www.411mania.com
|  News |  Columns |  TV Reports |  Video Reviews |  Title History |  Hall of Fame |  News Report |  The Dunn List |
SPOTLIGHTS  SPOTLIGHTS
MOVIES/TV
// Star Wars - Episode I 3D Brings In $1.1 Million in Midnight Showings
MUSIC
// First Official Pics of Beyonce and Jay-Z With Blue Ivy Posted
WRESTLING
// 411 PPV Roundtable Preview – TNA Against All Odds
POLITICS
// Obama Showing Strongest Poll Numbers In Months
MMA
// XFC 16: High Stakes Report 2.10.12
GAMES
// Star Trek Sequel Game in the Works


 HOT TOPICS
//  CM Punk
//  John Cena
//  Triple H
//  Hulk Hogan
//  Randy Orton
//  Christian
SYNDICATE  SYNDICATE



411mania RSS Feeds





Follow 411mania on Twitter!




Add 411 On Facebook
 



 
 411mania » Wrestling » Columns



Advertisement
The Wrestling Bard 10.25.08: Entertainment Woes
Posted by Aaron Hubbard on 10.25.2008



You know, I've been struggling with the idea of what to write down here all week. A range of topics from Jeff Hardy to a discussion of different styles of wrestling to a debate between John McAngle and The Rock Obama. But on Wednesday night, all other things became moot. A small bit of news gave me all the inspiration I needed to write an impassioned article.

Ladies and Gentlemen, it appears that Professional Wrestling is dead. Vince McMahon does not want the fine employees that work for him to be called "wrestlers". Fine. I can deal with "superstars". I have for the longest time. But now, he has gone a step further. Vince has apparently found a new nickname which sums up his view of our beloved wrestling.

Vince McMahon's wants his in-ring performers to be called "entertainers".

I am using every once of my restraint to keep a civil tongue here. This is quite possible the most insulting thing Vince McMahon has ever done. Grown men kissing his posterior? Fine, it's funny every once in a while. Ignoring women's wrestling in favor of eye candy? Fine, I'm a man, I can understand the logic. Calling wrestling "sports entertainment"? That's cool, it's athletic and entertaining, and it sums up the business nicely. Mocking God in his feud with Shawn Michaels? Fine, I can deal with that too, God has a sense of humor, and people bash my faith everyday.

But calling wrestlers "entertainers"? Frank Gotch, Lou Thesz, and a plethora of others have to be rolling in their graves right now. Vince officially wants to take the "sports" out of "sports entertainment". This is a slap to every fan of wrestling and the business itself. The fact that this is coming from a man who has been the most important figure in wrestling for the last thirty years is depressing. Vince, for the love of wrestling, get your head of your million dollar butt crack and respect the hard work that your "entertainers" have been doing for nearly fifty years.

Bruno Sammartino, despite not being a great worker, was driven by competition. Billy Graham, for all of his over the top pomp, still knew several holds. Hulk Hogan, for all the bashing the IWC gives him, was a capable in-ring performer when he cared enough to deliver. Steve Austin, for all of his beer swilling and byrd flipping, was proud to call himself a wrestler. John Cena, for all the flack he gets, lives and breathes the business of wrestling.

That's not even the non-sports entertainment guys. When Ric Flair retired, Jim Ross didn't call him the "greatest entertainer to ever lace a pair of boots". Bret Hart, for all the flack that I give him, was 100% dedicated to making the in-ring product look as real as possible. Shawn Michaels, perhaps the greatest "sports entertainer" of all time, is a master of psychology and telling a story. Eddie Guerrero and Chris Benoit, despite their issues, got over almost solely on their ability to have a great wrestling match. Kurt Angle didn't win an Olympic Gold Medal in "entertainment".

