www.411mania.com
|  News |  Columns |  TV Reports |  Video Reviews |  Title History |  Hall of Fame |  News Report |  The Dunn List | Search
SPOTLIGHTS  SPOTLIGHTS
MOVIES/TV
// 411 Movies Feedback: What Movie Have You Seen the Most Times?
MUSIC
// Michael Jackson Went From Doctor To Doctor For Anesthesia
WRESTLING
// The Importance Of... : Saturday Night's Main Event
POLITICS
// Sarah Palin Quits as Alaska Governor
MMA
// The MMA Top Ten: My UFC Wish List
BOXING
// 411's Prizefighter of the Month: June
GAMES
// The 10th Hour: Top 10 Patriotic Video Games




 HOT TOPICS
//  Chris Jericho
//  Randy Orton
//  Triple H
//  Jeff Hardy
//  Edge
SYNDICATE  SYNDICATE



411mania RSS Feeds





Follow 411mania on Twitter!




Add 411 On Facebook
 



 
 411mania » Wrestling » Columns
Advertisement
For The Record 01.04.09: The Prospect of a Woman Becoming WWE Champion
Posted by Kristopher Rodriguez on 01.04.2009



We have not seen a woman hold a major world championship in our lifetimes. According to my research, only men have held world titles in WWE, WCW, TNA, NWA, USWA, AWA, and ECW. There is probably a myriad of reasons for why a woman has never before been world champion. But we might be coming upon a time when a woman could credibly hold a coveted world title. Whether or not we'll ever see it is an entirely different issue.

I will now speculate as to why we haven't seen a female world champion or main eventer. But before I begin, let me preface by saying that I think putting a world championship on a woman is a great idea. Unfortunately, promoters have their own fears and issues with pushing a woman to the top of a company. This article will address some of the potential reasons why uptight promoters have not given a woman world title gold. For starters, the issue of size differential makes it hard for a promoter to justify putting a woman over a man. Men are generally larger than women, and in wrestling the big guys usually defeat the smaller guys. For a smaller female wrestler to dominate the larger male wrestlers would, at least in a traditional train of thought, damage the credibility of the wrestling company. In real life, larger people usually have an edge when they fight smaller people. If a person is large, muscular, and has a long reach, they should be able to beat up those with a smaller frame and limited reach. Wrestling has operated on that premise for decades. That's a major hurdle that any woman faces if she wants to build herself up to become a world champion.

Sure, some will argue that McMahon has put enough holes to make Swiss Cheese of that premise. Small wrestlers have won world titles; Rey Mysterio, CM Punk, and Eddie Guerrero come immediately to mind for WWE while Christian Cage and AJ Styles come to mind for TNA. So obviously the size of the wrestler is not the only factor, even if it is usually a major one. No, we need to go a little deeper. Another key reason why we've never seen a female world champion is because most men do not want to put over women. And that is for two reasons (A) their massive egos forbid a woman from ever beating them and (B) they are afraid of how the fans will view them in light of the fact that they lost to a female. Most of the wrestlers in WWE, TNA, and beyond are independent contractors. They are, in effect, running their own businesses. And like any business owner, they want to protect their product from public embarrassment. If those wrestlers are afraid that a loss to a woman would hurt their bottom line, they will of course politic their ways out of jobbing to a woman.

So, beyond the fact that promoters are afraid that smaller wrestlers beating larger wrestlers will hurt their promotion's credibility and the fact that male wrestlers would politic their ways out of losing to women, there's another crucial question to be raised. How would the public respond to women wrestling men on a regular basis? Wrestling is a rough and tumble spectacle. There's punching, kicking, submission holds, headlocks. Of course, female wrestlers have proven that they can take bumps as well as the men. But when women are the recipients of punches, kicks, and chokeholds, it is usually from other women. If a man is the person attacking the woman and punching her, we are entering into different waters. Most people know that wrestling is fixed. But the image of a man attacking a woman is always uncomfortable. Nobody wants to see the Big Show deliver his knockout punch to a Diva. Nobody wants to see a woman being bullied by a man. One way that people bully is with headlocks. In real life, men abuse women by putting them in restrictive holds. So if we see a male wrestler headlocking a female wrestler, it can be unsettling. So that aspect of a woman wrestling men for main events or world titles will always be problematic for women.

