www.411mania.com
|  News |  Columns |  TV Reports |  Video Reviews |  Title History |  Hall of Fame |  News Report |  The Dunn List |
SPOTLIGHTS  SPOTLIGHTS
MOVIES/TV
// Irina Shayk Shows Off Her Killer Curves At Cannes
MUSIC
// Kanye West and Jay-Z's Watch the Throne 2 Confirmed
WRESTLING
// Brooke Hogan Says Hulk Didn't Know She Was in Talks With TNA
POLITICS
// Obama Leads In Florida, Ohio, & VIrginia
MMA
// 411's MMA Roundtable - UFC 146: Dos Santos vs. Mir
GAMES
// Castlevania: Lords of Shadow Sequel Teased


 HOT TOPICS
//  CM Punk
//  John Cena
//  Triple H
//  Hulk Hogan
//  Randy Orton
//  Christian
SYNDICATE  SYNDICATE



411mania RSS Feeds





Follow 411mania on Twitter!




Add 411 On Facebook
 



 
 411mania » Wrestling » Columns



Advertisement
411 Fact or Fiction 02.05.09: Austin’s Induction, TNA Impact, Mike Knox in the Elimination Chamber, More
Posted by Larry Csonka on 02.05.2009





  • Welcome back to another week of 411 Fact or Fiction: Wrestling Edition! This week we have TWO men stepping up to the challenge as 411 writers Rob McNew and Jeff Small step into the 411 Arena to do battle in this week's edition of Fact or Fiction!

  • And remember to go to TigerFlashGames.com and play addictive, free flash games when you're bored at work, school, or whenever! Ashish made this place because he loves you.

  • Questions were sent out Monday morning.

  • Participants were told to expect WWE and TNA related questions.

  • If you would like to appear in the column, shoot me an email!


    1. Bret Hart, and not Vince McMahon, should induct Steve Austin into the WWE Hall of Fame.

    Rob McNew: FICTION. The feud with Bret Hart put Austin on the map, but the feud with McMahon is what defined his career. Ask anyone who Stone Cold's biggest rival is they will almost always answer "Vince McMahon." The ones who don't will probably say The Rock. Unfortunately from a mainstream perspective the feud with Bret is just a small blip on the radar screen compared to what was to come. This isn't meant to diminish the tremendous matches between Bret and Austin or that terrific feud, but its just rather small in the large scheme of Austin 's hall of fame career. For what its worth I think it should probably be Jim Ross to do the induction, but if I'm picking between these two guys its got to be Vince.

    Jeff Small: FICTION. As much as Bret Hart helped Steve Austin become a viable main eventer, it was Austin's feud with Vince McMahon that launched both the superstar and the company into the stratosphere. Steve Austin would not have had the impact he had in the WWE if it were not for his heel counterpart, Mr. McMahon. Their feud led to the WWE ending WCW's 82-win streak and the subsequent asswhooping the WWE gave WCW in the ratings afterwards. Because of this (and many other reasons), Vince McMahon should definitely induct Stone Cold Steve Austin into the Hall of Fame.

    Score: 1 for 1!


    2. Thursday's episode of TNA Impact was a horrible show.

    Rob McNew: FICTION. Not only was Thursday's episode not a horrible show, as I mentioned in The Brace for Impact, I thought hour one was the most entertained I'd ever been watching Impact. It gave us something different from the norm. Any time Scott Steiner is ring announcing you know its bound to be a good time. Now then was it particularly successful at selling the pay per view or attracting a new audience? No, in fact, I'm not sure it did one thing to make me want to buy the pay per view. But as far as being an incredibly entertaining hour and ten minutes, unquestionably. It really does show what a drag Tenay and West are on the program when they totally stopped the momentum of the program as soon as they regained the booth.

    Jeff Small: FICTION. I actually enjoyed Impact up until Foley's return in the early part of the second hour. I understand why people could hate the show as it was full of handicapped matches, everyone but the Main Event Mafia looked good, and I still do not understand how Jim Cornette can book matches but not stop Kurt Angle from sitting in Jeff Jarrett's chair. With that said, Booker T, Kevin Nash, and Scott Steiner all helped make at least the few hour perversely entertaining. I'd rather have a bad but entertaining show than a really boring, bad show.