If Vince was to call his wrestlers "superstars" and wrestling "sports entertainment" that's fine. The idea of wrestling is to have a wrestling match so good that it creates genuine emotion and thus entertains the audience. Not all wrestlers can be "sports entertainers". This takes a very special "it" factor, something that Ric Flair, Hulk Hogan, Shawn Michaels, Steve Austin, The Rock and John Cena all have in abundance. So yes, the ability to truly connect with an audience should be recognized. But they didn't just get the audience to love them by their great mic skills and hand motions. Ric Flair wasn't loved by anybody until they realized that he always had great matches and made his opponents looked good. Hulkamania wouldn't have been as big as it was if Hogan hadn't have slammed Andre the Giant in the ring . Shawn Michaels got over because what he could do in the ring was more entertaining than anyone. Steve Austin and The Rock's great promos wouldn't have mattered without the great matches they had against each other. And John Cena is only just now starting to win the other half of the audience over because he has shown that, despite his goofy, child friendly moveset, he delivers in the ring .

I suppose Vince's logic is that the "smarts" won't be able to chant "You can't entertain!" at John Cena without looking like idiots. But does he not see how ridiculous this is? I mean…the biggest "sports entertainment" show of the year is called Wrestlemania. Will 25 years of history be erased so that in 2010 we can have "Entertainmania I"? I suppose you won't have to show all the great Wrestlemania moments like Chris Benoit's world title win and Steve Austin passing out in his own blood while being put in a wrestling hold. Seriously Vince, are you so ashamed of how you became a multi-Millionaire that you refuse to call it what it is?

I don't know about the rest of you, but since the majority of you are older than me, I can only assume that this is even truer for you. I grew up on PROFESSIONAL WRESTLING. I didn't mind "sports entertainment", but I was raised on WRESTLING. I didn't fall in love with Sting because he had flashy face paint (although it helped), I fell in love with him because of how he would manhandle Ric Flair in the ring. I didn't grow to respect Chris Benoit because I thought he was entertaining, I respected him because he wrestled like he could beat anyone. I didn't become a Shawn Michaels fan because he pranced around in reflective chaps, I became an HBK fan because he could fly around the ring and entertain me with his wrestling ability.

I'm really trying to find something positive about this situation. I've come up with two things. 1) Hopefully, the disgruntled WWE fans that still love wrestling but are "smart" will expand their horizons to Japan, ROH, Mexico, or some other company that believes that still calls its in-ring performers wrestlers and claim to be profession wrestling. 2) Hopefully, the disgruntled WWE fans that have finally had enough will no longer whine about John Cena since he will no longer be relevant to their lives, and I won't have to slowly scratch holes in my ears from hearing about it. That's really all I got.

I've got a confession to make. I don't watch current day wrestling on a weekly basis. I don't have cable in my house due to a family decision, and I'm actually glad for it. When you live in a house with three pre-teenage girls, it's a blessing to not have to worry about some obnoxious Disney show. So I don't watch a lot of recent wrestling. I watch ECW every week via the computer, and I try to catch the ROH PPVs and the occasional WWE PPV. If I'm somewhere else on a wrestling night, I'll try to watch RAW or Smackdown! But most of what I watch is DVDs and YouTube. I've watched more matches predating 2002 that I have matches post-Benoit in 2008.

I'm really trying to stay attached to wrestling. I've always tried to take the 1 Corinthians approach to wrestling. "Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs…It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres." But I've started to notice things. I'm beginning to notice that wrestling is less of a fun hobby and more of an obsession.

I've referred to my wrestling fandom as a love affair. Perhaps it is more of an addiction. I don't have a lot of vices in my life. I don't drink, I don't smoke, I don't pop pills, and I don't go around having sex. Perhaps wrestling is my drug of choice. It's my happy place, my escape from the world. And I'm really starting to question whether or not that's a healthy thing. When I look at how much I bash Vince's insulting decisions, the fact dawns on me that I'll probably still be ordering Wrestlemania 25. It seems I have no moral standard, no place to put my foot down and say that enough is enough. And when I look at that, I start realizing that the answer to whether or not wrestling is healthy for me or not is a resounding no.