Fortunately for aspiring women's wrestlers, those issues seemed to subside (at least temporarily) when Chyna entered the WWE scene.

Chyna received a big push in 1999 through 2000. She even became the Intercontinental Champion. Some might say that her time in the limelight was a disaster. I disagree. Though I was never a fan of Chyna, I have to give her credit for a job well done as Intercontinental Champion. Chyna carried the title well. But she also accomplished something that no other female wrestler has done. In 1999 she became the number 1 contender for the WWF Championship. Unfortunately, she never got her shot or the title. Why she never got her shot is still unknown. Did McMahon consider handing her the title, only to get cold feet? Who knows. Perhaps August of 1999 gave us insight into McMahon's openness to a female WWE Champion. I'm sure only a handful of people know what McMahon was considering back then.

Chyna was a transcendent wrestler. Because she was more broad, muscular, and masculine than most grapplers on the roster, her battles with the men felt less offensive. She also possessed the indefinable "it" that for some reason made her different than the other female wrestlers. It is for those reasons that she likely received her push. It is also possible, however, that she simply lucked out. Who knows, McMahon may have only given her that push because he was trying to one-up Bischoff. McMahon was willing to try anything to slay the WCW monster. Giving a woman an unprecedented push was an idea that only WWE was pursuing and it made for great TV.

But whether Chyna was merely the beneficiary of McMahon's innovative efforts or not, she still proved that the fans were willing to get behind a woman. That is an important lesson for us today.

Sure the promoters will probably always worry about the politics and the publicity that a woman wrestler might draw. Male wrestlers might whine over a woman's push and a few activist groups might get upset at a woman taking a sleeper hold or a clothesline on television. But overall it would teach an important lesson to society. A woman can do anything a man can do. What a great lesson for kids. How empowering it would be to women. I'm not saying women wrestlers should dominate the main event scene. Main event pushes should be based on merit, fan approval, proper etiquette on camera and off, and leadership skills. I'm not aware of the backstage behavior of the female wrestlers in WWE. Perhaps some of them are whining babies backstage. Perhaps McMahon doesn't have the confidence that the women wrestlers could put on 30 minute main events. But for those women wrestlers that have the "it" factor that makes them title worthy, due consideration should be given to them.

To date, there are only two female wrestlers that I have ever seen that have the size, charisma, and talent to be WWE Champions. Chyna was one of them. The other is Beth Phoenix. Beth Phoenix is the perfect combination of strength and grace. She is slowly becoming one of the most beloved figures in all of WWE. If she keeps up on her current path, Phoenix could become one of McMahon's most over wrestlers.

Beth Phoenix is too dominant to compete exclusively in the WWE Women's Championship division. That is her problem. And that is at the heart of this column today. I'm not saying WWE or all of professional wrestling is hurting for a female world's champion. What I am saying is that when a female wrestler is as over as the men and has the attributes of a WWE main eventer, their genders shouldn't stop them from headlining a few cards and holding a few world titles. Beth Phoenix can be so much more than a WWE Diva; she has the potential to be the WWE Champion. And for all those who follow in the mold of Beth Phoenix or Chyna, a world title reign should never be put off the table.

Will Beth Phoenix ever get that push? I honestly don't know. There is something special about her though. I would be hesitant to put any kind of glass ceiling over the Glamazon.


Post Comment (44)  |  Email Kristopher Rodriguez  |  View Kristopher Rodriguez's 411 Profile

  Send To Friend  |    Stumble It!  |    Digg It!  | 



Please add your comment below.
If you are registered, you can login and post under your registered name. If not, you can post as a guest or register.

* Please note that 411 moderates all comments. Your comment will show up on the site after it has been approved by an editor.
 
Name : 
Comment : 
Remaining Characters : 
2800
 

Comments (44)

 
It would be much easier for Kong to win a world title than Beth.

