More Royal Rumble Updates (SPOILERS)
Posted by Jeremy Thomas on 01.30.2011
Who else is being brought in?
- Booker T arrived in Boston last night. Check out this photo of him arriving:
- Christian has been brought in for the show as well. There is no word on whether he'll be in the Rumble, but he was brought in by the company for the show and reportedly is not wearing a sling on his arm.
- Hacksaw Jim Duggan has a non-WWE booking in the area and is expected to be at the show.
Right after the photo was taken, Booker did a spinaroonie on the luggage carousel, grabbed his bags, and left the airport, shouting, "Can you dig it, sucka!"
Posted By: subtlefuge (Registered) on January 30, 2011 at 01:01 PM
I don't care what you haters think. Booka, Big Sexy, Christian, maybe Trips too? I'm actually excited about wrestling for the first time in a while. Should be a fun night!
Posted By: Me (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 01:02 PM
CAN YOU DIG IT... SUKAAH!!!
Posted By: The Viz (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 01:03 PM
I'm just glad these guys are not coming to TNA ! Don't need em'
Posted By: Guest#8177 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 01:05 PM
Where are all the booker t and kevin nash haters at? Oh thats right its only if they wrestle for tna. Guys are only washed up and worthless if they work for tna. Iwc is a joke. 411...pwi torch...observer...cageside seats. All crap.
Posted By: sirlaz187 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 01:09 PM
Hacksaw ain't gonna be in the rumble but Booker T and Nash is.
Posted By: Guest#8995 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 01:17 PM
It'd be cool to see the first Royal Rumble winner in it again, if only for a few minutes.
Posted By: Guest#4628 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 01:17 PM
I would laugh my ass off if Booker and Nash are in the Rumble and not just one-off appearences. Totally screws up the resurrection of the Main Event Mafia.
Posted By: Jed (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 01:18 PM
people want to say TNA is pushing old guys and blah blah. But Booker is 45 and Nash is 51 and they are being brought in for this.
Posted By: KB (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 01:20 PM
WWE is the greatest wrestling company of all time. No wrestling company can beat WWE, not even TNA.
Posted By: Guest#6315 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 01:21 PM
good Booker T didn't bring sharmel.
Posted By: Guest#2706 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 01:22 PM
Maybe its because I'm looking at this from my phone, but Booker T looks about 75lbs lighter with a grey Hogan-like handlebar mustache.
Posted By: bighustle (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 01:23 PM
NFL and UFC might be doing better than WWE in America, but WWE is doing more better than UFC and NFL all over the world.
Posted By: Guest#8122 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 01:24 PM
No Sharmel = no king Booker. Good.
Posted By: Guest#1000 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 01:25 PM
No queen sharmel!! Yes. No king Booker gimmick. Booker T will come back as Booker T... Can you dig it sucka!?!?
Posted By: Guest#0516 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 01:27 PM
Obviously, I'm a huge Booker guy. Glad he is out of tna. He is more of an asset as a trainer sort. I'm actually looking forward to the rumble. Hopefully wm27 looks good.
Posted By: Booker t (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 01:29 PM
Hahahahaha.
Posted By: Guest#6217 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 01:36 PM
I don't care what you haters think. Booka, Big Sexy, Christian, maybe Trips too? I'm actually excited about wrestling for the first time in a while. Should be a fun night!
I'm with this guy!! And I'm still calling for Undertaker returning tonight and earning a retirement match against Edge at Mania too.
Posted By: SLW4836 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 01:36 PM
It's gonna be a fun Rumble tonight.
Posted By: ComBat Man (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 01:40 PM
KING BOOOOOKKKAAAAHHH HAS RETURNED!
Posted By: wylun (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 01:40 PM
Now only if Evan Bourne returns as well, this Rumble will be perfect.
Posted By: ManSpice (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 01:47 PM
i'm a HUGE mark for Booker T, if i had known he was in the Rumble i would have maybe ordered it haha!
Posted By: the16th6toothson (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 01:49 PM
WWE needs to bring in TNA rejects to generate PPV buys.
A shame.