Wrestling has gotten me through a lot of things. From ugly break-ups to losing my job to those days where I questioned my belief in God, wrestling has always been there, ready to comfort me. Wrestling is my mistress. But now, wrestlers are entertainers. Since Vince McMahon thinks that wrestling is dead, perhaps I should follow suit.

I realize now that I didn't want to go down this road. Venting my frustrations with the business has left me no longer angry, but sad and a little afraid of how much I care. Perhaps I shouldn't have taken you down this road either. But sometimes you've got to ask yourself…is all of this really worth it?

Maybe it is. Maybe this is all just a bad day for me. I've always had the thought in mind that I should go up to Kansas City and train with Harley Race before pursuing a career in the business I love. Today, I'm considering selling all of my DVDs so I can have some extra money and can spend the time I usually spend watching wrestling to refocus on school, connecting with God, and getting a job. Maybe I'll even go out on a date. Where I'll be tomorrow, I don't know.

Perhaps all wrestling fans get like this. Perhaps we all just have off days. I don't know. Maybe this is just a personal thing for me. Maybe the fact that I haven't watched wrestling with anybody but myself for the last two months is getting to me. Or maybe it's all of the negativity of the comments section on this website. Maybe it's just that I've watched wrestling all my life and I feel the need to move on. Maybe God is calling me to something else. I don't know.

Whatever the reason is…today is one of those days when I wish I had gave up on wrestling after the Benoit Family Tragedy. It might be an off day, or it might be a new dawn. I don't know. I suppose I'll know tomorrow. After all, my approach to wrestling "keeps no record of wrongs" . Maybe, despite all the negativity I feel right now, the kid that always dreamed of main eventing a Wrestlemania will wake up tomorrow with revived vigor to accomplish that dream. I'll just have to wait and see.

This has been what's on my mind this week. For some reason, I can't get my mind wrapped on wrestling this week. Probably because it's called Entertainment now.

Ask Aaron

Next week, I will have a feature up where you can ask me questions to get my opinions on things. It does not have to be wrestling related, but I am putting four guidelines here.

1) Questions with foul language will not be answered. Keep it civil.
2) Anything having to do with faith or religion is off limits, for the sake of other readers.
3) Politics is also off limits. I've expressed my viewpoint, I know who I'm voting for, and nothing anyone says is changing my vote. I'd rather talk about other things.
4) Chris Benoit is off limits. I've expressed my "forgive and move on" viewpoint, but everybody will have different takes that they are entitled to, and the last thing I need is another pointless debate about whether or not Chris is in Hell. Who, outside of his friends and family, really cares?

These rules are in place to encourage interesting questions that will not be offensive to the other readers. Granted, some punk is likely to take offense no matter what I say, but I don't want to get into those touchy subjects. It's just better for my sanity's sake.

Some people are probably going to flame me for venting, but I have a right to do it every now and then. Since wrestling is the cause of my frustration, I see no problem voicing that frustration on a wrestling column. If you want to read about wrestling, my review of Tombstone: The History of the Undertaker, should be coming up sometime next week.

Have a good one, and I sincerely hope you are having a better day than I'm having. Enjoy Cyber Sunday if you're ordering it. It already has given me more headaches than I needed when I tried to do the roundtable predictions. I've had pretty decent luck at getting my predictions right. I was one of the top 5 for No Mercy, which pisses me off since I didn't get to see it. I think I deserve a free DVD at least, but I'm sure I won't since some people hate intentionally crappy haikus.

Now, because the Bard likes to leave things on a positive note:



Use your caption skills.


Post Comment (23)  |  Email Aaron Hubbard  |  View Aaron Hubbard's 411 Profile

  Send To Friend  |    Stumble It!  |    Digg It!  | 



Please add your comment below.
If you are registered, you can login and post under your registered name. If not, you can post as a guest or register.

