www.411mania.com
|  News |  Columns |  TV Reports |  Video Reviews |  Title History |  Hall of Fame |  News Report |  The Dunn List | Search
SPOTLIGHTS  SPOTLIGHTS
MOVIES/TV
// [Gossip] Kristin Cavallari's See-Through Lace Top
MUSIC
// Cheryl Cole Grabs Her Some Of Nadine Coyle's Booty
WRESTLING
// Top 10 Survivor Series Matches
POLITICS
// Is It Possible To Change Washington?
MMA
// 411’s Strikeforce: Fedor vs. Rogers Report 11.07.09
BOXING
// Haye Slays The Beast
GAMES
// Top 10 Arcade Games




 HOT TOPICS
//  Chris Jericho
//  Randy Orton
//  Triple H
//  Jeff Hardy
//  Edge
SYNDICATE  SYNDICATE



411mania RSS Feeds





Follow 411mania on Twitter!




Add 411 On Facebook
 



 
 411mania » Wrestling » Columns
Advertisement
If I Could Be Serious For A Moment 12.29.08: New Year, New Russo
Posted by Chris Lansdell on 12.30.2008



Should Auld Acquaintance Be Forgot…


There are few figures more reviled in professional wrestling than Vince Russo. If any. The man responsible for numerous "x-on-a-pole" matches, ridiculous swerves and screwjobs, complete shows with no clean finishes and teenage-level humour is the first across people's lips whenever blame needs to be apportioned in TNA. I'll be the first to admit that I am often guilty of this myself, and to a certain extent that blame is justified. When the fans chant "Fire Russo" during things like the AJ Styles-Frank Trigg "match", it's not because they only know one person's name on the creative team. Although Jeff Jarrett retains a veto on booking and writing, the majority of the decisions are made by Russo and his "Crash TV" style reminiscent of an ADHD child off his Ritalin. What we tend to do all too often is forget that this man is also responsible for some of the best ideas of the past 10 or so years. When he is controlled by a strong-willed person like a Vince McMahon, Russo can be just the breath of fresh air that a wrestling company needs.

And Never Brought To Mind

It would be remiss of me to write an article praising Russo's current work without pointing out the bad he's done. Remember the Fingerpoke of Doom? The Misfits in Action? The cattle prod on a pole match? Sports Entertainment X-treme? Vince Russo, WCW Champion? All Russo's brainchildren. The same man who became a born-again Christian and started a promotion based around that. Russo is an ideas man, with a creative and fertile imagination that goes faster than his logical brain. However he has no filter between conception and implementation. Left unchecked he will play out all of his ideas on screen, changing them mid-stream if a better idea comes along. He reminds me very much of an outlaw come to rescue his friends with a huge ring of keys. In the cell is a wrestler's success, and Russo is frantically trying every key on the ring for a few minutes at a time, desperate to free that success before the jailers catch him.

He believed (or possibly still believes) in muddying the face-heel lines, in keeping title reigns short and in interference or swerve finishes. He harboured an intense dislike for foreign wrestlers, lucha-style in particular, and seemingly has an obsession with tag team partners who dislike each other. Not all of these things are bad, but when they are all thrown together, mixed up and added to gimmick matches, the rules of which take several minutes to explain, then the viewer is left befuddled by what he's just seen.

Russo was successful in WWE because his approach was new, it made for sensational viewing, it brought in a huge audience who never knew what to expect and chiefly because Vince McMahon put the reins on him and was not afraid to choke up on them. Once he went to WCW and convinced the suits there that he needed full control to keep them on top of the war, we saw how dangerous an unfettered Russo could be. The problem has since resurfaced in TNA, where up until recently Russo's hallmark could be seen in such things as the Lethal Lottery tag tournament, the Rat on a Pole match, the Black Tie Brawl and Chain match and other classics. His dislike for "flippy-floppy stuff" was evident as the X-Division took a smaller and smaller role in the shows, being reduced to 3 minute matches and a 10 minute multi-man spotfest at the PPVs. When it became clear that he was resurrecting to angles that had been messed up before (Millionaire's Club vs New Blood and Muhammad Hassan's Arab American), many IWC pundits feared the worst. Especially since one of those mess-ups was his fault.