Posted By: roundballer (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 01:54 PM
Funny. Cue all the WWE-tards claiming this is awesome, even though they have been complaining for years about TNA's older talent including Booker T and Kevin Nash. But because its WWE, it's acceptable. THIS is why WWE fans are so damn annoying.
Posted By: JWestmoreland (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 01:59 PM
I hope we see black snow on commentary
Posted By: scott hall (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 01:59 PM
This is awesome!!!!
Posted By: Iceberg (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 02:04 PM
Where are all the booker t and kevin nash haters at? Oh thats right its only if they wrestle for tna. Guys are only washed up and worthless if they work for tna. Iwc is a joke. 411...pwi torch...observer...cageside seats. All crap.
Posted By: sirlaz187 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 01:09 PM
Then what the fuck are you doing here? Leave! Go back to your Meat Spin
Posted By: A-Ron (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 02:06 PM
Where are all the booker t and kevin nash haters at? Oh thats right its only if they wrestle for tna. Guys are only washed up and worthless if they work for tna. Iwc is a joke. 411...pwi torch...observer...cageside seats. All crap.
Posted By: sirlaz187 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 01:09 PM
I'm sure this is a one time deal, let's not forget this WWE HOF class is rumored to be WCW themed and Booker T and Nash r BIG WCW guys
Posted By: Iceberg (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 02:07 PM
You can keep 'em, wwe. We now have both of your hardy boys! We WIN!!!!
Posted By: Dixie C (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 02:13 PM
with Booker's wrestling school in texas and stone cold hosting i could see booker taking a part as a trainer on tough enough, maybe even nash as part of the show. . . both those guys, and austin, have a good grasp of the buisness and would certainly help the show's ratings
i really don't see wwe using fcw staff or facilities for the show, maybe, but using booker's school and fed would make some sense
Posted By: guesticles (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 02:15 PM
and if nash and booker returned to tna everyone wud be crapping all over this. i dont get you idiots
Posted By: Guest#6781 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 02:16 PM
NFL and UFC might be doing better than WWE in America, but WWE is doing more better than UFC and NFL all over the world.
Posted By: Guest#8122 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 01:24 PM
Wrong.
Posted By: Guest#9333 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 02:20 PM
Where are all the booker t and kevin nash haters at? Oh thats right its only if they wrestle for tna. Guys are only washed up and worthless if they work for tna. Iwc is a joke. 411...pwi torch...observer...cageside seats. All crap.
Posted By: sirlaz187 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 01:09 PM
I can't speak for anyone else but I've always liked Booker T. Even his TNA work was solid. Now Nash? Nash I don't care for. But there's a huge difference between if he's being brought in for a one shot deal or to make some of the younger talent look good.
Now, if Nash is being brought to the WWE to content for titles in major feuds ala him versus Foley for the Legends belt or even him versus Hunter for the World title then yes, that sucks.
If I were you I wouldn't make the mistake of painting everyone with a broad stroke because I've got news for you: by posting here you are part of the IWC.
Posted By: Ron Mexico (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 02:28 PM
It'd be cool to see the first Royal Rumble winner in it again, if only for a few minutes.
Posted By: Guest#4628 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 01:17 PM
______________________________________
See the 2009 Royal Rumble. He's in there
Posted By: Hank (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 02:31 PM
You sure that's not Mr. Glass coming to see if someone in the WWE is unbreakable?
Posted By: Guest#9580 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 02:51 PM
This is cool, Nash (my guess is he comes out to the "horn sounding diesel music). but i cant look at it the same after rock made fun of it a few yrs ago with his..."beep, beep" comment.
Booket T- heh, same ol, same ol. Not to much of a suprise.
But to see sting come out in the rumble...
Now that would be a suprise! it could still happen, who knows?
Posted By: Sting maybe? (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 02:52 PM
Crimson:.....THEY couldn't make it..
Posted By: The danger stranger (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 02:59 PM
what? no hate about the wwe using old wrestlers? come on wwe-tards wheres you bitchin about this? oh thats right...double standard
Posted By: Guest#1838 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 03:02 PM
Anyone can win the royal rumble.
Posted By: Guest#4397 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 03:06 PM
Jericho might return at the rumble or WM..