    Score: 2 for 2!


    3. Ricky "The Dragon" Steamboat will be the most deserving inductee into the WWE Hall of Fame this year.

    Rob McNew: FICTION. This one is really easy. One of the three biggest draws in the history of pro wrestling is being inducted. That alone means Ricky needs to take a backseat to Austin on this one. I'm sure Steamboat himself would admit that. I'm as big of a fan of Ricky Steamboat as anyone. The man is arguably in 4 of the 5 greatest matches of the 80's. But there's more to the wrestling business than putting on five star classics. It's about putting an ass every eighteen inches. Stone Cold Steve Austin did that better than anyone not named Hogan. A cup of coffee with the NWA title and a show stealing performance with Randy Savage doesn't vault you ahead of Austin . Not only is Austin the most deserving inductee in the 2009 class. He's probably the second most deserving inductee ever behind only Hulk Hogan.

    Jeff Small: FICTON. Stone Cold Steve Austin is the most deserving inductee into the Hall of Fame. While Ricky Steamboat was a great technical wrestler and had a historic feud with both Ric Flair in the WCW and the Macho Man Randy Savage in the WWE, he did not carry either company on his back like Stone Cold did. Don't get me wrong, I appreciate Steamboat's wrestling ability, but in the world of sports entertainment, there are many other important attributes that have to be looked at.

    Score: 3 for 3!


    ---SWITCH~!---



    4. TNA's success in their recent International tour proves that they should not only tour there again and soon, but that they should tape both an episode of Impact and a PPV in one of those International markets.

    Jeff Small: FACT. With TNA trying to reduce costs, it would almost be impractical if they do not tape more than one event during their next overseas tour. The company could tape two weeks worth of Impact at one show to promote a UK-only PPV and then tape that also on the tour. The UK-only show would be a benefit to TNA as it adds another novelty DVD to the US market (like the Global Impact DVDs) and gives the UK fans something more important than just a house show. My only fear with the success of the International tour is burnout and dimished returns if TNA proceeds too quickly with a return. Rather, the company should already start thinking of holding a show like Lockdown in 2010 in the UK.

    Rob McNew: FACT. Why wouldn't they? I thought when I saw the photo of that full arena at one of the UK shows that TNA should use that photo every chance they get. It would be an opportunity to put on a television program in a full arena with a crowd of over 10,000. Wrestling fans in the UK are starved to see a big time wrestling program. Assuming it's feasible from a cost perspective there is absolutely no reason for TNA not do this. If you present your product as a big deal you might actually get people to believe it. A hot crowd and a full arena could do wonders for the product. This makes too much sense for them not to do it.

    Score: 4 for 4!



    5. Mike Knox being a part of the Raw Elimination Chamber is a joke.

    Jeff Small: FICTION. While we all know Mike Knox has no chance of winning the Elimination Chamber, I am not upset about his inclusion in the match. With two Elimination Chambers at No Way Out, it's nice to see other superstars have a shot at the WWE Title. Judging from the star power, the Smackdown EC will main event the night so there's nothing wrong with Knox in the undercard EC. Plus, it's not nearly as insulting as Chris Masters and Carlito being two of the final three competitors in the 2006 EC.

    Rob McNew: FICTION. Even the most naive wrestling fan in the world knows that Orton-Cena is etched in stone for Wrestlemania. You're not going to convince anyone that Cena is going to lose the match anyway. With JBL and HBK set to settle their differences in the winner take all match at No Way Out and Randy Orton already locked in to a title match at Wrestlemania there are only so many places they could go. Knox has even been mildly entertaining in his generic monster #19309 role putting on a terrific tag match Monday Night. Knowing that Orton and Priceless are preoccupied with Shane, JBL and HBK are facing off with each other, who else are you going to put in there? You could probably find a place for Punk, but if I was going to take someone out I'd probably go with the always useless Kane or the still green Kofi Kingston.

    Score: 5 for 5!