We'll Drink A Cup Of Kindness Yet

If we were a fair and just bunch, we would not always expect the worst of Russo. After all, this is also the brain behind D-Generation X, Austin vs. McMahon, the Nation of Domination and the Undertaker-Mankind-Kane feud. Some of his WCW ideas were sound, but were hampered by too many people having creative control. So when the Main Event Mafia angle started to develop well, and when Sheik Abdul Bashir started to cut intense and strong promos that cut close to the bone without cutting into it…well we just shouldn't have been so thoroughly shocked.

Becoming a born-again Christian, as I'm sure Mr Hubbard will agree, is about redemption and absolution. Whether or not Russo has displayed Christian values in his portrayals of various characters is an issue for a column written by a far more religious man than I. What I do see is that this redemption and absolution has presented itself in several forms, and one of those is to take good story ideas that were done wrong and do them right.

Fixing his own mess

One of the best ideas Russo had after leaving the WWF for WCW was the Millionaire's Club vs The New Blood. In 2000, after disposing of Kevin Sullivan, WCW brought back Russo and Eric Bischoff who quickly ascertained that WWF was beating them due to allowing the younger talents to carry the ball. The feud saw the young talent in WCW uniting to take on the old guard, who they perceived as holding them down and preventing them from reaching the main event. The fans were supposed to get behind the young guys and cheer them as they slowly overcame the wily veterans and their backstage politics to become main eventers. Unfortunately for both Russo and WCW, the creative control of the veterans, the bad booking and the outright refusal of people like Hulk Hogan to put over people like Billy Kidman, the angle backfired and the fans cheered the veterans. Upper WCW management quickly pulled the plug once they realised that the angle was not doing what it needed to do, i.e. rescue the ratings. Although the angle failed miserably (one might even say epically), the tendency to lay the blame for said failure squarely at the doorstep of Mr. Russo is not a just one. He was scuppered not by bad planning, but by a group of old wrestlers who were desperate to hang on to their position on the card.

Fast forward 8 years. Russo is once again in charge of the second-biggest promotion in the country, and once again has been charged with vitalising the ratings. Having been roundly criticised for trying his normal tricks with swerves, pole matches and juvenile humour, he decided to try his hand at an angle that should have worked before. This time it would have the added bonus of working with two accusations that fans had levelled at TNA for years: overuse of veterans AND over-pushing of former WWE talent. Russo knew that the theory behind the angle was sound; it just needed some tweaks in execution. And tweak it he did. The Main event Mafia-Front Line angle is the best-booked thing in TNA since the switch to Spike TV. It started off pretty rocky, with the fans still cheering Sting above all and not quite sure how to handle the fact that perennial favourites AJ Styles and Samoa Joe were showing him so much disrespect. Russo stuck to his guns, and with a slow build and some good talk segments the factions took shape and are now driving the show. It is no coincidence that Impact enjoyed 2 consecutive weeks of 1.2 ratings as this angle was really picking up steam. It did drop the next week, but it was opposite a huge NFL game. The angle has its detractors, but they are mainly sourpusses who will crap on anything TNA does, either because it's not WWE or just because it's TNA. The Main Event Mafia needed to dominate the early exchanges, mainly by cheating and trickery (Russo specialties), in order to establish their role in the feud: the veterans desperate to stay on top by any means necessary. The Front Line won their first match of the feud on Impact a couple of weeks back, and promptly suffered a beatdown of biblical proportions, with Sting managing to correct one of the issues with the feud and take part in the carnage. Could the much-maligned Russo have learned his lessons and come up with an extended, coherent and well-planned story? Possibly, but how about we find another example?