Posted By: Guest#8872 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 03:08 PM
It's simple, TNA is terrible. No matter who they bring, it will suck. They could bring in The Rock and Stone Cold on the same night and they would still manage to make face palm worthy. WWE knows how to handle things.
Posted By: lol (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 03:08 PM
Booker was godawful in TNA, but the difference is in WWE he'll have to try harder or they won't put up with his garbage like TNA did for years. Nash is useless, either way.
Posted By: ryan (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 03:25 PM
Booker T has always been entertaining. I'm glad they're bringing him in, hopefully this isn't a one shot deal. I wouldn't mind seeing him on Smackdown.
Posted By: Hmm (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 03:27 PM
Jeez relax tna lovers there bringing in Nash and Booker T for the suprise and nostlalgia factor! There not gonna be part of the companies major main event storyline like TNA!
Posted By: vince mcmahon (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 03:35 PM
NFL and UFC might be doing better than WWE in America, but WWE is doing more better than UFC and NFL all over the world.
Posted By: Guest#8122 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 01:24 PM
Wrong.
____________________________________
No it's true. And to all you TNA marks, Booker T and Nash is just gonna be in the rumble and that's it. And then they will be used for backstage roles unlike TNA who uses them as main event stars. WWE actually pushes the young stars more unlike TNA.
Posted By: Guest#0017 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 03:44 PM
Wait till see me, then the haters will really start sticking their heads out
Posted By: steve "the stinger" borden (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 03:47 PM
I'm really looking forward to watching some wrestling tonight, I'm going to see my local promotion put on a show.
WWE? Royal Rumble? Am I hell watching that crap.
Posted By: Vince McArsehole (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 03:48 PM
WWE needs to bring in TNA rejects to generate PPV buys.
A shame.
Posted By: roundballer (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 01:54 PM
TNA rejects who were already let go by WWE
Posted By: Guest#2496 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 03:48 PM
what's with the Diesel obsession?
Have Nash come back in nWo mode, then get squashed by Nexus or Corre. McMahon loves symbolism.
Posted By: Guest#5913 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 03:52 PM
Jeez relax tna lovers there bringing in Nash and Booker T for the suprise and nostlalgia factor! There not gonna be part of the companies major main event storyline like TNA!
Posted By: vince mcmahon (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 03:35 PM
There? Nostlalgia? There again?
I've just spotted another WWE mark.
Posted By: Radcliffe (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 03:56 PM
Watch me break my leg coming down the ramp!!
Posted By: Nash (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 04:06 PM
the reason booker T and Nash don't work and are extra baggage in TNA is because they are older men pushed at the top of the card and have not brought anything really to the table in terms of growth....... the WWE is the place where they have a history, and while can be pushed at the top because of their name (name value can matter when you have over a 1.1 rating) and because of the size of the audiance them putting over younger talent even in main event spots does more to put that talent over then it would in TNA.....
Posted By: just saying (guest) (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 04:16 PM
I will be happy if this is a one shot deal and/or if they come back as managers or commentators,but if they are main event that blows chunks,I don't see that happening Vinnie Mac is too savvy to do that,I think its WCW HOF related
Posted By: The Reaper (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 04:21 PM
Any chance that, after the two are eliminated, they beat the shit out of Cole and company and take over commentary?
Posted By: neverAcquiesce (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 04:22 PM
You sure that's not Mr. Glass coming to see if someone in the WWE is unbreakable?
Posted By: Guest#9580 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 02:51 PM
Fucking lmao'd at that one
Meanwhile, this had better be a one-shot deal... I haven't liked Booker since his Harlem Heat days, and Nash, yeah, I have a soft spot for the Coach, but he's not really in the best condition these days, he might break a hip if he gets tossed over the top rope
Posted By: Guest#2714 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 04:23 PM
Tna fans are so dumb. Wwe brings in these guys as special attraction..not to hold any titles. Bret would be the exception winning the us title. Its all just fun, unlike Mick Foley winning the title or hall and waltman holding the tag titles.
Posted By: kevin (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 04:25 PM
But who's side is he on!?
Posted By: Bobby H. (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 04:26 PM
Poor Booker. Since he doesn't have a drug problem TNA didn't want him back.
