www.411mania.com
|  News |  Columns |  TV Reports |  Video Reviews |  Title History |  Hall of Fame |  News Report |  The Dunn List |
SPOTLIGHTS  SPOTLIGHTS
MOVIES/TV
// Kelly Brook Gets Glamorously Sexy For Fabulous Magazine
MUSIC
// First Official Pics of Beyonce and Jay-Z With Blue Ivy Posted
WRESTLING
// [VIDEO] Torrie Wilson & Sable Strip Down & Kiss In Lingerie Contest
POLITICS
// Obama Showing Strongest Poll Numbers In Months
MMA
// XFC 16: High Stakes Report 2.10.12
GAMES
// Star Trek Sequel Game in the Works


 HOT TOPICS
//  CM Punk
//  John Cena
//  Triple H
//  Hulk Hogan
//  Randy Orton
//  Christian
SYNDICATE  SYNDICATE



411mania RSS Feeds





Follow 411mania on Twitter!




Add 411 On Facebook
 



 
 411mania » Wrestling » Columns



Advertisement
For The Record 02.01.09: Punk Should Break the Intercontinental Record
Posted by Kristopher Rodriguez on 02.01.2009



The longest reigning Intercontinental Champion in history is the Honky Tonk Man. The Honky Tonk Man held the Intercontinental Championship from June 2, 1987 until August 29, 1988. His loss to the Ultimate Warrior at the 1988 edition of Summerslam ended his record setting 454 day run with the coveted title. Since then, no WWE competitor has had even a one year reign. But the time has come for somebody to seriously challenge that record.

One has to wonder why McMahon hasn't picked a wrestler to beat the Elvis impersonator's mark. Why let somebody like the Honky Tonk Man have the bragging rights? The Intercontinental Championship is a cherished title and whoever exceeds the 454 day period as champ will hold a special place in WWE history. The Superstar of today who would be the best candidate to break the record is CM Punk.

CM Punk is one of WWE's most important and prominent wrestlers. Because he abstains from alcohol and drugs, he is a great public ambassador for McMahon and company. He is also well-liked by IWC fans and general audiences alike. In addition, Punk is a skilled worker and talker. But the two best reasons for Punk to break the record are simple: (1) someone should break it, and (2) Punk has nothing else to do.

Before winning the Intercontinental Championship, Punk was in a strange position. As a former World Heavyweight Champion, one would think that he would be a main eventer. But with Raw being so stacked with main event talent (John Cena, Shawn Michaels, Randy Orton, Chris Jericho, and JBL), Punk has found himself in the upper midcard category with Kane and Rey Mysterio. And when Batista returns later on this year, Punk will be even lower in the Raw "food chain." So if Punk can't hang with the main eventers, he might as well chase history.

Before I continue, let me put some emphasis on a subtle point I made in the previous paragraph: Punk (as his character stands at the moment) is not a main eventer. Much like Jeff Hardy and Rey Mysterio, he is more of a "featured attraction" type of Superstar. That is not to disparage the Punkster. There is nothing wrong with being a midcard talent. They are an important part of any wrestling product. Just consider the contributions of such former WWE upper midcarders as Jake "The Snake" Roberts, Owen Hart, Ted DiBiase (Sr.), Mr. Perfect, Rowdy Roddy Piper, Razor Ramon, Superfly Jimmy Snuka, and Tito Santana. All of those individuals during the "Fed years" were instrumental to WWE's success. But Punk, a midcarder, has already attained something that none of the other aforementioned "Fed" wrestlers have… a WWE world championship.

So everything else CM Punk achieves in WWE is gravy. By winning the WWE World Heavyweight Championship, he has already accomplished something that the upper midcarders of the past could only dream about. Punk is honored among the middlers; now it's time for him to take his unique and privileged position and set his eyes on the Intercontinental record.

If WWE uses Punk to chase history, it could do wonders for the prestige of the title. Punk is the kind of wrestler that doesn't necessarily headline pay-per-views, but is more of the kind that fans expect to see on pay-per-view. He is not the kind of guy you leave off the card. So if Punk has a long reign and is used on pay-per-views, it's reasonable to assume that the Intercontinental Title will be defended on more pay-per views. We could even be treated to an actual Intercontinental Title defense at Wrestlemania. Plus, anytime a wrestler has a lengthy and dignified run with a title, the worth of the championship is enhanced.

