|  News |  Columns |  TV Reports |  Video Reviews |  Title History |  Hall of Fame |  News Report |  The Dunn List |
// Alleged Nude Photos Of Jennifer Lawrence, Kate Upton and Dozens More Celebs Leaked in Online Hack
// Kesha Instagrams a Nearly-Topless Selfie From VMAs
// The Monday Night War Review: Episode Two - 'The Rise of the n.W.o'
// Top 10 Fighters Who Are Better Than Their Record
// Grand Theft Auto 5 Not Delayed on Xbox One, PS4 & PC

//  CM Punk
//  John Cena
//  Triple H
//  Hulk Hogan
//  Randy Orton
//  Christian

411mania RSS Feeds

Follow 411mania on Twitter!

Add 411 On Facebook

 411mania » Wrestling » News

Some Good News For WWE In Martha Hart's Lawsuit Against Them
Posted by Jeremy Thomas on 11.30.2012

- Portions of Martha Hart's lawsuit against WWE and the McMahons over the use of Owen Hart's likeness were dismissed in court within the last couple of weeks. On November 16th, the judge in the case threw out parts of the lawsuit against WWE, though exactly what was dismissed and what remains is not confirmed. The portions of the lawsuit that were remaining before the partial dismissal were the following claims:

* That Owen's name would have reverted back to strictly his usage after his passing
* That his legal name would not be considered his character's name (i.e. that WWE did not have the rights to use, market and promote him as Owen Hart)
* That WWE released several DVDs other products such as the WWE Encyclopedia without giving Hart's estate proper payments per his booking contract
* That WWE used "original intellectual property" (e.g. family photos) without the permission of Owen's estate
* That the Owen Hart Foundation has been hurt by the unwanted association with WWE due to WWE's usage of Owen Hart's name and likeness

In addition, a motion to dismiss Martha's copyright infringement suit against against Vince McMahon personally was partially approved as it was ruled that Martha had "failed to present sufficient evidence of McMahon's vicarious liability for copyright infringement." It was noted that in order to establish liability, Hart had to prove that McMahon had "the right and ability to supervise and an obvious and direct financial interest in the exploitation of copyrighted materials" and that she failed to do that since the only proof presented was that Vince is WWE's President and majority shareholder.

Linda McMahon was not mentioned in any of the rulings, meaning that the lawsuit against her may still be proceeding. The McMahons did not get their requested sanctions against Hart's lawyer to pay for legal fees approved, nor their request to have certain remarks made in Hart's latest amended
lawsuit stricken.

Credit: PWInsider

Must-read news from around the site:
* Christopher Nolan wanted Heath Ledger to play Batman
* Will there be a Family Guy movie?
* Coldplay working on new album
* Vida Guerra's booty is a heart-shaped wonder
* Rihanna gets her tight bikini booty all wet
* The Top 5 Star Wars Requests
* Roundtable Discussion - Is The GSP vs. Silva Superfight Best For MMA?


DC Comics: Doomed At Box Office?

Top 8 Comic Face Turns

Nude Pics of Upton, Other Celebs Leak?

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright (c) 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.