Showing he's better than others

In 2004, WWE took a bold step when they tried to capitalise on rampant anti-Muslim sentiments in the Western world by introducing an Arab-American wrestler (Muhammad Hassan) with his Arab-American manager (Khosrow Daivari). From early vignettes, the plans for the character were to toe the line between face and heel, to win matches cleanly but to cut strong promos about how he was treated unfairly due to the bias of Americans and the stereotyping of all Arabs and Muslims following September 11. These vignettes were excellent in that they told a story of a man who was just like any other, except for his racial roots and religious beliefs. Having debuted, the angle became more and more the typical "evil foreigner" gimmick, and of course the fans turned on it and on him. The cherry on the cake was the tragedy in London in July of 2005, when public transit across the city was attacked by suicide bombers. Days before, WWE had taped an angle with Hassan and the Undertaker, with Hassan summoning goons in ski masks, camo pants and dark clothing to beat Taker with clubs and piano wire. Hassan then applied the Camel Clutch (another sign that his character was degrading to the stereotypical evil foreigner) to Taker before the goons carried him off. The episode of Smackdown was set to air scant hours after the attacks, leaving WWE with insufficient time to pull the segment. Despite having developed something of a cult following, and being tremendously over with the fans, UPN forced WWE to pull the gimmick after a huge mass media backlash.

Russo had nothing to do with the Hassan angle, but when TNA signed Daivari following the World X Cup in 2008, Russo saw an opportunity to right another wrestling wrong. The angle was once again sound in theory, but it had been executed badly because the fans were slow to take to the character. The fans just didn't know how to react to a clean-cut foreigner, a character that they wanted to hate so badly but who was speaking the truth in his vignettes and really had given them nothing to hate in the ring. WWE lost patience with the fan reaction, which any fool could have seen was going to be slow to start with until the fans figured out how they felt about this revolutionary idea. Russo took the idea and tweaked it a little, mainly to account for the time elapsed since September 11. Daivari, now rechristened, errr perhaps I should say renamed Sheik Abdul Bashir, started his promos as an angry foreigner who took things too far. He talked about raping Mother America, and his theme music started with the sound effect of a low-flying airplane. The uproar was immediate and previously would have triggered a patented Russo U-turn. Once again though, Russo learned. He tamed down the promos, removed the sound effect, and started having Bashir talk about how he lost everything as a result of September 11, despite having had nothing to do with it. He started having run-ins with a referee, which he claimed were due to bias, and started winning matches in questionable fashion. Even some of the referee run-ins were questionable. What this gave us was a true heel who was hated, but also made us uncomfortable because we knew he was right. Once again Russo had taken a gimmick that flopped miserably, made some minor changes and turned it into a success. Better yet, he did it with a mid-card angle, using a smaller wrestler.

New Year's Resolutions

So if we accept, as we should, that Vince Russo has started to turn around, then how can he continue it? To start with, he can stop trying to find the next Hell in a Cell. Gimmick matches do have a place in wrestling today, and a new one occasionally is welcome, but when you throw a new idea out each month it gets tiring. The Dome was probably the best idea he's stolen, let's stick with that one for now. He could also do with resisting the urge to turn people who are feuding or about to feud into tag teams. It's not funny, it's not clever and we've seen it all before. What you're doing right now is working, by and large, and if you can stay on the same track then maybe, just maybe, TNA will break a 1.3 rating this decade.

No UnSerious this week as I have been totally out of the wrestling news loop. It will return, have no fear. Until next Tuesday, Stay Cool and Rock Hard.

Lansdellicious – Out.


Post Comment (26)  |  Email Chris Lansdell  |  View Chris Lansdell's 411 Profile

  Send To Friend  |    Stumble It!  |    Digg It!  | 



Please add your comment below.
If you are registered, you can login and post under your registered name. If not, you can post as a guest or register.

* Please note that 411 moderates all comments. Your comment will show up on the site after it has been approved by an editor.
 
Name : 
Comment : 
Remaining Characters : 
2800
 

Comments (26)

 
Who was responsible for WWE from 1993-7?
Skinner, Repoman, Pierre the Pirate, Mantaur, Goon, Sultan, and so much more wrestlecrap. Was that Russo???
If so, he should have never got another job.


Posted By: FUZEY (Guest)  on December 30, 2008 at 12:48 PM

 
 
I just think TNA needs what all wresting companies need every few years, a booker change. I say have Jarrett step down from booking and get rid of Russo and Mantell (or give them other roles) and let people like Cornette take over with is own team. The booking has been the same in TNA for a long time and I think a new booker will give them a new direction. Maybe after the MEM angle ends, its worth the try.