    6. TNA's rumored "female" investor will lead to an on air role for Dixie Carter.

    Jeff Small: FICTION. Dixie Carter has already been introduced to much of the TNA audience through Spin Cycles, press releases, and at live events. People already know her as the President of TNA, which would be a lackluster surprise for her to be given this on-air role. Rather, I believe that the new "female investor" will lead to the return of Karen Angle! Karen's already had history with the company, has a built in feud with the Main Event Mafia (featuring her ex-husband Kurt), and is a hot piece of ass who needs to be on my television. Simple as that.

    Rob McNew: FICTION. Dixie has said on numerous occasions she has no desire to be an on air character. This isn't like Vince revealing himself as owner in '96 either. Everyone already knows Dixie is the President. They don't hide this fact. So in a way she already is revealed so to speak even in kayfabe. I'm thinking that all signs lead to the female investor being Karen Angle. Possibly with the storyline being that she used the money from the divorce to buy into TNA and make Kurt's life a living hell. She's still under contract and has a profile on the website. I believe that Kurt and Karen had an amicable split so it stands to reason that they could still work together. She plays a vindictive bitch quite well and would be good in this role wreaking havoc on Kurt and the MEM. I could be wrong and it could be someone else, but I'm fairly confident it won't be Dixie.

    Score: 6 for 6!


  • Larry Csonka: Jesus, are you too ladies done making out yet? Come on back next week for more of 411 Fact or Fiction: Wrestling Edition!


    Post Comment (45)  |  Email Larry Csonka  |  View Larry Csonka's 411 Profile

      Send To Friend  |    Stumble It!  |    Digg It!  | 



    Please add your comment below.
    If you are registered, you can login and post under your registered name. If not, you can post as a guest or register.

    * Please note that 411 moderates all comments. Your comment will show up on the site after it has been approved by an editor.
     
    Name : 
    Comment : 
    Remaining Characters : 
    2800
     

    Comments (45)

     
    What happened to the 411 hall of fame?

    Posted By: already forgot what my name is (Guest)  on February 04, 2009 at 11:25 PM

     
     
    its amazing how bad TNA is...

    Posted By: BAM! (Guest)  on February 04, 2009 at 11:47 PM

     
     
    funniest part about fact or fiction this week, larry's line at the end!!!!!!!gold csonka gold!

    Posted By: bondman (Guest)  on February 04, 2009 at 11:57 PM

     
     
    I liken the Raw elimination chamber match this year to the SD Championship scramble match from Unforgivent. Both had the champaion (HHH v. Cena), both had one main challenger with an outside chance (Jeff Hardy & Jericho), and both had a bunch of midcarders who never really stoond a chance (Knox, Kane, Mysterio & MVP, Kendrick & Shelton). Sometimes predictable isn't all that bad, and if there is one or more breakout performances w. some follow up, then the midcarders entry would be worth it. However, given the WWE track record on that sort of thing, I don't expect much in the way of follow up.

    Posted By: Michael L (Guest)  on February 05, 2009 at 12:14 AM

     
     
    GET A ROOM YOU TWO

    Posted By: AND GET OF MY LAWN! (Guest)  on February 05, 2009 at 12:14 AM

     
     
    This column lacked the word WHAMMY~!

    FACT


    Posted By: Matt P (Guest)  on February 05, 2009 at 12:19 AM

     
     
    I agree with every opinion too! Great work guys!

    Posted By: FUZEY (Guest)  on February 05, 2009 at 12:20 AM

     
     
    "if there is one or more breakout performances w. some follow up, then the midcarders entry would be worth it. However, given the WWE track record on that sort of thing, I don't expect much in the way of follow up."

    To be fair, I think the Smackdown Championship Scramble match was supposed to elevate The Brian Kendrick, but then he had to shoot himself in the foot when he wouldn't give up the wacky tobacky.

    "Yowza!"


    Posted By: W. Axl Rose (Guest)  on February 05, 2009 at 12:42 AM

     
     
    I know its an opinion but you're both wrong on knox.

    Posted By: Mr1700 (Guest)  on February 05, 2009 at 01:00 AM

     
     
    Quite honestly, I think the RAW Chamber match may be more entertaining than the SD match. Simple fact is that you will get to see what these midcard guys will do when given a spotlight. Knox and Kane may be "monsters" but I wouldn't mind seeing them tangle up with Jericho and likewise with Rey and Kofi with Cena. It gives you something different to watch even though you know who wins.