A long, record chasing or record breaking reign will also keep Punk relevant. Nobody wants to see Punk float aimlessly like Mr. Kennedy or Kane. Punk is the kind of wrestler that fans want to see on their TVs. His style, unique look, charisma, and credibility as a former world champion make him a very compelling figure. He is one wrestler that should always be kept busy. Making him a fighting champion in a high profile will certainly keep him in the limelight on the Raw brand.

No wrestler in this modern era will ever be able to break the record for the longest WWE Championship reign of all-time. Bruno Sammartino's seven year (2803 day) run as champion will never be touched. That leaves the Intercontinental Championship as the only other 20th century WWE singles title that has a breakable "longest reign in history" record.

Some might argue that McMahon is incapable of keeping a title on a wrestler for over a year. With the WWE Championship, the World Heavyweight Championship, and the Intercontinental Championship changing hands so frequently the past five months or so, it would appear to the novel fan that WWE is incapable of committing to lengthy reigns. But McMahon has proven otherwise. Hurricane Helms held the Cruiserweight Title for over a year. Though his time with the belt was unspectacular to say the least, he still holds that accomplishment as his claim to fame. John Cena held the WWE Championship for over a year from 2006-2007. Now of course, it goes without saying that Cena's reign was not very memorable either. But both of those documentable feats show that breaking the Honky Tonk Man's record is not preposterous by any stretch.

Regardless of whether CM Punk or somebody else break's the Honky Tonk Man's record, I hope the achievement is recognized as an historical event in WWE. I also hope that whoever breaks the record is a fighting champion that frequently competes on his brand and defends the title on pay-per-view. I would hate for it to be presented as an "under the radar" reign where the wrestler defends the title once in a while and out of nowhere is suddenly hailed as a record-breaking champion. The accomplishment should be a big deal. And that record-breaking honor is befitting of the best midcarder in a generation: CM Punk.




Post Comment (25)  |  Email Kristopher Rodriguez  |  View Kristopher Rodriguez's 411 Profile

  Send To Friend  |    Stumble It!  |    Digg It!  | 



Please add your comment below.
If you are registered, you can login and post under your registered name. If not, you can post as a guest or register.

* Please note that 411 moderates all comments. Your comment will show up on the site after it has been approved by an editor.
 
Name : 
Comment : 
Remaining Characters : 
2800
 

Comments (25)

 
I think that is a GREAT idea. I would love to see that. It would absolutely kill Honky Tonk Man's legacy....but really, he didn't deserve the legacy he had.

Posted By: Mike (Guest)  on February 01, 2009 at 12:09 AM

 
 
I do love long title runs for secondary titles...as long as they can keep it interesting

Much like RVD holding the ECW TV Title for his 2 year reign was awesome and helped put ECW on the map...he had awesome feuds and made himself more popular than even some of the ECW Heavyweight champs....if only the WWE had Paul Heyman lol


Posted By: Erik (Guest)  on February 01, 2009 at 12:51 AM

 
 
I do agree, the IC title may never be as prestigous as it once was, but it needs more attention to it. look what a long IC title reign did for randy orton back in 2004 and he only held it for 7 months, punk is the perfect guy to be a believe IC champ and fans could easily get behind his chase for the record. but like all good ideas, wwe won't do it, which does suck

Posted By: Cody (Guest)  on February 01, 2009 at 12:56 AM

 
 
I want to watch Punks indy stuff again. And his yard stuff i heard was even good.

Posted By: Morotov Coctair (Guest)  on February 01, 2009 at 01:15 AM

 
 
santino should have been the one to break it, that angle/gimmick was gold

Posted By: Nash (Guest)  on February 01, 2009 at 02:00 AM

 
 
Punk-A-Meter!!!! Pepsi logo in the middle!!!

Posted By: Guest#4877 (Guest)  on February 01, 2009 at 02:36 AM

 
 
"Now of course, it goes without saying that Cena's reign was not very memorable either."

ludacris statement. cena's title reign was fantastic. every ppv he main-evented the match would deliver. his fueds with hbk and rko were the best fueds of 07. he was even putting on passable matches with the great khali and bob lash.


Posted By: db (Guest)  on February 01, 2009 at 03:04 AM

 
 
"CM Punk is one of WWE's most important and prominent wrestlers."