* Please note that 411 moderates all comments. Your comment will show up on the site after it has been approved by an editor.
 
Name : 
Comment : 
Remaining Characters : 
2800
 

Comments (23)

 
Good article, and while I can't say I share your fervor against the move I can understand it. It dawns on me that WWE and TNA are both trying to distance themselves from wrestling in one form or another. Both companies have plenty of very talented guys and chose to not let them work, perhaps because it would make the Hollywood type talkers look bad in the ring. I too hope that people take notice and companies like ROH get a boost from these horrible business choices.

They do all this presumably out of some delusion about what fans want, or an interest in making wrestling as mainstream as it was in the 90's. It's foolish, really, and insulting to those of us who are wrestling fans and watch the product already.


Posted By: Andy (Guest)  on October 25, 2008 at 08:19 AM

 
 
"Giant Gonzalez's new pyro went a bit too far..."

Posted By: Someoneortheother (Guest)  on October 25, 2008 at 10:44 AM

 
 
I agree. Vince OWNS wrestling now and yes it's entertainment but call it what it is.

Posted By: The Rev (Guest)  on October 25, 2008 at 10:58 AM

 
 
He cud call it the Shitbreathe League and it wont make a difference.

Fans know its pro wrestling and they know pro-wrestling is a work.

Entertainment sounds better than SPORTS Entertainment which sounds corny and forced.

I dont like them being called entertainers or superstars.I think "talent" and "performers" sounds better.


Posted By: MacDollarz. (Guest)  on October 25, 2008 at 03:27 PM

 
 
I get your point Hubbard, but for me personally, as a little kid watching WWF on Saturday mornings in the 80's and early 90's, I did fall in love with wrestling because of the entertainment. I was an Ultimate Warrior fan because of the face paint and cool entrance, and a Hulkamaniac because of his charisma and ability to overcome any level of punishment to beat the bad guys. When I got back into wrestling years later, it was out of nostalgia for the old guys in WCW and for the Austin/Vince saga in the WWF.

Now, that's not to say I don't love a good match, but for me the wrestling has always been kind of secondary. I'm drawn into the characters and the spectacle first and foremost. I've never been a star rating geek, as I think being invested in a match on an emotional level is more important than holds and spots and whatnot.

I guess what I'm trying to say is, I get your point, and I'm sure most of the geeks on here will agree with you, but man I really don't give a shit what Vince calls his show. It is the combination of comedy, violence, drama, and staged competition that got me into wrestling and still keeps me a fan.


Posted By: Chopper (Guest)  on October 25, 2008 at 04:23 PM

 
 
I agree 100%. Vince thinks he owns wrestling (and to a degree, he does). Unfortunately, even if he changes the the name of his performers the masses will still watch... well, maybe not as many "masses" as before, but you get my drift. Fact is, fans should love the product regardless of what it is called.
On another site a few days ago, I had to defend my statement of "wrestling is the best sport". Everyone took the term "sport" too literally. I meant it more along the lines of "business" than to "sport" - the "sport of business", if you will. Same principles apply - there are winners and losers, people get prizes for winning (money, fame, sponsership, etc), recognition, and so on. Vince has worked for years, turning the sport of wrestling into a business. Calling his on-screen performers "entertainers" is a part of the "sport of business". We, as fans of wrestling, may not like it, but if it'll attract new fans and add to the diversity of our sport, then I welcome it. If anything, actors and other sports stars are "entertainers". UFC has their brand of entertainers, and whilst they're known on screen as fighters deep down we know them as entertainers. Why? Because they ENTERTAIN. I not saying that thinking that we're all naive - it's obvious. But Vince is going a long way to prove it to everyone else - despite the term "sport entertainment" that already exists. Why not have "wrestling entertainiers"? Then, the personalities can be refered to as wrestlers, and the sport as a whole be branded as entertainment, like it always has been. I understand he's trying to make a loophole in not having wrestling branded as a real sport and not the business sport that it is, but frankly put the groups that he's trying to make loopholes for should be smarter than this. Everyone knows wrestling is predetermined, despite there being an element of pain involved and the appearance of a real sport.
If these groups really care, they'd assist in making rules in which help the Wellness Policy, etc. That's the main issue here, and if they don't think WWE or TNA are doing a good enough job, the fine them. That'll scare Vince into shaping up AND he won't have to brand his performers as entertainers.

