Reviews From The City of Orange: Clash of the Champions - March 27, 1988
Posted by Mike Campbell on 06.19.2009
Crockett strikes back!
CLASH OF THE CHAMPIONS
March 27, 1988
So let’s get this straight. The WWF had sabotaged both of the NWA’s attempts to get on PPV, but now the WWF is on PPV tonight with the blowoff to the situation that saw the WWF Title get held up. What better way to get revenge than by sabotaging the WWF’s show, and also putting on the best show of the night?
Tommy Rogers . . . makes the Greensboro crowd forget all about Ricky Morton leaving by taking over his role and doing it awesomely.
Barry Windham . . . seems to be lucky that the Horsemen didn’t try to break any bones, or maybe it’s a sign of things to come.
Ric Flair . . . almost carries Sting on his back to one of his first good matches, which shows why he’s one of the best of all time.
If you’re wondering why the Midnight Express is the standard by which most tag teams in the U.S. are held up to, then look no further than their control segment on Rogers. They dismantle him with double teams early on like their Double Goozle and even the Demolition Decapitation (ironic given that the Demos would be winning the WWF Tag Titles on this night). There’s a great false hope moment when Rogers surprises Lane with a sunset flip and Eaton distracts the ref. Eaton bulldogging Rogers on the table is pretty hardcore for ‘88. This is by no means a one-team show though, Rogers’ selling is great, the reaction to the bulldog is the best stuff, but he’s very good throughout, especially his Kawada-like spot where Lane tries to whip him into the ropes and he crumples to the mat. Fulton’s frustration building up is fun to watch, and when he loses control after the ref missed the tag and Cornette hit Rogers with the racket it’s easy to see why he threw the ref out and it’s easy to forget (even for a second) that he just cost them the titles. People might complain about the Dusty finish, with the second ref counting the pin after the Fantastics’ Rocket Launcher, but it was a necessary evil, the alternative was the first ref just calling it right then and there which would mean that the Midnights don’t get their comeuppance. ****1/4
DUSTY RHODES/HAWK/ANIMAL vs. IVAN KOLOFF/WARLORD/BARBARIAN (Barbed Wire Street Fight)
Enclosing this many big guys into the ring at the same time probably wasn’t such a good idea. Nobody really has the room to do anything. The only real bumps are the press slam to Koloff by Hawk and Animal’s powerslam to Warlord, but other than that they just brawl and trade punches. And, of course, Dusty makes sure to bleed. Warlord gets pinned by Animal after Barbarian headbutts him on accident. The heels attack afterwards and remove Animal’s mask and target the eye, which would have been nice to see during the match, at least then the brawling and lack of wrestling would have at least had some sort of purpose.
There’s also a few missteps from Barry that drag this down a bit. There were several times that it was obvious that he was able to make the tag to Luger, but because it wasn’t time for it yet, Barry had to find something else to do and it looked obvious that he was killing time. Tully had a moment like that, but was much smarter in covering it, he hit Barry with the Slingshot suplex and stopped to celebrate and thus made Barry’s kick out look plausible. Luger is great as the hot tag, he’s almost as fired up as Fulton was, and he’s smart to stick with using his power advantage to take the fight to Tully and Arn. Some might take issue with the misfire with the chair that leads to Luger pinning Arn, but it doesn’t detract from anything at all. This was supposed to look somewhat like a fluke with the Horsemen’s cheating catching up with them and costing them the titles. The fact that two teams could churn out such a good match, despite its flaws, shows just how good these four were at this time and also speaks volumes for why the tag match formula is the tag match formula. ***1/2
Sting’s best run of offense comes less than one-third of the way into the match, Flair is crisscrossing the ropes and showing good shape he’s in, and Sting catches him by surprise with a big press slam and Sting follows that up with a bear hug, complete with Flair screaming about his back. Incidentally, it also will weaken Flair for the Scorpion Deathlock. Sting never goes back to it though, he’s more concerned with busting up Flair’s leg and using the figure four in revenge for Flair busting up his leg. Sting would have been better served to spend that time doing stuff that might lend credence to the notion that he could win the title. Nobody would think for a second that Flair would submit to his own move. Maybe if Sting spent that time continuing to set up the Scorpion, then Flair might not have been able to last in the hold until the time limit ran out.
