Posted By: Guest#3462 (Guest) on April 20, 2009 at 11:22 PM
If they give Jericho vs. Steamboat over 15 minutes then it'll be a classic
Posted By: Bill (Guest) on April 20, 2009 at 11:23 PM
shame this ppv has fell under the radar with lockdown, mania and draft all in the same month, cos despite the amount of rematches and a very tna-ish main event which i still think will entertain, this is a very very solid line up so far....
Posted By: Guest#7898 (Guest) on April 20, 2009 at 11:24 PM
That's ALL?!?! This card looks so weak.
Posted By: Puff (Guest) on April 20, 2009 at 11:30 PM
Two words: Ricky Frickin' Steamboat!
Posted By: Paul Heyman (Guest) on April 20, 2009 at 11:34 PM
Wow! That is one confusing main event.
Posted By: Jeff Jarret (Guest) on April 20, 2009 at 11:37 PM
i disagree with the above poster saying this card looks weak, i mean outside of the main event which i think shud be at the very least decent, the other 4 matches all look good to very good, with the hardys match and cena v edge match both potentially being great, 5 matches is too little for a 3 hour ppv though
Posted By: Guest#1265 (Guest) on April 20, 2009 at 11:41 PM
Actually looks like a really solid card...other than the shit-tastic main event. Kind of like a 1998 WCW card.
Posted By: The REAL MP (Guest) on April 20, 2009 at 11:49 PM
Quality card so far, can't wait to check this out on Sunday.
Posted By: Nick M. (Guest) on April 20, 2009 at 11:59 PM
i imagine people r gonna say the ppv looks weak because of the amount of rematches and the fact theres only 5 matches on the card, but i can see one other match being added on smackdown this week involving rey or punk, end of the day not having many matches on the card can be a very good thing, u look at the 5 matches that have been announced and id be happy for all those matches 2 go around 15 minutes
Posted By: Guest#3827 (Guest) on April 21, 2009 at 12:01 AM
I'm not complaining about Jericho/Steamboat, but I got a feeling that they are going to throw together "crap" matches last minute to fill this show.
They'd actually do better if they didn't throw together any more matches at the last minute, and give each of these matches more in-ring time to make them better.
Just a thought
- Mr B
Posted By: Mr Base aka Your Hero (Guest) on April 21, 2009 at 12:02 AM
so i guess the main event is going under TNA rules? so randy can pin shane and get the title, and neither trips or tista has to job?
Posted By: Guest#8055 (Guest) on April 21, 2009 at 12:06 AM
Minus HBK vs. Taker........................THIS CARD BLOWS MANIA XXV OUT OF THE WATER.
Posted By: DocH78 (Guest) on April 21, 2009 at 12:17 AM
Lame as hell.
Posted By: Rod (Guest) on April 21, 2009 at 01:12 AM
i would rather the "I Quit" match was Jericho/Steamboat...
Posted By: 6d6 (Guest) on April 21, 2009 at 04:59 AM
Don't forget about Khali's lips vs. Santina's lips which will probably be given more time than the ECW world title match.
Posted By: PlummerLovesYou (Guest) on April 21, 2009 at 06:33 AM
Card is OK, too bad the main event blows. Here's to HHH and Batista both blowing out quads.
Posted By: Guest#9533 (Guest) on April 21, 2009 at 07:01 AM
Perhaps an IC title defense to round things up?
I mean, 6 matches plus the Khali/Santino stuff would fill 2 hours 40 minutes with each match getting a decent amount of time
Posted By: mr_wishart (Guest) on April 21, 2009 at 07:51 AM
Cena defeats Edge in a stellar match... CM Punk cashes in MITB to become the new and transitional champ.
All three end up looking good coming out of that scenario.
Posted By: Dick (Guest) on April 21, 2009 at 08:45 AM
The main event looks like TNA booking (title on the line in a 6-man Tag is flatout BAD no matter which company does it) but everything else looks very solid. Plus, Ricky Steamboat, Ricky MF'N Steamboat !! *Marks like it's 1989*
Posted By: Guest#5008 (Guest) on April 21, 2009 at 08:52 AM
God this looks good, but I just don't care for some reason...
Posted By: Banz (Guest) on April 21, 2009 at 09:45 AM
So regarding the WWE title match, do Batista and Shane have any chance at winning the title? No? Then why are they set on helping HHH defend it? Because they can get their hands on Orton? Oh that's right, it is more prestigious to beat up Randy Orton rather than to win the WWE title.
Posted By: Guest#3317 (Guest) on April 21, 2009 at 10:08 AM
Minus HBK vs. Taker........................THIS CARD BLOWS MANIA XXV OUT OF THE WATER.
Posted By: DocH78 (Guest) on April 21, 2009 at 12:17 AM
it had to be said, hell yea
Posted By: vintageHBK (Guest) on April 21, 2009 at 10:16 AM
I am all for a Trips and Batista quad tear. They could be off our tvs for months. I m a huge legacy supporter. The love has grown even more since meeting the Million Dollar Man this past weekend. Bury Batista and Triple H not Orton and Priceless. Oh and Steamboat Cena Jeffy and Christian to win their respective matches book it.
Posted By: RADTKE (Guest) on April 21, 2009 at 11:34 AM
The main event is not that bad, at least give it a chance, I think it could be unpredicatable - if a screwjob occurs or not.
If HHH pins cleanly then I guess all you people were right that the main event sucks, but Im a little more hopeful that the Age of Orton begins again and a 4th Legacy member is revealed
Posted By: Woz8005 (Registered) on April 21, 2009 at 11:48 AM
WILL THER BOOGEYMAN BE AT BACKLASH THIS YEAR
Posted By: WORM LOVER (Guest) on April 21, 2009 at 12:02 PM
shame this ppv has fell under the radar with lockdown, mania and draft all in the same month, cos despite the amount of rematches and a very tna-ish main event which i still think will entertain, this is a very very solid line up so far....
Posted By: Guest#7898 (Guest) on April 20, 2009 at 11:24 PM
Under the radar???
Backlash has been going on for YEARS!!!
If you wouldn't have just started watching wrestling yesterday you would have known that.
Posted By: duh (Guest) on April 21, 2009 at 12:44 PM
Copyright � 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.