Anyways, sorry for the wall of text! Great article, and don't worry about being addicted to wrestling - I'm sure there are others, including me!


Posted By: Gothekain (Guest)  on October 25, 2008 at 04:42 PM

 
 
I think you're making a mountain out of a mole hill. I mean, I agree with you, the label change from "sports entertainment" to "entertainment" is awful, but it's just not that big of a deal. It's just what Vince McMahon calls his product. But he's not fooling anybody. I guarantee you that Triple H still considers himself a professional wrestler. I'm sure JR still tells people that he calls "wrestling" matches. And most importantly, I'm absolutely that the public at large considers the WWE to be "professional wrestling." I don't see why the world is falling here. It's not any worse than changing the name from "professional wrestling" to "sports entertainment" anyway. It's just the next logical step.

Like I said, I'm not justifying it at all. Anybody who's been on this site for more than a day knows what I think about Vincent Kennedy McMahon. And to say "This is quite possible (sic) the most insulting thing Vince McMahon has ever done" is just ridiculous. For example, throwing Melanie Pillman on live television a day after her husband died in a hotel room. Just off the top of my head.


Posted By: The REAL MP (Registered)  on October 25, 2008 at 04:43 PM

 
 
Good column! I love your caption idea, but I can't think of a good one.

Posted By: The Great Capt. Smooth (Guest)  on October 25, 2008 at 05:45 PM

 
 
I like your different take on things Chopper. It's very fresh.

Posted By: Aaron Hubbard (Registered)  on October 25, 2008 at 07:44 PM

 
 
I meant I don't see why the SKY is falling. Don't post high, kids.

Posted By: The REAL MP (Registered)  on October 25, 2008 at 08:01 PM

 
 
Funny, because I'm sure Frank Gotch and Lou Thesz probably won't mind that people they helped influence are going out and entertaining people in the way that THE MAJORITY OF WRESTLING FANS THESE DAYS WANT TO BE ENTERTAINED. I'd think they'd be pretty damned proud.

You suck.


Posted By: Guest#6398 (Guest)  on October 25, 2008 at 08:04 PM

 
 
"Eddie Guerrero and Chris Benoit, despite their issues, got over almost solely on their ability to have a great wrestling match."

Bullshit. Eddie got over with his gimmick as well.

Plus, improve your writing skills. It looks like a whiny thirteen-year old wrote this.


Posted By: guest (Guest)  on October 25, 2008 at 08:07 PM

 
 
MacMahon is doing this so that he can avoid taxes on professional athletics. He knows people will still call them wrestlers and/or superstars. Furthermore, why would he care if you boo or mock Cena? You're in the building. I'd ask the writer to grow up, but it sounds as if he's thirteen.

Posted By: Iron Knee (Guest)  on October 25, 2008 at 08:20 PM

 
 
To MP:

I would agree to some extent on making the mountain out of a molehill. But hey, sometimes you have to take a ball and run with it. I couldn't think of anything, and then something showed up that legitimately pissed me off...I'm nothing if not opportunistic.

I've never heard the Pillman thing, but I have to think that if Melanie was still used as part of a storyline that would have been just as tasteless. (see: Vickie Guerrero and Edge) So maybe that was for the best.


