Forgotten Favorites 03.12.09: SmackDown 2003 - Undertaker & Kurt Angle vs. Brock Lesnar & John Cena
Posted by Jim Grimm on 03.12.2009
It was the new generation taking on the one prior when these four guys stepped into the ring in Fall 2003. Which would prevail: youth or experience?
Are you worried, wrestling fans? Worried that some dude with a rhyming name is going to come along and expose further shortcomings in your wrestling-obsessed memory with yet another obscure match? Well, worry not, fans. My aim is not to stump you, but to refresh your memories. I am merely here to strengthen your faith in the Church of Wrestling. I am a guide of sorts. You may call me Father Jim, and yes, I am currently accepting donations.
Now, you might think, 'There's no way he'll reuse the same intro from the last two weeks.' And if you think that, you're wrong. So here's my purpose, as assigned by the excellent people at 411:
The evil master of wrestling history, who rules from his titanic towers of evil, takes great joy in robbing his followers of cherished memories. He has even gone so far as to wave his billion-dollar wand on more than one occasion in an attempt to completely erase particular pockets of time. Well, we, the people, have refused to stand for such injustices, and as a result, I have been called upon to right the wrongs of time.
With that out of the way, let's get down to some great wrestling.
SmackDown - October 2, 2003
Undertaker & Kurt Angle vs. Brock Lesnar & John Cena
HOW IT WENT DOWN
One Sunday night in Seattle, 54,000 fans watched Brock Lesnar culminate the ultimate babyface journey when he closed WrestleMania with his second WWE Championship. After the match he was embraced and congratulated by his opponent Kurt Angle, who many at the time believed was wrestling for the last time. Just weeks prior to WrestleMania XIX, Angle's long list of nagging injuries had finally caught up with him in a major way, particularly his bad neck. Although he was rumored to have been risking paralysis by competing, Kurt Angle is Kurt Angle and nobody but God or a painkiller is going to tell him he can't work. Despite Angle's condition, he and Lesnar worked an amazing main event that was well worth its place at the end of the year's biggest show. Almost immediately after Mania, Angle met with a mad scientist/witch doctor/Criss Angel and went under the knife. The standard surgery for Angle's condition would have kept him out of action for at least twelve months, as it had with Steve Austin, Chris Benoit, and Edge. Angle's projected return was half that time. And he came back even sooner than that.
Another guy worth looking at is someone who didn't quite make it onto the card of WrestleMania XIX. Even though he didn't make it onto the actual show, this guy named John Cena came out on the Heat broadcast before the PPV. He cut a promo that involved insulting a cardboard Jay-Z and claiming that he would main event WrestleMania XX the following year. This was a pretty unbelievable claim at the time, but not long after Mania, Cena started proving himself to the fans. With Angle out and unable to exercise his rematch clause, a number one contender had to be named for Lesnar's WWE Championship. In a damned shocking moment, John Cena made it to the finals of a number one contender tournament, defeating Chris Benoit to earn a title shot at Backlash. Although Cena lost to Lesnar at Backlash, it was still a huge step in Cena's career, marking his first WWE Title match on PPV.
A couple of months later, building steam and more arrogant than ever, John Cena issued an open challenge to anyone in WWE to mark his first year in the company. Well, there's one guy who doesn't take kindly to young punks making open challenges, and his name's Mark. Er, the Undertaker. Just to remind the many Cena-haters (myself usually included) that there was a time when the dude was not unbearably lame, let's relive this feud, shall we?
He pissed on a grave, man. That's, like ... serious.
So these two met at Vengeance in July, where Undertaker soundly (and cleanly, as I remember) defeated Cena. Later that night there was a Triple Threat match held for the WWE Championship. Defending champion Brock Lesnar put his title on the line against The Big Show and a (miraculously) already-returning Kurt Angle. Since his return to the SmackDown brand a month prior, a now-babyface Angle had made amends with Lesnar, who had apparently supported the Olympic Champion throughout his rehabilitation. So when Kurt Angle walked out of Vengeance as the new WWE Champion, you'd think that his new buddy Brock Lesnar would be happy for him, right? Well ... not so much ...