Posted By: Guest#9579 (Guest)  on January 04, 2009 at 12:24 PM

 
 
It'll never happen because it's way to hard to suspend disbelief to see a 120lbs-odd woman beating guys who weigh 100+lbs more than them, there are plenty of great women wrestlers out there but they belong in their own divison (I know it sound sexist but it's true), even when joshi was at it's peak women stayed in their own division (or their own company) and the skill level of the Japanese women was better than almost anything you'll find in North America

Posted By: PJ (Guest)  on January 04, 2009 at 12:31 PM

 
 
absolutely agree. beth is the only one who could do it and she should be doing it. she's far too dominant to only be in the womens division. more than anything, she has a great amateur wrestling background that makes the idea of her wrestling men much more interesting. i was hoping she would lock up with Cena in that tag match. she's also an extremely beautiful woman unlike Chyna was, making her much more interesting and i think would be a great example for fans.

Posted By: christi (Guest)  on January 04, 2009 at 12:31 PM

 
 
I dont think WWE will ever give a woman a world title, not saying i wouldnt like to see it but i know it will never happen.

I have no problem with women competing with men, im a former amateur wrestler and there were girls on my team who better than most of the guys.

Beth definitely has something about her that makes me tune in every monday to watch her, when she first hit the scene i was in complete fascination with her and to know of her background Beth has all the tools to get in the ring and actually go toe to toe with guys, and not have the guys have to slow down for her but her becoming World Champion? Thats something that i dont think will ever happen, and i think alot of male fans will piss bullets if it ever did happen, especially since women's wrestling isnt that respected as is.


Posted By: Rocky (Guest)  on January 04, 2009 at 12:32 PM

 
 
Well, you can scratch this one off the "Things I Can Write About When I Can't Think Of Anything" list.

Posted By: Guest#7960 (Guest)  on January 04, 2009 at 12:43 PM

 
 
I think it would be worth trying Beth with the Intercontinental, to see how she's received. And, maybe, reintroduce the cruiserweight title - with women able to compete.
The World Title would be too much though IMO, as how could be Beth ever overcome John Cena or HHH?


Posted By: tpr007 (Guest)  on January 04, 2009 at 01:00 PM

 
 
In order for a woman to win a world title in the WWE, a woman would have to do it legitimately in UFC or Boxing.

Unless it's like a David Arquette/Vince Russo/ Vince McMahon title reign, it won't happen, and even under those circumstances, I only see it happening with the ECW title, not the other two.

WWE is worried about mainstream perception of their product, and Beth Phoenix as WWE champion not only makes them promote a man hitting a woman, it also makes their male talent look weaker, something I know they are concious of with the emergence of the UFC.


Posted By: Tim Haught (Guest)  on January 04, 2009 at 01:09 PM

 
 
I'd love to see a woman hold a world title someday, but the woman in question would have to be quite exceptional. And the structure of the matches would have to be just right.

You can't have a woman go toe-to-toe with most men. The woman in question would have to take a more strategic direction in the ring. Hit and run tactics, use of momentum, etc. Basically the same kind of strategy a cruiserweight needs to use against a large wrestler, only turned up a notch.

If the right woman came along...someone who could really do a great job working that kind of a match...someone with exceptional talent...than I'd be all for it.

What I'd like to see a company do would be a test run of sorts: make a male/female duo the tag champs.


Posted By: Wade (Guest)  on January 04, 2009 at 01:52 PM

 
 
You people know it as well as I do; it doesn't matter how realistic it is, it matters who the audience is paying to see. If giving the title to a woman would make new fans tune in without pissing off the existing fanbase and provide tons of media exposure, it can happen.

If a woman came on the scene with the charisma of The Rock, the looks of a fitness model, a knowledge of submission holds that would theoretically make opponents of any size tap (and there are tons of those holds in the martial arts), and some other kickass moves; there's no reason Vince (or Dixie) wouldn't take a chance on her as a champion.

Will this type of person ever come along? I don't know. Chyna probably had too many demons to be the face of a company, and WWE had many other options as champ. Kong may be fairly dominant against other women, but how's she going to represent your company? A woman champion would be big news, and she'd potentially become a media darling. Does anyone honestly see Kong charming the shit out of late night talk show hosts, giving inspirational speeches to little schoolchildren, and providing thought-provoking quotes for journalists? Shit, all she does is growl behind Cheerleader Melissa.

Beth Phoenix comes across as being very well-spoken when she and Santino do guest commentary. I'm not sure if she's going to be the one to break the glass ceiling, or if anyone will. Just chew on this; how many women out there have ALL of the following: beauty, charm & charisma, top-notch speaking/acting skills, athleticism, AND a love for the professional wrestling industry? And out of that handful of women, how many will be in the right place at the right time?


