ric Flair being the greatest).

Posted By: Guest#3997 (Guest)  on September 19, 2008 at 09:04 PM

 
 
And The PlayGirl cover Boy

Posted By: Guest#8477 (Guest)  on September 19, 2008 at 09:12 PM

 
 
"When's the last time Shawn had a long term feud with someone who wasn't Hunter in which the other person got the last definitive win that didn't involve any shennanigans?"

Batista this year.


Posted By: Rape Advocate (Guest)  on September 19, 2008 at 09:15 PM

 
 
If Shawn was doing what was asked of him for the business he'd be losing more high profile matches decisively to up and coming young stars that could use the rub.
------------------------------------

Shawn has a number of good years still in him before he slips into this role. He may well wrestle for another 10 years yet.


And as far as always getting the last clean win...it's the benefit of being the face, same with Taker.


Posted By: Stephen (Guest)  on September 19, 2008 at 09:28 PM

 
 
Batista this year.

Posted By: Rape Advocate (Guest) on September 19, 2008 at 09:15 PM

*Bzzt!* Wrong. Shawn didn't have to get pinned or made to submit. That's why it was a stretcher match. Shawn's shoulders don't touch the mat without shennanigans.

---

Shawn has a number of good years still in him before he slips into this role. He may well wrestle for another 10 years yet.


And as far as always getting the last clean win...it's the benefit of being the face, same with Taker.

Posted By: Stephen (Guest) on September 19, 2008 at 09:28 PM

Look at who Shawn is. He's a guy that can lose and not look bad. He could have a dozen feuds against new, upcoming guys and get pinned in the final match of each feud and his value wouldn't go down one bit. But he chooses to have to "get his win back" in a selfish fashion when it's not necessary.

A clean win for a young guy against Shawn means one million times more than a clean win for Shawn over anyone means. If he was doing everything he could for the business he'd be losing more because it CAN NOT HURT HIM.

The face excuse is lame too. Hunter, Edge, MVP, etc. have all won the final match in a longterm feud while being heels. Even Chavo gets the best of Punk in a long feud. Heel/face status does not matter.


Posted By: LT Paperstacks (Guest)  on September 19, 2008 at 11:11 PM

 
 
Not to insert logic into this oh-so unique discussion about win-loss records, but let's keep in mind that it is the office that makes the final decision on who wins and loses, not the wrestler.

Posted By: Mina (Registered)  on September 20, 2008 at 01:02 AM

 
 
Lets see he put over Benoit and Cena and Orton over clean as a whistle no muss no fuss. All of whom they were tryin to get over as big things, and really thats all he needs to do put over the big guns. He doesn't need to job to anyone but sure things.

Posted By: ThePhenom (Guest)  on September 20, 2008 at 01:33 AM

 
 
who doesn't like HBK?

Posted By: what (Guest)  on September 20, 2008 at 02:39 AM

 
 
"*Bzzt!* Wrong. Shawn didn't have to get pinned or made to submit. That's why it was a stretcher match. Shawn's shoulders don't touch the mat without shennanigans."

I would say getting destroyed and being made to look like a fool by Batista is a little more impressive than simply pinning him.


Posted By: Guest#0824 (Guest)  on September 20, 2008 at 03:56 AM

 
 
I don't like Shawn Michaels, never will like him, and yes I CAN deny his importance. He's wrestled the same match since 1984. He's a parasite and a dirty yellow gutless coward. The single most overrated wrestler of all time.

Posted By: Darren (Guest)  on September 20, 2008 at 09:08 AM

 
 
He has none- Bret Hart Rules- the Real WWE Champion

Posted By: Legacy (Guest)  on September 20, 2008 at 09:52 AM

 
 
Good column, but this is like arguing the importance of entrance music and pyros. Shawn Michaels is one of the TOP performers of the last 25 years and will be an ispiration to MANY more young workers in the future, however he like the rest of us are HUMAN. Eventually SOMEONE from this generation will step up and be the "next". Dont bitch, just enjoy watching Shawn while we still can. Too many of the heroes of MY generation are long gone, crashed and burned, or just dead. Some I regret "hating" at the time because they were so good at what they did.