When Brock Lesnar asked his friend for a rematch on SmackDown, it seemed that it would be a standard face versus face confrontation over the title. That was until Vince McMahon entered the equation and said that Lesnar would have to earn his rematch by defeating the Chairman himself. To make matters more ridiculous, this match would be inside a Steel Cage. And then to go from ridiculous to obvious swerve, Kurt Angle was named the guest referee. When all three men were inside the Cage, Lesnar revealed that he indeed had no soul, and with Vince McMahon at his side he violently beat down his former friend.
From here we move into an excellent series of WWE Title matches happening within about a month's time. The first was the one on one rematch between Angle and Lesnar at SummerSlam, where Brock tapped out to the Ankle Lock. The following week on SmackDown, Angle defended the title against the Undertaker in yet another classic confrontation between two old rivals. Lesnar made sure there wasn't a decisive winner, interfering with an attack on both men. This set up one of the finest matches in the history of televised wrestling when two weeks later Lesnar won the WWE Title from Angle in an Iron Man match.
Following the Iron Man match, Angle's quest for a rematch was brought to a halt by an emerging problem by the name of John Cena. And while Cena provided a distraction for Angle, this allowed Undertaker to get his revenge and move into a one on one program with Lesnar. At No Mercy in just a couple of weeks, Angle would face Cena and Lesnar would defend the title against Undertaker. But before that, these four guys would all step into the ring at once for a star-studded tag team contest.
The match
WHY IT SHOULD BE REMEMBERED
I am just as guilty as plenty of other wrestling fans of giving John Cena a lot of crap. WWE has dramatically changed its programming over the last few years in an effort to predominantly target a much younger audience, and John Cena, lame fifth grade jokes and all, has led the way. But, my people of the anti-Cena movement, I tell you that the man was not always this bad! There was a time when John Cena was the hottest rising heel in WWE. Every week the crowd reactions got louder and louder, with more participation in his pre-match raps. The only problem encountered was that when the fans' reactions got so loud as to justify a face turn, WWE lost their heads on how to book Cena. When Kurt Angle was assembling a Survivor Series team to take on Brock Lesnar's team of giants, there was real tension over who Cena would end up siding with. And even if he were to wrestle on the face team, there was no telling how he would interact with his teammates, as it was not within Cena's character at the time to blindly buddy up with a fellow babyface. There was a real "second coming of Austin" vibe surrounding him at the time, and it was damned exciting stuff. The only difference was that when they turned Austin face, they let him keep the outlaw image that had defined him. He truly was a Rattlesnake that could strike anyone at anytime, regardless of face or heel status. This was not true of face Cena. A couple of months into Cena's face turn, it was clear that he was no longer the same Doctor of Thuganomics. He grew increasingly cartoonish and kid-friendly over the course of the following year, changing to such an extent that he was barely the same character when he debuted on Raw with the WWE Championship. Two years after their first No Mercy encounter, Cena and Angle engaged in a series of matches over the WWE Title. Ironically, the same fans who had cheered heel Cena over face Angle in 2003 were cheering heel Angle over face Cena in 2005.
Now let me come right out and say this first: I love the Undertaker. Not in any I-wanna-run-away-to-San-Francisco-and-do-Pilates-with-him kind of way, but more in a holy-shit-it's-awesome-watching-that-dude-steal-souls kind of way. And I'll admit, when the Deadman returned to his supernatural ways at WrestleMania XX, I was all sorts of psyched. But now that it's been five years, I have to wonder, was it the right choice? For questions like this, a fan is well-served to go back and take a look at matches like this week's tag team contest. Just over a month after this match, Vince McMahon -- with Kane's help -- buried Undertaker alive at Survivor Series, marking Taker's last appearance in mortal, biking-enthusiast form. When he returned in his current zombiefied state, he was the Undertaker of old: a mysterious force with (sometimes, when it's convenient) super powers who was immune to the offense of nearly the entire roster. The American Badass was another step in Undertaker's maturation both as a character and a competitor. He showed more emotion in interviews, sold his opponents' offense much more, and seemed like a real dude. But that was gone after WrestleMania XX. I won't argue that Taker has let his guard down in the last couple of years and had some classics against guys like Edge, Batista, and (again) Kurt Angle, but he still remains a zombie with super powers. I'm not saying this is good or bad, because I've always enjoyed Undertaker's work regardless of his abilities to command lightning or ride a motorcycle. But the excellent quality of some of his matches as a short-haired Big Evil makes me think the classics of the last few years might have been different kinds of (and possibly superior) classics. It's a tough call, and ultimately it's a testament to how good the Undertaker really is. No matter what kind of character he portrays, he's able to pull it off perfectly.