    Posted By: SuperJeff (Guest)  on February 05, 2009 at 01:17 AM

     
     
    its amazing how bad TNA is...

    Posted By: BAM! (Guest) on February 04, 2009 at 11:47 PM

    it's amazing how stupid you are.


    Posted By: Guest#8083 (Guest)  on February 05, 2009 at 01:41 AM

     
     
    its amazing how bad TNA is...

    Posted By: BAM! (Guest) on February 04, 2009 at 11:47 PM

    it's amazing how stupid you are.

    Posted By: Guest#8083 (Guest) on February 05, 2009 at 01:41 AM

    Its amazing i know that someone dose not think the same as yoo


    Posted By: vadertime (Guest)  on February 05, 2009 at 03:17 AM

     
     
    if mike knox did a bit more technical wrestling and complemented that style with power, he could be a relaly good enforcer. he should copy some of arn anderson's moves (i'm sure HHH would love that) to mke him more of a legit wrestler.

    Posted By: knoxville (Guest)  on February 05, 2009 at 04:17 AM

     
     
    Wow, TNA needs another "authority figure" like the 1991 Summerslam Bret-Perfect match needs inclusion on another DVD.

    Posted By: Guest#6938 (Guest)  on February 05, 2009 at 04:39 AM

     
     
    Of course Bret, and not Vince, should induct Austin. Who would have a more interesting perspective on Austin? Do we need to see Vince talk about Austin even more than he already has? Maybe if "Mr. McMahon" was inducting Austin and not Vince it would be worthwhile.

    Posted By: Mr. America (Guest)  on February 05, 2009 at 08:02 AM

     
     
    Mike Knox is going to WRASSSLEMANIA! The Desert Destroyer is your next CHAMPEEN!

    Posted By: Jake Fury (Guest)  on February 05, 2009 at 08:18 AM

     
     
    $10 says the new "female" investor in TNA is RVD.

    Posted By: Sink (Guest)  on February 05, 2009 at 08:35 AM

     
     
    Hey I am the first person to belittle TNA in every way possible. Yes i am a long term fed fan and as far as im concerned there is not a number 2 company. there was not 1 in the 90s and there is not 1 now. However i was tna impact last week for only the 3rd time. the story with the main event mafia taking over the show with booker t and kevin nash announcing pretending to be the actual announcers was funny as hell. but nothing compared to booker t doing live commentary from the ring while beating up some dude. kudos to tna for being my favourtie segment of wrestling last week. after that im now back to there's only 1 fed

    Posted By: sketchy1 (Guest)  on February 05, 2009 at 08:55 AM

     
     
    2) FACT--Beer Money and the Beautiful Poeple were nowhere to be found, Team 3D and LAX were made to look like chumps, and the supposed lolz were not enough to actually make me LOL.

    4) FACT-ish: The only way this can be FICTION is if Knox doesn't get the same booking Big Daddy V got in last year's Smackdown EC (which I think he will).


    Posted By: B.W.G. (Guest)  on February 05, 2009 at 08:59 AM

     
     
    I think he's been pretty solid, even back when the new ECW came back.

    Knox > Snitsky, Bam Neeley, Big Daddy V, Henry, and even..KHALI

    Onto TNA..The last thing they need is another investor or authority figure on that show. Foley just did that whole thing back on that first live HD impact in Vegas. He already told Kurt he was his new boss, blah blah blah. No to have Karen come out 4-5 months later and do the same routine seems sort of lame. Enough already. Find something new to do already


    Posted By: Byzdalmyt (Guest)  on February 05, 2009 at 09:15 AM

     
     
    have to agree with you guys that the vince/austin feud is what started it all BUT the rock was for me definitely his greatest opponent. I think that feud eventually was the main thing that killed wcw.

    Posted By: c.j (Registered)  on February 05, 2009 at 09:39 AM

     
     
    its amazing how bad TNA is...