Er, no. I'm not trying to slight Punk in any way, but there are about a handful of wrestlers that are truly important to the WWE. Would the fans miss him? Most assuredly. Would the WWE miss the money from his merchandise sales (whatever the total)? Sure. But at the end of the day, Vince could simply put the hype machine behind anyone currently drawing decent cheers and bring that person to the level of CM Punk.


Posted By: Devas (Guest)  on February 01, 2009 at 03:09 AM

 
 
What in god's nonexistance are you talking about?
So where in the "Fastest ever Grand Slam" winner speaks of staying in the midcard any longer then it takes to say Punk merch outselling Cena's?

Really i dont understand these post's sometime's.


Posted By: Showster (Guest)  on February 01, 2009 at 04:08 AM

 
 
Triple Crown champ*
sorry long night and BJ Penn's Poor performance still makes me a sad panda


Posted By: Showster (Guest)  on February 01, 2009 at 04:11 AM

 
 
Good article.

Speaking of year long championships didn't London and Kendrick hold their titles for a while? And Batista and Cena came close to a year- Batista may have gone 12 months had he not got injured and I think Trish had the Women's belt for ages too.

Randy Orton could have broke the record in 2004. They took the belt off him to give him a world title reign which HHH killed. For the record I didn't mind Orton as a face he got huge face pops which people seem to forget.

I also agree that Santino SHOULD have broke it. He didn't even get close in the end, which was stupid.

The only problem with Punk going for it is that he usually botches his springboard moves so sadly he may fall on his head and injure himself.

A heel breaking it would be better. That way the fans would be begging for someone to win the title from the hated wrestler and then when somebody does it will be a great moment. If a face broke the record and then lost it would be like "damn..it's over."


Posted By: Tim (Guest)  on February 01, 2009 at 06:41 AM

 
 
This is the best idea I've heard in a long, long time. Great column, here's hoping you're right.

Posted By: Deathpool (Registered)  on February 01, 2009 at 06:47 AM

 
 
I dont think he will break it because keeping a title that long is something that just doesnt happen these days(unless your name is Cena) but he should certainly have it for at least 6 months, defending it every ppv & now & again on Raw, i just hope he doesnt hold it for ages but never defends it like what sometimes happens.

He is certainly the right guy to be a fighting champion.


Posted By: jbardo (Guest)  on February 01, 2009 at 07:13 AM

 
 
"Now of course, it goes without saying that Cena's reign was not very memorable either."

* Handed Umaga his first loss
* Had 411's MOTY against Umaga at RR 2007
* Headlined Wrestlemania
* Had 1-hour match on RAW with HBK
* Had two passable matches with Khali (can argue this one, but I'd consider that fairly memorable)

Dunno, I personally think that was he most memorable reign as champion


Posted By: mr_wishart (Guest)  on February 01, 2009 at 07:58 AM

 
 
You bring up Cena as an example that it can happen, but he's the only world champion to hold the belt for a year since '84 and the IWC shit all over his long reign.

I'm not saying it's a terrible idea, but I don't trust WWE to properly book it; Punk would defend his title about as much as Santino did once the initial novelty wore off.


Posted By: The Glide (Guest)  on February 01, 2009 at 09:12 AM

 
 
Hell no, Punk's going to Smackdown in the draft to win all three titles there this year. Then it's off to TNA in 2010 to complete the Grand Slam Grand Slam of modern Pro Wrestling.

Posted By: EZMark (Guest)  on February 01, 2009 at 09:33 AM

 
 
No one should break that record.

Posted By: icon zeke (Guest)  on February 01, 2009 at 09:38 AM

 
 
Good article, but I'd argue there is a way to make the IC title relevant that isn't quite as time-intensive as having a year-long reign. Have a top level IC title match at Wrestlemania.

I remember one of the reasons to look forward to WM was that the IC title matches were usually the workrate horses. Steamboat and Savage had a classic at WM3. Rude gave the best match to Warrior at that point at WM5. Hart v. Piper was a near WM8 classic that featured what for the time was a rare face/face encounter. The ladder match at WMX made the career of Ramon & HBK. At WM16, Jericho, Benoit & Angle tore the house down.

However, we have not seen a WM IC title match since RVD took the belt from Regal at WM18 in 2002.

2003: IC belt temporarily retired after HHH unified all the Raw singles titles

2004: Orton is the champ, teams up with the rest of Evolution (aside from HHH) to take on the Rock & Sock connection.