Posted By: The Logical One (Guest)  on January 04, 2009 at 02:08 PM

 
 
The whole "dispending belief to see someone smaller beat someone bigger" debate can be worked around. We've seen many smaller guys, who give up 100+ pounds to their opponent, win their matches, big events, and the top titles. A very simple way would to have Beth or Kong beat a Mysterio or a Styles's sized male.

Now the real question is HOW they'd win. Would it be a fluke and piss the IWC off? Many could say Punk's title win or Jericho's "replace Punk and go easy" win were shmozzy-fluke wins due to the way it went. That's just wrestling.

I agree with tpr007 in not just jumping the gun and going with the other titles first. A Beth/Santino Tag Title reign would be fun to watch and a step in the right direction. If that sells, go with the IC Title. Same for Kong with the X-Division Title. Hell, Kong taking Booker's "Legends Title" would be interesting.

UFC and boxing have nothing to do with it. Boxing trends might effect promotional ideas and UFC might influence a very small style change or at the most be a gimmick match, but I don't think it's ever really effected the booking. It just all depends if the companies man-up(pun intended), and take that chance.


Posted By: Mikey MiGo (Registered)  on January 04, 2009 at 02:26 PM

 
 
Remember this isn't as far fetched as it sounds it ALMOST happened with Chyna. It wouldn't shock me but the chick would have to be more over than most of the men and considering Divas are booked like Bimbos I don't see that ever happening.

Posted By: The Rev (Guest)  on January 04, 2009 at 02:27 PM

 
 
Whenever a diva wins the world title i'll be switching off the WWE forever

Posted By: IOV (Guest)  on January 04, 2009 at 02:45 PM

 
 
Wrestling will never see a woman make it past the Women's championship because the wrestling business and its fans are primarily sexist. Plain and simple.

While Chyna strikes me as whiny and narcissistic at times, I appreciated her reign as IC champ for breaking down gender barriers. Wrestling fans, generally speaking, are very agressive and masculine and could not handle a woman getting the same accolades as a man. The harsh truth is that at times pro wrestling is still stuck in the past when it comes to social issues. It's only lately that black and other ethnic wrestlers have risen to the top of the card.

The other issue, like you said, is credibility. If fans think Rey Misterio or Brian Kendrick barely have a chance, you think they'd take to Mickie James or Melina going over a legitimate competitor like Shawn Michaels without comedic shenanigans?

All in all, great column. It was an eloquent essay on something that is barely even looked at.


Posted By: Thornley (Guest)  on January 04, 2009 at 03:06 PM

 
 
It would go down as a black eye on the belt, like David Arquette in WCW.
Deserving guys like Regal, Piper, Valentine, Finlay, Dibiase who never got the world title would roll in their graves if that ever happened.


Posted By: FUZEY (Guest)  on January 04, 2009 at 03:39 PM

 
 
Whenever a diva wins the world title i'll be switching off the WWE forever

Posted By: IOV (Guest) on January 04, 2009 at 02:45 PM

I now hope more than ever a diva wins a world title


Posted By: Sam (Guest)  on January 04, 2009 at 03:53 PM

 
 
Maria for World Champ!

Posted By: Guest#9805 (Guest)  on January 04, 2009 at 03:54 PM

 
 
You know, it's really hard for me to take your article seriously when you misspelled Beth PHOENIX's name every single time it's mentioned in the article.

Posted By: Anonymous Smart Mark (Guest)  on January 04, 2009 at 04:28 PM

 
 
You know, it's really hard for me to take your article seriously when you misspelled Beth PHOENIX's name every single time it's mentioned in the article.

Posted By: Anonymous Smart Mark (Guest) on January 04, 2009 at 04:28 PM


Fair point. I have fixed those errors.


Posted By: Kristopher Rodriguez (Registered)  on January 04, 2009 at 05:11 PM

 
 
do u really see beth fucking phoenix going over the undertaker .. sort your head out

Posted By: sense (Guest)  on January 04, 2009 at 06:01 PM

 
 
A woman should never hold the Title. Men are bigger and stronger for a reason and even in the fantasy world of wrestling it would make all of the men look weak.