Stay out of his yard or dude will make you famous.
WHY IT ISN'T REMEMBERED
Think John Cena's the kind of guy who would encourage pissing on a headstone? Allow me to Adjust your Attitude! The John Cena that you see on WWE television these days is a cash cow when it comes to the kids. Like him or not, the man sells a shit ton of merchandise and, arguably more than any other guy, puts the asses in the seats. They may be small asses, but their small asses mean larger parental asses in other seats, and all in all, that's a lot of ass profit. Now, I'm not trying to say that John Cena's fans are asses (or to see how many times I can say ass in one paragraph), but let's face it, these parents are being suckered out of a lot of money by both Vince and their own kid(s). My point here is that parents love satisfying their children and, lucky for WWE, John Cena loves satisfying children (open to interpretation). And as long as the kids keep buying his new t-shirt, expect John Cena to continue to move further and further from the untouchable thug fueled by ruthless aggression. So anytime WWE reflects on Cena they're going to remember his superhero babyface adventures, not the badass stuff he did as a heel. 2007's John Cena: My Life DVD is disgusting in its treatment of Cena's early career, with a worthless televised match against RIKISHI being the only match featured from 2003. It really is a shame considering Cena did some great work that year before his face turn, and it deserves remembrance.
What happened to the foul mouth, Dr. Cena?
I'm willing to bet another reason why fans might not immediately remember this match is because of the history between John Cena and Brock Lesnar. These two battled earlier in the year with Cena playing the heel and Brock the face, then later in the year with the roles reversed. They were rarely ever on the same page. When a fan thinks of Lesnar and Cena in 2003, they're going to think of the Backlash title match or their SmackDown confrontations later in the year, not of an alliance formed between the two men. The same goes for their opponents, two guys who probably weren't going out for a couple beers after the show. Over the years, the Undertaker and Kurt Angle have given fans some of the best wrestling matches of all time. 2003 in particular featured a hell of a WWE Title match between the two, occurring just weeks before they would join forces against Lesnar and Cena. When fans think of Undertaker and Kurt Angle, they think of kickass matches against one another over a span of several years, not the two of them teaming up together.
WILL IT BE REMEMBERED?
Well, the date showing up at the beginning of the video I found leads me to believe this has been released on DVD. I'm just not sure what DVD that is. I'm sure somebody out there has the answer, so please, do your duty to the wrestling world and share this knowledge with your fellow faux-sport fans.
Other than that, this is a hell of a combination of stars, so I don't see why fans wouldn't remember this one over time. With all of the stuff available on YouTube, this one's bound to stand out to both newer and older fans who are searching for classic matches. Younger fans may find it hard to believe that this match actually did happen, considering it would be pretty enormous if it took place today. WWE may not care for the match, but the fans will keep it alive.
- -
No feedback this week because my classes are consuming my life. I know this is contrary to what I said last week, where I claimed I'd respond to everybody's comments, but yeah ... my bad. Regardless, I did read everybody's comments and I appreciate all the positive feedback. My goal is always to be more interesting than whatever else you should be doing at the moment at work or school or wherever, and I hope that I am succeeding in that.
