www.411mania.com
|  News |  Columns |  TV Reports |  Video Reviews |  Title History |  Hall of Fame |  News Report |  The Dunn List |
SPOTLIGHTS  SPOTLIGHTS
MOVIES/TV
// Irina Shayk Shows Off Her Killer Curves At Cannes
MUSIC
// Kanye West and Jay-Z's Watch the Throne 2 Confirmed
WRESTLING
// Brooke Hogan Says Hulk Didn't Know She Was in Talks With TNA
POLITICS
// Obama Leads In Florida, Ohio, & VIrginia
MMA
// 411's MMA Roundtable - UFC 146: Dos Santos vs. Mir
GAMES
// Castlevania: Lords of Shadow Sequel Teased


 HOT TOPICS
//  CM Punk
//  John Cena
//  Triple H
//  Hulk Hogan
//  Randy Orton
//  Christian
SYNDICATE  SYNDICATE



411mania RSS Feeds





Follow 411mania on Twitter!




Add 411 On Facebook
 



 
 411mania » Wrestling » News



Advertisement
Event Advertising Confirms Triple H vs. Undertaker at WrestleMania 28
Posted by Larry Csonka on 02.09.2012



- Advertising for the March 12th edition of WWE Monday Night Raw in Cleveland , Ohio has basically confirmed the Triple H vs. Undertaker rematch with the following advertising…

"What will HBK have to say about the confrontation between his long-time friend (Triple H) and WrestleMania foe (The Undertaker)?"


Post Comment (17)  |  Email Larry Csonka  |  View Larry Csonka's 411 Profile

  Send To Friend  |    Stumble It!  |    Digg It!  | 



Please add your comment below.
If you are registered, you can login and post under your registered name. If not, you can post as a guest or register.

* Please note that 411 moderates all comments. Your comment will show up on the site after it has been approved by an editor.
 
Name : 
Comment : 
Remaining Characters : 
2800
 

Comments (17)

 
*sigh* This is why people who have control of booking should not wrestler at the same time. No one wanted to see HHH vs Taker the first time. Even less wanted to see it a second time. A third time... ugh, why? HBK vs Taker had the rematch because the first one was so good.

After how BAD last years WM was, and how weak this years card is looking (sorry Rock vs Cena doesnt interest me) I may not even download this one.


Posted By: Guest#1237 (Guest)  on February 09, 2012 at 08:52 AM

 
 
No it doesn't. Look again and you'll see that they're establishing relationships between HBK and each of the other two.

Srsly though, I really hope that match doesn't happen. It's been done, twice, now let's move on.


Posted By: Jabolio (Guest)  on February 09, 2012 at 08:59 AM

 
 
i agree this dosent say anything about a wm match but i hope it dosent happen...as great as rock and austin were together by the time they got to rock vs austin 3 it was a far reach at a good match...but taker vs hhh was weak the first 2 times why a third would be expected to be better is a very good question

Posted By: Guest#7809 (Guest)  on February 09, 2012 at 09:38 AM

 
 
"No it doesn't. Look again and you'll see that they're establishing relationships between HBK and each of the other two."

Exactly - Its not referring to Undertaker as HHH's WM foe, its referring to him as HBK's WM foe.


Posted By: Guest#3791 (Guest)  on February 09, 2012 at 09:49 AM

 
 
It's happening...get over it.

Posted By: Guest#4706 (Guest)  on February 09, 2012 at 10:05 AM

 
 
I agree, no one wants to see this match AGAIN! If Wrestlemania was actually going to have 10-11 matches with actual wrestling I'd buy it. But if its another 8 matches in 4 hours with tons of stupid backstage filler, I'll pass.

Posted By: SilentOx (Guest)  on February 09, 2012 at 10:13 AM

 
 
I had hope this match wouldn't happen, don't care to see it.

Posted By: Guest#2166 (Guest)  on February 09, 2012 at 10:15 AM

 
 
*sigh* This is why people who have control of booking should not wrestler at the same time. No one wanted to see HHH vs Taker the first time. Even less wanted to see it a second time. A third time... ugh, why? HBK vs Taker had the rematch because the first one was so good.

After how BAD last years WM was, and how weak this years card is looking (sorry Rock vs Cena doesnt interest me) I may not even download this one.

Posted By: Guest#1237 (Guest) on February 09, 2012 at 08:52 AM

*sigh* This is why people who download stuff illegally should not comment. besides, who else should undertaker wrestle than? lets just reduce that bitching and post and share your great wrestling ideas. isnt it what these forums are supposed to be. share and masturbate to each others wrestling fantasy?