Posted By: iomis (Guest)  on January 04, 2009 at 06:27 PM

 
 
Judy Bagwell was World tag team champion...

Posted By: JP (Guest)  on January 04, 2009 at 06:55 PM

 
 
Awesome Kong could very easily and very credibly achieve a World Title reign. That's something TNA should honestly consider, actually.

Beth Phoenix should be trialled in the IC Division. A female from Japan could be presented as someone who can hang with the men. And while she's not exactly big, I could buy Gail Kim as an underdog against some of the boys.


Posted By: Matt Eli (Guest)  on January 04, 2009 at 07:43 PM

 
 
"Some might say that her time in the limelight was a disaster. I disagree."

Whoever argues that bullshit obviously wasn't watching the product at the time. Regardless of what a half-nuts car wreck Laurer turned into after her peak, she was INSTRUMENTAL in the WWE's continued drubbing of WCW. She was over like no women's wrestler has EVER been over in the States; even when Lita and Trish were hot topic, they were still relegated to being the gold standard for divas.

Chyna's pops were entirely different, and she was over in a way that's practically incomprehensible: THE credible candidate for a woman to hold the WWE world title. Even if her momentum eventually crashed and burned and politics prohibited it from ever happening, there were several points where the audience was more than willing to accept the idea of her becoming champion.

Headlining Wrestlemania? Maybe notsomuch.


Posted By: Meirsch (Guest)  on January 04, 2009 at 07:52 PM

 
 
*WrestleMania XXVI*
Main Event
Triple Threat
WWE Championship
Beth Phoniex (c) Vs. Trish Stratus Vs. John cena

BOOK IT!


Posted By: Evan (Guest)  on January 04, 2009 at 08:05 PM

 
 
This seems like some ridiculous shit that Jake Chambers would only write, although at least this guy can write intelligently.

Posted By: Rob (Guest)  on January 04, 2009 at 08:23 PM

 
 
Why does a woman have to fight a man to be a champon? Why can't a woman be a Champion among women only, her peers? Your premise seems like the old sexist cliche: women can't do anything on their own, there must be man in the act. Phooey.

Posted By: thayer c taylor (Guest)  on January 04, 2009 at 08:37 PM

 
 
Lemme get this out of the way. The only way it's going to happen is a vacant title, a fluke royal rumble entry, and a fluke finish. Huzzah. There you go. A discredited, unbelievable champ that'll lose the title the next night on Raw. If they do it this way, I vote for, say, Maria. Happy?

Oops. I forgot. If I'm not 100% for this stupid idea, I'm a sexist like "all the WWE fans". This is absolutely different from racism in wrestling. There's no significant physical difference between Ron Simmons and, say, Lex Luger. Having Beth as a world champion makes as little sense as having Hornswoggle as cruiserweight champ. It was stupid and nonsensical because the idea that Horny would physically fight even a guy like Super Crazy was, well, crazy. There is no way, no matter how much liquor you provide, that Beth is a credible physical threat to Big Show, Cena, or HHH.

Now, if you want to make this some sort of politically correct male guilt sort of thing, go right ahead, but keep it to your fantasy wrestling league, and leave the rest of us out of it.

And before you bring up Rey and CM Punk, everyone shit all over their reigns because the writers had to book fluke finishes all the time to keep it credible. Does this mean a small guy can't win? No. It means he can't keep winning credibly. There. I said it.


Posted By: Mr. Fuji (Guest)  on January 04, 2009 at 09:04 PM

 
 
won't happen, shouldn't happen, could happen

Not with Beth Pheonix, it'd have to be some Chyna clone with the ability to get over like Chyna and be as big as Chyna.

Beth Pheonix is not much bigger than the rest of the divas and i don't think it will be her.


Posted By: vaderbp,b (Guest)  on January 04, 2009 at 10:14 PM

 
 
This article gets my hopes up for 411mania publishing my 29 page thesis on the possible outcome of an Urkel vs Mayor McCheese steel cage match

Posted By: Guest#7058 (Guest)  on January 04, 2009 at 10:15 PM

 
 
Kong, ODB, and Victoria I can beleive. Beth does not cut it in my mind.