Posted By: Guest#9095 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 04:27 PM
I'm just glad these guys are not coming to TNA ! Don't need em'
Posted By: Guest#8177 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 01:05 PM
Amen to that. YNA has enough problems without Booker T and Kevin Nash back in the loop. I used to be a big Booker T fan until he phoned it in during his stay in TNA, if I never see him wrestle again it will be too soon.
Posted By: JAK (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 04:28 PM
It will be reviled that nash or booked is the raw gm.
Posted By: my 2cents (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 04:30 PM
And your NEW WWE Champion!!!!!!!!!!
Posted By: Guest#3802 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 04:30 PM
people want to say TNA is pushing old guys and blah blah. But Booker is 45 and Nash is 51 and they are being brought in for this.
Posted By: KB (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 01:20 PM
Yep, why would you bring in big names for a battle royal that needs 40 men when you could fill it up with Chavo and Chris Masters like guys?
Please....appearing as a special attraction at the Royal Rumble is far from a push amigo.....
Posted By: Guest#3847 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 04:31 PM
That's not Booker T. That's Danny Glover!
Posted By: Jimbo Slice (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 04:32 PM
THEY are arriving to get more troops for the TNA invasion angle, DUH!
;-)
Posted By: AG Awesome (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 04:33 PM
Where are all the booker t and kevin nash haters at? Oh thats right its only if they wrestle for tna. Guys are only washed up and worthless if they work for tna. Iwc is a joke. 411...pwi torch...observer...cageside seats. All crap.
Posted By: sirlaz187 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 01:09 PM
Look up at the post above you, you sexless zero. You're as big a loser as everyone you're calling out.
Posted By: Guest#0063 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 04:35 PM
WWE haters = Fail.
Posted By: Guest#1382 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 04:37 PM
Funny. Cue all the WWE-tards claiming this is awesome, even though they have been complaining for years about TNA's older talent including Booker T and Kevin Nash. But because its WWE, it's acceptable. THIS is why WWE fans are so damn annoying.
Posted By: JWestmoreland (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 01:59 PM
You're the worst kind of wrestling fan. You're ignorant because you don't realize that you are just as pathetic as everyone else here. I bet you use phrases like "future endeavored" and "put over" in non-wrestling related conversations. Guess what, your "friends" aren't laughing with you, they're laughing at you.
Posted By: uuuuuuuuuuuugh (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 04:40 PM
Jim duggan the original rumble winner takes it then goes to beat that dirty canadian edge at mania. Xcallin it
Posted By: sp1 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 04:45 PM
Where are all the booker t and kevin nash haters at? Oh thats right its only if they wrestle for tna. Guys are only washed up and worthless if they work for tna. Iwc is a joke. 411...pwi torch...observer...cageside seats. All crap.
Posted By: sirlaz187 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 01:09 PM
Look I don't 100 percent agree with the hate on this, but sirlaz187 is correct. If they work for TNA, their rejects. If they come back to WWE, then they're lauded as heroes as they make their triumphant return to the WWE. Personally, the vitrol/hate from the IWC sucks. Regardless of where they go, if you like a wrestler, stick with 'em and support them wherever they are.
Posted By: AGNJoe (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 04:48 PM
Damn haters hating on WWE all the time. Your opinions don't matter.
Posted By: Guest#4775 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 05:02 PM
People.....
Posted By: Guest#1931 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 05:06 PM
That's gonna be alright.
Posted By: Guest#3107 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 05:08 PM
Jeez relax tna lovers there bringing in Nash and Booker T for the suprise and nostlalgia factor! There not gonna be part of the companies major main event storyline like TNA!
Posted By: vince mcmahon (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 03:35 PM
There? Nostlalgia? There again?
I've just spotted another WWE mark.
Posted By: Radcliffe (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 03:56 PM
Ahahahahaha. Keep it up, internet wrestling nerd.
Posted By: Guest#6541 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 05:11 PM
Tna marks all over the show right now. Why dont you guys try and defend the Abyss/Hogan/Flair ring story next and remember that Nash and Booker are there on on-shot deals. The two of them are there for nostalgia, nothing more, nothing less.
