Wacky Wrestling Theory 11.27.08: World Wrestling Entertainment
Posted by Jake Chambers on 11.27.2008
Many fans cry for the end of the brand extension in the WWE, but I think it’s time for a fourth brand! Hell, why stop at four? I’ve got a whole list of different brands that the WWE needs to take under serious consideration.
The WWE brand extension is an oft-bemoaned focal point for online fans and critics. Many call for its demise, many said it wouldn't last, some protect its sanctity, and there are those who probably don't even remember when the WWE was all just one show! Regardless, the brand extension is here and has even expanded with the addition of ECW as a full-time, fully entrenched, independent wrestling entity. So what's stopping the WWE from adding more brands? The answer is: nothing. More brands are bound to happen soon enough, so I've dug deep and decided to come up with a few ideas of my own for possible wrestling brand extensions in the WWE universe.
Ultimate WWE
Although it may seem like the ‘new' Razor Ramon and Diesel idea was a failure, in theory it could still work. The two biggest problems at the time were (a) the real Scott Hall and Kevin Nash were on a more popular show doing the same gimmick they originally invented, and (b) the ‘new' versions were interacting with original gimmick wrestlers like Bret Hart and Marc Mero. I'm proposing a WWE brand where all the wrestlers are young guys re-imagining classic popular characters. You could have a new Hulk Hogan, Ultimate Warrior, Ric Flair, Stone Cold, The Rock, Iron Sheik, Junkyard Dog, Big Bossman, and even recent and current stars like dX, the Undertaker or Mankind could be fun to mimic and expand on. The attraction would be to not only judge how well the wrestlers could integrate the classic personality into their personal style but also to see hypothetical dream matches come to life in some form. As well, they could re-do classic moments, like the Wrestlemania V main event but this time Macho Man wins, or the Montreal Screw-job where Hebner doesn't ring the bell. Eventually the anticipation about what is going to be different would create a high level of interest. Much like the Marvel Ultimate comic book line, with hindsight at your disposal it is possible to craft stories that play off of expectations and work to tighten up the overall mythology loved by the fans, and re-experience the most invigorating narrative moments in wrestling history.
WWE Silent
One of the best aspects of the weekly ‘UFC Ultimate Fighter' reality series is that the matches at the end of the show don't feature any commentary. Something about this is freeing to watch, like a movie that doesn't rely on sappy, emotional music to dictate exactly how the audience should feel. Well, I think a one-hour show of WWE wrestling with no commentary, no ring announcing and no interviews would be an interesting style of wrestling to watch. If the show were to take place in smaller arenas, just the natural sound of the crowd and the ring action would be unique enough to sustain a whole audio experience. I think an atmosphere like this would be the perfect opportunity for quiet yet skilled wrestlers who don't get a lot of spotlight like Paul London, Val Venis, Snitsky, Funaki and Mike Knox to emerge as a different kinds of stars, while seasoned independent wrestlers like Bryan Danielson and Scotty ‘don't call me Colt' Goldman could make a name for themselves telling stories in the ring with just their actions and timing.
WWE AWA
Since the WWE is so caught up in the legal rights behind the AWA, why not just go ahead and bring it back as a brand. Unlike my previous ideas, this would just be a fourth WWE brand in the same style as RAW, ECW and Smackdown. The WWE would have a new World Champion to promote, and another night of generic ‘firsts' when four ‘world' titles are defended at the same pay-per-view. Actually, it would be perfect to spread out the top stars to a third main brand. Already RAW and Smackdown feel a bit top heavy, with at least four top stars who legitimately should be having long title reigns, stuck trading victories on their respective shows. The AWA name and legacy are just generic enough to support more WWE style action. Considering the low-key style of the AWA, this would be the perfect home for Jerry Lawler as a commentator/General Manager, country boys like Matt and Jeff Hardy to be the top stars, some grumpy old guys like William Regal and Finlay to thrive, a place for traditional tag teams Jesse & Festus and Cade & Murdoch to ply their trade, as well as the perfect stage for a chin-locking, pure-bred old school wrestling superstar like Randy Orton to have a bigger purpose than just winning and losing the same title over and over again on RAW. As a vehicle for Orton, the way Smackdown once felt like the home of The Rock, the WWE AWA could be a successful brand extension for the WWE to shore up it's wrestling tradition and spread out their wealth of main event talent.
WWWWE
The ‘Whole Wide' World Wrestling Entertainment brand that would be run more like a World Cup tournament than a regular pro-wrestling show. Every year, wrestlers representing different countries would compete in matches for about six months, like a league format. The country-specific wrestlers would then be seeded into fixtures where they would compete in order to qualify for the annual tournament. Final brackets would then be based on individual wrestlers performance, with a focus on having wrestlers who represent as many countries as possible as the final concept. If this was a one-hour show, then I think there should only be one match, combined with a lot of panel predictions and wrap-up, video packages showing the countries and interviews with experts, much like a regular sporting event. I think the international aspect of the show relates more to a global sporting appeal and thus why the different format from other WWE programs. A show like this could definitely appeal to viewers from around the globe, which as all barks know is where the real money is to be made.