Posted By: who cares (Guest)  on January 04, 2009 at 11:06 PM

 
 
I don't know where you wrestled buddy but after middle school girls cannot defeat men in amateur wrestling outside of very low weight classes. They can be terrific wrestlers but they will easily be overpowered. I have a lot of experience in wrestling and have never seen a 200+ lb man lose to a woman.

Posted By: Dolph Ziggler (Guest)  on January 04, 2009 at 11:25 PM

 
 
I'd like to see Beth & Santino with the Tag Straps, but no more.

Posted By: JayCaz (Guest)  on January 05, 2009 at 06:52 AM

 
 
Think about this: when Chyna was fighting for the IC belt, she was involved in that feud at different times with three men who became future World champs: Chris Jericho, Kurt Angle and, of course, Eddie. None of them lost any reputation. And you can add Jeff Jarrett to that equation. If the WWE could do that kind of booking the y did with Chyna, maybe, just maybe, Beth can become the "next" Chyna. She's just a bit smaller than Chyna was, has much more amateur wrestling background (which could be a big part of the booking material) and she seems to be a much more stable person. The downside? People perceived Chyna to be beyond womanhood, if that is possible; Beth seems too much ladylike. The other downside is that Chyna was never involved in the Women's division until the end of her career, because she was always around men (Triple H, DX, Jericho-Angle-Eddie-Jarrett). Beth hasn't had that opportunity.

Posted By: mr_wonderful (Registered)  on January 05, 2009 at 08:40 AM

 
 
All this can be avoided by simply calling it the WWE Mens Championship

Posted By: Guest#4718 (Guest)  on January 05, 2009 at 08:47 AM

 
 
Had ECW been a part of WWF during Chyna's heyday we might have seen a female world champion but no chance with the two big belts.

Chyna was pushed as completely distinct from the women's diviision for the most part until late on in her run and, in my opinion, this better allowed her to be accepted as IC champ and Rumble/KOTR contender. Beth, on the other hand, is pushed as a women's division wrestler.

However, Awesome Kong might have a shot if the TNA booking team's dart hits that particular booking option in the future...


Posted By: King Nikolai (Guest)  on January 05, 2009 at 08:49 AM

 
 
*WrestleMania XXVI*
Main Event
Triple Threat
WWE Championship
Beth Phoniex (c) Vs. Trish Stratus Vs. John cena

BOOK IT!

====
Of course , cena wins by the FU.
We got it.

======
The only
divas capable enough to be world champ are Taylor Wilde , Michelle Mc Cool , and Triple H.


Posted By: HHDiva (Guest)  on January 05, 2009 at 10:54 AM

 
 
I remember when Jacqueline won the WWE Cruiserweight title from Chavo Guerrero on Smackdown...

Posted By: TikkiMon (Guest)  on January 05, 2009 at 03:35 PM

 
 
To the writer get well soon, if there were to be a woman world champion in the E that will be the last day I will ever watch wrestling Happy Womens Day

Posted By: AHM (Guest)  on January 05, 2009 at 03:36 PM

 
 
The problem is they'd need a woman who could win credibly enough for this too look like anything other than a pro feminist publicity stunt. I can only think of a handful Cheerleader Melissa, Lufisto, and Awesome Kong and with WWE's penchant for generic blonde supermodels with boobjobs I don't think any of these or other women we'll be holding WWE's big gold belt anytime soon.

Posted By: The Adamantium Elbow (Guest)  on January 05, 2009 at 04:59 PM

 
 
What if a woman won it by a complete fluke? You know how Eddie accidently pinned Chyna for the Intercontinental belt. Or what if they had a stipulation where the woman won if time expired, and the man was attacked by someone associated with the woman. Therefore, it wouldn't make the male look weak because he was screwed out of the title. That would be interesting and new. Wouldn't it?

Posted By: Steve (Guest)  on January 05, 2009 at 05:57 PM

 
 
I might be in the minority, but I don't really see anything that spectacular in Beth. I mean she could be a great wrestler, but for whatever reason she really hasn't shown all that much skill. I would probably blame the writers or bookers or level of competition for that more than I would Beth. I don't buy Mysterio as a heavyweight champion either. His moves look forced. I just need to point out the matches against Snitsky and Kane. He is just simply too small for it to look credible. Mysterio is 5'6. I would not put Punk in his same league, plus Punks striking offense looks more credible than Rey irish whiping off the 2nd and bottom ropes. Could a woman be champion? Sure. She has to have the popularity of one though. Beth is no where close. Trish had it. Lita had it. Chyna had it to a lesser extent. But the average joe, is not going to pay to see Trish Vs The Undertaker....I don't think anyways...

