Thoughts From The Top Rope 11.05.08: Time For A Change
Posted by Daniel Wilcox on 11.05.2008
Raw is living off of its past glories, and it may not be long before its overtaken as the number one show in wrestling. Maybe it's time for a change.
I stayed up to watch Monday Night Raw live this week for the first time in a long while (for those that don't know, the show airs in the early hours of the morning here in the UK). I did this not because there was anything advertised that I was desperate to see, but because I didn't have to get up early the next morning anyway, and because it started an hour early, the tedious wait until the show starts was, well, less tedious. It didn't take me long to regret my decision, as it soon became clear that this show was going to suck. While I understand that this was a "celebration" of 800 hundred episodes of Raw, there are only so many times that they can show highlights of DX invading WCW and Austin driving a beer truck and keep my attention. Having seen those clips probably hundreds of times over the years, they've more or less lost their allure – much like Raw itself.
SmackDown, on the other hand, feels like it's going places. Whereas Raw leaves you thinking its best years are far, far behind it, I'd imagine the best is yet to come for SmackDown. With some if its acquisitions in the draft this year, the ever-awesome Edge and Taker on board and a fresher feel since the move to MyNetwork, SmackDown seems to be building to bigger and better things. Sure, Triple H may be at the helm, but I don't think too many would disagree that The Game has been a lot more tolerable on Friday nights, and really has given the show a legitimacy it didn't have before. Now more than ever, SmackDown seems to be on par with Raw.
Outside of a World title change (that brings into question why Batista was crowned champion in the first place), Raw this week was a shambles. The opening tag match was far too short; the battle royal only served to expose how worthless the Intercontinental Championship is; Kozlov/Haas was fun but forgettable; the big men vs. little men tag match was, again, too short; Punk/Orton had an awful finish; and the Divas match was pathetic. The only things of merit were the main event, teasing a Shane/Steph rift and DX vs. Miz and Morrison. Unfortunately, we had the same pattern of DX going over in a bout that will lead nowhere and benefits no one, though I will say their pre-match promo was good stuff. And I don't even want to mention that retarded dance segment.
I understand that WWE does not like putting on these 3-hour episodes of Raw and only does so to please USA, but it seems to me like they have no faith in their roster. Being a 3-hour show, there's obviously some theme that's being promoted and thus they tend to have a big-night feel, supposedly leading to more viewers tuning in who may not tune in week in week out. So to make these viewers stay, WWE should be presenting their current product in the best light possible; instead they filled up the show with lame "comedy" segments and clips of the days when Raw used to be must-see TV – days that are long gone.
It seems WWE trot out these DX reunions, special Undertaker appearances, McMahon appearances and Hardys reunions in order to make a show feel "special", but at the end of the day, they're really not highlighting what the current product is about. Why not, just once in a while, put a pay-per-view quality match on one of these shows. And that brings me to another point; where the hell was the Survivor Series hype? OK, so they announced Cena vs. Jericho, but that's it. We're three weeks away from the WWE's fourth biggest show of the year and it barely got a mention all night.
Raw's legacy is what's holding it back, I feel. When people compare it to the old days, no one seems to think it's as good today as it was in the late 90s. Raw back then was must-see TV, where big things went down night in, night out. Nowadays, we'll get a couple of truly great moments each year, if we're lucky. And because of its past glory, I don't think people will ever truly appreciate the current product, which, at times, can be extremely entertaining if a little tired.