Posted By: Thatsrightiwentthere (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 05:12 PM
There's FIVE TIMES, FIVE TIMES, FIVE TIMES, FIVE TIMES, FIVE TIMES the amount of snow in the goddamn town as Ive EVER SEEN....SUCKA!!!!
Posted By: Cm Wolf (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 05:14 PM
They need to get Goldust in the rumble for a hilarious reunion! I can just imagine him screaming out "No, you did NOT just do that!"
Posted By: Guest#7921 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 05:14 PM
Where are all the booker t and kevin nash haters at? Oh thats right its only if they wrestle for tna. Guys are only washed up and worthless if they work for tna. Iwc is a joke. 411...pwi torch...observer...cageside seats. All crap.
Posted By: sirlaz187 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 01:09 PM
well, theres the imaginary door, don't let it hit you on the imaginary ass on the way out
Posted By: typical 411 troll (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 05:18 PM
what about Kong? Anyone spotted a 350lb black woman at the Boston airport?
Posted By: Joe (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 05:23 PM
I want Pamela Paulshock to show up naked.
Posted By: Zingy (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 05:40 PM
Oh shit first chet lemon now black snow. At the announcing at the royal rumble will entertaining.
Posted By: betterthanthebest (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 05:43 PM
Good...i hope this signals that no MEM will be in TNA.
Posted By: Guest#0962 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 05:49 PM
....My god having Kevin Nash and Booker T beat up Michael Cole and do commentary would be the shit! Without hyperbole, i believe that to be the greatest idea ever!
And if some of you pricks would stop and think for a moment...nobody ever calls Kurt Angle a WWE Reject. They didn't call Christian a WWE Reject. It's about the quality of their appearances. Hell, i'm even allright with Flair being there as a manager. Booker T would have been allright too if he didn't fight Robert Roode for 9 months straight.
Posted By: the danger stranger (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 05:50 PM
I wonder is WWE knew that TNA wanted to bring back MEM and just signed booker and nash just to screw up the plans. I don't know what they were thinking outside of signing them for induction to the hall of fame being in atlanta and all, but it works out good for TNA in the long run. They don't need nash and booker burying talent, now they can rebuild a stable out of some MEM members with some newer guys (even though basically all the TNA originals are in fourtune)
Posted By: Guest#6389 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 06:08 PM
WWE needs to bring in TNA rejects to generate PPV buys.
A shame.
Posted By: roundballer (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 01:54 PM
-----------------------
Rejects? So.. are you saying TNA picked up WWE Rejects to generate ratings? YES. WWE does this from time to time if nobody has noticed. I mean hell, the one year Rick Martel was in the Rumble and who would actually think he'd win? WWE does if for the fun. I'd pay to see Nash back in WWE with an event like the Royal Rumble.
Posted By: Guest#3861 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 06:08 PM
people want to say TNA is pushing old guys and blah blah. But Booker is 45 and Nash is 51 and they are being brought in for this.
Posted By: KB (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 01:20 PM
Uhh, yeah, but neither is going to win it and headline wrestlemania. it's how you're using, not who you're using...
Posted By: Guest#1964 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 06:12 PM
Ahmed Johnson is also rumored. As is Billy Gunn. Gunn denied it though
Posted By: Mike (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 06:15 PM
one shot deal??????
Posted By: dorado (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 06:24 PM
Or Booker paid his own way to the show vist friends.
Posted By: Guest#7100 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 06:38 PM
Everyone knows HHH is taking this so ultimately who cares who they are bringing in for the night and if Nash is actually signed beyond tonight WTF??!! Booker T can still go so that wouldn't be that bad of signing but Nash? Let's keep the washed up dinosaurs and WWE castaways in the company no one gives a shit about please.
Posted By: Guest#4329 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 07:12 PM
Since nobody brought it up, hopefully Christian being there without a sling means he enters the rumble and so he don't get re-injured when thrown over the top, he wins the rumble...probably won't happen but I'm hoping for it. Even if it meant Edge vs Christian at mania I woldnt care.