Posted By: Curtis (Guest)  on December 30, 2008 at 12:49 PM

 
 
Russo wasn't in wcw for the fingerpoke of doom. He was still in wwf.

Posted By: jericho4life316 (Guest)  on December 30, 2008 at 12:55 PM

 
 
Actually Russo didn't have anything to do with the caddle prod on a pole or the finger poke of doom concepts. those took place in January of 1999 when Russo was still in the WWE doing great things. Those were more Kevin Nash concepts as thet took place just as he had joined the WCW creative team.

Posted By: Mike (Guest)  on December 30, 2008 at 01:06 PM

 
 
Who was responsible for WWE from 1993-7?
Skinner, Repoman, Pierre the Pirate, Mantaur, Goon, Sultan, and so much more wrestlecrap. Was that Russo???
If so, he should have never got another job.

Posted By: FUZEY (Guest) on December 30, 2008 at 12:48 PM


Russo was booking the WWE to the best of my knowledge from April 97 till September 99.

You know, the good years.


Posted By: Mike (Guest)  on December 30, 2008 at 01:18 PM

 
 
This guy gets way too much grief. Some people need to take wrestling less seriously.

The edginess WWE showed up until early to mid 2006, a lot of it should be accredited to this guy..

With the benefit of hindsight, it is embarrassing to watch wrestling pre 1996.


Posted By: Propagandhi (Guest)  on December 30, 2008 at 01:53 PM

 
 
Very, very good read. People hate on Russo alot, which is fine because he has done alot of things that just havent worked, but that man was also responsible for the wrestling boom. DX? Vince Russo. Rocky Maivia becoming The Rock? Vince Russo. Austin/McMahon? Vince Russo.

Sure, Stone Cold was "Stone Cold" before Russo came around, he inherited Stone Cold and, in many ways, Stone Cold gave him time to create his own ideas. See, without Stone Cold, the WWF goes out of business in 1997. The first year of Russos booking, 1997, was probably his best stuff but fans were too entrenched with WCW and The NWO to care. The only time WCW fans tuned into to RAW was to see Stone Cold.

In time, they started watching Stone Cold and 5-10 extra minutes and got to catch DX, The Rock, etc...Over time, those concpets became fresh to the WCW fans who were growing tired of the nWo.

So, much like WWF at the beginning, when all they had as a draw was Austin and everyone was watching WCW/nWo and flipping over to see Austin and then flipping back, in the end those same fans had switched from WCW/nWo to WWF Attitude and were flipping over to WCW for a few minutes on Monday Nights to catch WCWs last draw (and only reason to watch in the last 2-3 years), Goldberg.

Once Goldberg got injured in 1999, that marked the end of the WCW/WWF war. The fans that were still flipping to catch Goldberg knew that he was out of action and simply stopped flipping over. When he came back, few fans watching the WWF knew because they werent flipping over anymore and had moved on to new stars like The Rock & HHH who were just entering their primes as legit, prized franchise players like Austin & Goldberg were.

See, this is the true story of the Monday Night Wars. Vince Russo, slowly but surely, swayed the fans over. There were always a 2.0 ratings worth of WCW fans and a 2.0 ratings worth of WWF fans. WCW and Eric Bischoff created a whole new fanbase, the nWo fanbase, which we call casual fans. Vince Russo worked and worked to get those fans over and they becamse WWF Attitude fans as the nWo dies away.

In time, we lost those fans as they just quit caring. The nWo, Austin, Goldberg, The Rock, and The Attitude Era are all gone and those guys are now watching Dancing with the Stars and other stuff that is hot.

Now, we are left with the same 4.0 worth of fans that we used to have back in 1995, before the nWo, before Stone Cold, before Goldberg, Rock, DX, Attitude, etc..3.0 of them are watching WWF and 1.0 of them are watching TNA.

So, if anything, that is the story of Vince Russo. I dont think he can capture lightening in a bottle twice. Now without those nWo/Attitude fans around to capture.