After eight hundred (and six) episodes, maybe it's time Raw was put on the shelf. Now that would be a "major announcement" that would truly change wrestling as we know it. WWE seem to think Raw (and really the company as a whole) can get by just because of its name-value. That's why they trot out these "Did You Know" spots and why Michael Cole has the phrase "…the longest weekly episodic TV show in history" engraved in his memory forever. And as the ratings show, the "WWE Universe" just ain't buying it. And I'm not talking about ratings in the last few weeks, or even the decline since the Attitude Era, I'm talking about the steady decline in the last few years. I don't think the quality of the product has declined, just the way WWE presents itself. Their "style over substance" approach is taking all the enjoyment out of Raw for me and, assumedly, many others. Maybe a whole new WWE show - new look, new direction, new era - will spark some major interest in wrestling again. Sure, it's like starting from scratch, but sometimes to progress you have to do just that. This way, you know that things can only get better. And while this ain't "Wacky Wrestling Theory", a great man once said that all the best ideas seem absurd at first, or something to that affect.
For the decade or so I've been a wrestling fan, I've never missed an episode of Raw until recently. Even when I'd go on holiday, I'd record Raw and make sure I'd watch it when I got back. Now, I generally only catch Raw in its replay slot and even then, I'm not too bothered if I forget to tune in (which I frequently do). If a dedicated fan like myself is losing interest, how can WWE expect to maintain a casual audience? It's time for a change. Incidentally, I always make sure I catch SmackDown one way or another.
It's pretty apt that I'm here calling for such a drastic change as the end of the longest weekly episodic TV show in history the day after the US elects its first black President (or at least, I'm assuming they did (I'm writing this Tuesday morning)). I imagine America will undergo some pretty drastic changes itself in the near future, and I think most would agree that they're necessary ones. So too, I feel, are the changes that WWE should be looking to make. Not just because their own ratings and pay-per-view buys are declining, but because there's a company from Florida who are growing. Sure, they may not seem like much of a threat right now, but TNA continues to expand and who knows when they'll go over the top and become real competition – of course, if Raw's decline continues, that time could be sooner than we think.
Smackdown is going places? I don't know what show you've been watching but Smackdown is still in the same boat as Raw.
Triple H, while good is a stale act as world champion.
Shelton Benjamin as US champion has no noteworthy feud on his hands.
The tag titles barely get any exposure as it is (when's the last time those belts were defended on PPV?)
And don't get me started on the tramp belt.
Smackdown is much worse than Raw right now. As it has no noteworthy storylines happening at this point in time.
Smackdown going places, YEAH RIGHT!
Posted By: ??? (Guest) on November 05, 2008 at 01:39 AM
Wow, I've been a long time reader of this site and it's great columns. I'm usually completely satisfied by the time I'm done with a column, it obvious they look for the best. I made it about half way through this column (reading it for the first time)and realized why! I can't believe this guy is even employed by this site, I felt like I was reading some teenage boys blog post he did in his basement in between games of World of Warcraft and jerking it to the gamer babe of the week! So I feel like being a hypocrite and spewing some negative garbage myself and letting Mr. "I've got a voice, I'm gonna use it" know that I really could give 2 shits about your opinion of the state of pro wrestling and that even the half your column I could get through was more a waste of time then that dance segment on RAW! NOBODY CARES WHAT A DOOSH WITH A KEYBOARD THINKS!!!!! Less complaining and more thought provoking content dude! I'm off to read an enjoyable column now, hey man that felt great being a negative , pissed off internet poster, now I'm in the cool crowd too, YES!
Posted By: Wow! (Guest) on November 05, 2008 at 02:28 AM
Great article. I can't imagine Monday nights without thinking WRESTLING, but I can certainly move past RAW. Maybe if they just rename the show, change the look, and maybe do it around the time of the next draft (so it doesn't still FEEL like Raw, having the same wrestlers). Also they should switch to a 6-sided ring. I don't think anyone's done that yet. Lol. But seriously, I know exactly what you mean about how it seemed that RAW USED to be must-see-tv (I too would always make sure to record it and watch it later) but since 2006, I've probably missed 40 editions of RAW that I didn't bother to see (I'd just read the recaps)...and I'm a die-hard wrestling fan. Anyways, I'm rambling, but yeah, I completely agree that things need to be freshened up.