2005, 2006 & 2008: Benjamin the champ in 2005 & 6, Jericho the champ in 2008. All in the MITB match

2007: Umaga the champ, faces Bobby Lashly in the angle-heavy Battle of the Billionaires.

Since the introduction of the US belt, we've seen that defended twice on PPV several times

2004: Cena defeats Big Show
2005: Orlando Jordon as champ--not on PPV
2006: JBL defeats Benoit
2007: Benoit defeats MVP
2008: MVP is champion, part of MITB

Thus, the US belt seems to be the secondary title of interest for the WM PPV? Why not have a great show-stealing match for Punk at WM? If the Mickey Roarke thing does fall through. how about Punk v. Jericho? Those two have had great chemistry on their TV matches, and some time on a PPV could further help to bolster Punk's credibility. Punk v. HBK could also be an awesome match if booked properly (although they seem to be headed to HBK/JBL). Kane isn't doing anything right now, so a match between those two isn't out of the question. And a Punk/Kofi match would be fun to watch and could help further elevate Kofi.


Posted By: Michael L (Guest)  on February 01, 2009 at 10:22 AM

 
 
I can see Punk having a more beliveable chance of breaking the record than Dorktino.

Posted By: Michael (Guest)  on February 01, 2009 at 10:26 AM

 
 
A good way to make Punk a legend and a future main eventer

Posted By: MRM (Guest)  on February 01, 2009 at 04:19 PM

 
 
That's not a bad idea. It benefits Punk and it benefits the tit;e. I'd love to see a mini-feud with Santino down the line where they compare title reigns. That would be classic.

Posted By: Skreb Masters (Guest)  on February 01, 2009 at 05:23 PM

 
 
anyone remember stunning steve austin WCW tv title reign? Or RVD's tv title reign, until the one time deal where jerry lynn took it because rvd injured himself. Long title reigns are great for a secondary title, not a world title or you get treated like Cena does now where the face is the world champ and NEVER loses the title. The US title and IC title should have long reigns because it builds the respect and the stability of that person holding the title. Because once they lose the title it builds heat and puts over that person what they went through to earn a spot in the ranks with world or former world champs. For example the best of seven with booka t, finlay, and he-who-BENIOT-must-not-be-named in WCW. That built up huge heat and put all three of them so over with the fans that also gave it a sortive a storyline in itself.

I think someone like cm punk should break that record for the IC title because he was bamboozled out of the world title, never really lost it, then forcefully lost to jericho in a cage match and basically threw him out of the title hunt. In other words, start over and he won, and lost, tag team titles and now won the IC title. If wwe really wants to keep people interesting, let the US and IC titles stay around the waist of their current owners for a bit and then develop their identities so people become familiar with them. Shelton benji is another example, hes got talent, athletics, and top notch performer which he should have won clean over the UT but did not. This meant that he was overlooked and pushed aside along with the integrity of the US title, i.e. US champ and title = irrelevant and insignificant!!! These titles IMHO should be as important to maintain as the main event title. Another thing that makes people lose interest in them is have these secondary titles fight the primary titles. The last time that ever meant shit to me was.... Ultimate Warrior vs Hulk Hogan WM 8, any other time was useless after this event occurred.


Posted By: guest1228 (Guest)  on February 02, 2009 at 12:57 AM

 
 
it shoulda been a heel Eddie Guerrero. lying and cheating and stealing his way for a good 18 months. and whoever ended the run would have been an instant superstar. that's pretty much what HTM (and Warrior) did. those of us who remember might have enjoyed the homage.

Posted By: 6d6 (Guest)  on February 02, 2009 at 01:41 AM

 
 
While that is a great idea, I dont see it happening, as I see a long feud w/ the Shaman of Sexy over the title, and the title will be proudly displayed at the Palace of Wisdom

Posted By: C.Drama (Guest)  on February 02, 2009 at 11:09 AM

 
 
Punk IS the right man to receive this honor.

Honky Tonk doesn't deserve this legacy for the fact that his whining and bitching about dropping the IC title back to Randy Savage robbed our generation the 1st Heel Champion to walk out of Wrestlemania 4 in Ted Dibiase. Sure he would have lost it back to Hogan the following year, but that would have been something to behold.

Just for GODS SAKES, don't give it to SANTINO!!!!


Posted By: Tony Forever (Guest)  on February 02, 2009 at 10:23 PM

 


www.41mania.com
Copyright � 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.