Posted By: Aaron Hubbard (Registered)  on October 25, 2008 at 08:41 PM

 
 
No, Vince as commentator on Raw legit grilled Melanie Pillman about the cause of Brian's death, his abuse of painkillers, how the children were taking it, etc. That Raw just aired on 24/7 about a month ago, and I'm sure it's on YouTube if you want to check it out. It's pretty disturbing though.

Posted By: The REAL MP (Registered)  on October 25, 2008 at 10:42 PM

 
 
Aaron, good points, I see where you're coming from. However, I don't feel that it will make a difference to the paying fan what the announcers call them. Besides, based on what the WWE presents to us today, can we really call that entertainment?

(Refraining from making a "lipstick on a pig" joke)

It's obvious that the WWE is just not that much fun to watch. TNA may have their frustrating moments, but they at least do a better job of entertainment, so if they call themselves "TNE" I wouldn't mind. ROH does a great job of entertaining simply by telling a story in the ring.


Posted By: JJ (Guest)  on October 25, 2008 at 11:27 PM

 
 
"No, Vince as commentator on Raw legit grilled Melanie Pillman about the cause of Brian's death, his abuse of painkillers, how the children were taking it, etc. That Raw just aired on 24/7 about a month ago, and I'm sure it's on YouTube if you want to check it out. It's pretty disturbing though."

Yipes. Think I'll pass on seeing that clip, MP. That's just...sad. Glad I missed it.

"Don't post high kids."

ME? HIGH? That's Michael O's gimmick!


Posted By: Aaron Hubbard (Registered)  on October 26, 2008 at 12:46 AM

 
 
I was correcting my original post, not you. Also, here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ta71GQYRTIE

You kids should be as jaded as the rest of us smarks. For the good of the business.


Posted By: The REAL MP (Registered)  on October 26, 2008 at 01:20 AM

 
 
You know what, Hubbard? One of these days, you'll have to realize that the universe...is...indifferent. And that your problems mean absolutely nothing.

Only then are you going to find true happiness. I'm not a fortune cookie, just a very mysterious man from an Emmy Award-winning television drama.


Posted By: Don Draper (Guest)  on October 26, 2008 at 01:30 AM

 
 
You actually read your posts after you post them to make corrections?

I don't know if being jaded is a good thing, but I think it is good to be aware of how bad wrestling has been, so that we can always point to it's low times and say that the "now" could always be worse.

2007, in my opinion was the worst year in wrestling since 1993. You had the steroid scandals, below average matches, and the Benoit Family Tragedy. By my estimations, that means wrestling should get really good again in 2011.


Posted By: Aaron Hubbard (Registered)  on October 26, 2008 at 02:28 PM

 
 
I agree with MP, Aaron. I think you're making more out of this than necessary. I understand your POV on the matter, but it seems much ado about nothing. Those days are long gone and we have to move on.

"I don't have a lot of vices in my life. I don't ....... and I don't go around having sex."

Damn, buddy. Try it. Even CM Punk does it.

Have a good weekend.


Posted By: Angry Bear (Guest)  on October 26, 2008 at 06:38 PM

 
 
To Angry Bear:

As I said to MP, sometimes you gotta take a ball and run with it. In a very boring week, I found something that pissed me off enough for me to care.

As far as the Punk comparison, Kansas isn't exactly crawling with Marias, you know? Not to mention some other well known facts about me that are a little more relavant to abstinance.

Have a good week. Honestly, I got comments that were interesting to read this week, so that's better than most.


Posted By: Aaron Hubbard (Registered)  on October 27, 2008 at 12:26 AM

 
 
"As far as the Punk comparison, Kansas isn't exactly crawling with Marias, you know?"

Actually, I do know. I got my degree from the WU in T-town. It would always take around 3-5 days for my ability to determine women attractive to revert back to normal whenever I returned home from KS. I guess that may be why I drank myself stupid out there. You're a better man than me, Mr. Hubbard.


Posted By: Angry Bear (Guest)  on October 27, 2008 at 09:33 AM

 


www.41mania.com
Copyright � 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.