WWE Revealed
A new concept for a brand that takes you backstage into the politics of the wrestling industry. We would follow wrestling veterans and newcomers as they deal with the obstacles of performing backstage with their opponents being the producers and company owner of a fictional wrestling company who are constantly trying to control the wrestlers' performances. Matches on the show would not be in ring contests, but verbal confrontations between wrestlers and ‘suits.' The show could have an omniscient faux-documentary feel, like the sitcom ‘The Office' that is obviously scripted but is showing what the performers know is being filmed and what they try to hide. This would be a perfect concept to set up at a WWE training territory like FCW or OVW, where the audience can follow along with the drama of creating characters and planning matches, and the psychological struggle that accompanies these aspects of the wrestling business. Of course, the whole show would be carefully planned and scripted to look realistic, so even though it was not really ‘real,' it would be a unique experience nonetheless.
WWE TXT
This brand would combine the current concept of asking the WWE Universe to vote their opinion to questions via text message, and make an entire show based on the Cyber Sunday format. Using a texting subscription service, fans watching shows at home would be given general choices, like which two wrestlers will face each other in the opening match and what outfits they should wear, down to very small choices, such as which moves a wrestler must use at a certain point in a match. For example, once a list of moves is flashed on the screen during a match, let's say some wear-down holds like an armbar, abdominal stretch or figure four, then the audience has a few seconds to text in their favorite choice. Then after the votes are tabulated (obviously this should be able to be done instantly) the name of the move is shown on the big screen, in a color designated to one of the wrestlers in the ring, and they will have to use that move next. Fans would literally be calling the matches in the ring, using the wrestlers like puppets. Wrestlers on this show would literally be blank slates that the texting audience would be able to design, put the words into their mouths, and control their movements in the ring.
Well, there you have it, just a short look at some possible new brands that the WWE could be bringing out in the near future. You won't be calling me wacky when you see some of these shows on the air in a few years, or maybe you have a better idea…?
Posted By: Samer (Guest) on November 26, 2008 at 11:40 PM
you are a moron. stop your incoherent ramblings.
Posted By: supa sta (Guest) on November 27, 2008 at 01:13 AM
Jake - They haven't fired you yet?
Posted By: T-Mac (Guest) on November 27, 2008 at 01:20 AM
i can easily say this is the worst column on 411
Posted By: Nash (Guest) on November 27, 2008 at 04:25 AM
AWA is already came back.
vince mcmahon sold it back to its owner.
Posted By: BIGGAM (Guest) on November 27, 2008 at 06:28 AM
Are you 12? It sounds like you're 12. Your ideas suck. Horribly. Stop writing. Unless you want a whole fed of Vampires. WWV. Hells yeah!
Posted By: Justin (Guest) on November 27, 2008 at 06:29 AM
For the last fucking time, it's called WACKY Wrestling Theory. What were you expecting when you clicked on the link? Jake, keep up the good work. It's good to see someone not taking this too seriously.
Posted By: Jimmy (Guest) on November 27, 2008 at 08:55 AM
This would be the perfect way for GILLBERG to return....
Posted By: Guest#4530 (Guest) on November 27, 2008 at 02:34 PM
Once again, Jake, Hilarious concepts with a hinge of frightening truth. The fact that people get so upset with you cracks me up. As did the Ultimate WWE idea, and since gimmicks tend to get recycled anyway we'll essentially be seeing it in about 5 years. Keep up the good work, and keep pissing off all the lame smarks who think wrestling columns are all serious business.
Posted By: lern2bserius!!! (Guest) on November 27, 2008 at 03:26 PM
Why are you still writing this dribble? If you're going to have different brands, do it: WCW, AWA, a real ECW.. hell, buy up ROH! But make them entirely different entities under the WWE umbrella.
Posted By: Spyke (Guest) on November 27, 2008 at 03:45 PM
sweet column mate, fuck the haters
Posted By: Guest#9423 (Guest) on November 27, 2008 at 04:20 PM
WWE CRAP!.. Oh wait, that's too similar to the shows they have now. GOSH DARN IT!
Posted By: Guest#4460 (Guest) on November 27, 2008 at 04:32 PM
the problem with wrestling is that there are no good CHARACTERS they are all Celeberties....ever notice on the girl entrance videos its all sex...they should show there strengths...
Posted By: bill (Guest) on November 27, 2008 at 04:48 PM
I LOVE DOUBLE DOUBLE DOUBLE DOUBLE E!