    Posted By: BAM! (Guest) on February 04, 2009 at 11:47 PM

    true it is a shame becaus ethey can be so much better if it wasnt for horrible booking...these guys are doing the same thing WCW did during the last 2 years before being sold...but i feel as though when ROH finally hits tv that will light a fire under TNA because they dont wanna be the number 3 company which could very well happen inside 2 years if they keep carring on the way they are doing....Like it or not its gonna be damn near impossible for anyone to knock off WWE


    Posted By: trae316 (Guest)  on February 05, 2009 at 09:41 AM

     
     
    Austin was a bigger draw than Hogan...Vince himself stated that Austin made him more money than anyone else...

    Posted By: y2j420 (Registered)  on February 05, 2009 at 09:43 AM

     
     
    They are going with Orton vs. HHH @ Mania, not Orton vs. Cena.

    Posted By: GUEST (Guest)  on February 05, 2009 at 09:45 AM

     
     
    WWE blew any chance of Knox being "mildly entertaining" when they revealed his motives for attacking Matt Sy- Evan Bourne and Rey Mysterio: "uh... I dunno." That doesn't build his character as a "psycho" or in ANY other conceivable way; it just displays bold-faced indifference by the ironically-named creative team.

    Posted By: KanyonKreist (Guest)  on February 05, 2009 at 09:57 AM

     
     
    I must disagree with Small's statement about Knox being more acceptable than Carlito and Chris Masters. Masters had been built up very well with his Master Lock challges and had even feuded with HBK. Carlito won the US title in his SD! debut and the IC Title in his Raw debut. Both are much more acceptable to be in a Chamber match and even being part of the last three than Knox. All Knox has done is attack Rey. And before being on Raw he was Kelly's boyfriend on ECW who didn't want her to dance. He truly doesn't deserve this spot.

    This isn't to knock Knox as I think last week's tag match with him and Kane was the match of the night. I hope they stay together.


    Posted By: MachoManFanStill (Guest)  on February 05, 2009 at 10:22 AM

     
     
    Larry Csonka is a dumb name. Hyatte lives.

    Posted By: stonecoldstunner (Guest)  on February 05, 2009 at 10:39 AM

     
     
    steamboat had some decent matches with austin in wcw as well. just a little side note i wanted to throw in here. great column guys, i really enjoy reading these.

    Posted By: Ric Switzer (Guest)  on February 05, 2009 at 10:45 AM

     
     
    SWAYZE!!!

    Posted By: Todd Vote (Registered)  on February 05, 2009 at 11:04 AM

     
     
    Why is Cena/Orton etched in stone? Their meeting makes very little sense in the design of the booking currently.

    Here is what I think will happen

    HHH wins the SD title via the EC.

    After Orton destroys Shane-O-Mac, Stephanie pleads with HHH to defend the family honor against Orton.

    HHH reluntantly choose to put the title up against Orton at WMXXV.

    Now this leaves who Cena's opponent should be...

    Cena's logical opponent should be the Undertaker, as two of the biggest current WWE draws collide. UT might be getting his last shot at the big gold, while Cena has to defeat not only UT but the streak as well.


    Posted By: thegunisgood (Guest)  on February 05, 2009 at 11:14 AM

     
     
    Last weeks TNA was very entertaining especially the commentary.

    Now on TNA in general. When ever I watch TNA for entertainment purposes, I'm usually entertained. (though it could use more wrestling) But things ten to fall when I actually put thought into what I just watched. Like that ODB promo WTH?


    Posted By: Guest#8078 (Guest)  on February 05, 2009 at 11:59 AM

     
     
    I can't believe that people enjoyed listening to the MEM on commentary. I could only listen to bookers fake accent/commentary voice for a couple minutes, then i had to change the channel. It was beyond annoying and the sound was so bad you couldnt understand half of what they were saying anyways, so if they said anything funny, you missed it. Add to that the shitty matches you had to watch at the same time. I thought i was done watching WCW on my tv. . i guess i was wrong

    Posted By: Guest#5248 (Guest)  on February 05, 2009 at 12:17 PM

     
     
    I just lost my cable. Thank god, it was becoming a chore to have to sit through Impact every week. The only thing that made it close to tolerable was my DVR. What does TNA stand for any way? Also, why is there still an X Division title? These guys really have not learned their lesson, huh?