Posted By: miles (Guest)  on December 30, 2008 at 01:59 PM

 
 
"I say have Jarrett step down from booking and get rid of Russo and Mantell (or give them other roles) and let people like Cornette take over with is own team. "

I guess it's time that again to talk about good old JC. Of all people, why Cornette? So that TNA could be like the 80's?


Posted By: Burt Price (Guest)  on December 30, 2008 at 02:04 PM

 
 
"Despite having developed something of a cult following, and being tremendously over with the fans, UPN forced WWE to pull the gimmick after a huge mass media backlash."

Exactly who are you referring to here? Hassan hardly had any following, let alone a cult following. He got the X-Pac go away heat, not the we love to hate you heat that Edge gets.
Great article by the way, and your analogy for Russo:
"He reminds me very much of an outlaw come to rescue his friends with a huge ring of keys. In the cell is a wrestler's success, and Russo is frantically trying every key on the ring for a few minutes at a time, desperate to free that success before the jailers catch him. "

Spot On. Well said.


Posted By: Toddo (Guest)  on December 30, 2008 at 02:12 PM

 
 
Nope in the words of Bob Seger "still the same"

The Frontline still look like chumps getting punked out by the old dinosaurs. The X Division title is still up for grabs after the prior pay per view's screjob finish which was shortly after a prior screwjob finish.

The X Division is still pretty much an afterthought and takes a backseat to crap like fake Sarah Palin.

Same old Russo.


Posted By: Guest#7795 (Guest)  on December 30, 2008 at 02:12 PM

 
 
"I say have Jarrett step down from booking and get rid of Russo and Mantell (or give them other roles) and let people like Cornette take over with is own team. "

I guess it's time that again to talk about good old JC. Of all people, why Cornette? So that TNA could be like the 80's?

Posted By: Burt Price (Guest) on December 30, 2008 at 02:04 PM

I just said Cornette as a suggestion as he has experience, but I think a team of him, Foley and D'Amore could be good as you get three different aspects in one and the stuff D'Amore did with the knockout division speaks for itself.


Posted By: Curtis (Guest)  on December 30, 2008 at 02:39 PM

 
 
"Has our favourite writer finally learned?"

Probably not...


Posted By: Guest (Guest)  on December 30, 2008 at 03:33 PM

 
 
Dear Vince Russo,

I said it once and I'll say it again. Leave the wrestling business and sell hot dogs on a street corner with all your current co-workers on the booking team after you all go to rehab and get off crack.

Sincerely,

not your friend,

Chico


Posted By: Chico (Guest)  on December 30, 2008 at 03:42 PM

 
 
Dear Chico,

You're a moron.

Sincerely,

not your friend,

Burt


Posted By: Burt Price (Guest)  on December 30, 2008 at 04:56 PM

 
 
good article...it is popular to hate him, but you did a nice job of reminding us of the positive things he has delivered

Posted By: Doug (Guest)  on December 30, 2008 at 05:05 PM

 
 
People like Chico and guest are exactly the kind of people Lansdell was describing, in that they hate on anything he does simply because it's not the WWE or it's TNA.

If these idiots actually bothered to read the article they would've read how well Russo has tweaked both the MEM and Bashir angle's to become good episodic TV, something the WWE is horrible at unless it involves a McMahon.

I predict that in 2009 Russo will take it one step further and continue to help build up the Frontline characters to re-create the Attitude era, with Samoa Joe and AJ Styles being the face of TNA.


Posted By: JJ (Guest)  on December 30, 2008 at 05:06 PM

 
 
Um, no I didn't read all of the article. Still, maybe Vince Russo could do an angle about a certain wrestler has to retire and sell hot dogs on a street corner if he loses a match. The TNA production crew and Russo could film vignettes of Russo actually selling hot dogs while looking into the camera and saying "Hey, wrestler X (fill in the blank) if you lose the match, this is what you'll end up doing. Muah ha ha ".

Posted By: Chico (Guest)  on December 30, 2008 at 05:17 PM

 
 
he was not there for the cattle prod on a pole matcheither

Posted By: random (Guest)  on December 30, 2008 at 07:09 PM

 
 
Neither Russo nor Cornette should be the sole bookers of TNA, but together they could probably produce a compelling product. Russo, while not the best at what he does, can come up with edgy, realistic storylines. I like that about him. Cornette can be the buffer that takes those edgy ideas and garners them more towards wrestling audience. Cornette may have an old school mentality, but if you allow his wrestling philosophy to be the stage that plays out Russo's storylines it could be awesome.