Posted By: Chris Stone (Registered) on November 27, 2008 at 05:32 PM
Jake, for the love of God, please stop writing. Every time I read your article I feel a child die.
Posted By: Eric (Guest) on November 27, 2008 at 06:34 PM
have you lost your mind?
Posted By: mr xix (Guest) on November 27, 2008 at 06:47 PM
Most of those brands do seem a bit wacky but I think the WWE silent idea would be amazing. To see a technically sound wrestler fight another wrestler who relies on his gimmick would be an interesting concept. For example have William Regal fight the hugely popular Hulk Hogan. Imagine gimmicked Hulk Hogan entering WWE silent's own yard to have a showdown with William Regal. In a strange turn of events William Regal get enormous pops and Hogan would get tremendous heat. It would create a similar environment to that of when RVD fought John Cena at one night stand and we all got a special feel on that night. Keep up the good work Jake.
Posted By: Duffers (Guest) on November 27, 2008 at 09:29 PM
Vince Russo, is that you?
Posted By: Wow (Guest) on November 28, 2008 at 02:05 AM
I dig the WWE Silent idea. Personally I don't watch WWE TV anymore but I love going to house shows. Is pretty hilarious how people overreact to an 'opinion' column.
Posted By: Steve the jobber (Guest) on November 28, 2008 at 02:47 AM
i don't usually like your stuff but this was pretty good, just the basic concept that they need to differentiate the brands is a good idea. I just don't see why every show is for the same audience when it doesn't have to be.
Posted By: Brett (Guest) on November 28, 2008 at 03:12 AM
I had an idea for the xbox360 SVR where u can control the crowd's chants during a match, eg. while ur playing with bret vs HBK, u hold down a button and speak into the headset and say 'you screwed bret', and then the crowd in the game starts chanting 'you screwed bret'
Posted By: Smackdown vs Raw (Guest) on November 28, 2008 at 05:21 AM
The NFL tried the silent idea a few decades ago. The hardcore fans loved it, but the casual fans had trouble following the action. I bet the same thing would happen to the WWE.
ROH or TNA might be able to pull off the silent match in small doses. Booker t could claim that the Legends Title is bigger than any announcer and thus no one can sully it by calling the matches.
Posted By: Iron Knee (Guest) on November 28, 2008 at 10:03 AM
well this is certainly wacky, i'd give you that. It does however seem a little rushed towards the end as you seem to get a bit bored and slop down any old idea that comes into your head. Bit more planning and this would have been funnier.
Posted By: me (Guest) on November 28, 2008 at 12:07 PM
Actually ROH has pulled something similar to WWE Silent (basically, no commentary) in a handful of cases: the end of Joe/Punk II, the end of the first Dragon Gate 6-man at SOH, and the whole of Joe/Kobashi. There are probably other times this happened that I'm not aware of. But it worked really, really well with just the natural sounds of the crowd and the action, especially if you have a good surround sound.
Of course, those are considered the three best matches in the promotion's history (by me, anyway) so this may be the exception that proves the rule.
Posted By: The REAL MP (Registered) on November 28, 2008 at 01:54 PM
I don't understand where all the hate is coming from, i like this article. It's wacky and some it really got the gears in my own head working.
I like the AWA idea, although i wouldn't bring it back as the AWA. I think WWE dropped the ball with the new ECW by not making it different from the other brands. I think WWE could be successful in running its own seperate wrestling company with different production values and a different road schedule (of course if they could afford it). The problem with ECW and the brand extension to begin with was that both shows looked and felt essentially the same. It was too obvious that there wasn't any real competition. The show doesn't even need to have ppvs, just some Saturday Night Clash of the Champion style specials. Book it old school, make it look completely different from a Raw or SmackDown and eventually you can have a cross promotional angle. They have the developmental guys to do it.
Posted By: Vinnie the Rooh (Guest) on November 30, 2008 at 03:16 PM
Love the Ultimate wwe idea. We would be able to see some dream matches that we want.
Also we have to have WWE MINI. all midgets all the time. then we could have my fantasy match of a midget battle royal. yeah baby money in the bank
Posted By: gutter (Guest) on December 03, 2008 at 07:40 AM
I normally hate everything you write, but, outside of the completely impossible WWE TXT idea, most of these are certainly interesting ideas that at least a few of them might be effective. I can' believe I'm saying this Jake, but good job!
Posted By: RJ (Guest) on December 11, 2008 at 10:59 AM
yea...add more programming on tv. more free wrestling = even more decline in ratings. smart idea. they need to issue a slammy for Dipshit of the Year and jake chambers would win it every year with this garbage.
Posted By: mikecheck (Guest) on December 14, 2008 at 10:32 PM
Copyright (c) 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.