Posted By: CM Wolf (Guest)  on September 20, 2008 at 10:07 AM

 
 
I don't like Shawn Michaels, never will like him, and yes I CAN deny his importance. He's wrestled the same match since 1984. He's a parasite and a dirty yellow gutless coward. The single most overrated wrestler of all time.

Posted By: Darren (Guest) on September 20, 2008 at 09:08 AM



He has none- Bret Hart Rules- the Real WWE Champion

Posted By: Legacy (Guest) on September 20, 2008 at 09:52 AM



Oh Canada....Thats All I know.....HBK Was The 3rd Best Wrestler In WWF Back In 96-98 Only Behind Austin And Taker...And Is A Damn Shame That He Is Hated Just Because Of What Happended A Certain Night.....He Is Not Going To Stop Being The Showstopper....The Main Eventer....The Icon....Mr.Wrestlemania....The First Ever Grand Slam Champion....Yours Trully The Heart Break Kid Shawn Michales


Posted By: M.Bison#2 (Guest)  on September 20, 2008 at 11:02 AM

 
 
"He's just like 'Taker in the respect that they both have the mindset that they have to get their wins back to save face even though they're legends to the point where no numbers of losses will hurt their legacy."

The Mayor of Awesometown is also apparently the WWE's inhouse psychiatrist and knows the mindset of of these people.

either that, or he is just another supossoing internet dipshit who thinks he understands the mindsets of people he has only seen at a distance.

it does, however, highlight exactly why the smarks are never, nor should never taken seriously.


Posted By: Darth Mortis (Registered)  on September 20, 2008 at 11:40 AM

 
 
I don't like Shawn Michaels, never will like him, and yes I CAN deny his importance. He's wrestled the same match since 1984. He's a parasite and a dirty yellow gutless coward. The single most overrated wrestler of all time.

Posted By: Darren (Guest) on September 20, 2008 at 09:08 AM

Nice insult. Did you learn that in grade 6 english, you tool?


Posted By: Brendan (Guest)  on September 20, 2008 at 12:42 PM

 
 
Lets see he put over Benoit and Cena and Orton over clean as a whistle no muss no fuss. All of whom they were tryin to get over as big things, and really thats all he needs to do put over the big guns. He doesn't need to job to anyone but sure things.

Posted By: ThePhenom (Guest) on September 20, 2008 at 01:33 AM

Shawn beat Cena clean in that hour long RAW match which is remembered much more than their 'Mania encounter.

Orton didn't beat Shawn clean. Shawn's finisher was banned and Orton won because Shawn stutterstepped since he couldn't use the kick.

Shawn beat Benoit clean on RAW prior to Benoit's title win.

Like I said. Shawn HAS to get his win back or he won't be beaten cleanly.

---

I would say getting destroyed and being made to look like a fool by Batista is a little more impressive than simply pinning him.

Posted By: Guest#0824 (Guest) on September 20, 2008 at 03:56 AM

I would say you made that up. Shawn was fine the next day. So much for getting "destroyed" and looking "foolish."

Wrestling logic does not = real world logic. Getting pinned/submitting is ALWAYS worse to a guy trying to protect his legacy than any other sort of loss.


Posted By: Tom Black (Guest)  on September 20, 2008 at 02:29 PM

 
 
@ Mina

No shit


Posted By: tron:man (Guest)  on September 20, 2008 at 02:57 PM

 
 
he is just another supossoing internet dipshit who thinks he understands the mindsets of people he has only seen at a distance.it does, however, highlight exactly why the smarks are never, nor should never taken seriously.

Posted By: Darth Mortis (Registered)

You included lil guy!


Posted By: Blueoyster (Guest)  on September 20, 2008 at 07:51 PM

 
 
it does, however, highlight exactly why the smarks are never, nor should never taken seriously.

Posted By: Darth Mortis (Registered) on September 20, 2008 at 11:40 AM

---

Ahhh... an IWC guy that likes to pretend he's not an IWC guy. Gotta love people like you with your undeserved sense of self-importance. Silly hypocrites like you are endlessly entertaining.


Posted By: Guest#3776 (Guest)  on September 21, 2008 at 10:13 PM

 


www.41mania.com
Copyright © 2005 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.