Old school booked wrestling + compelling edgy storylines = wrestling goodness.

I know historically these guys haven't been able to get along, but it would be for the betterment of TNA if they did. It would also help if these guys had more worldly agents backstage. Guys who can recognize and scout talent elsewhere in the wrestling world.

Beyond that though, they need some broader thinking business minds in the higher ups. Jeff knows wrestling. Unfortunately that's all he knows. If TNA wants to ever become a media giant, they need guys that will be able to take the business side to another level. Jarrett and Dixie are too content with partnering up with NASCAR and CMT when they should be looking at genres of entertainment with broader appeals


Posted By: bighustle (Guest)  on December 30, 2008 at 08:14 PM

 
 
You say this. Unfortunately you say this the day this site carries a link to a TNA Spin Cycle that both riffs off Internet memes (one seen on this very site, Braden Walker) and opened with an Arab who's working some kind of gimmick that's either foreigner or not, they can't decide, recreating the shoe-throwing attack on Bush.

Add in the Palin stuff, and I'm thinking you might be a bit ahead of yourself making this argument.


Posted By: Tom (Guest)  on December 30, 2008 at 09:24 PM

 
 
Who was responsible for WWE from 1993-7?
Skinner, Repoman, Pierre the Pirate, Mantaur, Goon, Sultan, and so much more wrestlecrap. Was that Russo???
If so, he should have never got another job.

Posted By: FUZEY (Guest) on December 30, 2008 at 12:48 PM
Wasn't Russo. He took over the booking in '97. He booked plenty of great stuff in the WWF from 97-99.


Posted By: Guest#9914 (Guest)  on December 30, 2008 at 10:52 PM

 
 
I predict that in 2009 Russo will take it one step further and continue to help build up the Frontline characters to re-create the Attitude era, with Samoa Joe and AJ Styles being the face of TNA.

Posted By: JJ (Guest) on December 30, 2008 at 05:06 PM

If Russo acknowledges this, TNA will succeed. Joe, AJ and Daniels need believable heels to battle to become the austin-rock-hhh of TNA. i reckon if they brought in heels like nigel, hero and bryan danielson to feud with joe-styles-daniels, the entire WWE universe will switch over to TNA.


Posted By: Guest#1503 (Guest)  on December 31, 2008 at 04:37 AM

 
 
To continue what Guest#9914 was saying, Russo was actually responsible for getting rid of those cartoon gimmicks.

Posted By: JJ (Guest)  on December 31, 2008 at 11:32 PM

 
 
Sorry buddy. The fingerpoke of doom was 1998- under Bischoff. Russo went to WCW in the late summer of 1999.

Posted By: Brett (Guest)  on January 04, 2009 at 05:55 AM

 
 
I was going to point out that Russo had absolutely nothing to do with the so-called "Fingerpoke of Doom," but it seems that's already been done. (By the way, "Fingerpoke of Doom" is a pretty stupid name, a fine example of misfired sarcasm. The modifier "of Doom" should be applied to moves that are supposed to be genuinely devastating, but look silly and/or harmless. The 'Poke was SUPPOSED to be silly and harmless, so calling it the "Fingerpoke of Doom" doesn't really work, even though everyone but me seems to call it that.)

And, for the record, the reason the fans didn't cheer for the young guys over the veterans in the Millionaires' Club vs. New Blood angle
was because the New Blood had no one worth cheering for. Billy Kidman's failure had nothing to do with Hulk Hogan, the most villified man in wrestling, and more to do with his own shortcomings.


Posted By: Lord Koz (Guest)  on January 09, 2009 at 04:20 PM

 
 
And, for the record, Miles, no one was ever a bigger nWo fan than me, and in terms of wrestling knowledge and seriousness, I'm about as casual as a tuxedo.

Posted By: Lord Koz (Guest)  on January 21, 2009 at 04:39 PM

 




www.41mania.com
Copyright © 2005 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.