Thankfully, Sting isn’t in the ring with just any Roody Poo Candy Ass that’s walking down Know Your Role Boulevard, he’s in there with Ric Flair, and Flair is good enough to overcome Sting’s limitations. His bumping and selling are as over the top as ever, especially the Flair flip that sends him right over the judge’s table. He acts like the Figure Four and Scorpion are killing him, and he’s eons better than Sting with making his offense mean something and showing *why* he’s the champion of the world while Sting is just a punk kid. One of Sting’s better offensive moves was when he surprised Flair and was able to outwrestle him for an Abdominal stretch and instead of cheating, Flair decides to just outwrestle him right back and easily counters it. Much of Flair’s work here is the typical Flair formula where he plays cowardly heel, but, like the previous tag matches, Flair’s performance is so good that you see why this is such a proven formula and it doesn’t reek of Flair going through the motions for lack of anything else to do. I’m not sure what the point of having the judges were, aside from possibly trying to show how important the Clash of Champions is, since the WWF had made a habit out of using celebrities at WrestleMania in various capacities. The concept of bringing in judges in case the match goes to a draw so that there is a decisive winner, and then having the finish be a draw anyway is certainly backwards, but would anyone expect anything less from World Championship Wrestling? ***1/2
The 411: You simply can’t go wrong here. There’s tons of good wrestling, and the stuff that isn’t so good in the wrestling department has some good stuff afterwards to make it salvageable. It’s rare that something with a lot of hype lives up to it, but this is certainly one of those instances, huge recommendation for this show
Good review although I don't think you give enough credit for Sting for holding his own in his first prominent singles match on national TV. It wasn't like Sting was a total broomstick out there. I thought Sting did far better than Lex Luger did in his early battles with Flair which seemed to get more credit than this match did.
A little bit of trivia on this show: Two matches advertised for the first Clash but didn't take place because of "time constraints":
-Rick Steiner defending the Florida title against Ricky Santana
-Larry Zbyszko defending the Western States Heritage title against Shane Douglas
Posted By: Jason S (Guest) on June 19, 2009 at 12:46 PM
Jason S - You know way too much wrestling trivia than you need to my friend!
Posted By: HvyMetalMG (Guest) on June 19, 2009 at 05:07 PM
you fail to see how this match is a star making match for Sting? Are you kidding me? this was stings first big match on national tv and was a very new face in the NWA, and he nearly beat flair his first time out! this is why i laugh at some of you "reporters" on the net when talking about matches from the 80s and 90s, more so the 80s. this shows you either wasnt around to realize the impact and scope of this match, or if you were you forgot. you have no clue. this match made sting.
Posted By: flair1111 (Guest) on June 19, 2009 at 11:19 PM
So you're basically saying this match made Sting because he took the champ to the distance his first time out. Which is the exact thing that I alluded to in the first line of the review.
Posted By: Mike Campbell (Registered) on June 20, 2009 at 05:57 AM
'Aside from the simple fact that he was able to go forty-five minutes with the champion of the world, I fail to see how this is any sort or real star-making performance for Sting.'
I just can't describe how stupid this line is.
Posted By: someone (Guest) on June 20, 2009 at 10:00 AM
Unfortunately the review the main event is proof that Mike Campbell is more of a mark then just a reviewer. I'm guessing that if Sting were currently in the WWF he would give him the benefit of the doubt. But, since Sting is in TNA he goes out of his way to trash him. This is the NWA, so just review it as the NWA. Sting was a hell of a performer and he did a damn good job of helping Flair carry that match.
Posted By: Wow (Guest) on June 20, 2009 at 11:57 AM
Exactly flair1111. This is proof positive that they either weren't around to see the matches, they're marks and thus make it "WWE vs TNA", or they think they're smarter then they really are. The match made Sting. Everyone involved has said as much, from Flair, to Arn to Tully to JJ to Dusty, to Sting himself. Sting did a hell of a job putting together a great match with Flair in Sting's first ever big match national debut.
Posted By: Wow (Guest) on June 20, 2009 at 12:01 PM
"So you're basically saying this match made Sting because he took the champ to the distance his first time out. Which is the exact thing that I alluded to in the first line of the review.