    Posted By: Tony (Guest)  on February 05, 2009 at 12:27 PM

     
     
    "Larry Csonka is a dumb name. Hyatte lives."

    Hyatte may live, but the way the STD's have ravaged his body and particularly the damage the syphillis has rotted his brain is truly sad.


    Posted By: is it REALLY living? (Guest)  on February 05, 2009 at 01:14 PM

     
     
    Didn't Karen get fired from TNA due to the awkwardness between her and Kurt backstage?

    And Mike Knox is a bit of a letdown in the Cahmber but he's a million times better and more charismatic than Snitsky. I actually like his generic mnonster run a bit, as he brings a new sociopathtic twist to it.


    Posted By: lilwayne1 (Registered)  on February 05, 2009 at 01:15 PM

     
     
    " Thank god, it was becoming a chore to have to sit through Impact every week."

    That's a bunch of bullshit, no one is forcing you to watch. Just because you like pro wrestling doesn't mean you have to watch every wrestling show on TV. God change the channel and quit the fucking whining


    Posted By: Guest#2913 (Guest)  on February 05, 2009 at 01:33 PM

     
     
    knox being in the match is much better then rey the midget being in there.

    Posted By: fred (Guest)  on February 05, 2009 at 02:07 PM

     
     
    Mike Knox in the Elimination Chamber is a joke.......FICTION

    Mike Knox under contract with the WWE and on TV ever Monday is a joke......FACT


    Posted By: Marco (Guest)  on February 05, 2009 at 02:25 PM

     
     
    "are you too ladies done making out yet?"

    phail.


    Posted By: Guest#3817 (Guest)  on February 05, 2009 at 06:33 PM

     
     
    Why not have some random people in the EC, works for masters and carlito. Besides EC is like royal rumble, a lot of big names but only one likely to win. The raw brand EC i hate to say it but WWE will have Cena continue the annoyingly obvious domination over all. The SD brand EC should be the better of the two because Show triple haitch, UT, and edge so far bring more to the table than what raw brand has. SD EC will NOT have anyone dominate over all. No offense to kane and mike knox but they are just pawns same with kofi and rey rey. I look for cena to crush all of them to set up orton and cena for the WHC.

    Posted By: guest1228 (Guest)  on February 05, 2009 at 07:38 PM

     
     
    God, I hope the investor is Ashley Massaro, then I can laugh at EVERY TNA for ever sticking up for a company that hired Ashley willingly.

    Posted By: beezy (Guest)  on February 05, 2009 at 08:25 PM

     
     
    WWE blew any chance of Knox being "mildly entertaining" when they revealed his motives for attacking Matt Sy- Evan Bourne and Rey Mysterio: "uh... I dunno." That doesn't build his character as a "psycho" or in ANY other conceivable way; it just displays bold-faced indifference by the ironically-named creative team.

    Posted By: KanyonKreist (Guest) on February 05, 2009 at 09:57 AM

    I actually thought that was brilliant. Anyone can attack people with a reason, its takes a true psycho to attack people just for the hell of it.


    Posted By: Blade0242 (Guest)  on February 05, 2009 at 09:53 PM

     
     
    So Mike Knox is acceptable and Kofi Kingston's green? The hell, McNew.

    Posted By: The Glide (Guest)  on February 05, 2009 at 10:07 PM

     
     
    Chris Jericho should be in the elimination chamber. Kofi is both over and entertaining, two things Mike Knox is not and Kane has been entertaining at times and is always over there for the only logical conclusion is to replace the useless Knox with the awesome Jericho.

    Posted By: 17 (Guest)  on February 06, 2009 at 07:29 PM

     
     
    "Chris Jericho should be in the elimination chamber. Kofi is both over and entertaining, two things Mike Knox is not and Kane has been entertaining at times and is always over there for the only logical conclusion is to replace the useless Knox with the awesome Jericho."

    Mm, I could have sworn Jericho wasn't in the chamber, my bad. Still there are better options than Knox, like Morrison for example.


    Posted By: 17 (Guest)  on February 07, 2009 at 06:44 AM

     


  • www.41mania.com
    Copyright (c) 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
    Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
    Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.