I think that match is from the John Cena dvd that came out in 2004 called Word Life but I'm not sure
Posted By: B~Rad (Guest) on March 12, 2009 at 12:08 AM
Sorry to nitpick,but your statement-
"The first was the one on one rematch between Angle and Lesnar at SummerSlam, where Brock tapped out to the Ankle Lock. The following week on SmackDown, Angle defended the title against the Undertaker in yet another classic confrontation between two old rivals."
isn't quite right.The week after Summerslam had a Triple-threat match between Undertaker,Big Show and Brock Lesnar(another forgotten favorite?) ,which Taker won to become the No.1 contender.The Angle-Taker match happened the following week.
Posted By: comment (Guest) on March 12, 2009 at 12:47 AM
man in 2003 and 04 cena was my fav wrestler. he was cutting sick promos everyweek and for a long time, i had to tune into smackdown just to see what he would do, he had this edge about him that made him stand out, i wish he could regain at the very least some of that edge but what can ya do right? and pl bring back his old word life theme, it was sick
Posted By: COdy (Guest) on March 12, 2009 at 01:35 AM
This is one of the few columns I make sure to read every week. That was a pretty good match that would be crazy if it happened today. I cant believe Lesnar was only in the 'E for 2 years and got that insane monster push the whole time. But he was a fuckin beast! He had the look, he was a freak athlete with size and speed, he could work, and while not oozing charisma he was decent on the mic (look at the heat he gets in UFC). He was the perfect monster heel. Angle and Lesnar were made to feud and to this day both remain in my top 10 or 15 favorites of all time. Good job on the column-cant wait to see whats next.
Posted By: amusing comments (Guest) on March 12, 2009 at 04:26 AM
might have been a UK exclusive release from silver vision called "Smackdown's greatest matches".
i've seen that generic date come up in the corner before, at the start of the edge-chris jericho cage match i think
Posted By: DaJ (Guest) on March 12, 2009 at 05:21 AM
TURN CENA HEEL!!!!!!!!!!!! ARGH HE'S SOOOO BORING AS A FACE
Posted By: Guest#7356 (Guest) on March 12, 2009 at 05:54 AM
While I don't cheer the man, this is why I don't hate him. Cena was AWESOME back in 2003 / 2004! Blame WWE creative for taking away our John Cena and giving us what he is now. I highly recommend his first DVD for the promos.
Posted By: Word LIfe (Guest) on March 12, 2009 at 10:10 AM
Really digging that Cubs shirt/jersey thing. This is our year.
While the late '02/early '03 SmackDown Six period is generally revered as the high point of televised wrestling, mid-late '03 SmackDown wasn't far below it with the additions of Lesnar, Rhino, Tajiri, Cena, and even Undertaker. That Angle/Taker match is definitely a lost classic as is the Lesnar/Benoit match that debuted the Brock Lock.
Early Cena was a thing to behold. I vividly remember attending a SmackDown just before SummerSlam '03 and marking my brains out for him, throwing up the original "too much metal for one hand" sign. Here was a guy who was legitimately clever and clearly had "it," and we were seeing him on WWE TV every week before he was a star. The PG shift is unfortunate for him cos he could easily be a Rock-like babyface instead of having to dumb himself down. Can't really blame him, though. He can only work with what he's given.
Posted By: neverAcquiesce (Guest) on March 12, 2009 at 12:08 PM
When he has an actual DVD bio released, there will be a "shit ton" of matches from that era. My Life was less foccussed on his actual wrestling and more about him as a person (cars, sneakers, bodybuilding). Wait a year or two, and there will be an awesome 3-disc Cena DVD with a 2-hour bio program, hours of promos, and loads of great matches... just like this Savage DVD they got coming out.
Posted By: Dink (Guest) on March 12, 2009 at 12:58 PM
this taker was my favorite. he wasnt a zombie or a mortician.
he was an butt kicking, super submitting badass.
Posted By: rey (Guest) on March 12, 2009 at 12:59 PM
Damn, that video makes the Cena/Taker feud look like nothing short of pure destillated awesomeness!
Posted By: Mikael (Guest) on March 12, 2009 at 01:02 PM
yea heel cena was way better.didn't he beat taker on smackdown one time?