Posted By: piperfan01 (Guest)  on January 08, 2009 at 07:59 PM

 
 
For one, I never looked at Chyna as a female. I always saw her as just a strong wrestler. Beth I look at as a female. Look who Chyna was pushed over. She beat HHH and Taker in a triple threat match, Beth lost to Kelly Kelly. Chyna never once said I'm a woman and I'm proud during her run. She always said that I'm a strong, fit, wrestler. Look at Alundra Blayze, she was alway for paving for woman, instead of just viewing herself as a wrestler. She was awesome by the way. Beth is too girly, from what I can see on TV. She doesn't have that star power that Chyna had. Chyna was up there with Rock and Austin. One of the reasons why wrestling was so entertaining. I can see her coming back and being pushed with men, maybe not like before. But you can't go from pinning HHH 3 times to losing to Maria. Trish was a great flagship diva, but was pushed more as a bombshell turned wrestler. Plus, females are forced to undergo so much surgery that fighting a guy would prove very dangerous. What the WWE should do is worry about making an awesome womens division. With a womans title and tag title. Women don't have to hold the WWE title to be taken serious. The women's title can be just as serious. Yet WWE always has bimbos hold it. Beth is strong, but it's no secret that Chyna would have squashed her. Beth is a bland character, and is obviously there to erase Chyna's legacy. As us fans of the attitude era knows, that's impossible being that Chyna participated in 2 Royal Rumbles and KOTR tournaments. Defeated some of the greatest names in wrestling, including HHH and Taker, and was a number one contender for the WWF world title for 2 weeks. Plus, she did fairly well as the only female on the roster at NJPW. Plus, she made females that would whip Beth like Molly, Trish, and Lita look like whimps. Chyna is the prime candidate for a female world champ. Beth shouldn't be placed over the other women in the division. Instead, she should help make her division second to the main eventers. Today's divas wont be able to put on a great match with men. Even if they did, they would still seem unbelievable. Yeah, Maryse pinning Kane. That, and many of the girls can't seem to get it together like they did in 2001-2004. It's like a bunch of Sable's backstage. BTW, Sable is a prime example that a female can still specifically compete against women and get as much attention as the men. During her prime, she had the highest pop seconded to Austin. Plus, she occasionally powerbombed men (Marc Mero). So, in conclusion, a woman world champ is amazing, but today's society seems too simple-minded to handle the idea. Chyna was never really a woman wrestler. She was a woman who happened to be a wrestler. The womens division can be just as serious as the main eventers. If given the chance.

Posted By: MostDominantAthlete (Guest)  on January 27, 2009 at 01:56 AM

 
 
For those who say Beth doesn't cut it obviously don't know her past. She HAS wrestled men before, so its NOT new, along with Katie Lea. I would LOVE to see more intergender matches on TV, but we are still stuck in the bullshit mindset that women are weaker than men. BULL. Kong could EASILY take the TNA title, and hell, given the chance, Beth could be WWE champ.

And the whole "nobody will believe a small woman can win against a bigger man" argument is garbage as well because as the writer stated, Rey Mysterio won the effin title. I know quite a few women wrestlers, like Cheerleader Melissa (Raesha Saeed), MsChif, LuFisto, Sara Del Rey, and many others who can take on men and do it well.

The wrestling world needs to open its doors already to this prospect again, because I know it would cause more heads to turn.


Posted By: Eiko212 (Guest)  on January 31, 2009 at 12:43 AM

 
 
I definately Agree . Beth , Chyna , Katie Lea . Theyve all wrestled men before , so why does it matter now? . I also think one day , maybe there will be a girl with the charisma , the skill , and the "it" factor that will make promoters more open to considering giving them a major title . You never know . Its a complicated business.

Posted By: PalaceOfFujji (Guest)  on May 17, 2009 at 07:44 PM

 


www.41mania.com
Copyright © 2005 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.