Posted By: Pooh Bear (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 07:26 PM
I would laugh my ass off if Booker and Nash are in the Rumble and not just one-off appearences. Totally screws up the resurrection of the Main Event Mafia.
Posted By: Jed (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 01:18 PM
Not really.. TNA still has Angle, Steiner, Joe, and Sting and I would take Sting and Samoa Joe over Nash and Booker any day.
Posted By: JWS (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 07:40 PM
You can keep 'em, wwe. We now have both of your hardy boys! We WIN!!!!
Posted By: Dixie C (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 02:13 PM
NOT to mention KURT ANGLE.. whoever has him truely wins.
Posted By: Guest#3570 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 07:42 PM
Any chance Booker or Nash could be set up to be the "anonymous GM"? Either one would be pretty awesome in that role?
Posted By: Tourman (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 08:28 PM
Having 40 guys in the Rumble isn't so bad if it gives Booker and Nash an appearance, and Christian a comeback stage.
Posted By: Guest#2857 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 08:43 PM
the WWE are gonna keep Nash and Booker around till after Mania, so they can do a WCW style ending. then, those 2 can ride to the WWC in peace. as for them in the rumble, they both got tossed rather quickly. Edge using Christian's finisher......a good thing. No Trips.....bad deal, but, they're gonna wait a while longer and reveal him as the RAW GM. Taker's not gonna be back till possibly around Mania Time. Wade vs Taker at Mania 27. Evan Bourne......hahahahahahaha. and for those that say TNA isn't as good as WWE, look how long it took WWE to get as big as they are........TNA's only been around for what, 8 1/2 years?? it took WWE over 40 years to get to the high point. so, TNA has time to build, and to get to be a top draw promotion. i'm glad though, that they're not doing a MEM reunion in TNA. they already have that same deal going on with Immortal and Fortune. They are gonna be Crimson, Angle, Steiner, RVD, and MISTERRRRRRRRRRRRR ANDERSONNNNNNNNNNNNN
Duggan = not in as a mystery star. Sting.......hahaha. 48 years old with blown knees. why not?? WWE would push him to the brink of fakeness, even more fake than TNA, and they'd kill his career like they did Goldberg's. Next PPV surprise......Jericho returns, Batista Returns(after a failed MMA attempt), and they get put into the elimination chambers for raw and sd.
TNA is so much better than WWE. why?? they're not as fake, they let their wrestlers actually get bloody, and they don't run the same matches every week. deal with that. i mean come on. Kofi vs Ziggler for over 2 months, with no special stipulations........waste of tv time, WWE. plus, how is it that WWE's losing talent, due to cost cutting, and TNA seems to pick most of that talent up?? answer that all of you TNA HATERS. TNA does push a lot of the younger talent, unlike WWE. how can you say they don't, when in 2 weeks of being in the company, Robbie E. gets the X title?? how's that when 2 x division guys are the tag champs for 6 months?? and where's wwe's talent being pushed, other than Nexus and Corre?? in the mid-card area, or lower card, which they use on Superstars only, or make them lose weekly on smackdown. how's losing every week a push??
nash didn't accept TNA's offer, and Booker......broke and looking for a paycheck. his school's all he has going on, and maybe 4 students(lmao. idk for sure).
Hey WWE fakers. you can keep Nash and Booker. TNA has not only the Hardy's, but they have the only man that has held both the ECW and WWE titles at the same time......RVD. plus, TNA also has the best tag team of all time(most tag title eins ever) in the Dudley's(even though they're split now). TNA also has the Natche, so WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO. and they also have a lot of the better released WWE talent, like Mickie James and Victoria. TNA WINS
Posted By: Guest (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 11:50 PM
NFL and UFC might be doing better than WWE in America, but WWE is doing more better than UFC and NFL all over the world.
Posted By: Guest#8122 (Guest) on January 30, 2011 at 01:24 PM
Not really bro... NFL barely exists outside the states and is usually on a recap show for an hour at like 3am, drawing no ratings. UFC pounds them...
WWE does well in most countries but TNA and UFC do better numbers in the UK, i'm its the same in some others.
Posted By: D (Guest) on February 01, 2011 at 09:56 PM
Copyright (c) 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.