Posted By: Guest#1484 (Guest) on March 12, 2009 at 01:39 PM
I actually miss Takers 2002 run... he seemed to be in better shape than the previous year and played this kind of tweener role most the year and was having kick ass matched with everyone... especially Brock and Angle.
Posted By: Andrew Barbarash (Guest) on March 12, 2009 at 01:50 PM
they have to bring biker taker back ASAP...
Posted By: JJ (Guest) on March 12, 2009 at 01:56 PM
The funny thing to think about is how much more money WWE could be making with Cena if they kept him the way he was. No one will argue Cena is on Austin's level. He isn't. The only reason his merch is on par with Austin is because of inflation and the fact that there's about 80,000 different pieces of Cena merch compared to the few dozen pieces of merch Austin had at any given time 10 years ago. But the thing about Austin is that he sold merch to both the kids and their parents. You'd see an 8 year-old and a 28 year-old wearing the Austin 3:16 shirt. You only see the 8 year-olds wearing Cena merch today. WWE shot itself in the foot by going kid friendly. Cena could have been an even bigger cash cow had he retained the edge. People like anti-heroes, plain and simple.
Posted By: Guest#9301 (Guest) on March 12, 2009 at 02:20 PM
The crazy thing about Cena is that he was an amazing heel. I remember a rap he did on an episode of Smackdown when he was feuding with Eddie Guerreo when he was in Guerreo's hometown of El Paso, and by the time he was done the crowd legitimately looked like it was about to start a riot just so they could get their hands on him. Too bad he isn't allowed to use that skill anymore, and is forced to read from a script.
Posted By: Guest#3962 (Guest) on March 12, 2009 at 02:24 PM
Biker taker was much better than zombie taker, but unfortunately, we won't see that taker again due to the PG audience. The biker gimmick wouldn't work in that type of atmosphere.
Posted By: Butters4Prez (Guest) on March 12, 2009 at 02:40 PM
Dang! Those spills over the top rope from Angle and Lesnar were sick!
I agree that the American Badass should return, but is he WWEPG material?
Posted By: Armitage Shanks (Guest) on March 12, 2009 at 02:56 PM
I'll tell you what was really ridiculous about the feud between Cena and Taker
It involved Billy Gunn, the wrestling world's biggest punchline (aside from non-wrestlers) getting a win over JOHN FUCKING CENA!
Posted By: Lance Stratton (Guest) on March 12, 2009 at 03:13 PM
Great article Jim. I'll be back for more next week.
Posted By: Probes (Guest) on March 12, 2009 at 03:30 PM
was paul heyman still booking smackdown at this point?
Posted By: bluenoserob (Guest) on March 12, 2009 at 04:19 PM
The funny thing to think about is how much more money WWE could be making with Cena if they kept him the way he was. No one will argue Cena is on Austin's level. He isn't. The only reason his merch is on par with Austin is because of inflation and the fact that there's about 80,000 different pieces of Cena merch compared to the few dozen pieces of merch Austin had at any given time 10 years ago.
Posted By: Guest#9301 (Guest) on March 12, 2009 at 02:20 PM
Just remember this logic when you idiots claim that Austin outdid Hogan.
Posted By: Lance Terwilliger (Guest) on March 12, 2009 at 05:55 PM
Like Cena, Quackenbush tries too hard to be funny when he's fairly generic and no one would realize if he was gone.
Posted By: Breaking Rites (Guest) on March 12, 2009 at 11:01 PM
"But, my people of the anti-Cena movement, I tell you that the man was not always this bad!"
So? The key here is the past tense. There was also a time when HHH was the ICW's most beloved darling. There was also a time when the Ultimate Warrior was the uber-face of the WWF. There was also a time when SCSA was a vanilla midcarder called "The Ringmaster" who would job to Marc Mero... Do I have to go on?
Posted By: Guest#6433 (Guest) on March 12, 2009 at 11:04 PM
Promo-wise, John Cena was much more entertaining back in the day. However, his matches were sometimes downright BRUTAL. His promos may kinda suck now, but at least his matches are good.
Posted By: Guest#3705 (Guest) on March 13, 2009 at 01:37 AM
Copyright � 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.