Posted By: Dwayne (Guest)  on February 09, 2012 at 10:16 AM

 
 
Well, Triple H and UT are "Wrestlemania foes" even if there isn't a match at this year's WM

Posted By: C (Guest)  on February 09, 2012 at 10:25 AM

 
 
What if they bring HBK out of retirement & do a Triple Threat Match?

Posted By: Guest#1348 (Guest)  on February 09, 2012 at 11:01 AM

 
 
The posts on this thread make me ECSTATIC the iwc is the MINORITY of wrestling fans. Hell, most don't even deserve to be called fans! The PAYING customers are the ones WWE caters too(with the exception of some experiments here and there) and they LOVE HHH AND THE UNDERTAKER!!!

Go read the All The King's Men column and try to wrap your brains around LOGIC. Come back when you have more than you own whining about not wanting to see it again. Tissue anyone? Diaper change?


Posted By: Guest#7332 (Guest)  on February 09, 2012 at 11:07 AM

 
 
Unique booking idea:

Leading into the Elimination Chamber, you have the talk being will HHH take on Undertaker again? The Raw after HHH is about to make his decision. Sheamus's music hits.

"Sorry fella-I've made my decision what title I want to go after, and I think the people need to hear it right now. Should I go after the vegan Daniel Bryan? Should I go after Chris Jericho/CM Punk? (whichever one wins the Chamber with the other chasing) No...the title I want to go after...is The Streak! I've won the WWE Championship Fella...but so have 41 others. Only one person can be the person to say they ended the streak...and that one person will be me!"


Posted By: JotaEse (Guest)  on February 09, 2012 at 11:08 AM

 
 
The posts on this thread make me ECSTATIC the iwc is the MINORITY of wrestling fans. Hell, most don't even deserve to be called fans! The PAYING customers are the ones WWE caters too(with the exception of some experiments here and there) and they LOVE HHH AND THE UNDERTAKER!!!

Go read the All The King's Men column and try to wrap your brains around LOGIC. Come back when you have more than you own whining about not wanting to see it again. Tissue anyone? Diaper change?

Posted By: Guest#7332 (Guest) on February 09, 2012 at 11:07 AM

And fans like you are the reason why the WWE product is growing staler and losing fans rather than gaining them. What's gonna happen after no more Rock returns??? Ratings go right back down. They already can't sell out even televised shows(little hint, don't buy televised shows on day of release, hold out and you can buy better seats at a lower price, or get moved to a better section just so the tv shots don't look bad) so you know house show business is still going down. Enjoy the same old shit dumb dumb, I'm gonna enjoy doing ANYTHING else that day and then maybe I'll read the results here...maybe.


Posted By: Guest#0182 (Guest)  on February 09, 2012 at 01:42 PM

 
 
Lol at all the imc bitching. That's right, imc as in internet mark community. You think wwe gives a shit about you marks? You're gonna watch their product either way! They have more important mainstream concerns to focus on.

Posted By: IMC Member (Guest)  on February 09, 2012 at 02:01 PM

 
 
DENIAL. For the love of God, there is NO WAY they're NOT doing Undertaker/HHH. I've seen so many comments about "I hope they're not going in that direction" or "there's still time for Sheamus to come out and announce that he's going for the streak." Really?! It's happening, accept it. Find another match to be excited for.

Posted By: Gusty (Guest)  on February 09, 2012 at 02:43 PM

 
 
The only way that I would actually want to see Taker vs HHH again is if it's in Hell in a Cell. Taker has been in 11, Trips has been in 8 so it would be pretty cool to see the two HITC leaders go at it. Too bad there's probably no way you could hang the HITC in a stadium, and if you could, it probably would be an eyesore for the rest of the night.

Posted By: Guest#4213 (Guest)  on February 09, 2012 at 02:44 PM

 
 
What a Bunch of whiners and complainers. There is a reason WWE is the #1 wrestling promotion and has always been the #1 promotion besides two little years in the 90's, and that's because they tend to know what they are doing. There has def. been some errors along the way, but I don't know any other company in Business with such a great track record that they've been at the top for so long. The 'E is in a transition from the old guard to the new guard, but ANYTIME I see HHH, HBK, Undertaker or any of those SUPERStars from the previous 2 decades, that makes me want to buy a pay-per-view. Besides, everyone keeps telling HHH to get out of the spotlight, but in all reality, the guy is only 42yo and if he wasn't in with the "McMahon" family, the IWC would think so differently about him. Anyway, if you don't want to watch WWE and the product they put on TV, you can always watch GOOD OLE Impact Wrestling and watch a roster with about 3 talented guys, and then a bunch of has been's that are closely reaching the age of collecting Social Security.(Which I understand Ric Flair badly needs now a days with no money left which is a sad story all in itself)

Posted By: Seth (Guest)  on February 09, 2012 at 03:18 PM

 


www.41mania.com
Copyright (c) 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.