Posted By: Mike Campbell (Registered) on June 20, 2009 at 05:57 AM"
Ummm, no you didn't. You said that the start of the review:
"Aside from the simple fact that he was able to go forty-five minutes with the champion of the world, I fail to see how this is any sort or real star-making performance for Sting. It’s pretty clear that this is a Flair match,"
You say IN YOUR OWN WORDS that you failed to see how this was a real star-making performance by Sting. You said YOURSELF that the match only made Flair look great and showed how great Flair was, and that Sting didn't really contribute anything to it. Also, review is flawed. Would you expect anything less from World Championship Wrestling? That was the NWA not WCW. WCW, at that point in time, was just a Georgia territory.
Posted By: Wow (Guest) on June 20, 2009 at 12:08 PM
I've gotta hand it to you, "Wow", you've got a great username for yourself. Because when I read your posts I think "Wow, what a moron!"
First off, there's zero mention of TNA in the review. So you can put the theory of my dislike of Sting's performance because he's in TNA back in your ass, where it came from.
Second, I've never denied that the match made Sting. It did. I simply question *why* the match made Sting, beyond him taking the Champion to the limit. Read: Sting's actual performance in the match didn't do much for me. I talk about it at length in the review. I didn't like things like his selling, his choice of timing his comebacks, and his choice of offense.
As far as the line about "would you expect less from World Championship Wrestling?" Now I have to ask you, were you around when this was going on? The promotion was never officially the NWA. It was technically Jim Crockett Promotions (similar to how WWE is tecnically Titan Sports). The WCW name goes back to when Crockett merged Georgia Championship Wrestling with Mid Atlantic Championship wrestling and created World Championship Wrestling.
This show took place in 1988, Georgia was dead as a territory in 1985.
Posted By: Mike Campbell (Registered) on June 20, 2009 at 04:13 PM
""So you're basically saying this match made Sting because he took the champ to the distance his first time out. Which is the exact thing that I alluded to in the first line of the review."
no. you are missing the point of it all. ive seen mike jackson have great matches with flair, but it wasnt on the level of this match. everyone knew jackson was just getting "lucky" (if it was real of course)...sting in this match was the real deal and posed a great threat to flair during and always after this match and the fans knew it. the interviews leading up to this match were very good and the taunting back and forth made it that much better. before this match, no one knew if sting had "it". after the match there was no question we were looking at the future of wrestling. its hard to explain, other than saying you just had to be there, and clearly you were not. also, never before, had a virtually unproven and unknown wrestler EVER put it to flair like sting did on this night.
Posted By: flair1111 (Guest) on June 20, 2009 at 04:44 PM
Flair1111, Yes, I understand your point. And again, I'm not denying that the match made Sting.
What I fail to see in it is *how* STING's actual performance, move to move and spot for spot, does that, because it wasn't very good. He was rarely believable in how he took control of things. He'd just decide the figure four didn't hurt anymore and just pull Flair back and roll over. He'd go flying over the top, and then just casually climb up top and dive onto Flair like he was fine (and this was when going over the top was supposed to be a big deal).
And, it shouldn't be a surprise that Flair's performance was better. He'd been working matches like this for years, going to all the territories and wrestling their top guys. This was far from Flair's first time having to go out and help make someone look like they were a hair away from the World Title.
Posted By: Mike Campbell (Registered) on June 21, 2009 at 09:56 AM
You got caught trying to backtrack on your comments about Sting. You claimed Sting was a back worker and that Flair had to carry the entire match. That is false. In other reviews you have called Sting a bad worker, and you're the only one who thinks that.
Posted By: Wow (Guest) on June 26, 2009 at 08:32 PM
OK, this is my last post in the comments section for this review.
Wow (what a moron) do yourself a favor and learn some reading comprehension.
I've maintained the same viewpoint, which is that I didn't care much for Sting's performance. And I've gone so far as to further explain it to Flair1111. That's the opposite of backtracking. Maybe Flair1111 saw the post, understood where I was coming from and didn't feel like discussing it anymore. Maybe he didn't see it, but either way, it's still there,
Nowhere in that review did I call Sting a bad worker. In fact, do an in-page search (hold cntrl + F) for the word worker and the first hit will be your comment. Funny how that works.
Posted By: Mike Campbell (Registered) on June 29, 2009 at 07:29 PM