Posted By: Empire Of Ownage (Guest) on November 05, 2008 at 03:20 AM
I didnt watch Raw but 75% of it sounds awful, They really need to have to build a strong tag & IC title division to get people interested in things outside Jericho, HBK, Cena, Orton & Batista.
Theres just too many short matches that nobody cares about.
Posted By: jbardo (Guest) on November 05, 2008 at 05:00 AM
The wise man was Schopenhauer:
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident
Posted By: M:-X (Guest) on November 05, 2008 at 07:49 AM
TV wrestling has lost all appeal for me right now. For someone with even some small semblence of a life, 5 hours of TV Wrestling just for WWE (7 if you count TNA, which I'm even less inlclined to watch) is way too much time for bad television. My plan was usually to record all shows and fast forward through all adverts and skippable bits, but when I found myself skipping more and more and then missing shows and not actually wanting to spend any time to catch up - I knew it was time to pack it in.
I agree Raw is in a bad slump but disagree about Smackdown, that's the same if not worse. Sure they're not booking it so much as the B show anymore, but since Triple H came onboard to bury everyone and Undertaker came back to bury everyone with him, it's just gone unwatchable.
I'm a big fan of ROH. I'm also a big fan of PWG and I like to try out Chikara and FIP every so often. For now I'll be spending my time with those when it suits me. I have no time to spend so much of each week forwarding through all the crap of each TV wrestling show. They're all almost as bad as each other (Impact definitely being the worst by FAR) and it just isn't worth even wasting the large amount of space they take up on my cable box hard drive every week anymore.
I'll still buy the PPV discs cheap as I find that 90% of the time WWE puts on good PPV's. I won't pay to see them on the night, I just wait a couple of weeks and order them on DVD cheap and then watch & keep them. I think I'm happy now just doing that and reading the spoilers and show reports on here. It gives me much more time to play with.
Posted By: Col (Guest) on November 05, 2008 at 09:12 AM
tna!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted By: dam (Guest) on November 05, 2008 at 11:31 AM
At the end of the day we fans have to ask ourselves if there's anything on RAW that makes us go, "Man I've GOT to see what happens next week." As of right now there really isn't, and I don't think that has anything to do with the booking so much as there is only one engaging character on the show (Jericho).
I know right now there are about 10,000 marks who are screaming "What about Santino?" Comedy is only ok as long as he's not holding a championship.
What made the Attitude era special was that there were characters that drew people to watch, even if some of the wrestling left a lot to be desired. Also, they made every title and mid-carder seem important, something TNA does a better job of doing.
I wish they would split up the ECW roster and let them go on both shows. That way you could begin putting together both different and exciting matchups. It would not only spruce up the mid-card/tag team scene, but it would also add some new characters to the World Title scene.
Posted By: Orlando (Guest) on November 05, 2008 at 01:34 PM
I k now most people think that it will be the two Hardey brothers holding the titles at the end of the next Wrestlingmania just like Eddie and Chris but I think at the end next Wrestlingmania it will be HHH and HBK.
Hope it is not at the cost of the Undertaker’s streak.
Thank God Matt Hardey is spared this.
HBK vs Y2J for the title and HBK wins.
HBK beats Jeff Hardey for the tittle?
Then DX celebrates.
Just hope Miz and Morrison kicks their asses just then just be4 the end :)
Posted By: who cares (Guest) on November 05, 2008 at 03:52 PM
Even though I dont' watch the WWE anymore I was shocked at the results of the last 3 hour raw, mostly 3 minute matches? You have an extra hour, use it to give the undercard time to work. Why not push the Noble/Regal fued and give them like 10+ minutes to do something, you have a hole 40 extra minutes to fill, so why the hell not?
I think 3 hour raws would be great for that reason, if TNA had a 3 hour impact I would hope for a solid 10+ minute X title match and maybe another 10+ minute multiman X match. Seriously, just run the normal angles and let the matches go longer, is it that hard?
Posted By: Curtis (Guest) on November 05, 2008 at 03:53 PM
Copyright (c) 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.